Bazarov's attitude to science table. Comparative characteristics of Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Evgeny Bazarov (based on the novel "Fathers and Sons")

The problem of generations. Comparative characteristics E. Bazarov and P. Kirsanov. (based on the novel by Ivan Turgenev "Fathers and Sons")

Goals : 1. To improve the ability of students to make a comparative description of characters. 2. To be able to determine the moral and ideological positions of the heroes of the work. 3. Develop students' thinking, speaking. 4. Develop students' interest in reading the novel.

Equipment: Portrait of I. S. Turgenev, presentation "Fathers and Sons".

During the classes.

Organizational moment .

Communication of the topic and objectives of the lesson. ( On the screen - a portrait of I. S. Turgenev) We continue to study the novel by I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons." “My whole life is in my writings,” he wrote. Turgenev has a special sense of time. “Our time demands to capture modernity in its coming images; you can't be too late. " In his works, he “caught” something new that was just emerging in Russian life. Today in the lesson we will try to answer the questions with you: -What is the meaning of the title of the novel? -How and why is there a dispute between representatives of different generations? Guys, at home you compiled a comparative description of the images of P. P. Kirsanov and E. Bazarov.3. Work on the table.

Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P. P. Kirsanov.

The conflict of generations ... This problem is relevant at all times. - In what works is this problem considered? (Shakespeare "Romeo and Juliet", A. Ostrovsky "Thunderstorm", etc.) In the middle of the 19th century, on the eve of the abolition of serfdom in Russia, disputes between liberals and revolutionary democrats, aristocrats and commoners. Turgenev tells us about this in his novel.

Which of the heroes of the novel is opposed to each other?

What are these people called? (antipodes)

Antipode - a person opposite to someone in convictions, properties, tastes. (Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language by S. I. Ozhegov)

Name the antipodes in Russian literature. (Grinev and Shvabrin, Oblomov and Stolz, Chatsky and Molchalin ...) Today we will conduct a comparative description of the new heroes of the novel.

- 1. What can you sayabout the origin, social belonging of the heroes ? P.Kirsanov - a nobleman, an aristocrat, the son of a general, a retired officer, a liberal conservative.E. Bazarov - the son of a military doctor, had peasant roots, a medical student. Faculty of St. Petersburg University, raznochinets, democrat-nihilist.

2.Portrait. Bazarov - « tall in a long robe with tassels. " The face is "long and thin, with a wide forehead, a flat top, pointed nose down, large green eyes and hanging sandy sideburns ...". He has "naked red hands."

P. P. Kirsanov all over appearance"Gloss and panache", "graceful and thoroughbred" look, beautiful hands with long pink nails.

3. Speech - P.P. Kirsanov uses French expressions in conversation, his speech is refined, he often distorts Russian words in a foreign manner (principles, etc.)E. Bazarov- speaks simply and artlessly, speech is common, often uses sayings and aphorisms. (read from the text)

There are many differences between the heroes, but perhaps the most important thing that makes them irreconcilable opponents is the philosophical positions of each.

- What are our heroes arguing about?

1. About the attitude towards the nobility

P. Kirsanov ... Pavel Petrovich sees the main social force in the aristocrats. The importance of the aristocracy, in his opinion, lies in the fact that it once gave freedom in England, that the aristocracy has a highly developed sense of dignity and self-esteem. Their self-esteem is important because society is built on individuals.

E. Bazarov. Talk about how the aristocracy gave England freedom - " Old song", Much has changed after the seventeenth century, so the reference of Pavel Petrovich cannot serve as an argument. No one is of any use to the aristocracy, their main occupation is doing nothing ("sitting with folded hands"). They only care about themselves, about their appearance. Under these conditions, their dignity and self-respect look like empty words. Aristocracy is a useless word. In idleness and empty chatter, Bazarov sees the basic political principle of everything noble society living at someone else's expense.

2.On the principle of nihilism

Pavel Petrovich stands for the preservation of the old order. He is afraid to imagine the destruction of "everything" in society. He agrees to make only minor changes when combining the foundations of the existing system, to adapt to new conditions, as his brother does. They are not reactionaries, they are liberals

E. Bazarov ... Nihilists act deliberately, based on the principle of the usefulness of activities for society. They deny social order, that is, autocracy, religion, this is the meaning of the word "ALL". Bazarov notes that the freedom the government is trying to get around is hardly worth it; this phrase contains an allusion to the forthcoming reforms. Bazarov does not accept reform as a means of changing social conditions. Denial is perceived by new people as activity, not chatter.

3.About attitude to the people

P. Kirsanov ... The Russian people are patriarchal, they sacredly value traditions, they cannot live without religion. These Slavophil views (with an English way of life) speak of reactionaryism. He is touched by the backwardness of the people and in this he sees the guarantee of the salvation of society.

E. Bazarov ... The situation of the people evokes in Bazarov not tenderness, but anger. He sees trouble in all areas. folk life... Bazarov turns out to be far-sighted and condemns what would later become a symbol of the Narodnik faith. It is no coincidence that he says that the Russian people do not need useless words like "liberalism", "progress". Bazarov has a sober attitude towards the people. He sees the ignorance and superstition of the people. He despises these shortcomings. However, Bazarov sees not only the downturn, but also the discontent of the people.

4.About views on art

P. Kirsanov. New Wanderers artists abandon frozen academic traditions, from blindly following old models, including Raphael. Wanderers, in his opinion, absolutely abandoned traditions. The new artists are "powerless and despicably sterile."

E. Bazarov. Denies both the old and the new art: "Raphael is not worth a dime, and they are no better than him."

Who Wins Arguments?

Does Bazarov have the right to judge his opponent and his "principles" in such a humiliating manner? (We must respect someone else's opinion, age ..)

5. Attitude towards love. (slide "Scene of E. Bazarov's declaration of love to A. Odintsova")

PP Kirsanov has always enjoyed success with women, men envied him. He led an active lifestyle, but everything changed instantly when Princess R. appeared in his life, whom Kirsanov met at a ball and with whom he fell passionately in love. The princess soon lost interest in him, and he almost lost his mind, began to chase her around the world, showing cowardice. Exhausted by this relationship, Pavel Petrovich grew old, turned gray and lost interest in life.

Bazarov, on the other hand, is very cold about love. “A man who has put all his life on the card of female love, and when this card was killed to him, became limp and sank to the point that he was not capable of anything, such a person is not a man,” he notes. Love seemed to be a test for Bazarov ... Love conquers selfishness, enlightens the world, this feeling turned out to be not physiology, as the hero assumed, this feeling is shocking and traumatic. In words, he denied love, but in reality, life forced her to admit.
For Bazarov, a similar drama means humiliation and is perceived as a manifestation of shameful weakness.

6. Lifestyle, interests.

There are disagreements between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich in relation to art and nature. From the point of view of Bazarov, “to read Pushkin - Lost time making music is ridiculous, enjoying nature is ridiculous. ” Pavel Petrovich, on the contrary, loves nature and music. Art (and literature, and painting, and music) softens the soul, distracts from business. All this is "romanticism", "nonsense". Looking at the album of Saxon Switzerland, Bazarov says to Madame Odintsova: “You don’t suppose an artistic meaning in me - yes, I really don’t have it, but these views could interest me from a geological point of view”. Bazarov tries to debunk the inactive "principles", does not accept the illusory dreaminess, abandoning the achievements of culture ("Raphael is not worth a dime") and utilitarianly perceiving nature.Kirsanov and Bazarov each have their own opinion. Bazarov is an enemy of abstract science, divorced from life. He is for a science that would be understandable to the people. Bazarov is a worker of science, he is tireless in his experiments, completely absorbed in his favorite profession.

7. Relationship to each other.

Bazarov should not forget about respect for the generation of the elders. He crosses out the whole life of P. Kirsanov, who believed that he was leading a noble life and worthy of respect.

4. Summing up the results of the lesson.

- Is there a winner in the dispute?

Did the heroes want to find the truth or were they just sorting out the relationship?

Which side do you think the author is on? (He refers himself to the generation of "fathers", tries to convey to us the idea of important role"Old men" in the past and present of Russia. It is impossible to deny all the accumulated human experience, art, religion, the spiritual side of the life of society. The author tried to convey to the reader the idea of ​​finding some kind of compromise between generations.

5. Submission of grades.

6. Homework. Analysis of the last chapters of the novel. "Death of Bazarov".

The problem of generations. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P. Kirsanov. (based on the novel by Ivan Turgenev "Fathers and Sons")

Lesson summary teachers of Russian language and literature MBOU "Arch-Golitsinskaya secondary school" Mikheeva Lyudmila Nikolaevna.

year 2014

The problem of generations. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P. Kirsanov.(based on the novel by Ivan Turgenev "Fathers and Sons")

Goals : 1. To improve the ability of students to make a comparative description of characters. 2. To be able to determine the moral and ideological positions of the heroes of the work. 3. Develop students' thinking, speaking. 4. Develop students' interest in reading the novel.

Equipment: Portrait of I. S. Turgenev, presentation "Fathers and Sons".

During the classes.

1. Organizational moment.
2. Communication of the topic and objectives of the lesson. (On the screen - a portrait of I. S. Turgenev) We continue to study the novel by I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons." “My whole life is in my writings,” he wrote. Turgenev has a special sense of time. “Our time demands to capture modernity in its coming images; you can't be too late. " In his works, he “caught” something new that was just emerging in Russian life. Today in the lesson we will try to answer the questions with you: -What is the meaning of the title of the novel? -How and why is there a dispute between representatives of different generations? Guys, at home you compiled a comparative description of the images of P. P. Kirsanov and E. Bazarov.3. Work on the table.

Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P. P. Kirsanov.

The conflict of generations ... This problem is relevant at all times. - In what works is this problem considered? (Shakespeare "Romeo and Juliet", A. Ostrovsky "Thunderstorm", etc.) In the middle of the 19th century, on the eve of the abolition of serfdom in Russia, disputes between liberals and revolutionary democrats, aristocrats and commoners sharply escalated. Turgenev tells us about this in his novel.

Which of the heroes of the novel is opposed to each other?

What are these people called? (antipodes)

Antipode - a person opposite to someone in convictions, properties, tastes. (Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language by S. I. Ozhegov)

Name the antipodes in Russian literature. (Grinev and Shvabrin, Oblomov and Stolz, Chatsky and Molchalin ...) Today we will conduct a comparative description of the new heroes of the novel.

1. What can you sayabout the origin, social belonging of the heroes? P.Kirsanov - a nobleman, an aristocrat, the son of a general, a retired officer, a liberal conservative. E. Bazarov - the son of a military doctor, had peasant roots, a medical student. Faculty of St. Petersburg University, raznochinets, democrat-nihilist.

2.Portrait. Bazarov- "tall in a long hoodie with tassels." The face is "long and thin, with a wide forehead, a flat top, pointed nose down, large green eyes and hanging sandy sideburns ..." He has "naked red hands."

P. P. Kirsanov in all appearance "gloss and panache", appearance "graceful and thoroughbred", beautiful hands with long pink nails.

3. Speech - P.P. Kirsanov uses French expressions in conversation, his speech is refined, he often distorts Russian words in a foreign manner (principles, etc.) E. Bazarov- speaks simply and artlessly, speech is common, often uses sayings and aphorisms. (read from the text)

1. There are many differences between the heroes, but perhaps the most important thing that makes them irreconcilable opponents is the philosophical positions of each.

- What are our heroes arguing about?

1. About the attitude towards the nobility

P. Kirsanov ... Pavel Petrovich sees the main social force in the aristocrats. The importance of the aristocracy, in his opinion, lies in the fact that it once gave freedom in England, that the aristocracy has a highly developed sense of dignity and self-esteem. Their self-esteem is important because society is built on individuals.

E. Bazarov. The talk that the aristocracy gave England freedom - "The Old Song", much has changed after the seventeenth century, so the exile of Pavel Petrovich cannot serve as an argument. No one is of any use to the aristocracy, their main occupation is doing nothing ("sitting with folded hands"). They only care about themselves, about their appearance. Under these conditions, their dignity and self-respect look like empty words. Aristocracy is a useless word. In idleness and empty chatter Bazarov sees the basic political principle of the entire noble society, living at someone else's expense.

2.On the principle of nihilism

Pavel Petrovich stands for the preservation of the old order. He is afraid to imagine the destruction of "everything" in society. He agrees to make only minor changes when combining the foundations of the existing system, to adapt to new conditions, as his brother does. They are not reactionaries, they are liberals

E. Bazarov ... Nihilists act deliberately, based on the principle of the usefulness of activities for society. They deny the social order, that is, autocracy, religion, that is the meaning of the word "EVERYTHING". Bazarov notes that the freedom the government is trying to get around is hardly worth it; this phrase contains an allusion to the forthcoming reforms. Bazarov does not accept reform as a means of changing social conditions. Denial is perceived by new people as activity, not chatter.

3.About attitude to the people

P. Kirsanov ... The Russian people are patriarchal, they sacredly value traditions, they cannot live without religion. These Slavophil views (with an English way of life) speak of reactionaryism. He is touched by the backwardness of the people and in this he sees the guarantee of the salvation of society.

E. Bazarov ... The situation of the people evokes in Bazarov not tenderness, but anger. He sees trouble in all areas of people's life. Bazarov turns out to be far-sighted and condemns what would later become a symbol of the Narodnik faith. It is no coincidence that he says that the Russian people do not need useless words like "liberalism", "progress". Bazarov has a sober attitude towards the people. He sees the ignorance and superstition of the people. He despises these shortcomings. However, Bazarov sees not only the downtrodden, but also the discontent of the people.

4.About views on art

P. Kirsanov. New Wanderers artists abandon frozen academic traditions, from blindly following old models, including Raphael. The Wanderers, in his opinion, absolutely rejected traditions. The new artists are "powerless and despicably sterile."

E. Bazarov. Denies both the old and the new art: "Raphael is not worth a dime, and they are no better than him."

Who Wins Arguments?

Does Bazarov have the right to judge his opponent and his "principles" in such a humiliating manner? (We must respect someone else's opinion, age ..)

5. Attitude towards love.(slide "Scene of E. Bazarov's declaration of love to A. Odintsova")

PP Kirsanov has always enjoyed success with women, men envied him. He led an active lifestyle, but everything changed instantly when Princess R. appeared in his life, whom Kirsanov met at a ball and with whom he fell passionately in love. The princess soon lost interest in him, and he almost lost his mind, began to chase her around the world, showing cowardice. Exhausted by this relationship, Pavel Petrovich grew old, turned gray and lost interest in life.

Bazarov, on the other hand, is very cold about love. “A man who has put all his life on the card of female love, and when this card was killed to him, became limp and sank to the point that he was not capable of anything, such a person is not a man,” he notes. Love seemed to be a test for Bazarov ... Love conquers selfishness, enlightens the world, this feeling turned out to be not physiology, as the hero assumed, this feeling is shocking and traumatic. In words, he denied love, but in reality, life forced her to admit.
For Bazarov, a similar drama means humiliation and is perceived as a manifestation of shameful weakness.

6. Lifestyle, interests.

There are disagreements between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich in relation to art and nature. From the point of view of Bazarov, "reading Pushkin is a wasted time, making music is funny, enjoying nature is absurd." Pavel Petrovich, on the contrary, loves nature and music. Art (and literature, and painting, and music) softens the soul, distracts from business. All this is "romanticism", "nonsense". Looking at the album of Saxon Switzerland, Bazarov says to Madame Odintsova: “You don’t suppose an artistic meaning in me - yes, I really don’t have it, but these views could interest me from a geological point of view”. Bazarov tries to debunk the inactive "principles", does not accept the illusory dreaminess, refusing the achievements of culture ("Raphael is not worth a dime") and utilitarianly perceiving nature.
Kirsanov and Bazarov each have their own opinion.
Bazarov is an enemy of abstract science, divorced from life. He is for a science that would be understandable to the people. Bazarov is a worker of science, he is tireless in his experiments, completely absorbed in his favorite profession.

7. Relationship to each other.

Bazarov should not forget about respect for the generation of the elders. He crosses out the whole life of P. Kirsanov, who believed that he was leading a noble life and worthy of respect.

4. Summing up the results of the lesson.

- Is there a winner in the dispute?

Did the heroes want to find the truth or were they just sorting out the relationship?

Which side do you think the author is on? I. S. Turgenev considers himself to be a generation of “fathers”, tries to convey to us the idea of ​​the important role of “old people” in the past and present of Russia. It is impossible to deny all the accumulated human experience, art, religion, the spiritual side of the life of society. The author tried to convey to the reader the idea of ​​finding some kind of compromise between generations.

5. Submission of grades.

6. Homework.Analysis of the last chapters of the novel. "Death of Bazarov".

RU :: Lines of controversy between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Kirsanov (by Evgeny Bazarov and the mature aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov... In the disputes and clashes between the two heroes of the novel - Pavel Petrovich. Pavel Petrovich is twenty years older than Bazarov, but perhaps even V. However, he does not give Pavel Petrovich victory on this point of the dispute either. The difference between the heroes is visible in their behavior in Kirsanov's "empire". Dispute about principles (views of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov). Comparison table.

Generational dispute: Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov (based on the novel by I. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons").

GDZ, book, retelling, message, report, literature. Woe from wit. In his novel "Fathers and Sons" I.

Turgenev was able to display the contradictions that arose in society on the eve of the fall of serfdom, including the aggravation of the class. In the disputes and clashes between the two heroes of the novel - Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Yevgeny Bazarov, Turgenev embodied the main conflict of "fathers" and "children", which, outlined at the beginning of the work, gradually deepens and grows out of the conflict of peace. Strengths their personalities favorably distinguish these people from the rather gray mass of others. Perhaps that is why they are moderate in the correctness of their beliefs and know how to do it.

• Comparative characteristics of Nikolai and Pavel Kirsanovs (table) Kirsanov N. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich (composition) Disputes between Bazarov and Pavel.
• Bazarov demands the replacement of the very foundations of society. These views and convictions Bazarov expresses in disputes with Pavel Petrovich - his ideological.

He is a nihilist, which means that he does not take anything for granted, for him there are no recognized authorities: “We act by virtue of what we recognize as useful. At the present time, denial is most useful - we deny. " Poetry and art, according to Eugene, are useless pursuits, so he rejects them on the backside. His attitude to nature is also peculiar, which. Bazarov wants to test everything in the world empirically, trusting only reason and eq.

One human specimen is enough to judge all others. " And in this he contradicts himself, since he seeks to establish himself as a person, not like others.

Proud of the fact that he understands the people and knows how to talk with peasants, Bazarov at the same time speaks sharply about the people, pointing out their conservatism, ignorance, and laziness. Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov is a nobleman, he is an aristocrat, a former "secular lion" who in his youth made a brilliant career as an officer, but later ruined his life because of his unhappy love for the frivolous Princess R.

In the image of this hero, Turgenev embodied the best features of the Russian nobility: decency, honesty. Cyrus pays much attention. Material from the site // i. Essay. ru. According to Pavel Petrovich, the aristocracy is the driving force of society, only it can change the life of Russia through reforms. Putting tradition above all else, he asserts: “We are people of the old age, we are gender. Bazarov sharply ridicules the "principles" and authorities of Kir. He also opposes chatter and lib.

Denying an empty term? You wouldn’t respect yourself and do the same. ” And yet, laughing at the convictions of Pavel Petrovich, Bazarov, in my opinion, has little to oppose them.

He acts as a destroyer, preparing a platform for the new, but who will build this new, he does not know. And Kirsanov, hating the whole style of Bazarov's behavior, wow, disrespect for authorities, still understands. The significance of the novel lies in the fact that it did not lose its relevance before today because of the vivid display of the conflict between "children" and "fathers" who will argue with each other, probably at all times. On this page there is material on the topics: the inevitability of the contradiction between bazarov and pavel kirsanovaspor of generations of bazaars and pavel petrovich kirsanovo what argue between bazaars and kirsanovspor of generations together and apart composition of fathers and children disputes of generations in the novel fathers and children.

Disputes between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov (based on the novel by I. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"). GDZ, book, retelling, message, report, literature. Turgenev worked on the novel "Fathers and Sons" at the beginning of the 6th century. The novel reflects the processes taking place in Russia at this time: the struggle socio-political forces of liberals and revolutionary democrats. The heroes of the novel are representatives of two ideological camps: the liberal Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and the revolutionary democrat Yevgeny Bazarov.

Evgeny Bazarov is young, energetic, businesslike. He takes nothing for granted and denies any principles. In his outlook, he is a materialist, a person who has gone through the school of labor and hardship. Bazarov thinks independently and does not depend on anyone. Knowledge and work give him independence and self-confidence. He is the grandson of a sexton, the son of a county doctor, he is proud of his origin. Bazarov is a nihilist, and this word comes from the Latin nihil - nothing, that is, he denies everything.

He substantiated his denial of everything theoretically: he explains the imperfection of society and social illnesses by the nature of society itself. Make Freeze Frames Download the Program further. Bazarov demands the replacement of the very foundations of society.

Bazarov expresses these views and convictions in disputes with Pavel Petrovich, his ideological opponent. Pavel Petrovich is a representative of conservative liberals. He is an aristocrat, an Anglomaniac and a very self-confident person. He is smart and has certain virtues: honest, noble, faithful to his convictions. But Pavel Petrovich does not feel the movement of time, does not accept modernity, for him, above all, tradition. In Bazarov, he sees a danger to himself and his class, so he defends his "world" by all means available to him, up to a duel. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich discuss the themes of art, culture, poetry, nature, science, spirituality, philosophy, and the Russian people.

In disputes with Pavel Petrovich, Bazarov is often aggressive, trying to impose his opinion. From Evgeny's point of view, reading Pushkin is wasting time, making music is ridiculous, enjoying nature is ridiculous. Kirsanov is able to appreciate the beautiful: he reads Pushkin, plays the piano.

Bazarov is a straightforward man, he is not accustomed to "bend his soul", out of politeness to hide a harsh but fair word. This annoyed Pavel Petrovich. Download Jump Train Game on Your Phone. His "aristocratic" nature was outraged by the perfect swagger young man... After Pavel Petrovich's words that at the present time, instead of Schiller and Goethe, "all some chemists and materialists have gone," Bazarov sharply declares: "A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet."

Material from the site // i. Essay. ru. All the principles of Pavel Petrovich are reduced, in essence, to one thing - to defend the old order. The principles of the young nihilist boil down to destroying this order. Turgenev wrote that his work was directed against the nobility, but he did not believe in the prospects of the revolutionary democratic movement, although the author's sympathies were definitely on the side of the protagonist. According to Turgenev, Bazarov is “a tragic person,” because the time of the Bazarovs has not yet come. The finale of the novel convinces of the inconsistency of Bazarov's theory.

It is not he who perishes, but his artificial theory. The novel "Fathers and Sons" for us is a mirror reflecting the 6th century era, with its conflicts and contradictions. On this page there is material on the topics: the dispute between Kirsanov and Bazarovo, the novel, fathers and children, the dispute between Bazarov, the verbal duels of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovicha, the pluses and minuses of the dispute between Bazarov and Kirsanov, the opinion of Pavel Petrovich on the topic of poetry.

fresoftlentacatholic.bitballoon.com

Disputes Between Bazarov And Pavel Petrovich Table

What did Bazarov and Kirsanov argue about in Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons"? One of the most important features of Turgenev is the desire to understand everything that is happening in the country.

All this gave rise to disagreements between the heroes. Dispute about principles (views of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov). Comparison table.

A vivid novel that reflected an entire stage in historical development The novel Fathers and Sons appeared in Russia in the second half of the 19th century. The title of the work suggests that it will resolve the eternal question - the contradiction between generations, and it is raised by the author, but in fact the writer is more worried about something else.

The author shows us three disputes between Bazarov and P. Kirsanov, in which. Pavel Petrovich condemns the nihilists for the fact that they “are nobody. A compromise between the heroes of Turgenev is impossible. Pavel Petrovich is twenty years older than Bazarov, but perhaps even V. However, he does not give Pavel Petrovich victory on this point of the dispute either. The difference between the heroes is visible in their behavior in Kirsanov's "empire". In the disputes and clashes between the two heroes of the novel - Pavel Petrovich. Comparative characteristics of Nikolai and Pavel Kirsanovs (table) Kirsanov N. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich (composition) Disputes between Bazarov and Pavel. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P.P. Kirsanov "(based on the novel by I. Turgenev" Fathers and. Work on the table. Pavel Petrovich sees the main social force in the aristocrats. Bazarov demands the replacement of the very foundations of society. These views and beliefs Bazarov expresses in disputes with Pavel Petrovich - his ideological.

Fathers and children are those who live with the thoughts of the generation that is leaving the past and representatives of new ideas, directions, thoughts, new people born in a new time. In the novel, Turgenev tries to understand, comprehend the goal - life, the worldview of this new man, a commoner by birth, a democrat in political views. The novel "Fathers and Sons" shows the struggle between the worldviews of two political trends - the liberal nobility and the revolutionary democrats. On the opposition of representatives of these directions - commoner Bazarov and nobleman P.

Kirsanov - the plot of the novel is built. In addition to this "main problem, Turgenev raises a number of other issues related to moral, cultural, socio-economic development of Russia in the sixties of the XIX century. Turgenev poses questions that worried the progressive people of that time: what is the discrepancy between revolutionary democrats and liberals, how to relate to the people, to work, science, art, what transformations are needed in agriculture, in economics?

RU :: Lines of controversy between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Kirsanov (after Evgeny Bazarov and the mature aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov.

The author shows us three disputes between Bazarov and P. Kirsanov, in which these questions are raised. So, the theme of the nobility, its role in life. Download Drivers For Epson Tx410 Scanner. According to Kirsanov, aristocrats - driving force social development.

Their ideal is “English freedom” (constitutional monarchy), the path to the ideal is liberal (reforms, glasnost, progress). According to E. Bazarov, aristocrats are incapable of action, there is no benefit from them, Bazarov rejects liberalism, denies the ability of the nobility to lead Russia to the future. The next question concerns nihilism and the role of nihilists in life. Pavel Petrovich condemns the nihilists for the fact that they "do not respect anyone", live without principles, considers them unnecessary and powerless: "You are only four and a half people." To this Bazarov replies: "Moscow burned out from a penny candle." By denying “everything”, Bazarov means religion, the autocratic serf system, and generally accepted morality. But what do the nihilists claim?

First of all, the need for revolutionary action. Their criterion is the people's benefit. What are the views of both sides on the people?

Pavel Petrovich glorifies the peasant community, family, religiosity, patriarchy of the Russian peasant. Bazarov says that the people do not understand their own interests, are dark and ignorant, but considers it necessary to distinguish popular interests from popular prejudices, argues that the people are revolutionary in spirit, therefore nihilism is a manifestation of precisely folk spirit... The fourth question concerns the attitude of the disputants to art and nature. Pavel Petrovich blesses and glorifies art. The author agrees with P. Bazarov in this, but denies art (“Raphael is not worth a dime”), approaches nature in a purely materialistic way: (“Nature is not a temple, but a workshop, and a person is a worker in it.) Let's sum up.

The disputes were not about private issues. They concerned the present and future of Russia. In all disputes the last word remained with Bazarov.

A compromise between the heroes of Turgenev is impossible, confirmation of this is their duel. Whose side is the author on? Turgenev, being a liberal by conviction, felt the superiority of Bazarov. Moreover, he argued: "My whole story is directed against the nobility as an advanced class." The author completely disagreed with his hero only on the issue of art and nature.

And yet his hero dies at the end of the novel. Maybe his time has not yet come ("And who is needed?") Or maybe the author considered Bazarov's task in the "noble nest" of the Kirsanovs completed? He could not show the hero in an environment close to him, among like-minded people - he was simply far from her. It is impossible to answer unequivocally. However, it should be noted that the novel is dedicated to V.

Belinsky - a man of the forties, who had the same "passionate, sinful, rebellious heart" as Bazarov. Turgenev does not know how the issues raised by his heroes will be resolved, but the fact that they are raised is a great merit of the writer.

Disputes between Kirsanov and Bazarov have ideological significance... They reveal the main idea, the idea of ​​the novel, what it was written for. They give a special acuity to the plot, serve as a characteristic of each hero, they show the superiority of new, progressive ideas over the old, obsolete, the eternal movement of society towards progress.

Bazarov and Kirsanov. The problem of the relationship between fathers and children in literature is not a new topic. However, Turgenev was the first to create the image of an advanced man of his time. The writer belongs to the main character of the work. Let's try to compare and analyze in what aspects these two characters differ.

Writer about the work. Download the Abstract On the Topic of Culture and Civilization here. Of his novel, Turgenev says that it is directed against the aristocracy, which was considered an advanced class in Russia. Bazarov and Kirsanov are two characters, the opposition of views of which formed the basis of the plot of the work. The specifics of the worldview and position in society of these heroes can be presented in the form of a table. This form allows you to see the main aspects of their contradictions most clearly. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich.

Comparative characteristics. Table. Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov. Evgeny Bazarov. Attitude towards the aristocracy. Aristocracy is the driving force behind the development of society. The uselessness of the aristocracy, the inability to lead Russia to the future. Attitude towards nihilism.

Considers nihilists harmful to society. Nihilism is a powerful driving force for development. Attitude towards the common people. Touched by patriarchy peasant family, says that the people cannot live without faith. He considers the people to be ignorant, dark and superstitious, notes the revolutionary spirit of the human spirit.

Attitude to art, nature. Loves nature, art, music. Defines nature as a workshop in which man runs.

Art considers it useless. Origin. Born into a noble family. Born into the family of a zemstvo doctor, a commoner. Attitude towards the aristocracy. Kirsanov believes that the aristocracy is the key driving force behind the development of society.

The ideal form of government, in his opinion, is a constitutional monarchy, which can be achieved through liberal reforms. Bazarov notes the inability of the aristocrats to act, they cannot be useful, they cannot lead Russia to the future. This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich relate to the aristocracy. The comparative characteristic (the table is presented above) reflects this, gives an idea of ​​how different their understanding of what the driving force of the development of society is.

Attitude towards nihilism. The next question, on which the two heroes argue, concerns nihilism, its role in the life of society. Pavel Petrovich defines the representatives of this worldview as impudent and cynics who do not respect and do not recognize anything. He is glad that there are few of them in society. Nihilists point out the need for revolutionary transformations.

Bazarov believes that the people are ignorant, but revolutionary in spirit. Eugene sees meaning only in what is useful, he does not consider it necessary to speak loud words. This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nihilism. Comparative characteristics (the table is available in the article) displays this moment, shows how different the attitude of the heroes to this worldview position is. Attitude towards ordinary people.

Kirsanov believes that life ordinary people according to the order established by the great-grandfathers, it is correct. Bazarov despises the ignorance of the peasants. Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table records this moment) differently perceive the situation common people in society. By his origin, Eugene is closer to ordinary people.

He is a commoner. Consequently, he understands the peasants more. Pavel Petrovich comes from a noble family, he is absolutely far from understanding the life of ordinary people. What Kirsanov considers faith, Bazarov calls superstition.

A compromise between these heroes is impossible, which is confirmed by the duel between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich. Attitude to art, nature. The views of Bazarov and Kirsanov differ even in the perception of art. They have different attitudes towards nature. According to Bazarov, reading fiction is an empty business, and he evaluates nature exclusively as a resource. Kirsanov is the complete opposite of him.

On the contrary, he loves the world, art, music. Bazarov believes that it is necessary to rely in life only on personal experience and sensations. Proceeding from this, he denies art, since it is only a generalized and figurative interpretation of experience, distracting from the matter.

He denies the world's cultural achievements. This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nature and art differently. Comparative characteristics (the table reflects this) once again shows the practicality of Eugene's views.

Biography of heroes, attitude to life. Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Bazarov are two opposite characters. The author makes it clear to us. Kirsanov hated Evgeny for showing Pavel Petrovich the futility of his existence. Before meeting him, Kirsanov believed that he was noble and worthy of respect. When Eugene appears, Pavel Petrovich comes to the realization of the emptiness and meaninglessness of his own life.

Kirsanov is undoubtedly a worthy representative of the nobility. He is the son of a general, an officer who squandered best years life in an effort to win his beloved woman.

Senior Kirsanov, of course, is honest, decent, loves his family. Turgenev notes that, having described the best representatives of the nobility in the novel, he wanted to emphasize the inconsistency and futility of this class. Bazarov's parents are very pious people. His father is a zemstvo doctor, his mother, as the author writes about her, should have been born two hundred years ago. In their own way social status Bazarov is a commoner, loving work... He is a man with a strong mind and character, who raised himself. Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table clearly reflects this) are two completely different people in their views and origins.

In the novel. The convictions of Pavel Petrovich characterize him as a representative of the past. Bazarov's views are too advanced and progressive, extremely materialistic, with which, perhaps, the death of this hero at the end of the work is connected.

discoverymegasoft2017.bitballoon.com

Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich: comparative characteristics (table). Bazarov and Kirsanov

The problem of the relationship between fathers and children in literature is not a new topic. However, Turgenev was the first to create the image of an advanced man of his time. The writer treats the main character of the work "Fathers and Sons" ambiguously.

Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Bazarov are representatives of different generations. Let's try to compare and analyze in what aspects these two characters differ.

Writer about the work

Of his novel, Turgenev says that it is directed against the aristocracy, which was considered an advanced class in Russia.

Bazarov and Kirsanov are two characters, the opposition of views of which formed the basis of the plot of the work. The specifics of the worldview and position in society of these heroes can be presented in the form of a table. This form allows you to see the main aspects of their contradictions most clearly.

Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich. Comparative characteristics. table

Attitude towards the aristocracy

Kirsanov believes that the aristocracy is the key driving force behind the development of society. The ideal form of government, in his opinion, is a constitutional monarchy, which can be achieved through liberal reforms.

Bazarov notes the inability of the aristocrats to act, they cannot be useful, they cannot lead Russia to the future.

This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich relate to the aristocracy. The comparative characteristic (the table is presented above) reflects this, gives an idea of ​​how different their understanding of what the driving force of the development of society is.

Attitude towards nihilism

The next question, on which the two heroes argue, concerns nihilism, its role in the life of society.

Pavel Petrovich defines the representatives of this worldview as impudent and cynics who do not respect and do not recognize anything. He is glad that there are few of them in society.

Nihilists point out the need for revolutionary transformations. Bazarov believes that the people are ignorant, but revolutionary in spirit. Eugene sees the meaning only in what is useful, he does not consider it necessary to speak loud words.

This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nihilism. Comparative characteristics (the table is available in the article) reflects the present moment, shows how different the attitude of the heroes to this ideological position is.

Attitude towards ordinary people

Pavel Petrovich is far from the people, while he is touched by patriarchy and religiosity. Bazarov considers the peasants to be ignorant, ignorant, ignorant of their rights.

Kirsanov believes that the life of ordinary people, according to the rules established by their great-grandfathers, is correct. Bazarov despises the ignorance of the peasants.

Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table captures this moment) perceive the position of ordinary people in society differently.

By his origin, Eugene is closer to ordinary people. He is a commoner. Consequently, he understands the peasants more. Pavel Petrovich comes from a noble family, he is absolutely far from understanding the life of ordinary people. What Kirsanov considers faith, Bazarov calls superstition.

A compromise between these heroes is impossible, which is confirmed by the duel between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich.

Attitude to art, nature

The views of Bazarov and Kirsanov differ even in the perception of art. They have different attitudes towards nature. According to Bazarov, reading fiction is an empty business, and he evaluates nature exclusively as a resource. Kirsanov is the complete opposite of him. On the contrary, he loves the world around him, art, music.

Bazarov believes that it is necessary to rely in life only on personal experience and sensations. Proceeding from this, he denies art, since it is only a generalized and figurative interpretation of experience, distracting from the matter. He denies the world's cultural achievements.

This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nature and art differently. Comparative characteristics (the table reflects this) once again shows the practicality of Eugene's views.

Biography of heroes, attitude to life

Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Bazarov are two opposite characters. The author makes it clear to us. Kirsanov hated Evgeny for showing Pavel Petrovich the futility of his existence. Before meeting him, Kirsanov believed that he was noble and worthy of respect. When Eugene appears, Pavel Petrovich comes to the realization of the emptiness and meaninglessness of his own life.

Kirsanov is undoubtedly a worthy representative of the nobility. He is the son of a general, an officer who squandered the best years of his life in an effort to win his beloved woman. Senior Kirsanov, of course, is honest, decent, loves his family.

Turgenev notes that, having described the best representatives of the nobility in the novel, he wanted to emphasize the inconsistency and futility of this class.

Bazarov's parents are very pious people. His father is a zemstvo doctor, his mother, as the author writes about her, should have been born two hundred years ago.

In terms of his social status, Bazarov is a commoner who loves work. He is a man with a strong mind and character, who raised himself.

Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table clearly reflects this) are two completely different people in their views and origins.

In the novel Fathers and Sons, the author contrasts two very striking characters. The convictions of Pavel Petrovich characterize him as a representative of the past. Bazarov's views are too advanced and progressive, extremely materialistic, with which, perhaps, the death of this hero at the end of the work is connected.

Comparative characteristics of Bazarov and Kirsanov in the table

Bazarov E.V.

P. P. Kirsanov

• Comparative characteristics of Nikolai and Pavel Kirsanovs (table) Kirsanov N. P. Kirsanov P. P. Appearance A short man in his forties. After a long-term fracture of the leg, he limps. The facial features are pleasant, the expression is sad. A handsome, well-groomed middle-aged man. He dresses smartly, in the English manner. Ease of movement betrays a sporty person. Marital status Widower for over 10 years, was very happy in marriage. There is a young mistress Fenechka. Two sons: Arkady and six-month-old Mitya. Bachelor. In the past it was popular with women. After […]
• Characteristics of the heroes "Fathers and Sons" (table) Evgeny Bazarov Anna Odintsova Pavel Kirsanov Nikolai Kirsanov Appearance Elongated face, wide forehead, huge greenish eyes, nose, flat on top and pointed below. Blond long hair, sand-colored sideburns, a self-confident smile on thin lips. Bare red hands Noble posture, slender stature, tall stature, beautiful sloping shoulders. Light eyes, shiny hair, a faint smile. 28 years old Medium height, thoroughbred, 45 years old. Fashionable, youthful slender and graceful. […]
• The image of Natasha Rostova (composition) Tolstoy in his novel "War and Peace" presents us with many different heroes... He tells us about their life, about the relationship between them. Almost from the first pages of the novel, one can understand that of all the heroes and heroines, Natasha Rostova is the writer's favorite heroine. Who is Natasha Rostova? When Marya Bolkonskaya asked Pierre Bezukhov to tell about Natasha, he replied: “I don’t know how to answer your question. I absolutely do not know what kind of girl she is; I can’t analyze it in any way. She is charming. Why, [...]
• Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich (composition) The disputes between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich represent the social side of the conflict in Turgenev's novel Fathers and Sons. Here, not only different views of representatives of two generations collide, but also two fundamentally different political points of view. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich find themselves on opposite sides of the barricades in accordance with all the parameters. Bazarov is a commoner, a native of poor family forced to make his own way in life on his own. Pavel Petrovich is a hereditary nobleman, guardian of family ties and [...]
• Bazarov's tragedy (composition) The image of Bazarov is contradictory and complex, he is torn by doubts, he experiences mental trauma, primarily due to the fact that he rejects the natural principle. The theory of the life of Bazarov, this extremely practical man, physician and nihilist, was very simple. There is no love in life - it is a physiological need, there is no beauty - it is just a combination of the properties of the organism, there is no poetry - it is not needed. For Bazarov, there were no authorities, and he strongly argued his point of view until life convinced him. […]
• Female images in the novel "Fathers and Sons" (composition) The most prominent female figures in Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" are Anna Sergeevna Odintsova, Fenechka and Kukshina. These three images are extremely different from each other, but nevertheless we will try to compare them. Turgenev was very respectful of women, perhaps that is why their images are described in detail and vividly in the novel. These ladies are united by their acquaintance with Bazarov. Each of them contributed to the change in his worldview. The most significant role was played by Anna Sergeevna Odintsova. It was she who was destined [...]
• Analysis of the episode "Death of Bazarov". Controversy in criticism around the novel "Fathers and Sons". Each writer, creating his work, be it a fantasy novel or a multivolume novel, is responsible for the fate of the heroes. The author tries not only to tell about a person's life, depicting its most vivid moments, but also to show how the character of his hero was formed, in what conditions it developed, what features of the psychology and worldview of a particular character led to a happy or tragic outcome. The finale of any work in which the author draws a peculiar line under a certain [...]
• The ideological duel of Bazarov and Kirsanov A duel test. Bazarov and his friend again drive along the same circle: Maryino - Nikolskoye - parental home. The situation outwardly almost literally reproduces the one that was on the first visit. Arkady is enjoying summer vacation and, barely finding an excuse, returns to Nikolskoye, to Katya. Bazarov continues his natural science experiments. True, this time the author expresses himself differently: "the fever of work has found him." New Bazarov refused tense ideological disputes with Pavel Petrovich. Only occasionally throws enough [...]
• The conflict between theory and life in Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" I. S. Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" contains a large number of conflicts in general. These include love conflict, clash of worldviews of two generations, social conflict and internal conflict Main character. Bazarov, the protagonist of the novel "Fathers and Sons", is an amazingly bright figure, a character in which the author intended to show the entire young generation of that time. It should not be forgotten that this work is not just a description of the events of that time, but also deeply felt, quite real [...]
• The history of the creation of the novel "Fathers and Sons" by Turgenev The idea of ​​the novel arises from I. S. Turgenev in 1860 in the small seaside town of Ventnor, in England. ". It was in the month of August 1860 when the first thought of Fathers and Sons occurred to me. “It was a difficult time for the writer. His break with the Sovremennik magazine has just happened. The reason was the article by N. A. Dobrolyubov about the novel "On the Eve". I. S. Turgenev did not accept the revolutionary conclusions contained in it. The reason for the gap was deeper: rejection of revolutionary ideas, “muzhik democracy [...]
• The death of Bazarov is the result of it life path Roman I.S. Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons" ends with the death of the protagonist. Why? Turgenev felt something new, saw new people, but could not imagine how they would act. Bazarov dies very young, not having time to start any activity. By his death, he seems to atone for the one-sidedness of his views, which the author does not accept. While dying, the main character did not change either his sarcasm or his directness, but became softer, kinder, and speaks differently, even romantically, that [...]
• Bazarov and parents (essay) Two mutually exclusive statements are possible: “Despite Bazarov’s outward callousness and even rudeness in his treatment of parents, he loves them dearly” (G. Byaly) and “Isn't that spiritual callousness that cannot be justified. " However, in the dialogue between Bazarov and Arkady, the i's are dotted: “- So you see what my parents are. The people are not strict. - Do you love them, Evgeny? - I love you, Arkady! " Here it is worth remembering both the scene of Bazarov's death and his last conversation with [...]
• Analysis of the episode of Bazarov's death in Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" appears in the February book of the Russian Bulletin. This novel is obviously a question. addresses the younger generation and loudly asks him the question: "What kind of people are you?" This is the real meaning of the novel. D. I. Pisarev, Realists Evgeny Bazarov, according to the letters of I. S. Turgenev to his friends, “the prettiest of my figures”, “this is my favorite brainchild. on which I have spent all the paints in my disposition. " "This clever girl, this hero" appears before the reader in kind [...]
• Letter from Bazarov to Odintsova Dear Anna Sergeevna! Let me turn to you personally and express my thoughts on paper, as saying some words out loud is an insurmountable problem for me. It is very difficult to understand me, but I hope that this letter will clarify a little my attitude towards you. Before meeting you, I was an opponent of culture, moral and ethical values, human feelings... But numerous life tests made me look differently at the world around me and reevaluate my life principles... For the first time I [...]
• Comparative characteristics of Bazarov and Kirsanov Pavel Petrovich What is the actual conflict between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov? An eternal dispute between generations? Confrontation between supporters of different political views? A catastrophic divide between progress and stability bordering on stagnation? Let us classify the disputes, which later grew into a duel, to one of the categories, and the plot will become flat and lose its sharpness. At the same time, the work of Turgenev, in which the problem was raised for the first time in history domestic literature, is still relevant. And today they demand changes and [...]
• Friendship of Bazarov and Arkady (composition) Arkady and Bazarov are very unlike people, and the friendship that arose between them is all the more amazing. Despite the fact that young people belong to the same era, they are very different. It should be noted that they initially belong to different circles of society. Arkady is the son of a nobleman, he is with early childhood absorbed what Bazarov despises and denies in his nihilism. Father and uncle Kirsanovs are intelligent people who value aesthetics, beauty and poetry. From the point of view of Bazarov, Arkady is a kind-hearted "barich", a brat. Bazarov does not want to [...]
• Strengths and weaknesses of Bazarov's nihilism In IS Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons", the main character is Yevgeny Bazarov. He proudly says that he is a nihilist. The concept of nihilism means a type of belief based on the denial of everything that has been accumulated over many centuries of cultural and scientific experience, all traditions and ideas about social norms. The history of this social movement in Russia is connected with the 60s-70s. XIX century, when there was a turning point in society in traditional public views and scientific [...]
• The strength and weakness of nihilism by Evgeny Bazarov Action of the novel by I.S. Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons" unfolds in the summer of 1859, on the eve of the abolition of serfdom. At that time in Russia there was an acute question: who can lead the society? On the one hand, to the leading social role claimed by the nobility, which consisted of both fairly free-thinking liberals and aristocrats who think the same way as at the beginning of the century. At the other extreme of the society were revolutionaries - democrats, the majority of whom were commoners. The main character novel [...]
• Bazarov and Odintsova in the novel "Fathers and Sons" The relationship between Evgeny Bazarov and Anna Sergeevna Odintsova, the heroes of the novel by I.S. Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons" did not work out for many reasons. The materialist and nihilist of bazaars denies not only art, the beauty of nature, but also love as a human feeling. Recognizing the physiological relationship between a man and a woman, he believes that love "is all romanticism, nonsense, rottenness, art." Therefore, at first he assesses Odintsova only from the point of view of her external data. “Such a rich body! At least now to the anatomical theater ", [...]
• Russian noblemen Kirsanovs The action of Ivan Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" dates back to 1859, and the writer completed work on it in 1861. The time of action and creation of the novel is separated by only two years. That was one of the most intense epochs in Russian history. In the late 1850s, the entire country lived in conditions revolutionary situation, under the sign of an imminent sharp turn in the fate of the people and society - the impending liberation of the peasants. Once again, for the umpteenth time, Russia was "rearing up" over an unknown abyss, and its future was illuminated for some [...]

Talking about the intention and purpose of his future work, Turgenev

confessed: "I was confused by the following fact: in not a single work

our literature did not even come across a hint of what seemed to me

everywhere. "The merit of the writer is that he is the first in Russia

raised this topic in literature and for the first time tried to create an image

"new man", a representative of the commoners. Dual

despite the inconsistency of the depicted image, he believed that for

these people open the future. "My whole story is directed

against the aristocracy as an advanced class, "he wrote.

The novel "Fathers and Sons" shows the struggle between the worldviews of two

political directions: liberal nobles and revolutionaries

Democrats. On the opposition of representatives of these directions,

commoner Bazarov and nobleman Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov,

the plot of the novel is built. In addition to this main problem, Turgenev

raises a number of other questions related to moral,

cultural, socio-economic development of Russia in the 60s

XIX century. So, the topic of the nobility and its role in life is raised again.

society.

According to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, aristocrats are the driving force

social development. Their ideal is constitutional monarchy, and the way

to the ideal - liberal reforms, publicity, progress. According to

Bazarov, aristocrats are incapable of action, there is no

benefits, therefore Bazarov denies the ability of the nobility to conduct

Russia to the future. The next question is about nihilism, the role

nihilists in life. Pavel Petrovich considers them powerless

"cynics, impudent and plebeians", they do not respect the people and traditions,

but he consoles himself that they are few. Bazarov weighty remarks: "From

a penny candle Moscow has burned out. "What do the nihilists claim?

all the need for revolutionary action, therefore the criterion for

them is the people's benefit. Bazarov believes that the people are still dark and

ignorant, full of prejudices, but still in spirit he

revolutionary.

Pavel Petrovich is touched by the patriarchy of the Russian people, not

understanding it in essence. Considering himself a liberal, he nevertheless,

talking to a man, sniffing English cologne This is

an important feature that characterizes him as a person. Drawing conclusions,

it can be said that the disputes were not conducted on private issues. They

concerned the present and future of Russia In all disputes, the last

the word remained with Bazarov.

A compromise between the heroes of Turgenev is impossible, confirmation

this is a duel. main reason that caused the elder's hatred

Kirsanov to Bazarov, was in what he is unlikely

even confessed to himself: Bazarov crossed out his whole life.

Pavel Kirsanov believed that he was leading a noble life, that he was worthy

respect. And from the point of view of Bazarov, his life is meaningless.

The difference in the views of the main characters lies in their biography.

Pavel Petrovich - the son of a general, a brilliant officer who squandered

all their mental strength in pursuit of the woman he loves. When she

died, he left the world, left his career and settled with his brother to

live the century. He tries to make changes to his estate and

economy, considers himself a liberal only because their estate does not

they beat the serfs with a whip, but he is unable to understand the demands

new era, views the younger generation deeply alien to him. O

We know little about Bazarov's past, but we understand that his path is

typical path of a common worker. Years of hard work

made him the most educated person. He proudly states:

"My grandfather plowed the land." Bazarov's parents are very religious

their interests are limited. Bazarov raised himself. how many

prejudices, how many habits rooted in childhood should

was to overcome Eugene in order to educate himself. Bazarov is a man

strong in mind and character. Russia knew many such Bazarovs:

after all, both Belinsky, to whose memory the novel is dedicated, and Dobrolyubov

went through a difficult life school. The Kirsanov brothers are aristocrats.

Turgenev wrote: "They are the best of the nobles - that is why they

chosen by me to prove their inconsistency. "Very bitter,

that their life is so worthless, although they possess

undoubted advantages. Pavel Petrovich is very noble

refers to his brother, to Fenechka, he is honest, constant in love, he understands

art. Nikolai Petrovich, his brother, is a very sensitive person, he

benevolent, kind-hearted, fond of music, but his life

monotonous and boring. Bazarov brings Fresh air to the "family nest"

Kirsanovs. Eugene appears before us as a new person

generation that replaced the "fathers" who are not able to solve

the main problems of the era.

Dobrolyubov wrote about people of the Bazarov type even before the appearance of the image

Bazarov, claiming that they dare to "step on the road

merciless denial to find pure truth. "

the goal is "to bring the greatest possible benefit to humanity."

The formation of their ideology was not without extremes, they believed

exclusively in science, but it was they who drove progress in Russia.

I would like to finish the essay with the words: Conflict of the "fathers" with

"children" - The key to those continuous changes in which something is looking for

God Playing with the change of generations.

181. ABOUT IDEAL FASHION AND BELIEFS IN "FATHERS AND CHILDREN" I.S. TURGENEVA

Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev is a first-class realist painter, one of the

the most wonderful Russians writers XIX century. Educated

a man of his era, a humanist, an enemy of slavery and arbitrariness, he is much

saw and understood, feeling impending big changes in Russia.

His position in the context of the escalated class struggle of the Bo-x-70s

years was difficult and largely contradictory. Critically evaluating

people of their social circle, noting a number of weaknesses and shortcomings

noble intelligentsia, Turgenev did not share the revolutionary

beliefs of the new generation, he understood that they were right in some way, but

they were alien to him in spirit. He could not accept ideas about the need

revolution, violent, radical breakdown of existing

relations, he was "abhorred by the peasant democracy of Chernyshevsky and

Dobrolyubov. "This is the reason for his break with" Sovremennik ". However

Turgenev retained a deep interest in activities until the end of his life.

revolutionary youth, he closely followed all

manifestations of advanced social thought. By characterizing

creativity Turgenev, Dobrolyubov wrote that he "quickly guessed

new needs, new ideas introduced into public consciousness ".

In 1862, Turgenev wrote the novel "Fathers and Sons" - one of the best

novels, both in artistic

venerable skill, and the depth, breadth and relevance of the main

themes. This was not a tribute to the ideological fashion, Turgenev is honest in the novel

tried to show two forces: liberal nobility / in the person of brothers

Kirsanovs / and the camp of revolutionary democrats represented by

while alone Bazarov. Turgenev wrote: "My whole story

directed against the aristocracy as an advanced class. "

Representatives of the past - "fathers" - are depicted with merciless

; rity. They are good people, but about these good people will not regret

Russia. Turgenev is not satisfied with either "fathers" or "children", the writer is not

fell in love with Bazarov, but recognized his strength, his superiority over others

people, so he brought him a full tribute. In the interpretation

Bazarov was affected by Turgenev's class limitations. Man with

such qualities as Bazarov could have done a lot, but he dies,

without doing anything. This was due to Turgenev's disbelief in the power

raznochintsy, into the ideal of revolutionary democracy. Pisarev in the article

I saw "Bazarov" in Turgenev's hero typical features young

between democratic magazines because of understanding the image of Bazarov

article by critic Pisarev played the role of strengthening the critical

attitudes towards Bazarov on the pages of the Sovremennik magazine. In the second

article Pisarev changed his view of Bazarov and put him in

on a par with the hero of Chernyshevsky's novel "What is to be done?" -

Rakhmetov. Turgenev himself said that Bazarov was his "enemy"

to whom he feels an involuntary attraction.

The liberal gradualist Turgenev believed that the revolutionary

activities in Russia will not find a response and support among the people. This

he also endowed his hero with consciousness. Bazarov speaks before

death: "Russia needs me ... No, apparently, it is not needed." This ideological

delusion of Turgenev. What about ideological fashions and beliefs?

If we compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Nazarov, then it is clear that

Bazarov is convinced of his positions, and Kirsanov is more drawn,

paying tribute to fashion. For all their "liberal antics" and

statements about "love of progress" Pavel Petrovich is conservative,

intolerant and class-limited in their views. One detail: he

sniffs cologne when talking to a man because

"It smells bad". Is this love for your neighbor? Kirsanov's words

at odds with the case, he is a liberal, because it is fashionable to be a liberal. A

what is liberal about him? Once a month relieves a man from

executions? But "if the cream is like that, then what is the milk", that is

uneducated nobility. Bazarov asks Arkady ,. seeing

perfumed, impeccably dressed in the latest fashion / and this is in the village /

Kirsanova: "What is this archaic phenomenon?" Pavel, Petrovich

lets go of the scornful phrase: "Who is this hairy?" In front of you

utterly different people by upbringing, persuasion, origin.

Bazarov criticizes the idleness of the nobility: "You respect yourself, but you sit

with folded hands, what is the use of this? "Bazarov is" a man of action, not

phrases ", he has not only great intelligence, but also great strength

will. Bazarov has an important principle - to do what is useful.

Turgenev in the novel also shows cartoon characters - these are Sitnikov and

Kukshina. If for aristocrats a tribute to fashion - to seem progressive

liberals, then for Sitnikov and Kukshina it is a tribute to fashion - to consider yourself

nihilists. Kukshina and Sitnikov seized on nihilism, because

that he is fashionable because he looks very progressive.

prestigious. But all their nihilism is petty and ostentatious. Sitnikov shouts:

before whom does he cringe? Bazarov does not need a lot of intelligence to

understand that Sitnikov may shout the opposite tomorrow. Kukshina believes

myself as an advanced, emancipated woman. But Turgenev alone

phrase makes it clear that she is just a stupid, unhappy woman,

which has no children and a husband, and she has no choice but to be

"emancipation". In her room "papers, letters, thick numbers of Russians

magazines, for the most part uncut, scattered across the dusty

tables ", These are empty talkers who" keep their nose to the wind ", and if

before they were just idiots, now they suddenly become

nihilists. They do not have certain views, their beliefs, and

when nihilism goes out of style, they will certainly abandon it. Have

Bazarov has his own principles, and he strictly follows them. "I am nobody's

I don’t share opinions: I have mine, ”he says. The problem of“ fathers ”and

"children", the search for the ideal and meaning of life at all times was quite

acutely. Marx called the situation of youth in society a tragedy

the younger generation, which finds an already formed world and does not

always aware of what can change him. Kirsanov

Bazarov immediately felt the enemy, because he crossed out

all his "active" life. Bazarov made it clear that the "fathers" did not

able to solve the main problems of the era. The controversy does not subside now

about the novel and interest in it does not disappear, because society

divided by conviction into two forces: the camp of democrats, who

ready to take a new path, and the camp of adherents of the idea of ​​socialism,

which has not justified itself. Who is the future of the country? It seems to me so far

a person will not be spiritually reborn, neither democrats nor

conservatives pull Russia out of the abyss. In a dispute with Dobrolyubov

and Chernyshevsky, Turgenev and Lev Tolstoy were right. None

a violent revolution will not change the life of the people. Until there is

moral perfection. And life has proven this incontestably.

182. BAZAROV - A TRAGIC FACE (Based on Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons")

There are a number of names in Russian literature, without which we cannot

imagine the existence of all national culture... These

names are known to everyone, because when we hear them, we have

there are clear associations with the works included in

treasury of world literature, with the time in which they created

these great people.

One of these great names is Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev. His

works cannot be confused with anyone else's, they have individuality

as if conveys to us events, new trends in contemporary to him

life, passing through the prism of their own feelings, views on

various problems. In the true masterpieces of Turgenev with great

the characters of the heroes are revealed with psychological certainty.

The writer tries to explain their actions and thoughts. Heroes exist

not divorced from the surrounding world, they are closely related to it,

are influenced by it, imbued with newfangled ideas, and

sometimes they reject them after long searches and mistakes.

The novel "Fathers and Sons" (1862) appeared after the author broke with

magazine "Sovremennik" in another magazine "Russian Bulletin". novel

fight. In St. Petersburg, student unrest broke out, and began

mass arrests. Fires started in the city. The emergence of the novel

caused a storm. Many greeted the novel with hostility. On Turgenev

both those and those fell, that is, both from the camp of the "children" and from the camp of the "fathers".

Turgenev wrote to Pauline Viardot: “I tried to imagine the conflict

two generations ".

The novel shows a new type of advanced leader-commoner -

democrat Bazarov, "a man of action, not a phrase." Bazarov is a man from

a different world, from a different environment than the writer himself. Turgenev noticed

the emergence of new people who call themselves nihilists. Writer

considers this phenomenon in different aspects. It would seem that both Bazarov and

Arkady Kirsanov and Sitnikov belong to the same category of people,

adhering to certain principles. They call themselves

it is clear that neither Arkady nor Sitnikov have their own convictions,

this is a temporary hobby for a fashionable trend, but nothing more. Turgenev

showed his hero as a loner who understands that their "nihilism"

This pathetic imitation strong personality... Turgenev not

satisfied neither "fathers" nor "children". He could not love Bazarov, but

recognized his strength and paid him a tribute full of respect. Turgenev not

fully sympathizes with any of its characters.

Representatives of the past ("fathers") are depicted with a merciless

loyalty. They are good people, but they will not regret these good people.

Bazarov, a strong man in mind and character, is the center of the novel.

He is a representative of a new young generation, in his personality

grouped those features that were inherent in the revolutionaries

because he is unmatched and has his own

own beliefs. "I do not support anyone's opinions, I have

their own ", - Bazarov declares half-disdainfully.

Bazarov's requests above his environment. Passion for science,

the desire to get to the bottom of the essence, broad-minded and critical

attitude to reality, self-esteem - that's

characteristic features of Evgeny Bazarov. The critic Pisarev put

Bazarov is on a par with the hero of Chernyshevsky's novel - Rakhmetov.

this is the end of its function. He says: "First you need a place

cleared, and others will build. ”Bazarov's views expressed in

disputes with Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, close to the views of the leaders

revolutionary democracy, but he is much at odds with

them. Pisarev wrote that "bazaarism is a disease of

time, and it must be endured. "Bazarov, possessed by this disease,

is distinguished by a remarkable mind and, as a result, produces a strong

impression on the people around him. "The Pechorins have a will without

knowledge, the Rudins have knowledge without will, the Bazarovs have both knowledge and

will, thought and deeds merge into one whole ", - wrote Pisarev.

Turgenev's opinion, Bazarov came to life early, he could do

much, but "dies without doing anything." There are negative ones in it.

traits, this was reflected in the class limitations of Turgenev himself.

Bazarov, which, unfortunately, is true, often denies

things that he does not know and does not understand. Poetry, in his opinion, is nonsense,

enjoying nature is ridiculous. Love for Eugene is just

physiological need. Life makes adjustments to him

views on love. Bazarov suffers deeply after Odintsova's refusal,

but it doesn't make it any smaller. Human ability is deep

Turgenev considered love to be the measure of his value as a person. Turgenev

he subjected many of his heroes to the test of love. Bazarov enters

the realm of subtle experiences that he had never accepted before. From

there is no trace of his confidence. The passion is wholly overwhelming

hero, but he finds the strength, unlike Pavel Petrovich,

break up with a selfish woman, despite the tragedy of this

break. Bazarov is capable of deep critical introspection and

rethinking past beliefs. And this is his strength. Rejected,

he still won a moral victory. After passing away

Dobrolyubova Turgenev said: "Sorry for the lost, wasted

strength. "He said the same about Bazarov.

The parting words of the dying Bazarov contain the main meaning

his life ending: "Russia needs me? ... No, apparently, it is not needed ..."

The origins of Bazarov's suffering are the premature appearance, absence

allies, excruciating loneliness. Turgenev wrote to his friend:

"I dreamed of a dark, wild, big, strong, vicious figure,

but honest. And yet, doomed to perish, because she stands in

the threshold of the future ... "Such an interpretation fully explains

a solemn chord completing the story of the "new man".

The main character of "Fathers and Sons" did not know compromises, did not know

selfish sense of self-preservation. In our time of restructuring

life on this type of personality can only be equal. Important

for us and more. Bazarov selflessly opposed routine

spiritual stagnation, dreamed of establishing new social

relationships, new culture... The origins, conditions, results of it

the activities were, of course, different. But the idea itself is to remake

the world, the soul of a person, to breathe into it the living energy of daring is not

may not care today.

The problems posed by Turgenev in the novel are always relevant.

Conflict of "fathers" with "children" - the key to those continuous changes,

whom God is looking for, Playing with the change of generations ...

© 2015-2019 site
All rights belong to their authors. This site does not claim authorship, but provides free use.
Date the page was created: 2016-02-12

One of the most important features of Turgenev is the desire to understand everything that is happening in the country. The novel Fathers and Sons was a striking novel that reflected a whole stage in the historical development of Russia in the second half of the 19th century. The title of the work suggests that it will resolve the eternal question - the contradiction between generations, and it is raised by the author, but in fact the writer is more worried about something else. Fathers and children are those who live with the thoughts of the generation that is leaving the past and representatives of new ideas, directions, thoughts, new people born in a new time. In the novel, Turgenev tries to understand, comprehend the goal - life, the worldview of this new man, a commoner by origin, a democrat in political views. The novel "Fathers and Sons" shows the struggle between the worldviews of two political directions - the liberal nobility and the revolutionary democrats. The plot of the novel is based on the opposition of the representatives of these trends - the commoner Bazarov and the nobleman P.P. Kirsanov. In addition to this “main problem, Turgenev raises a number of other issues related to the moral, cultural, socio-economic development of Russia in the sixties of the XIX century.

Turgenev poses questions that worried the progressive people of that time: what is the discrepancy between revolutionary democrats and liberals, how should one treat the people, labor, science, art, what transformations are needed in agriculture, in the economy? The author shows us three disputes between Bazarov and P.P. Kirsanov, in which these questions are raised. So, the theme of the nobility, its role in life. According to Kirsanov, aristocrats are the driving force of social development. Their ideal is “English freedom” (constitutional monarchy), the path to the ideal is liberal (reforms, glasnost, progress). According to E. Bazarov, aristocrats are incapable of action, there is no benefit from them, Bazarov rejects liberalism, denies the ability of the nobility to lead Russia to the future.

The next question concerns nihilism and the role of nihilists in life. Pavel Petrovich condemns the nihilists for the fact that they "do not respect anyone", live without principles, considers them unnecessary and powerless: "You are only four and a half people." To this Bazarov replies: "Moscow burned out from a penny candle." By denying "everything" Bazarov means religion, the autocratic serf system, and generally accepted morality. But what do the nihilists claim? First of all, the need for revolutionary action. Their criterion is the people's benefit.

What are the views of both sides on the people? Pavel Petrovich glorifies the peasant community, family, religiosity, patriarchy of the Russian peasant. Bazarov says that the people do not understand their own interests, are obscure and ignorant, but considers it necessary to distinguish popular interests from popular prejudices, claims that the people are revolutionary in spirit, therefore nihilism is a manifestation of the people's spirit.

The fourth question concerns the attitude of the disputants to art and nature. Pavel Petrovich blesses and glorifies art. The author agrees with P. Kirsanov in this. Bazarov, on the other hand, denies art (“Raphael is not worth a dime”), he approaches nature in a purely materialistic way: (“Nature is not a temple, but a workshop, and a person is a worker in it.)

Let's summarize. The disputes were not about private issues. They concerned the present and future of Russia. In all disputes, the last word remained with Bazarov. A compromise between the heroes of Turgenev is impossible, confirmation of this is their duel.

Turgenev, being a liberal by conviction, felt the superiority of Bazarov. Moreover, he argued: "My whole story is directed against the nobility as an advanced class." The author completely disagreed with his hero only on the issue of art and nature. And yet his hero dies at the end of the novel. Why? Maybe his time has not come yet ("... Russia needs me ... No, apparently it is not needed. And who is needed?") Or maybe the author considered Bazarov's task in the "noble nest" of the Kirsanovs completed? He could not show the hero in an environment close to him, among like-minded people - he was simply far from her.

It is impossible to answer unequivocally. However, it should be noted that the novel is dedicated to VG Belinsky, a man of the forties, who had the same “passionate, sinful, rebellious heart” as Bazarov. Turgenev does not know how the issues raised by his heroes will be resolved, but the fact that they are raised is a great merit of the writer.

The disputes between Kirsanov and Bazarov are of ideological significance. They reveal the main idea, the idea of ​​the novel, what it was written for. They give a special acuity to the plot, serve as a characteristic of each hero, they show the superiority of new, progressive ideas over the old, obsolete, the eternal movement of society towards progress.

Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich: comparative characteristics (table). Bazarov and Kirsanov

The problem of the relationship between fathers and children in literature is not a new topic. However, Turgenev was the first to create the image of an advanced man of his time. The writer treats the main character of the work "Fathers and Sons" ambiguously.

Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Bazarov are representatives of different generations. Let's try to compare and analyze in what aspects these two characters differ.

Writer about the work

Of his novel, Turgenev says that it is directed against the aristocracy, which was considered an advanced class in Russia.

Bazarov and Kirsanov are two characters, the opposition of views of which formed the basis of the plot of the work. The specifics of the worldview and position in society of these heroes can be presented in the form of a table. This form allows you to see the main aspects of their contradictions most clearly.

Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich. Comparative characteristics. table

Attitude towards the aristocracy

Kirsanov believes that the aristocracy is the key driving force behind the development of society. The ideal form of government, in his opinion, is a constitutional monarchy, which can be achieved through liberal reforms.

Bazarov notes the inability of the aristocrats to act, they cannot be useful, they cannot lead Russia to the future.

This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich relate to the aristocracy. The comparative characteristic (the table is presented above) reflects this, gives an idea of ​​how different their understanding of what the driving force of the development of society is.

Attitude towards nihilism

The next question, on which the two heroes argue, concerns nihilism, its role in the life of society.

Pavel Petrovich defines the representatives of this worldview as impudent and cynics who do not respect and do not recognize anything. He is glad that there are few of them in society.

Nihilists point out the need for revolutionary transformations. Bazarov believes that the people are ignorant, but revolutionary in spirit. Eugene sees the meaning only in what is useful, he does not consider it necessary to speak loud words.

This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nihilism. Comparative characteristics (the table is available in the article) reflects the present moment, shows how different the attitude of the heroes to this ideological position is.

Attitude towards ordinary people

Pavel Petrovich is far from the people, while he is touched by patriarchy and religiosity. Bazarov considers the peasants to be ignorant, ignorant, ignorant of their rights.

Kirsanov believes that the life of ordinary people, according to the rules established by their great-grandfathers, is correct. Bazarov despises the ignorance of the peasants.

Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table captures this moment) perceive the position of ordinary people in society differently.

By his origin, Eugene is closer to ordinary people. He is a commoner. Consequently, he understands the peasants more. Pavel Petrovich comes from a noble family, he is absolutely far from understanding the life of ordinary people. What Kirsanov considers faith, Bazarov calls superstition.

A compromise between these heroes is impossible, which is confirmed by the duel between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich.

Attitude to art, nature

The views of Bazarov and Kirsanov differ even in the perception of art. They have different attitudes towards nature. According to Bazarov, reading fiction is an empty business, and he evaluates nature exclusively as a resource. Kirsanov is the complete opposite of him. On the contrary, he loves the world around him, art, music.

Bazarov believes that it is necessary to rely in life only on personal experience and sensations. Proceeding from this, he denies art, since it is only a generalized and figurative interpretation of experience, distracting from the matter. He denies the world's cultural achievements.

This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nature and art differently. Comparative characteristics (the table reflects this) once again shows the practicality of Eugene's views.

Biography of heroes, attitude to life

Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Bazarov are two opposite characters. The author makes it clear to us. Kirsanov hated Evgeny for showing Pavel Petrovich the futility of his existence. Before meeting him, Kirsanov believed that he was noble and worthy of respect. When Eugene appears, Pavel Petrovich comes to the realization of the emptiness and meaninglessness of his own life.

Kirsanov is undoubtedly a worthy representative of the nobility. He is the son of a general, an officer who squandered the best years of his life in an effort to win his beloved woman. Senior Kirsanov, of course, is honest, decent, loves his family.

Turgenev notes that, having described the best representatives of the nobility in the novel, he wanted to emphasize the inconsistency and futility of this class.

Bazarov's parents are very pious people. His father is a zemstvo doctor, his mother, as the author writes about her, should have been born two hundred years ago.

In terms of his social status, Bazarov is a commoner who loves work. He is a man with a strong mind and character, who raised himself.

Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table clearly reflects this) are two completely different people in their views and origins.

In the novel Fathers and Sons, the author contrasts two very striking characters. The convictions of Pavel Petrovich characterize him as a representative of the past. Bazarov's views are too advanced and progressive, extremely materialistic, with which, perhaps, the death of this hero at the end of the work is connected.

Outline of a lesson in literature (grade 10) on the topic:
»The problem of generations. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P.P. Kirsanov "(based on the novel by Ivan Turgenev" Fathers and Sons ")

»The problem of generations. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P.P. Kirsanov "(based on the novel by Ivan Turgenev" Fathers and Sons ")

Preview:

The problem of generations. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P. Kirsanov. (based on the novel by Ivan Turgenev "Fathers and Sons")

Synopsis of the lesson of the teacher of the Russian language and literature MBOU "Arch-Golitsinskaya secondary school" Mikheeva Lyudmila Nikolaevna.

Objectives: 1. To improve the ability of students to make a comparative characterization of characters. 2. To be able to determine the moral and ideological positions of the heroes of the work. 3. Develop students' thinking, speaking. 4. Develop students' interest in reading the novel.

Equipment: Portrait of I. S. Turgenev, presentation "Fathers and Sons".

Organizational moment.

Communication of the topic and objectives of the lesson. (On the screen - a portrait of I. Turgenev) We continue to study the novel by I. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons". “My whole life is in my writings,” he wrote. Turgenev has a special sense of time. “Our time demands to capture modernity in its coming images; you can't be too late. " In his works, he “caught” something new that was just emerging in Russian life. Today in the lesson we will try to answer the questions with you: -What is the meaning of the title of the novel? -How and why is there a dispute between representatives of different generations? Guys, at home you compiled a comparative description of the images of P. P. Kirsanov and E. Bazarov. 3. Work on the table.

Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P. P. Kirsanov.

1. Origin, social affiliation

4. Philosophical, socio-political views, moral position

5. Attitude towards love

6. Lifestyle, interests

7. Relationship to each other

The conflict of generations ... This problem is relevant at all times. - In what works is this problem considered? (Shakespeare "Romeo and Juliet", A. Ostrovsky "Thunderstorm", etc.) In the middle of the 19th century, on the eve of the abolition of serfdom in Russia, disputes between liberals and revolutionary democrats, aristocrats and commoners sharply escalated. Turgenev tells us about this in his novel.

- Which of the heroes of the novel opposes each other?

What are these people called? (antipodes)

The antipode is a person who is opposite to someone in terms of convictions, properties, tastes. (Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language by S. I. Ozhegov)

Name the antipodes in Russian literature. (Grinev and Shvabrin, Oblomov and Stolz, Chatsky and Molchalin ...) Today we will conduct a comparative description of the new heroes of the novel.

- 1. What can you say about the origin, social belonging of the heroes? P. Kirsanov - nobleman, aristocrat, son of a general, retired officer, liberal-conservative. E. Bazarov, the son of a military doctor, had peasant roots, a medical student. Faculty of St. Petersburg University, raznochinets, democrat-nihilist.

2.Portrait. Bazarov - "tall in a long robe with tassels." The face is "long and thin, with a wide forehead, a flat top, pointed nose down, large green eyes and hanging sandy sideburns ..." He has "naked red hands."

PP Kirsanov - in all appearance "gloss and panache", appearance "graceful and thoroughbred", beautiful hands with long pink nails.

3. Speech - PP Kirsanov uses French expressions in conversation, his speech is refined, often distorts Russian words in a foreign manner (principles, etc.) E. Bazarov - speaks simply and ingeniously, speech is common, often uses sayings and aphorisms. ( read from the text)

1. There are many differences between the heroes, but perhaps the most important thing that makes them irreconcilable opponents is the philosophical positions of each.

- What are our heroes arguing about?

1. About the attitude towards the nobility

P. Kirsanov. Pavel Petrovich sees the main social force in the aristocrats. The importance of the aristocracy, in his opinion, lies in the fact that it once gave freedom in England, that the aristocracy has a highly developed sense of dignity and self-esteem. Their self-esteem is important because society is built on individuals.

E. Bazarov. The talk that the aristocracy gave England freedom - "The Old Song", much has changed after the seventeenth century, so the exile of Pavel Petrovich cannot serve as an argument. No one is of any use to the aristocracy, their main occupation is doing nothing ("sitting with folded hands"). They only care about themselves, about their appearance. Under these conditions, their dignity and self-respect look like empty words. Aristocracy is a useless word. In idleness and empty chatter Bazarov sees the basic political principle of the entire noble society, living at someone else's expense.

2.On the principle of nihilism

Pavel Petrovich stands for the preservation of the old order. He is afraid to imagine the destruction of "everything" in society. He agrees to make only minor changes when combining the foundations of the existing system, to adapt to new conditions, as his brother does. They are not reactionaries, they are liberals

E. Bazarov. Nihilists act deliberately, based on the principle of the usefulness of activities for society. They deny the social order, that is, autocracy, religion, that is the meaning of the word "EVERYTHING". Bazarov notes that the freedom the government is trying to get around is hardly worth it; this phrase contains an allusion to the forthcoming reforms. Bazarov does not accept reform as a means of changing social conditions. Denial is perceived by new people as activity, not chatter.

3.About attitude to the people

P. Kirsanov. The Russian people are patriarchal, they sacredly value traditions, they cannot live without religion. These Slavophil views (with an English way of life) speak of reactionaryism. He is touched by the backwardness of the people and in this he sees the guarantee of the salvation of society.

E. Bazarov. The situation of the people evokes in Bazarov not tenderness, but anger. He sees trouble in all areas of people's life. Bazarov turns out to be far-sighted and condemns what would later become a symbol of the Narodnik faith. It is no coincidence that he says that the Russian people do not need useless words like "liberalism", "progress". Bazarov has a sober attitude towards the people. He sees the ignorance and superstition of the people. He despises these shortcomings. However, Bazarov sees not only the downtrodden, but also the discontent of the people.

4.About views on art

P. Kirsanov. New Wanderers artists abandon frozen academic traditions, from blindly following old models, including Raphael. The Wanderers, in his opinion, absolutely rejected traditions. The new artists are "powerless and despicably sterile."

E. Bazarov. Denies both the old and the new art: "Raphael is not worth a dime, and they are no better than him."

Who Wins Arguments?

Does Bazarov have the right to judge his opponent and his "principles" in such a humiliating manner? (We must respect someone else's opinion, age ..)

5. Attitude towards love. (slide "Scene of E. Bazarov's declaration of love to A. Odintsova")

PP Kirsanov has always enjoyed success with women, men envied him. He led an active lifestyle, but everything changed instantly when Princess R. appeared in his life, whom Kirsanov met at a ball and with whom he fell passionately in love. The princess soon lost interest in him, and he almost lost his mind, began to chase her around the world, showing cowardice. Exhausted by this relationship, Pavel Petrovich grew old, turned gray and lost interest in life.

Bazarov, on the other hand, is very cold about love. “A man who has put all his life on the card of female love, and when this card was killed to him, became limp and sank to the point that he was not capable of anything, such a person is not a man,” he notes. Love seemed to be a test for Bazarov ... Love conquers selfishness, enlightens the world, this feeling turned out to be not physiology, as the hero assumed, this feeling is shocking and traumatic. In words, he denied love, but in reality, life forced her to admit.
For Bazarov, a similar drama means humiliation and is perceived as a manifestation of shameful weakness.

6. Lifestyle, interests.

There are disagreements between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich in relation to art and nature. From the point of view of Bazarov, "reading Pushkin is a wasted time, making music is funny, enjoying nature is absurd." Pavel Petrovich, on the contrary, loves nature and music. Art (and literature, and painting, and music) softens the soul, distracts from business. All this is "romanticism", "nonsense". Looking at the album of Saxon Switzerland, Bazarov says to Madame Odintsova: “You don’t suppose an artistic meaning in me - yes, I really don’t have it, but these views could interest me from a geological point of view”. Bazarov tries to debunk the inactive "principles", does not accept the illusory dreaminess, refusing the achievements of culture ("Raphael is not worth a dime") and utilitarianly perceiving nature.
Kirsanov and Bazarov each have their own opinion.
Bazarov is an enemy of abstract science, divorced from life. He is for a science that would be understandable to the people. Bazarov is a worker of science, he is tireless in his experiments, completely absorbed in his favorite profession.

7. Relationship to each other.

Bazarov should not forget about respect for the generation of the elders. He crosses out the whole life of P. Kirsanov, who believed that he was leading a noble life and worthy of respect.

4. Summing up the results of the lesson.

- Is there a winner in the dispute?

Did the heroes want to find the truth or were they just sorting out the relationship?

Which side do you think the author is on? I. S. Turgenev considers himself to be a generation of “fathers”, tries to convey to us the idea of ​​the important role of “old people” in the past and present of Russia. It is impossible to deny all the accumulated human experience, art, religion, the spiritual side of the life of society. The author tried to convey to the reader the idea of ​​finding some kind of compromise between generations.

6. Homework. Analysis of the last chapters of the novel. "Death of Bazarov".

On the subject: methodological developments, presentations and notes

This lesson is the end result of a short-term study training project based on the novel by IS Turgenev "Fathers and Sons". The purpose of the lesson is to present a finished research product.

The game is played in accordance with the regulations TV game"Clever and clever" and consists of 4 stages - agons (agon - competition), during which the agonist - the winner is determined.

A research article on the role and significance of the portrait in revealing the character of Turgenev's Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in the novel "Fathers and Sons" may interest high school literature teachers and.

The supporting synopsis can serve as an assistant in preparation for lessons based on the novel by IS Turgenev "Fathers and Sons".

Literature lesson (technology "Development of critical thinking through reading and writing").

The eternal desire of the writer to understand what is happening in the country, in the presence of I.S. Turgenev. The opposition of two worldviews, two political directions is reflected in the novel.

Lesson + presentation on the topic: Trial by love, illness by Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in the novel by I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons".

Disputes Between Bazarov And Pavel Petrovich Table

What did Bazarov and Kirsanov argue about in Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons"? One of the most important features of Turgenev is the desire to understand everything that is happening in the country.

All this gave rise to disagreements between the heroes. Dispute about principles (views of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov). Comparison table.

The novel Fathers and Sons was a striking novel that reflected a whole stage in the historical development of Russia in the second half of the 19th century. The title of the work suggests that it will resolve the eternal question - the contradiction between generations, and it is raised by the author, but in fact the writer is more worried about something else.

The author shows us three disputes between Bazarov and P. Kirsanov, in which. Pavel Petrovich condemns the nihilists for the fact that they “are nobody. A compromise between the heroes of Turgenev is impossible. Pavel Petrovich is twenty years older than Bazarov, but perhaps even V. However, he does not give Pavel Petrovich victory on this point of the dispute either. The difference between the heroes is visible in their behavior in Kirsanov's "empire". In the disputes and clashes between the two heroes of the novel - Pavel Petrovich. Comparative characteristics of Nikolai and Pavel Kirsanovs (table) Kirsanov N. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich (composition) Disputes between Bazarov and Pavel. Comparative characteristics of E. Bazarov and P.P. Kirsanov "(based on the novel by I. Turgenev" Fathers and. Work on the table. Pavel Petrovich sees the main social force in the aristocrats. Bazarov demands the replacement of the very foundations of society. These views and beliefs Bazarov expresses in disputes with Pavel Petrovich - his ideological.

Fathers and children are those who live with the thoughts of the generation that is leaving the past and representatives of new ideas, directions, thoughts, new people born in a new time. In the novel, Turgenev tries to understand, comprehend the goal - life, the worldview of this new man, a commoner by birth, a democrat in political views. The novel "Fathers and Sons" shows the struggle between the worldviews of two political trends - the liberal nobility and the revolutionary democrats. On the opposition of representatives of these directions - commoner Bazarov and nobleman P.

Kirsanov - the plot of the novel is built. In addition to this “main problem, Turgenev raises a number of other issues related to the moral, cultural, socio-economic development of Russia in the sixties of the XIX century. Turgenev poses questions that worried the progressive people of that time: what is the difference between revolutionary democrats and liberals, how should one treat the people, labor, science, art, what transformations are needed in agriculture, in the economy?

RU :: Lines of controversy between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Kirsanov (after Evgeny Bazarov and the mature aristocrat Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov.

The author shows us three disputes between Bazarov and P. Kirsanov, in which these questions are raised. So, the theme of the nobility, its role in life. Download Drivers For Epson Tx410 Scanner. According to Kirsanov, aristocrats are the driving force of social development.

Their ideal is “English freedom” (constitutional monarchy), the path to the ideal is liberal (reforms, glasnost, progress). According to E. Bazarov, aristocrats are incapable of action, there is no benefit from them, Bazarov rejects liberalism, denies the ability of the nobility to lead Russia to the future. The next question concerns nihilism and the role of nihilists in life. Pavel Petrovich condemns the nihilists for the fact that they "do not respect anyone", live without principles, considers them unnecessary and powerless: "You are only four and a half people." To this Bazarov replies: "Moscow burned out from a penny candle." By denying “everything”, Bazarov means religion, the autocratic serf system, and generally accepted morality. But what do the nihilists claim?

First of all, the need for revolutionary action. Their criterion is the people's benefit. What are the views of both sides on the people?

Pavel Petrovich glorifies the peasant community, family, religiosity, patriarchy of the Russian peasant. Bazarov says that the people do not understand their own interests, are obscure and ignorant, but considers it necessary to distinguish popular interests from popular prejudices, claims that the people are revolutionary in spirit, therefore nihilism is a manifestation of the people's spirit. The fourth question concerns the attitude of the disputants to art and nature. Pavel Petrovich blesses and glorifies art. The author agrees with P. Bazarov in this, but denies art (“Raphael is not worth a dime”), approaches nature in a purely materialistic way: (“Nature is not a temple, but a workshop, and a person is a worker in it.) Let's sum up.

The disputes were not about private issues. They concerned the present and future of Russia. In all disputes, the last word remained with Bazarov.

A compromise between the heroes of Turgenev is impossible, confirmation of this is their duel. Whose side is the author on? Turgenev, being a liberal by conviction, felt the superiority of Bazarov. Moreover, he argued: "My whole story is directed against the nobility as an advanced class." The author completely disagreed with his hero only on the issue of art and nature.

And yet his hero dies at the end of the novel. Maybe his time has not yet come ("And who is needed?") Or maybe the author considered Bazarov's task in the "noble nest" of the Kirsanovs completed? He could not show the hero in an environment close to him, among like-minded people - he was simply far from her. It is impossible to answer unequivocally. However, it should be noted that the novel is dedicated to V.

Belinsky - a man of the forties, who had the same "passionate, sinful, rebellious heart" as Bazarov. Turgenev does not know how the issues raised by his heroes will be resolved, but the fact that they are raised is a great merit of the writer.

Bazarov and Kirsanov. The problem of the relationship between fathers and children in literature is not a new topic. However, Turgenev was the first to create the image of an advanced man of his time. The writer belongs to the main character of the work. Let's try to compare and analyze in what aspects these two characters differ.

Writer about the work. Download the Abstract On the Topic of Culture and Civilization here. Of his novel, Turgenev says that it is directed against the aristocracy, which was considered an advanced class in Russia. Bazarov and Kirsanov are two characters, the opposition of views of which formed the basis of the plot of the work. The specifics of the worldview and position in society of these heroes can be presented in the form of a table. This form allows you to see the main aspects of their contradictions most clearly. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich.

Comparative characteristics. Table. Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov. Evgeny Bazarov. Attitude towards the aristocracy. Aristocracy is the driving force behind the development of society. The uselessness of the aristocracy, the inability to lead Russia to the future. Attitude towards nihilism.

Considers nihilists harmful to society. Nihilism is a powerful driving force for development. Attitude towards the common people. He is moved by the patriarchal nature of the peasant family, and says that the people cannot live without faith. He considers the people to be ignorant, dark and superstitious, notes the revolutionary spirit of the human spirit.

Attitude to art, nature. Loves nature, art, music. Defines nature as a workshop in which man runs.

Art considers it useless. Origin. Born into a noble family. Born into the family of a zemstvo doctor, a commoner. Attitude towards the aristocracy. Kirsanov believes that the aristocracy is the key driving force behind the development of society.

The ideal form of government, in his opinion, is a constitutional monarchy, which can be achieved through liberal reforms. Bazarov notes the inability of the aristocrats to act, they cannot be useful, they cannot lead Russia to the future. This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich relate to the aristocracy. The comparative characteristic (the table is presented above) reflects this, gives an idea of ​​how different their understanding of what the driving force of the development of society is.

Attitude towards nihilism. The next question, on which the two heroes argue, concerns nihilism, its role in the life of society. Pavel Petrovich defines the representatives of this worldview as impudent and cynics who do not respect and do not recognize anything. He is glad that there are few of them in society. Nihilists point out the need for revolutionary transformations.

Bazarov believes that the people are ignorant, but revolutionary in spirit. Eugene sees the meaning only in what is useful, he does not consider it necessary to speak loud words. This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nihilism. Comparative characteristics (the table is available in the article) reflects the present moment, shows how different the attitude of the heroes to this ideological position is. Attitude towards ordinary people.

Kirsanov believes that the life of ordinary people, according to the rules established by their great-grandfathers, is correct. Bazarov despises the ignorance of the peasants. Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table captures this moment) perceive the position of ordinary people in society differently. By his origin, Eugene is closer to ordinary people.

He is a commoner. Consequently, he understands the peasants more. Pavel Petrovich comes from a noble family, he is absolutely far from understanding the life of ordinary people. What Kirsanov considers faith, Bazarov calls superstition.

A compromise between these heroes is impossible, which is confirmed by the duel between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich. Attitude to art, nature. The views of Bazarov and Kirsanov differ even in the perception of art. They have different attitudes towards nature. According to Bazarov, reading fiction is an empty business, and he evaluates nature exclusively as a resource. Kirsanov is the complete opposite of him.

On the contrary, he loves the world around him, art, music. Bazarov believes that it is necessary to rely in life only on personal experience and sensations. Proceeding from this, he denies art, since it is only a generalized and figurative interpretation of experience, distracting from the matter.

He denies the world's cultural achievements. This is how Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich look at nature and art differently. Comparative characteristics (the table reflects this) once again shows the practicality of Eugene's views.

Biography of heroes, attitude to life. Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Bazarov are two opposite characters. The author makes it clear to us. Kirsanov hated Evgeny for showing Pavel Petrovich the futility of his existence. Before meeting him, Kirsanov believed that he was noble and worthy of respect. When Eugene appears, Pavel Petrovich comes to the realization of the emptiness and meaninglessness of his own life.

Kirsanov is undoubtedly a worthy representative of the nobility. He is the son of a general, an officer who squandered the best years of his life in an effort to win his beloved woman.

Senior Kirsanov, of course, is honest, decent, loves his family. Turgenev notes that, having described the best representatives of the nobility in the novel, he wanted to emphasize the inconsistency and futility of this class. Bazarov's parents are very pious people. His father is a zemstvo doctor, his mother, as the author writes about her, should have been born two hundred years ago. In terms of his social status, Bazarov is a commoner who loves work. He is a man with a strong mind and character, who raised himself. Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov (the table clearly reflects this) are two completely different people in their views and origins.