Lie detector confirmed that Dmitry Shepelev did not spend money Rusfond: the TV presenter was asked the sharp questions in the studio "Let them talk. Dmitry Shepelev: "Malakhov comes professionally, but inhuman

For two months, Dmitry Shepelev has leads the show "in fact." According to the plan of the project, stars and other participants, they check on the detector of lies. The transmission has high ratings, but guests complain that there are many lies in the show "Channel One.

So, in one of the issues of the program, the singer Aziza participated. The release was dedicated tragic death Igor Talkov. Experts of the show at the very end asked Aziza, what she silent, to which the artist answered that was honest. However, according to the polygraph, it turned out that it does not agree.

Aziz has the information that she hides, but which they did not ask, "reported experts.

Aziza tried to justify themselves, but Shepelev eventually concluded that Igor Talkova was still unexplored.

On the polygraph I personally do not care. Especially all this is a profanation and show. And the presenter, and experts play roles in competently fixed production. I asked me to come there Igor Talkov Jr., we are friends, I came. But for some reason he was not called to the studio. This disrespect is not even to Igor, but to the memory of his father, "- shared his impressions of Aziza. Her words leads the "TV program."

It remained unhappy with the organization of the show and Nikita Dzhigurd, who recorded all his conversations with the editors of the teleproject. In particular, the artist called and said: "They want to call you to the detector, to register everything ....", But Jigurd answered with refusal.

"I don't want to be a whipping boy ...", -he kept.

It is known that the showman communicates with those stars who participated in the program "In fact".

A scenario is written in advance, under which the answers needed, the necessary editors for ratings and earning a loot ... to the truth and the truth they will fly! "Piple Hall" means (from their point of view) everything is cool! And on the bangs of fate to shit! " - he told Jigurd.

Singer Danko also spoke about the imprint of the construction of the program. According to him, he had to play a role. According to the singer, his civilian spouse paid 150 thousand rubles for participating in the project, and Danko himself spoke in the studio strictly in the text compiled by the editor. In the program, we recall, it was about the treasures of his wife.

I gave the role of bastard, I played. I spoke clearly in the text, there could not be born in my head. Invented foreigners whose technically cannot exist - there are no departures in Natasha in the passport, except for hospitals. And questions that they did not fit ?! And first they agreed on one, but in last moment others slipped, "- told the singer.

As a result, according to Danko, the editor did not fulfill its obligations, although they promised a lot.

They promised to give the number of the card on the air, the collection of money to declare - I do not know what methods. But the focus was made on it. I had to agree on their "jaundice" to help the child: we need a lot ... ", - added a singer.

The youngest daughter Danko was born with deviations in development, so the money for her treatment is needed constantly.

The notorious Diana Shurygin also passed the test on the polygraph. For participation in TV projects pay 200 thousand rubles in each. The opponent of Diana Shurgina in the release of the program "In fact" was the sister of convict for the rape of Sergey Semenov Catherine.

Semenova believes that Diana said was a lie, but was issued for the truth, despite the polygraph.

Before entering the studio, we were tested on the detector. When Diana passed, we sat in the next room and heard her answers that truth is that a lie. Throughout the program, she constantly left the answer. Then he started the game: "I remember, I do not remember." When conveniently - I remember when not - I do not know, I do not remember. It could go, it was unconscious. When the experts are tired that she leads them for his nose, they asked to give accurate answers. To which she in her ordinary genre began to roll the hysteria, tear off the wires from the detector and leave, " he told the sister convicted for rape.

It is noted that the shooting organizers were frightened that the program could not be released due to this, and asked experts to be loyal to Diana.

After that, the answers in the form: "I do not remember, I don't know, perhaps" began to be accepted and in the end it turned out that everything she says is true. Happiness Diana was not the limit, she tried to show that the crying actually closed her face and laughed that she could deceive. Later, the organizers said, we need a "swing" - Seryozha Right, Diana right to support the interest of the audience and raise the rating of the program ... so that you understand the scenario was written long before we were a polygraph ", - added Semenov.

According to experts, the lie detector does not always give reliable results. It is a device with which psycho-physiological studies are carried out, in which the respiratory parameters, cardiovascular activity synchronously register.

In many projects, I studied the results of research on a lie detector and with confidence I can say that the polygraph gives flaws. Honesty Heroes of the program "In fact" adds responsibility to the audience federal Channeland graphics on the screen rather for the injection of intrigues, "- stated star psychologist Evgeny Voltov.

He noted that we are talking About the show, not about the documentary film.

And then, imagine the situation at which the detector was wrong. The man would ask for this to double! This is a natural reaction to lies! ", - said Volta.

Two months Dmitry Shepelev checks the stars on the lie detector in the show "In fact." TV viewers The project took on the "Hurray", the ratings of Shepelev are good, which means that the team "in fact" competently picks up and builds the playwright of the television show.

True, the guests are not always pleased with what happens behind the scene "in fact."

the site publishes Star Lock Teleproject.

1. The singer Aziza participated in the release of the program, which was devoted to the death of Igor Talkov. Dmitry Shepelev With the help of guests in the studio, I tried to understand the details of the tragedy, which happened on October 6, 1991 at the Sports Palace "Jubilee" in St. Petersburg. When the show experts in the final "in fact" asked Aziz about what she was silent, the actress answered that was honest. Although the polygraph has determined that it does not agree. "Aziz has the information that she hides, but which they did not ask," experts reported. Aziza tried to justify himself, and the presenter concluded that Igor Talkov's case remained unexplored.

In an interview after recording a TV project, Aziza told: "I personally do not care about the polygraph. Especially all this is a profanation and show. And the presenter, and experts play roles in competently fixed production. I asked me to come there Igor Talkov Jr., we are friends, I came. But for some reason he was not called to the studio. This disrespect is not even to Igor, but to the memory of his father. "

2. Nikita Dzhigurda little, who believes, so he recorded all their conversations with the editors of the teleproject, and then partially published. Of telephone conversation Showman with a program representative can clearly hear the phrase: "They want to call you to the detector, to register everything ...." But Jigurd refuses: "I don't want to be a whipping boy ..."

Despite his scandintion of Jigurd communicates with celebrities, including those who participated in "in fact". "A scenario is written in advance, which is customized by the answers you need to editors for ratings and earning a loot ... to truth and truth they will fly! "Piple Hall" means (from their point of view) everything is cool! And on the bangs of fate to shit! " - Emotionally exposes the TV show Jigurd. To someone, as not Dzhigurda and Anisina (frequent guests of the scandalous TV show) to know that the show often prescribed in advance the topics of conversations, sometimes discuss the answers, mount ...

3. The civilian wife of the singer Danko, according to his recognition, paid 150 thousand rubles for participation in "actually". In a conversation with the correspondent, the site of Danko told about the clogs of telecast: "... I gave me the role of bastard, I played. I spoke clearly in the text, there could not be born in my head. Invented foreigners whose technically cannot exist - there are no departures in Natasha in the passport, except for hospitals. (The program discussed in detail the possible treason of the wife of Danko - approx.) And questions that they did not fit ?! And first they agreed on some, and at the last moment others slipped. "

The main claim due to which Danko decided to make public the clogs of the TV project became the fact that the editor that was invited by the singer on the air did not fulfill their obligations: "They promised to give the card number on the air, the collection of money to declare - I do not know what methods. But the focus was made on it. I had to agree on their "jaundice" to help the child: we need a lot ... "Danko's youngest daughter (Sasha Fadeeva) is a disabled person, a child has several serious diagnoses at once, so money for treatment is needed constantly.

4. Diana Shurygin turned 18 years old and she was able to undergo a test on a polygraph, however, no sensations on the air did not happen. About the early wedding (October 5) Diana and operator of the first channel was already known at that time. Previously, the fees were announced by Diana Shurgina for participating in a talk show (200 thousand rubles for the transfer).

The opponent of Diana Shurgina on the air was the sister of convict for the rape of Sergey Semenova Catherine. That's what she told immediately after recording the transfer: "Before entering the studio, we were tested on the detector. When Diana passed, we sat in the next room and heard her answers that truth is that a lie. Throughout the program, she constantly left the answer. Then he started the game: "I remember, I do not remember." When conveniently - I remember when not - I do not know, I do not remember. It could go, it was unconscious. When the experts are tired that she leads them for his nose, they asked to give accurate answers. To which she in his usual genre began to roll the hysteria, tear off the wires from the detector and leave. The organizers understand that the shooting on the verge of a breakdown began to ask for experts to be loyal to Diana and stopped to drink on it. After that, the answers in the form: "I do not remember, I don't know, perhaps" began to be accepted and in the end it turned out that everything she says is true. Happiness Diana was not the limit, she tried to show that the crying actually closed her face and laughed that she could deceive. Later, the organizers said, we need a "swing" - Seryozha Right, Diana right to support the interest of the audience and raise the program rating. The filming were 4 hours, which will be left after the installation is unknown. To be understood, the script was written long before we passed the polygraph. "

5. Polygraph - technical means for psycho-physiological studies, in which synchronously register the respiratory parameters, cardiovascular activity. Machine is always right?

On this issue, the star psychologist Evgeny Voltov answered: "In many projects, I studied the results of research on the detector of lies and with confidence I can say that the polygraph gives Ogrechi. Honesty Heroes of the program "In fact" adds responsibility to the audience of the federal channel, and the schedule on the screen is rather for the injection of intrigues. Do not forget: this is a show, not documentary. And then, imagine the situation at which the detector was wrong. The man would ask for this to double! This is a natural reaction to the accusation of lies! "

Yesterday the guest of the Transmission Studio "and its leading Andrei Malakhov (45) became the former civic husband Zhanna Friske (34). The topic of release - and the struggle of Dmitry with the family of Zhanna for the son of Plato (4). Shepelev immediately stated that he would finally want to put all the points over I: "To my horror, the story of Jeanne does not leave alone. All this continues to discuss, condemn. It is still suitable for people: "We are for you" or "how you could do this." And scares me that so many questions that felt in the air. I want to answer any question and put a point forever. "

The first question, who asked, concerned the missing 20 million rubles - where did the money that the world was collected for the treatment of Jeanne? "I continue to insist and say that Vladimir removed the money (Father Friske - Approx. Ed.). This money is the equivalent of love for Zhanna. These money people from all over the country supported a seriously ill girl. Therefore, for each penny you need to report. Just imagine how many seriously ill children could be saved on these 20 million. 10 days before the death of Zhanna, her mother took the whole amount from the account. In addition, not only the money "Rusfund", but also the personal funds of Jeanne were removed. All accounts were devastated. I do not understand how it was possible, seeing a dying daughter, think about money and leave the grandson without the lion's share of inheritance, "said Dmitry and demonstrated the official document from the bank, confirming that the funds of Rusfond removed the Mother Zhanna. And you remember that Vladimir Friske argued that Dmitry removed from the account and built luxurious vacation home? According to Dmitry, the cottage he bought with Zhanna, but after her death he now has four owners - he, Plato and Parents Zhanna.

Malakhov asked if the son of Zhanna and Dmitry and Grandpa seemed to be seen. It turned out that he had not been trying to prevent the meetings of Vladimir and Olga for a long time with Plato: "I told Grandma and Grandfather:" Do not throw a grandson. You know my phone, you know where we live, and where is the playground. " "We will not go, bring it to us," they said. And instead of going to the grandchildren, they appealed to the court that the court define the order of communication. The court appointed: 1.5 hours a month. Is it normal for a family? Not normal. But the court estimated the actions of his grandparents: threats, meetings and then the amount of attention they allocated her grandchildren. "

Dmitry not only spoke to Andrei Malakhov, but also before recording the program was a check on the detector of Lie - he was asked the same questions that sounded during the ether. And the shepels answered only the truth. It should be noted that Vladimir Borisovich also agreed to undergo a check on the polygraph, but I did not find time for it.

Recall that when it became known about Zhanna Friske's disease (she fought with a brain tumor), the first channel together with RusFond organized the collection of funds for the treatment of singer. Collected more than 20 million rubles, but then these money was missing. Vladimir Friske accused of disappearing Shepelev.

One of the main premieres of the new television season in Russia was the show "In fact", which leads Dmitry Shepelev. The rating program has already managed to be in the center of attention and various accusations. "AIF" spoke with Shepelov about how the polygraph works on the program and whether it is possible to lie during the show.

Vladimir Polupanov, "AIF": Dima, what is main idea Programs "actually"?

Dmitry Shepelev:The key idea is to separate the truth from lies. This talk show began as a full-time bet between sometime close people, whose relationships doubted, but did not break the lies to the end, as an opportunity for the first time in a long time, talk perfoching, to ask vitality important questions And get truthful answers. In our studio, it is impossible to lie - the characters are connected to the sensors to the polygraph. This turns each program in a psychological thriller. True, which we learn, can breed people forever or vice versa - to join again, because even they do not always understand what is happening between them really. Today we have expanded the subjects of the programs: the format allows us to speak not only about personal, but also lead our own investigations into high-profile criminal, political events.

I feel in my place. The events of the last few years literally turned my life. There were a lot of lies around, a lot of betrayal and hypocrisy. Correction of the crowd. Therefore, as no one knows how important it is sometimes to find out the truth, to explain the world, as it is important to be heard.

By the way, I myself offered the first to pass testing at the polygraph and answer the questions that our colleagues with you are saved already that year. And after that I think that I have a complete right to ask the frank questions to my guests. I am very proud of this program. Over the summer, we managed to beat ratings not only by old direct competitors (the share of 18%, ed.), But also the rating of our new rivals - former colleagues on the first channel.

- I heard that decetent the detector is still possible. The whole question is how to answer questions.

I do not know how to deceive the detector. I think it is impossible. Before recording the program, our heroes are pre-testing on a polygraph. This is a long process. And only in the studio during the shooting, we finally learn that from those who have been told, and what a lie. This is not a game of detector, but verified and reliable information. On the horse is often the fate of people. Play with this - blasphemy. And we value the reputation. To be clearer, I will give an example. Let's say someone stole family decorations. The heroes are not only asked: did you stole it? And still ask a lot of additional questions. Have you been to this house? Do you know where the decorations were kept? Did you touch them? From the set of answers there is an irrefutable truth, so the polygraph is impossible to deceive. Even if someone succeeds to "slip" the first question, the additional will all equal to clean water. Therefore, often polygraphists do not immediately bring the verdict, but ask additional questions.

By the way, not only a polygraphist - a specialist in working with a polygraph, but also a profiler, who analyzes emotions, the expression of the program Hero of the Program, his speech, imperceptible to the inexperienced observer, signs that can always be understood: a man lies or tells the truth. Sometimes criminalist joins them - a specialist who works with the motives of crimes. Believe me if our specialists are taken for the guest - he does not get out. Lit it is impossible.

- How do you manage to persuade people to participate in the program? What technology is using— torture, blackmail, bribing?

As if loud and pathetic it sounded, but the desire to be heard for many is much more important than anything. People want to defend their truth, and we help them in this.

You yourself were in a similar position and understand that it is very hard to open, tell the details of your personal life before a large audience.

Yes, for me, the very checker on the polygraph and the need to talk about the personal became the hardest shock. The first such interview was devoted to the release of my book "Zhanna" in the fall last year. And the second on the eve of the exit to the ether of the project "in fact". It was damn difficult. But I had the main help - on my side the truth. Therefore, it was not easy to agree to this conversation, but to say the truth turned out to be a great relief. Psychologists know how non-infractions and lies destroy human destinies.

- But you probably pay people money for participation?

Do you really think that money for our person is a decisive argument? Just achieve justice - a much stronger motive. For example, the heroes of one of the programs became the famous 87-year-old actor Ivan Krako and his wife Natalia.which is 60 years old. Surely, you heard what kind of damn they write about these people, which only labels are inspired - whether a joke is such a difference in age.

And this is sincere loving friend A friend of people was vital to explain to the world, answer questions that they do not give rest to the fans: what is this - marriage by calculation? Whim the famous artist? Desire to draw attention to any price? Or sincere love? Isn't that a motive? After that program, I did not find myself places. I understood that asking the frank, sometimes intimate questions, for example, was the proximity between them or not, I did these people hurt and was sure that they were unhappy with the conversation that they were leaving with a hardhery heart. But Krasko himself came up behind the scenes to me: "Thanks for the conversation." And then it became clear that this truth became a heavy, but cleansing, just vital. As sometime for me, talk about Joan, about her illness, about our son and relationships inside the family. Not easy, but vital.

In one of the first programs, the actor Alexey Panin participated. After all that this person has done (sex with a dog, walking naked through the streets in female pantyhose and masturbation), doesn't you cause you feelings of disgust? Why give ether to give these people?

Speaking about me, the last few years they broke me very much, I, in principle, I try not to judge and not condemn. In addition, within the framework of the program, I am not interested in making morality - I do not decide what is good, but what is bad. My personal task is to try to understand the guest. And if the criminal comes to the studio, I will ask: why? And I will try to hear it. This does not mean justify. I did not ask Alexey Panina On the origin of scandalous videos. The topic of the program was another, more important and deep, in my opinion. Between Alexei and his wife an insurmountable conflict, which cost to try to decide. They have common child - 10-year-old girl who, like any child, deserves to grow in peace and harmony. And for the sake of her, they agreed to the conversation, they tried to hear each other. In this I see my task.

- And How? Help them this conversation?

From the studio they gone apart. They could not hear each other. But! Panin on a polygraph responded to fundamental questions: does its packed lifestyle presents danger to a child. Was a daughter witnessed his drunken trunks? No, not. And it was worth it.

- I got the impression that sometimes it truth harms relations, aggravates them.

One of the guests of the program was the actor Konstantin Glushkov. He growing his son, the existence of which he learned only when the boy was 4 years old. He wanted to know whether his child brings up all these years. I asked him more than once: "Are you sure you want to know the whole truth? Is it really true to change your attitude to the son? " "I want," he said. I learned. Son is not him. Glushkov could not resist, jumped out of the studio. It seemed to me that he would just kill his wife. But they reconciled behind the scenes. I agree, not easy truth for them both. But lies and so destroyed their family, and the truth opened the way to understand.

"Dmitry Dibrov in the first issue of the program" Let them say "with Dmitry Borisov said that" Botox, Silicone TV and Dalks with Vodka on the bottom "goes into the past. People are tired of people. It seems to me that Dibrov is mistaken. Such television will never go into the past. What do you think about this?

I am convinced that television should remain socially significant. In my opinion, the story of the "Crystal Boy" Sasha Pushkareva more than history expensive gifts for Anna Kalashnikova. Because he draws to the heart, because it is an example of persistence, an example of dignity!

One of the issues of our program was devoted to a reception daughter. Irina Ponarovskaya. 33 years old girl lived with conviction that adoptive father Wayland Road (former spouse Ponarovskaya) beat it. It cannot lead a single evidence, but claims: Wayland Major Bail me. And with this she lives all his life. Road has passed a polygraph. And it turned out - did not beat! Never beat, but was attentive to her attentive and caring father, and her memories are the fruit of children's fantasy. I am proud of this dramatic program. Because she is responsible, about education, about the attitude towards children. And she took off such a heavy cargo and from Welda, and from his reception daughter.

We called with Dibrov after the record that you mentioned. Long talked. I agree with the arguments of Dmitry: the topic can be some kind of everyday - "Silicone and Botox", unequal marriage, treason, rape, extramarital children. It's all vital. But the task is our television, as I see it, and the skill is to make from life History Not washing dirty linen, but literature. By the way, I encountered leisure opinions: any conversation about the intimate equal to the yellowness. And with this I do not agree. There is nothing more valuable on television than life frankness, especially when it comes to truth and lies and how they change their lives.

It seemed to me that the story of Prokhor Shiayapin was already so many times that could no longer be interested in television. The viewer creates a false impression that the person who is often called "Alfons and Gigolo" - positive hero, since it is so often used on television. Inviting him to the program, you make it free PR.

In our program Shalyapinand Copenkina Passed polygraph. We talked about the childhood of Prokhor and discovered: his mother and his fatherly beat his father, the father was planted, the boy actually grew up without dad. Further more. At 10 years in own home He witnessed the murder of two native women, aunt and grandmother.

- And now he will fly for this to other women?

I believe that nothing passes without a trace. And that prokhor, whom we see today on the screen, with his loud novels and odious tricks, he comes from severe, painful childhood. When in Studio Larisa Copenkin first heard these facts from the biography former husbandShe admitted that he looked at him with other eyes, was able to understand why he was so inexplicable threw her, why at all he comes so recklessly and with other women. In our program, it sounded more than just a dramatic story, the truth sounded. Therefore, it was worth it. Shalyapin and Copenkin, a long time misunderstanding, asked for forgiveness from each other, embraced and left the studio together. In this for me the incredible value of what is happening.

We will move along the path of separation of the truth from Lies, no matter how you call it: scandaling or social responsibility. We are talking on topics that do not leave indifferent. Rape Diana shurgina Lyudmila Porgin And dramatic accident Nikolai Karacantsova. All this is said very much. And what happened to these people in fact, only we said.

- Kohl went about what you think about the transition of Andrei Malakhov on the channel "Russia 1"?

I trusted Andrey the most important interview in my life about Joan, about our Plato, about why it is so carefully storing this personal, as it is important for me, why I struggle to protect my son. Today I understand: stating that he "will help his grandchildren to meet with his grandfather," Andrei comes professionally, but inhuman.

Shepelev admitted that very tired of the scandals that are contrary to the name of Joan. According to a man, he could not close his eyes on the eve of the program. "I did not sleep, I will say honestly, and at the same time I feel a great sense of appreciation for a meeting that we can spend today. I worry, sincerely worried. To my horror and my misunderstanding of Jeanne's story and everything connected with her, do not leave alone. All this continues to discuss, condemn, "said Dmitry.

Shepelev noted that a lot of questions still remain unanswered. According to the TV presenter, he came to the transfer to arrange all the points over "I". Most of all the public concerns the issue of disappearance of funds from the Rusfund accounts, which were collected for the treatment of Friske. Recall that the court ordered all the money of the heirs of the artist, among which Mom and Papa Joan, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich, as well as her son Plato. Dmitry Shepelev on the recovery of millions: "Plato should not answer for it."

"I have to separately say about these money. These are special money to which you can not be treated as papers, this is the equivalent of love. For these money, people throughout Russia and the whole world supported a seriously ill beloved girl Zhanna Friske, "said Shepelev.

The TV host explained that the remaining funds had to go to seriously ill children who need help. Dmitry showed statements from Rosbank's accounts, where the money "Rufonddand" and personal savings of the singer lay. "This written confirmation that was used in court was confirmed by all the means to remove her mother for 10 days to death," Shepelev said.

During the inspection on the detector, Dmitry was asked who paid for the purchase of a country house, which took place at the moment when Jeanne was already sick. According to Shepelev, they purchased a plot for two. "Half at home and half of the land belongs to me. Purchase made together. Repairs was performed on my money, "said the presenter, answering questions from experts.

A few days before the release of the program, Andrei Malakhov met with the Father Zhanna, Vladimir Friske to listen to his position. Papa artists claims that Shepelev did not give a penny of money, but he was constantly only filmed funds from the card. "He is arrogant, people do not consider anyone at all. A person who came from the dirt in the prince. Now he has eight guards, "said Vladimir Borisovich.

"All accounts are empty. These are dry banking statistics, "Shepelev answered it.

According to the journalist, the parents of Zhanna also reset the personal accounts of his daughter. "I do not fit in my head, as seeing a dying daughter, you can go to the bank and think about money. Here I do not understand this, "Dmitry stressed.

In an exclusive report to Shepelev showed the house that they bought with Zhanna. IN this moment Nobody lives there. According to the man, the actress itself was there twice. "It was a notable day. It was winter. We arranged a little picnic at the entrance to the house, drank home wine, ate kebabs, told different stories", I remembered the second trip to the section Dmitry.

"The Son not only remained without mom by tragic circumstancesBut even by virtue of human nonsense and greed remained without a home, "the TV journalist said.

According to the latest data, the cottage has now four owners. In addition to Dmitry and Plato, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich Friske have the right to the house. "I don't need anyone else's, I want my son to live calmly," the TV host said.

Father Zhanna argues that they will go on a lot to see the grandson more often. "I will fight for Plato. What he has the right to select Plato from us. This is our blood there, "said Friske.

Dmitry argues that he does not forbid grandparents and grandfather. On the detector, he honestly admitted that the last meeting took place three weeks ago. "The essence of the conflict is that grandparents do not want to ride the grandson," said Shepelev.

According to the TV presenter, in the future he plans to explain the child the situation. "Regardless of who says: I or the parents of Jeanne, there are pain in us, it is also necessary to make a discount. And you need to believe only your own heart and confidence that it is needed and loved. I hope that this disgusting story will not affect it, "Shepelev said.

According to the lead, he constantly tells the boy about his mother. Dmitry would like in the future Plato could be proud of parents. "Plato came the time of infinite" why. " I answer these questions 1000 times a day ... I speak directly with him. He knows about everything: he knows the mother's voice, knows how mom looks like. By the way, he was in our house and asks: "When will we live in our house?" - told Shepelev.

For Plato, Mom is still alive in songs, films and in his heart. Shepelov condemns the situation. According to the TV presenter, the last communication of the boy with the Friske's family passed quite intense. "It was very hard. After meeting, Plato rose the temperature. I called a doctor. He replied to me that this is an emotional reaction to this meeting. That is why I insist that a psychologist attended the meetings, "Shepelev said.

According to the civilian wife, Zhanna, all claims were filed by the Fir School. The court ruled that one and a half hours a month they can see Plato. Mom who left the life of the singer otherwise represents the whole situation. The program showed an excerpt from another transmission with Olga Vladimirovna, in which she talks about his grandson. "We met in the office of a psychologist in the presence of nanny, Dima. We still guarded eight guards. It was 30-35 minutes, "the woman recalls.

The strong resonance caused the conflict of Vladimir Borisovich and Dmitry Shepelev, when a serious fight was barely between them. "He looks over. They are for him as manure, "says the TV presenter of Pope Friske.

According to Shepelev himself, he admits that the father of the singer can kill him. In this TV journalist admitted during checks on the lie detector. Poligraphologist Roman Ustyuzhanin, who worked with Dmitry commented, his answers. "On the issue with money we have no questions about Dima. He answered him honestly. The question with a grandson took off by itself, because the court decided, "the expert said.

The editors of the program showed the conversation of Vladimir Freica and Dmitry Shepelev. According to this conversation, the journalist threatened. The TV host appealed to law enforcement agencies, but he was refused to initiate a case about the murder. Dmitry does not want to deal with the attraction of the trial, as he is worried about the future of the Son. "For parents Zhanna I like a red rag for a bull. In their eyes, the reason for the loss of the daughter - I, "said Dmitry.

At the end of the program showed how Shepelov pleased Plato. The TV host prepared a surprise for the boy. Plato really loves motorcycles and on the street it was waiting for the iron horse, decorated with balls. "I will tell everyone in kindergarten," said a satisfied child.

Many have been waiting for an answer to two main questions: Dmitry really loved Jeanne and regrets that the day of death was not next to her. The TV journalist really can't forgive himself that he was absent at that time. Then they flew to the sea with Plato. "I love her today," Shepelev said, answering the question of feelings for the singer.