Pavel Petrovich - "Pechorin of small sizes." Do you agree with this statement

Heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Aleksandrovich and Pavel Petrovich - People belonging to one social groupbut living in different time. After the crucifier over the Decembrists in 1825, the generation time was coming about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: "... Before the danger, disgraceful slaves are disgraced and before the rule of gloom ..." This is not said about all young and mature - it is possible about Pechorin. should say how an individual is extraordinary as a very interesting person. It shows his M. Yu. Lermontov, when he draws an unusual portrait of Pechorin, tells about his actions (abduction of white, duel with a pearshnitsky), about friendship with Dr. Werner, single love Pechorina to Lithuanian faith, about the desire of the hero to find his place in life. Pechorin can like or not to like, but it is impossible to stay indifferent. Someone hero has its own straightness, and someone is crubble; One like his sincerity, others see her cruelty. Two or three episodes of the Hero of M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the memory of the reader as an example of honesty, the decency of the hero, for example, an explanation from Prince Mary, and a duel with a pears, when Pechorin gives a chance to a person to recognize his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell with Maxim Maxima - cold, cruel, - it seems, the Pechorin does not like anyone, and this is true.

About Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov essentially nothing to say ... Pose is very short about his behavior. But there are moments that deserve the attention of the reader. In the dispute with the bazaarov Pavel Petrovich Right, arguing that life with her ready, historically grown forms could be smarter than a person or group of persons. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov in contempt for the people, the nihist parries the reproach: "Well, if he deserves contempt!" Kirsanov speaks about Shiller and Goethe, exclaims: "A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than a poet!" etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to the diminishing of the human person before the principles adopted on faith, then the bazaarov approves his own personality to the cost of destruction of authorities.

Pavl Petrovich's youth passed in the 1830s in the atmosphere of a deaf reaction, mature years coincided with a period of "gloomy seven years". He is not able to understand the requirements new era, views young generation He is deeply alien. As Turgenev wrote: "Pee in the face of" fathers "- weakness and lethargy or limitation." Pavel Petrovich considers himself liberal and loving progress. He interprets a lot about the public well, but the rights of the bazaars, when he tells him: "... You respect yourself and sit back; what is the benefit?" All principles of Pavel Petrovich are reduced to one: protect the old one.

Is there anything general about these people - Pechorina and Pavel Petrovich? What did D. I. Pisarev allowed to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with a peopling "small size"? First of all, I think the features of character: selfishness, self-conceit, continuing in judgments, the manner of dressing, staying in society ... In principle, there should be no questions, you simply cannot be compared Paul Petrovich with Pechorin.

At the end of Roman I. S. Turgenev, told about the stay of P. P. Kirsanov in Dresden, as if he puts the point in this comparison: "... between two and four hours, on the most luxurious time for a walk, you can meet a person about about fifty ... elegantly dressed ... it's Pavel Petrovich. Here he knew more with the British and with the visitors of Russians, in a conversation with which he gives the will of his bile ... He does not read anything Russian, but he has a silver writing desk Ashtray in the form of a Menietian laptia. He is still noise ... "

That's all. In the preface to the novel "Hero of our time", M. Yu. Lermontov offered such an observation to the reader: "The history of the soul of human, at least the smallest soul, is hardly curious and not more useful than the history of the whole people." This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Paul Petrovich Kirsanov, he is not interested. So judge: Is the senior kirsanov look like "Little Pechorina"? No, of course not! With all due respect for judgments, Dmitry Ivanovich Pisareva ...

How to download a free writing? . And reference to this essay; Pavel Petrovich - "Pechorin of small sizes." Do you agree with this statement D. I. Pisarev? (According to the novels of the "Hero of Our Time" M. Yu. Lermontov "and" Fathers and Children "I. S. Turgenev") already in your bookmarks.

Quoted1 \u003e\u003e Pavel Petrovich - "Pechorin of small sizes". Do you agree with this statement D. I. Pisarev? (according to the novels of the "Hero of Our Time" M. Yu. Lermontov "and" Fathers and Children "I. S. Turgenev")

Heroes Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov are people belonging to one social group, but living at different times. After the crucifier over the Decembrists in 1825, the generation time was coming about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: "... Before the danger, disgraceful slaves are disgraced and before the rule of gloom ..." This is not said about all young and mature - it is possible about Pechorin. It should be said as an extraordinary person, as
I. S. Turgenev worked on the novel "Fathers and Children" in the early 60s of the XIX century. The romance reflected the processes occurring in Russia at this time: the struggle of the political forces of liberals and revolutionaries-Democrats. The heroes of the novel are representatives of two ideological camps: Liberal Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and the revolutionary Democrat Evgeny Bazarov. Evgeny Bazarov is young, energetic, deliver. He does not take anything on faith and denies any principles. In his worldview, he materialist, a man who has passed school
The nature of the conflict in the novel is based primarily not on age, but on public contradictions. In the 60s of the XIX century in public Life Russia appeared two directions: Democrats, the differences and liberals. The nature of the struggle of these currents and is reflected in the work. Roman ( immortal work) It has a special composition: it is built in the form of dialogue, political disputes. There are 28 chapters here, and the last chapter acts as an epilogue, and all the chapters follow one after another according to the principle of "for" and
Kirill Petrovich Troekurov is one of the main heroes of Roman A. S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky". This is an old Russian barin. Thanks to his wealth and fame, he felt above all the neighbors in the province. Kirill Petrovich loved to arrange lush evenings with rouse fun. No one and never could dare to abandon the offer of the Barin, afraid to angry it. He, in turn, was pleased with the flattery, which his guests crushed. Barin never missed the case boasts
I. S. Turgenev, according to his contemporaries, owned a special senior to guess the movement nasty in society. In the novel "Fathers and Children", Turgenev showed the main public conflict The 60s of the XIX century - the conflict between the courses-liberals and democratic differences. The main principle of building a novel - antithesis; And this can be seen from the name of the novel, in which two generations are opposed to: the older and the youngest. But in the novel itself, the conflict is not age-related, but ideological nature, i.e. it
They are the best of nobles - and precisely because they are chosen by me to prove their inconsistency. I. S. Turgenev in alarming, full of dramatic events time appeared best work I. S. Turgenev - Roman "Fathers and Children". The world split. how true artist Turgenev was faithful to the truth of life, showing the opposition of the suspended and new, nagging. Kirsanov - not the worst representatives of the nobles. Their Father is a combat general, a 20012 war member. Semi-graphite himself, he gave the best education for that time to children.

Is it possible to agree with the thought of criticism of Pisarev that Pavel Kirsanov is a hero of Pechorinsky type?

Work A.S. Pushkin "Yevgeny Onegin" was completed in 1830. The end of the end of the Roman M.Yu. Lermontov "Hero of Our Time" - 1841

Thus, the main heroes of the works of Pushkin and Lermontov are divided into time only ten years: Onegin from the era of the twenties, Pechorin is the "hero ... of the time" of the thirties.

In his article "Bazarov" literary critic DI. Pisarev notes in them the features " unnecessary people"That" did not fit "into the usual forms of life, did not find their calling, did not determine for themselves the main, authentic interest that could make the meaning of their existence.

"At any time," writes a critic, "people lived in the world, dissatisfied with life in general or some forms of life in particular."

To the category of such people belong to Onegin and Pechorin.

"... the inaccessibility and vulgarity of life are soul of Onegin." He cannot be content with the fact that it is so happy, so happy proud of mediocrity. " (V. Belinsky. "Overactions of Alexander Pushkin".)

Exactly, according to the critic Belinsky, "light empty" is the environment that ruined top Qualities Soul Onegin.

Grigory Pechorin in Roman M.Yu. Lermontov "Hero of Our Time" - Nature contradictory. "The forces are immense" did not appear in the life of this person gifted by nature. Therefore, the hero is unhappy, so "he is chasing himself for life, looking for it everywhere." Pechorin seeks to embody his "High" appointment, "he is looking for genuine values \u200b\u200bin life. However, it turns out that his strength is wasted, and the events and people encountered on the way are too simple and uncomplicated for him.

And what can be the happiness of Pechorina?

He dreams of "everyone loved", but devotees, selfless, loving soul, as it seems to him, no near. Gregory Aleksandrovich loves Mary, Faith, Bala, Maxim Maximych, good friendship, but he quickly "solves them" and loses interest to them. He himself "fucked by the baits of passions of empty and ungrateful".

Pechistine nature is very deep. Time will come, and Pechorin, having survived passion and doubts, will become another - man, strong spirit, clever and vitality. This is the opinion of the critic of Belinsky.

Pavel Petrovich in Roman I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Children" can not be called the hero of Pechorinsky type, although these two people are similar. His upbringing, lightness, aristocracy, wealth give rise to a sense of superiority over other people. He, in essence, the peer of Pechorina, also experiencing the influence of his difficult time, the era of "timeless". But throwing Pecherin is unusual. He believes that irresistible. As a secular lion, a man of rare fate, he is sure that his luck, success in his career is given to him right.

Unhappy love broke it, took away from him best years Life.

At the same time, Pavel Petrovich has always been a self-free man, and it was more important for him than to be more important.

Pechorin, with his ardent moral moral and desire to "fool" (expression of Pisareva), a person is much more sincere and open to people than Kirsanov.

Pechorina Criticism assesses as an "excess person" that is a conflict with its time, medium.

Heroes Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov are people belonging to one social group, but living at different times. After the violence over the Decembrists in 1825, the time of generation was coming about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: "... Before the danger, the contemptuous slaves are disgracefully and before the rule ..." it is not said about all young and mature - it is possible about Pechorin. It should be said as an individual, as an extraordinary person, as a very interesting person. This shows him M. Yu. Lermontov, when he draws an unusual portrait of Pechorina, talks about his actions (abduction of Bella, Duel with Hushchnitsky), about friendship with Dr. Werner, about the only love of Pechorin to faith Lithuanian, about the desire of the hero find his place in life . Pechorin can like or not to like, but it is impossible to stay indifferent. Someone hero has its own straightness, and someone is crubble; One like his sincerity, others see her cruelty. Two or three episodes of the Hero of M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the memory of the reader as an example of honesty, the decency of the hero, for example, an explanation from Prince Mary, and a duel with a pears, when Pechorin gives a chance to a person to recognize his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell with Maxim Maxima - cold, cruel, - it seems, the Pechorin does not like anyone, and this is true.

About Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov essentially nothing to say ... Pose is very short about his behavior. But there are moments that deserve the attention of the reader. In the dispute with the bazaarov Pavel Petrovich Right, arguing that life with her ready, historically grown forms could be smarter than a person or group of persons. Pavel Petrovich reproaches the Bazarov in contempt for the people, the nihist parries the reproach: "Well, if he deserves contempt!" Kirsanov speaks about Shiller and Goethe, Bazarov exclaims: "The decent chemist is twenty times more useful than a poet!" etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to the diminishing of the human person before the principles adopted on faith, then the bazaarov approves his own personality to the cost of destruction of authorities.

Pavle Petrovich's youth passed in the 1830s in the atmosphere of a deaf reaction, mature years coincided with the period of "gloomy seven years". He is not able to understand the requirements of the new era, the views of the younger generation to him deeply alien. As Turgenev wrote: "Pee in the face of" fathers "- weakness and lethargy or limitation." Pavel Petrovich considers himself liberal and loving progress. He interprets a lot about public well, but the rights of the bazaars, when he tells him: "... You respect yourself and sit back; Which of this benefit? " All principles of Pavel Petrovich are reduced to one: protect the old order.

Is there anything general about these people - Pechorina and Pavel Petrovich? What did D. I. Pisarev allowed to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanova with a "small size" people? First of all, I think the features of character: selfishness, self-conceit, continuing in judgments, the manner of dressing, staying in society ... In principle, there should be no questions, you simply cannot be compared Paul Petrovich with Pechorin.

At the end of Roman I. S. Turgenev, told about the stay of P. P. Kirsanova in Dresden, as if he puts the point in this comparison: "... between two and four hours, on the most luxurious time for a walk, you can meet a person about about fifty ... elegantly dressed ... it is Pavel Petrovich. Here he knows more with the British and with the visitors of Russian, in a conversation with whom he gives the will of his bile ... He does not read anything Russian, but in the writing desk he has a silver ashtray in the form of a Menietian laptia. He is still noise ... "

That's all. In the preface to the novel "Hero of our time" M. Yu. Lermontov offered such an observation to the reader: "The history of the human soul, at least the smallest soul, is hardly more curious and not more pleasant to the history of the whole people." This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Paul Petrovich Kirsanov, he is not interested. So judge: Is the senior Kirsanov look like "Little Pechorina"? No, of course not! With all due respect for judgments, Dmitry Ivanovich Pisareva ...

Option number 379573.

The answer to the tasks 1-7 is the word, or phrase, or the sequence of numbers. Record answers without spaces, commas and other additional characters; Do not copy the words-responses from the browser, enter them by typing from the keyboard. On tasks 8-9, give a connected response in the amount of 5-10 sentences. By performing the task 9, select two works of different authors for comparison (in one example, it is permissible to appeal to the execution of the author to which the source text belongs); Indicate the names of the works and surname of the authors; Justify your choice and compare the works with the text proposed in the specified direction of analysis.

Performing tasks 10-14 is a word, or phrase, or a sequence of numbers. Performing the task 15-16, rely on copyright, if necessary, set out your point of view. Argument the answer, relying on the text of the work. By performing the task 16, select two works of different authors for comparison (in one example, it is permissible to appeal to the execution of the author to which the source text belongs); Indicate the names of the works and surname of the authors; Justify your choice and compare the works with the text proposed in the specified direction of analysis.

On the task 17, give a detailed argumental response in the composition of the composition of at least 200 words (an essay of less than 150 words is estimated by zero points). Analyze literary work, relying on the position of the author, attracting the necessary theoretical literary concepts. Given the answer, follow the norms of speech.

If the option is specified by the teacher, you can enter answers to the tasks of the part with or download them to the system in one of the graphic formats. The teacher will see the results of the tasks of the part in and will be able to evaluate the downloaded answers to Part S. The scores issued by the teacher will be displayed in your statistics.

Printing and copying version in MS Word

C17.1. Why two outstanding personalities are Onegin and Tatiana, - could not find happiness in love? (According to the novel by A. S. Pushkin "Evgeny Onegin")

C17.2. Do you agree with the opinion of D. I. Pisarev, who claims that Pavel Petrovich is a hero of Pechorinsky type? (According to Roman I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Children")

C17.3. What are all the characters of the play by A. P. Chekhov "Cherry Garden"?

C17.4. Hero - character - a deed in modern domestic prose. (On the example of one of the works.)

To complete the task, select only one of the four proposed works (17.1-17.4). Write an essay on this topic in an amount of at least 200 words (with a volume of less than 150 words, the essay is estimated 0 points).

Open the work of the compositions is full and multidimensional.

Argument your theses analysis of the elements of the text of the work (in writing on lyrics it is necessary to analyze at least three poems).

Reveal the role artistic means, important for disclosure the topic of essay.

Think over the composition composition.

Avoid actual, logical, speech errors.

Writing Write clearly and picking up, observing the norms of written speech.

C17.1. Why in the final of the sixth chapter of Roman A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin" sounds the topic of farewell to the author with young people, poetry and romanticism?

C17.2. What symbolizes the fate of Mr. San Francisco and who else from the writers of the twentieth century appealed to the topic "full"?

C17.3. Why did Sofya prefer the brilliant chavkom's imperceptible silence?

C17.4. Why in the work of V. Shukshina dispute between the city and the village always resolved in favor of the village?

Solutions of the tasks of part are not checked automatically.
On the next page you will be asked to check them yourself.

To complete the task, select only one of the four proposed works (17.1-17.4). Write an essay on this topic in an amount of at least 200 words (with a volume of less than 150 words, the essay is estimated 0 points).

Open the work of the compositions is full and multidimensional.

Argument your theses analysis of the elements of the text of the work (in writing on lyrics it is necessary to analyze at least three poems).

Reflect the role of artistic agents important to disclosure the theme of the essay.

Think over the composition composition.

Avoid actual, logical, speech errors.

Writing Write clearly and picking up, observing the norms of written speech.

C17.1. What gave the foundation of F. M. Dostoevsky to assert that the main character of Roman A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin" should recognize Tatyana Larina?

C17.2. Is it unambiguous to say that the conflict of Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov are ideological differences? (According to Roman I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Children")

C17.3. Is Margarita look like a heroine of previous literature or it new Type Heroine? (According to the novel M. A. Bulgakov "Master and Margarita)

C17.4. How is the topic "Man and War" theme reveals in the work (the work is chosen by students)?

Solutions of the tasks of part are not checked automatically.
On the next page you will be asked to check them yourself.

To complete the task, select only one of the four proposed works (17.1-17.4). Write an essay on this topic in an amount of at least 200 words (with a volume of less than 150 words, the essay is estimated 0 points).

Open the work of the compositions is full and multidimensional.

Argument your theses analysis of the elements of the text of the work (in writing on lyrics it is necessary to analyze at least three poems).

Reflect the role of artistic agents important to disclosure the theme of the essay.

Think over the composition composition.

Avoid actual, logical, speech errors.

Writing Write clearly and picking up, observing the norms of written speech.

C17.1. How revealed in the novel by A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin" "Russian Soul" Tatiana?

C17.2. Why can Bazarov be called a "reflecting nihilist"? (According to Roman I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Children".)

C17.3. How in the story of M. A. Sholokhov "The Fate of Human" is expressed by the humanistic protest of the writer against the inhumanity of the war?

C17.4. The topic of the revolution I. civil War In the works domestic literature (On the example of one or two works).

I think the critic is right in your estimates. Turgenev deliberately emphasized the image of the Bazarov using dialogs. Disputes make it possible to understand deeper life principles acting persons. The main opponent of the hero is the retired officer of Kirsanov. The author is confronted in the novel two extremes - nihilista and aristocrat, showing the need to search for a golden middle.

Pavel Petrovich about 45 years old.

He was born at one time with Lermontov, his personality was formed in the 30s, in an atmosphere, generating "extra" people such as Pecherin. Probably, this would look like the aged Lermontov hero. In his youth, Pavlu Petrovich was also characterized by skepticism, bile, "proud contempt" and boiling "in action empty". Drawing the image of Kirsanova, Turgenev notes that he was self-confident and mocked, it was waiting for a brilliant career, but rocky love changed the fate of the nobleman.

Roman is permeated by worldview disputes. Composite B. art plan The scene of the dispute between the heroes in the tenth chapter is important. Pavel Petrovich proves: without "prunps" only empty and immoral people can live. It is necessary to be guided by clear rules, even if they have evoked their own. Evgeny Vasilyevich parries the fact that "spinning" is a meaningless foreign word. At Kirsanov's bumps in contempt for the people, the bazaars straight explains his attitude towards a ignorant man: "Well, if he deserves contempt!".

The author attracts in an open radicalism of the hero the lack of pretendation, contempt for high-pass phrases and rush to practical matters. Evgeny Silen in the chinds of conservatism Kirsanov, in criticism of the puffy and the boric style of Russian liberals. He rightly notices that Pavel Petrovich operates smart wordsbut sits folded hands.

The resolution of the ideological dispute occurs only in the 24th chapter, where it is narrated by a duel between opponents. This episode has become a natural consequence of the development of the plot. Already after a duel, Kirsanov-Sr. is recognized by the brother: "I begin to think that Bazarov was right when I reproached me in aristocratism." As farm people, in his opinion, it's time to stop breaking and thinking about society, it is necessary to postpone the bustle to the side.

In the finals of Roman Turgenev, it makes its sentence to conservatism, describing how Pavel Petrovich drank his forehead and predicted: "... The walled head was lying on a white pillow, like a dead head ... Yes, he was the dead." This offer is the final point in the dispute of the old and the new one, which the author himself put.

Effective preparation for the exam (all objects) -