Syntactic disclation. Selling proposals in parts of speech online

1. Describe the proposal for the purpose of the statement: a narrative, questional or motivating.
2. According to emotional color: exclamation or non-visible.
3. According to the presence of grammatical foundations: simple or complex.
4. Then, depending on whether a simple offer or complex:

An example of a simplicity of a simple sentence

Interpretation:

Proposal narrative, non-promotional, simple, twisted, grammatical basis: pupils and students learnCompleted, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

Writing:

Narrative, unkonsectative, simple, double, grammatical basis pupils and students learnCompleted complicated by homogeneous subjects.

Sample discretion sample

Interpretation:

Proposal narrative, non-promotional, complex, communication union, communication means because, complex proposal. The first simple proposal: Single-part, with the main member - the fag not askedcommon not complicated. Second simple sentence: double, grammatical basis we went with the classroom,common, not complicated.

Writing:

Narrative, unkonsectative, complicated, communication union, communication means submissions because, NGN.

1st PP: Single-part, with the main member - the fault not askedcommon not complicated.

2nd PP: twisted, grammatical basis - we went with the classroom,credited, not complicated.

Example of the scheme (offer, after it scheme)

Another option of the syntactic parsing

Syntactic analysis. The procedure for syntaxially.

In phrases:

1. We allocate the necessary phrase from the offer.
2. We consider the structure - we allocate the main word and dependent. We indicate which part of the speech is the main and dependent word. Next, we specify how this phrase is connected with this syntax.
3. And finally, we indicate how his grammatical meaning is.

In a simple sentence:

1. Determine what the proposal for the purpose of the statement is a narrative, motivating or questional.
2. We find the foundation of the offer, we establish that the proposal is simple.
3. Next, you need to talk about how this offer is built.
   • Twisted it, or a single one. If one-point, then define the type: personal, impersonal, called or vaguely personal.
   • Common or non-proliferated
   • Incomplete or complete. If the proposal is incomplete, then it is necessary to specify which member of the sentence is missing in it.
4. If this offer has something complicated, be it homogeneous members or separate members of the sentence, it is necessary to note.
5. Next, you need to take the analysis of the sentences on members, while pointing to what parts of speech they are. It is important to comply with the procedure for parsing. First, the previously defined and subject is determined, then the minor, which are included in the first - to be subject to, then the faithful.
6. We explain why someone somehow placed the signs of punctuation in the sentence.

Predicate

1. We note what is the leakable - simple verb or composite (nominal or verb).
2. Indicate what is expressed by the lean:
   • simple - what form of the verb;
   • composite verbous - from which it consists;
   • compound nominal - What a bunch is used than the name is expressed.

In a sentence, having homogeneous members.

If we have a simple proposal, then when it is planned, it should be noted that this is for homogeneous members of the sentence and how they are connected with each other. Either by intonation, or intonation with alliances.

In offers with separate members:

If we have a simple sentence, then when it is analysis, it should be noted than turnover will be. Next, we disassemble the words that are included in this turnover.

In suggestions with separate member of speech:

First, we note that in this sentence, there is direct speech. We indicate the direct speech and text of the author. We disassemble, explain why so, and not otherwise the signs of punctuation in the proposal are arranged. Almighty scheme offer.

In a complex sentence:

First, we indicate which proposal for the purpose of the statement is a questionnaire, narrative or motivating. We find simple proposals in the proposal, we allocate the grammatical foundation in them.

We find unions with the help of which simple proposals are connected in the complex. We note that this is for alliances - opposing, connecting or dividing. Determine the value of all this complex proposal - contrasting, alternation or enumeration. Explain why it is in this way that the signs of punctuation are placed in the proposal. Then every simple sentence, of which it consists of complex, it is necessary to disassemble the same way as a simple sentence.

In a complex proposal with the apparent (one)

First, we indicate what proposal is to the goal of the statement. We allocate the grammatical basis of all simple proposals, of which it consists of complex. We read them.

We call what proposal is the main thing, and what is the apparent. We explain what kind of complex proposal it is, we pay attention to how it is built than connecting the appling to the main offer and what it applies to.

We explain why this is how the punctuation marks in this proposal are placed. Then, the appropriate and main proposal should be disassembled, therefore, as simple sentences are dealt.

In a complex proposal with pressing (several)

We call what proposal is on the purpose of the statement. We highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences, of which it consists of difficult, we read them. We indicate which proposal is the main thing, and what is the apparent. It is necessary to specify what is subordination in the proposal - either this is parallel submission or consistent or uniform. If there is a combination of several types of subordination, it must be noted. We explain why, thus, the proposals are placed punctuation marks. And at the end, we make the analysis of the apparent and main proposals as simple offers.

In a complex non-union sentence:

We call what proposal is on the purpose of the statement. We find the grammatical basis for all simple sentences, of which this complex offer consists. We read them, call the number of simple proposals that are part of the complex. We define what the relationship between simple proposals is in meaning. This may be a sequence, reason with the consequence, opposition, simultaneity, explanation or addition.

We note what the features of the structure of this proposal, which particular proposal it is. Than in this offer are connected simple and what they relate to.

Explain why it is in this way that the signs of punctuation are placed in the proposal.

In a complex sentence, in which there are different types of communication.

We call how the purpose of the statement is this proposal. We find and highlight the grammatical basis of all simple proposals, of which it consists of difficult, we read them. We establish that this offer will be a proposal in which there are different types of communication. Why? We determine which links are present in this offer - allied writing, supervisory or other.

In meaning, we establish how simple suggestions are formed in the complex sentence. We explain why it is thus placed in the proposal of punctuation marks. All simple suggestions, of which are composed of complex, disassemble as a simple proposal.

All for study »Russian language» Syntactic disclation

To add a page to bookmarks, press Ctrl + d.

When working with various texts, many need to make out a proposal for its composition. The implementation of such a parsing usually suggests the presence of relevant philological knowledge, capable of helping in a correct analysis of the text you need. At the same time, the network also exists services that perform operations on the syntactic disable offer online. After a thorough study of the rules for the analysis of different proposals in composition, I decided to set out all my developments in this article.

At the beginning, I note that the expression "analysis of proposals in composition" is somewhat incorrect, since according to the composition, words usually disassemble, and what interests us in this case are called "Syntactic Debriefing".

At the same time, the specified syntactic analysis (in school it is also called "analysis of members") is usually performed as follows:

• Decide which analyzed proposal for his statement (narrative, questioning or is a wonderful nature);
• Indicate the emotional color of the sentence (it is exclaiming or not exclaiming);
• Mark the number of grammatical foundations in this offer (if the suggestion is simple, then the basis, if complex - two or more);

If the offer is simple:

An example of a simple sentence:

"It was an extraordinary autumn day!"

After conducting a syntactic analysis, we can see that this proposal is a narrative, exclamation, simple, twisted, complete, not complicated.

If the offer is complex:

• Decide with the connection in a complex proposal - allied or non-union;
• Indicate the connection used in the proposal - intonation, the verbulent, writing;
• Specify the type of complex proposal - the non-union, complex, complex.

An example of a complex sentence:

"The bouquet had roses and lilies, but she liked the tulips more."

After a syntactic analysis of this offer, we can see that this proposal has a narrative nature, not exclaiming, complex, has an allied connection, complex. The first proposal here is a double, the grammatical framework is the words "roses and lilies were", it is common, and complicated by homogeneous subjects.

The second proposal in this complex proposal is a two-stroke, its grammatical basis are the words "tulips liked", the proposal is common, and not complicated.

Services to pave a proposal for the composition online

Due to the wealth of grammatical structures, and the complexity of creating a powerful network tool for text syntactic analysis, presented in the network services (koi) have rather weak opportunities to carry out a full syntactic analysis of proposals. Nevertheless, I would allocate the following resources:

Seosin.ru.

Among Russian-speaking resources for conducting semantic analysis online (De Facto, they are practically not represented) I would allocate the service seosin.ru. It allows you to determine syntactic and morphological errors, demonstrates the general associativity of the text, performs other types of analysis. Unfortunately, the service does not always work stably, dysfunctions are often observed in its work.

1. To work with this service, go to the site seosin.ru.
2. Enter your offer to the corresponding window, and click on "analyze".

Lexisrex.com.

Lovers of English in syntactic analysis can help a powerful linguistic resource Lexisrex.com. Its capabilities allow us to analyze the proposal for its members. At the same time, this site also has other auxiliary tools for the implementation of various types of linguistic analysis online.

1. To work with this resource, log in to the LEXISRX.COM website.
2. Insert your offer to the appropriate window, and click on the Analyze button.

Linguist Forums

In the syntactic analysis of the proposal online, you can contact the help of the "human factor", and go to a variety of linguistic forums (level gramota.turbotext.ru, rusforus.ru and analogues). Register there, ask your question, and you will help you.

Conclusion

Network resources that make it possible to analyze proposals in composition, have a rather poor character, which is associated with the difficulties of creating such resources. Nevertheless, there are several such tools in the network (most of them are English), allowing us to easily hold the text analysis we need. Use the functionality of these services to parse the necessary proposals, and the online syntactic analysis.

In contact with

Suggestions, he is a parsement in composition, one of the first to learn Russian. Question: How to make out a proposal for the composition? " - At first, it causes many difficulties, but in fact everything is much easier than it seems at first glance.

The basis of the sentence

Let's start with the fact that each proposal has a basis - to be both faithful. Usually subject to, when parsing it is emphasized by one line, expresses what is said in the sentence (has come night; They are Finally were able to build a house; Book was put on the shelf). The subject always stands in the nominative case - this is one of its main signs.

Rights with the subject to the subject - a member of the sentence, which describes the actions performed with the subject, as well as its condition ( Came dawn; Bridge was opened; Night quiet), it is emphasized with the analysis of the previous two features. By the number of foundations, simple and complex suggestions are divided: in the first case, the basis is only one (the sky stassed Dark tuchi), and in the second - their two or more ( The sun disappeared - Sky stassed Dark tuchi).

Minor members

In order to understand how to properly disassemble the proposal in composition, you first need to become familiar with all its members. We have already figured out the main toed and fault. Let's turn to secondary.

Supplement is a member of the sentence, most often pronounced by nouns or pronoun with pretexts and without them and answering questions of indirect cases (that is, all, except for the nominative): see (what?) on the horizon; Below (from what?) from this; Let's discuss (what?) the main thing; Tomorrow is not like (what?) for today - That is, various parts of speech can act as a supplement, but in its semantic meaning they equate to the noun.

Definition describes items in the proposal, answering how to questions? whose? The complexity of them is that they can be consistent (that is, completely coincide in the face, childbirth, the number, the case with the word they describe) and inconsistent (represented by phrases with the adjoining and control). Compare: Book shelf hung on the wall and On the wall hung shelf for books. In both cases, you can ask a question what?,consequently, in both cases, in the proposal there is a consistent and inconsistent definition, respectively.

How to disassemble a proposal in composition, not knowing about the existence of circumstances? The circumstance is responsible for nareny questions, it can also describe the image of action, and its time, and circumstances are probably the most extensive member of the sentence: we met (where?) on the square; (when?) Tomorrow I will refuse this proposal; He (how?) free spoke English; He turned pale (why?) from anger; I came (why?) talk; I will go (despite what?), despite on the storm; He is beautiful (how?), as a summer day. Sometimes the circumstance is confused with the addition, but still with questions of indirect case, circumstances look somewhat unnaturally, whether the matter is an impregnation.

Second Communication and Main

Now that we already know which members of the sentence exist, it is worth adding something that each of the secondary is associated with one of the main ones. The definition, for example, is part of the subject, that is, the questions are set to it that this is this main member of the sentence; As for the addition and circumstances, they are associated with the fag.

Designation of membership members

It is still necessary to dwell on how they are referred to those or other members of the sentence. As mentioned above, subject to and the surehead is emphasized by one and two lines, respectively.

The addition is denoted by the dotted line, the determination is a wavy, and the circumstance is a barcode (that is, dotted with points). Now, when we know how to disassemble the proposal in the composition and emphasize its members, let us try to practice specific examples.

First Practice: Simple Offer

So, we present the following example of the proposal:

In a hot afternoon, a young man in the garden shadow read a book.

We start with the basics. This proposal speaks about the young man who read the book, in addition, it is this member of the sentence that is in the nominative case, that is, we are subject to. The actions performed by the subject, describes the verb "read" means it is he who is a surehead. Thus, the basis of the sentence young man readingexcept this basis, there are no others in the proposal, that is, the suggestion is simple. Members of the proposal directly related to the subject, no. Go to the search for add-ons: read (what?) Book. As for circumstances, the situation here is a little more interesting: read (when?) In (hot) noon - you can perceive all the phrase as the circumstance of time, and you can also add a definition: at noon (what?) Roast. The same with the circumstance of the place: read (where?) In the shade (garden) - also develops to another addition: in the shade (what?) Garden.

That is, the analysis of the proposal on the composition will look like this (members of the sentence are indicated in brackets): In hot(ODA) noon(Once) Junior(P) in the shadow(Once) Garden(e) was reading (from) Book(e) .

Task Second: An example of a discrepan offer

But we remember that there are simple and complex offers. How to act in the second case? Let's try first find the foundations:

From the early morning it was raining, and the sky was black yesterday.

In this sentence, as can be seen, the two subjects that we are talking about, and they are not interconnected. Consequently, there are two foundations. Considering the first part of the proposal, to the comma, we discover that the basis here it was raining, whereas in the second - the sky was black. The next step we work with secondary members of each part of the sentence: went (since when?) since morning (circumstance), in the morning (what?) early (definition); It was black (what?) yesterday (addition). That is, to parse a complex sentence, we work separately with each part of it.

Fix the analysis of the complex sentence

Knowing how to disassemble a complex proposal in composition, let's try to consolidate our knowledge.

In the courtyard stood the regiment of extruded soldiers; Yard girls with admiration chased on them.

And again we see that there are two foundations in the offer. We work with the first part of it: subject - the regiment, the taught - stood, that is, the first base - regiment stood. Go to secondary members: Standing (where?) in the courtyard - circumstance, regiment (whom?) - soldier - Supplement, soldier (what?) - exhausted - Definition. Go to the second part: Girls are subject to, glazed - failed: the second base girls glaze. Girls (what?) - yard - Definition, chased (How?) - with admiration - The circumstance, caught (for whom?) - on them - addition.

How to make out a proposal for the composition? Allocate all its members! That is, after the syntax parsing, the proposal will have the following form:

In the courtyard(Once) stood(from) regiment(P) Exhausted(ODA) soldier(e) ; dv.ouri (oRD) Girls(P) with admiration (oops) chased (from) on them(D. ).

Conclusion

As you can see, in how to disassemble the proposal in the composition, there is nothing complicated. The analysis begins with the search for the main members - the foundations of the proposal. From them, then questions are already asked for secondary sentences. At the end of the pars, all members emphasize a certain type of lines, which clearly demonstrates their availability in the proposal.

Often, users are looking for a way to dismiss the offer in the Internet online. This is necessary not only to schoolchildren in preparing homework, but also to people who are students in philology universities and linguistics. And also to all who have to work with the text every day. To make a syntactic analysis of the proposal, a person must have the necessary knowledge in this area. To facilitate this process, you can contact special online services. Below we will analyze several best sites on the automatic part of the sentence on the part of speech.

Such a parsement in primary and secondary schools is called "analysis of the sentences." Sometimes they say "analysis of proposals in composition", but this expression is somewhat incorrect, because according to the composition it is customary to disassemble words.

To make a syntactic analysis of the sentence:

The presence of syntactic designs of the proposal, its parameters, as well as the wealth of design options create large barriers to the developers when creating online service to disable the offer. Therefore, such services in the network are not so much. But they still have.

Goldlit - Morphological and Syntactic Development Service

Very convenient Goldlit service. Simple design and understandable interfaces make the site available to people, with different levels of computer knowledge. In the top line of the menu are 3 points with a drop-down list.

1. The main menu is a list from the main partitions of the site.
2. Literature - in the drop-down menu list of Russian and foreign literature, as well as the analysis of poems - what the poet wants to say in them.
3. Chronology - literature, placed in the centuries.

To take advantage of proposals in parts of speech on the GoldLit.ru service:

1. Go to the site - http://goldlit.ru/.
2. The menu contains the line in which you want to enter text to pars.
3. Next to the text input window is the "Disband" button.

Immediately under the line of input text, in the yellow field go in a row down blocks with a parsing. Each block is one word from the sentence. They alternate in the same order, as alternate words in the sentence. Parts block:

1. A word that stands in the initial form.
2. The second string is part of the speech, which is the word.
3. Grammar. They are written through the comma number, quality, animated form, genus, etc.
4. Forms. All existing forms of the word (with consoles, suffixes, chain).

Seosin - a site that has a sentence analysis service for speech parts

One of the well-known resources on the Internet, which provides a tool for and morphological separation of the offer online. In addition, the site offers other services for working with text, for example. As well as on working with other files, such as images and photography. The site periodically has access problems, although the administrator writes in ads on the site that the situation with the server has been fixed.

To check the text in the service:

1. Go through this link - http://www.seosin.ru/.
2. Enter the text to analyze in the service field.
3. Click the "Analyze" button.

After a few seconds, you will be given the analysis of your text with explanations.

Other sites and on the analysis of proposals in parts of speech

In addition to automatic services online, there are also special sites on which all the necessary information is provided, which will be required for the syntactic and morphological separation of the offer. One of these sites is - Soudta.rf. For schoolchildren, he will be indispensable. As for the Russian language, here you will find sections:

• Word is the basic spells of words with pretexts, particles, word transfer, etc. ().
• Together or separately adjective, nouns, alliances, interjections.
• Unstressed particles "not" and "ne"
• Rules of writing consonants - double "NN", "LJ".
• The consonants who are written behind the hips - "Well, h, sh, sh."
• Spelling of vowels.
• Unstressed heads.
• The letters "b" and "b".
• Sentence.
• Abbreviation.
• Capital letters.

From the first class of schoolchildren introduced various types of linguistic parsing. It all starts with the division of the lexemes on syllables and sounds. In the second grade is added - the next unit with which children should meet. Let's talk about how to properly perform a syntactic analysis and with what difficulties can be encountered here.

Grammatical basis

Offer is a syntactic unit consisting of words related to each other. It conveys a relatively complete thought. The disclation of the proposal in the composition involves the definition of roles that separate words perform.

• Subject to which calls the subject or object of speech. It answers the identity of the nominative case: "Who? What?". Most often subject to name noun (cat sleeps) or pronoun (I went). When parsing, this member of the proposal is emphasized by one line.
• The fault, telling about what happened to the subject. Most often, the question is asked: "What does?", Although other options are possible (what is he? What?). Usually, the role of the faucet is the verb, but there are exceptions (this person is my father). Emphasize him with two features.

The proposal may be attended by both main member or one of them. For example: "Winter. Lights."

Minor members

The grammatical basis is the necessary attribute of any offer. But the secondary members are not always present. Before analyzing the proposal of proposals in composition, remember them.

• The definition describes the subject by calling its signs. I ask questions: "What / Aya / OE / IE?" or "whose?". Most often, this role is performed by adjectives or communion. When parsing, the definition is made to designate a wavy feature.
• Supplement specifies information about the subject and answers questions of any case, except for a nominative (what? O whom? What?). Often they turn out to be nouns. Emphasize the addition to the dotted line.
• The circumstance tells about the features of the action: its goals, place, reason, time, etc. This member of the sentence answers questions: "How? Where? Where? Why? When? Where? Why?". Often expressed by noun, adorption, verbalism. Allocated to a dotted feature with points.

Difficult cases

What problems arise from students when dealing with proposals in composition? Not everyone can clearly determine the role of a particular word. Moreover, there are two questions at once to some sentences. For example: "lived (where? What is?) In the house." In this case, it is proposed to stay in one option.

Problems arise and with the definition of the role of various revolutions (involved, conspicable). At school it is customary to allocate them as one member of the sentence. If direct speech is present in the expressing statement, it is considered a separate proposal.

Many questions are associated with service part of speech. On the one hand, they are not members of the sentence. But they can be part of separate revolutions (bathing in the river) or the faugables (let them come, did not see). In many Russian language textbooks, children teach emphasize the prepositions together with the nouns to which they relate. But the introductory words, the appeals are not allocated.

Debriefing of proposals in composition: Example

Let's see how this type of parsing is performed in practice. Take a simple sentence that you can read in the picture.

1. Find subject. To do this, we use the question: "What?". The sentence speaks of the sun, underline this word. Top of the speech on top.
2. What did the sun do? Illuminated. We found a lean, it is expressed by the verb. We draw the arrow from above, we sign the question.
3. Now allocate secondary members of the sentence. Illuminated when? In the morning. So, before us the circumstance. We emphasize, sign part of the speech - noun, spend an arrow from the fag.
4. Lit that? Village. We found an addition, and it is also expressed by nouns. We mark all this in the notebook, we indicate graphically.
5. A village what? Native. This name is adjective is a definition. We emphasize his wavy feature, sign the question from above, as well as part of speech.

Analysis of complex proposals

In the example above, there was one grammatical basis. However, there may be several them. Such suggestions are called complex. One of them in front of you in the picture. We will analyze it for members of the sentence.

1. We find grammatical foundations. What? Leaf. This is subject to. What does a sheet make? Flies. Before being tamed. We emphasize them, sign parts of speech. We read the offer on. What? Chill. As you can see, in the sentence two subject. What does chill do? Runs. The second grammatical basis was found.
2. We find the boundaries of simple sentences, numerate each part from above. You can distinguish between their vertical feature.
3. We allocate secondary members first in one part of the sentence, and then to another. We indicate graphically. We sign parts of speech.

The disclation of the proposal on the composition is not easy task. Sometimes professional linguists can not come to an unambiguous solution by defining the role of a word. However, with practice, it will be made everything easier for you and easier. The main thing is not to be afraid of mistakes and take patience.