Gaev behavior. Characteristics Hero Gaev, Cherry Garden, Czechs

The genre of Dramaturgia A. P. Chekhov appealed in early work. But the authentic success of him as a playwright began with the "Seagull" play. The play "Cherry Garden" is called the Swan Song of Chekhov. She was completed by the creative path of the writer. In the "Cherry Garden" author expressed his beliefs, thoughts, hopes. Chekhov believes that the future of Russia belongs to such people like Trofimov and Anya. In one of the letters of Chekhov, wrote: "Students and cruising are a good and honest people. This is our hope, this is the future of Russia. " They, according to Chekhov, are the true owners of the Cherry Garden, which the author identified with his homeland. "All Russia is our garden," says Petya Trofimov.

The owners of the Cherry Garden are the hereditary nobles of Ranenevskaya and Gaev, the estate and the garden - the property of their kind over the years, but they can no longer shop here. They are the personification of past Russia, there are no future for them. Why?
Gaev and Ranevskaya - people helpless, idle, not capable of any active actions. They admire the beauty of the blooming garden, he brings the nose-talgic memories of these people, but only. Their estate is ruined, and these people cannot and do not try to do anything to ensure that the position can somehow correct. The price of such "love" is small. Although Rainful and says: "God sees, I love my homeland, I love gently." But the question arises that this is for such love, if she left from Russia five years ago and returned now only because Fiasco has suffered in his personal life. And in the final of the play Ranevskaya again leaves the homeland.
Of course, the heroine impresses a man with an open soul, it is heart, emotional, impressionable. But these qualities are combined with such features of its character as carelessness, spoilness, frivolity, bordering to worry and indifference to others. We see that in fact Ranevskaya is indifferent towards people, even sometimes cruel. Otherwise, how to explain the fact that she gives the last golden passing, and the servant in the house remains to live the injignment. She thanks Firsi, copes his health, and ... leaves the old, sick person in a ciphed house, simply forgot about him. This is at least monstrous!
Like Ranevskaya, Gaev has a sense of excellent. I would like to note that he is more than Ranevskaya gives the impression of Barin. Although this character can be called exactly the same inactive, careless and frivolous, like his sister. Like a small child, Gaev can not give up the habit of sucking the lollipops and even counts in the trifles. His mood changes very quickly, this is a non-permanent, windy man. Gaev is upset to tears from the fact that the estates are sold, but hardly he heard a knock of the balls in the billiard room, then immediately cheated, like a child.
Of course, Gaev and Ranevskaya is the embodiment of the past of outgoing life. Their habit of living "in debt, for someone else's account" talks about the fear of the existence of these heroes. They definitely not the owners of life, because even their material well-being depends on any accidents: or it will be an inheritance, or the Yaroslavl grandmother will send them money in order to pay off with debts, or the money will lend a lopakhin. A completely different warehouse people come to replace such as Gaev and Ranevskaya, people: strong, enterprising, clever. One of these people is another play of the play of Lopakhin.
Lopakhin embodies real Russia. Parents of the leopard were serfs, but after the cancellation of serfdom, the fate of this person has changed. He was gone into people, rich, and now able to buy the estate of those who were once his owners. Lopahin feels its superiority over Ranenevskaya and Gaev, and they treat him with respect, since they realize their dependence on this person. It is clear that Lopahin and such people, how he will soon be supplanted by the Rovnyny nobles.
However, Lopahin impresses a person who is the "master of life" only in this, short period of time. He is not the owner of the Cherry Garden, but only the temporary owner. Cherry Garden He is going to cut out, and to sell the ground. It seems that by introducing its capital from this enterprise beneficial to him, he will still not take a dominant place in the future of the state. In the image of this character, Chekhov masterfully managed to portray the bizarre and controversial connection of the features of the past and present. Lopahin, although proud of the current situation, does not forget for a second about his low origin, it is too strong in peace for life, which, as he thinks, was unfair to him. Very soon, the reader and the viewer understands that the lopahin is just an intermediate stage between past and future generations.
In the play of Czech, "I also see and the characters, opposite destructive activities of the blades and inaction of Ranenevskaya and Gaeva. This is Anya and Peter Trofimov. It is for such people, according to the author, the future of Russia. Trofimov is a hot truth seeker who sincerely believes in the celebration of fair life in the near future. The student Petya Trofimov is poor, tolerates deprivation, but as an honest person refuses life for someone else's expense. He says a lot about the fact that it is necessary to reorganize society, but the real deeds do not have real actions. But he is a wonderful propagandist. This is one of those who are going to young people who believe. Anya fascinates the call of Trofimov to change life, and at the end of the play we hear her words calling for "plant a new garden." The author does not give us the opportunity to have the fruits of the activities of representatives of the new generation. He only leaves us the hope that the words of Petit Trofimov and Ani will not disperse with the affairs.
Three generations of people depicted Czechs in their play "Cherry Garden", and each character personifies the life of Russia: Radious and Gaev - last, Lopahin - true, Trofimov and Anya - the future. The time has shown that Chekhov was absolutely right - in the near future, the Russian people expected the revolution, and it was such people like trophimes and peak history.

Ranevskaya and Gaeva can no longer be attributed to the long series of "extra people" in Russian literature. After all, they, in essence, are not concerned about anything, they are not tormented by the problems of being, no question of their place in life. Love Andreevna - a good man, but helpless. Her brother is also helpless, but hardly kind, as evidenced by his mockery of people from common people. Ranevskaya all the time thinking about childhood, about the dead parents. In memories, it finds refuge from the troubles that the present carries. Gaev pity with their empty high speeches, with the help of which he is trying to revive the habitual atmosphere of the former well-being. However, Leonid Andreevich sympathy does not cause - too stupid and soulless.

Ranevskaya causes not only pity, but also sympathy. She sincerely wants to do good people, but she does not work well. And the inability of love of Andreevna to achieve in the life of some humane acts leads to the tragedy. She never checked, whether the sick firbus was sent to the hospital. As a result, the unfortunate old man was left in a cipal balm house for almost true death. It would seem that Lopahin, who came to replace the disassembled nobles, can radically change the life for the better.

He directly declares: "... tormented without a case. I can not without work, I don't know what to do with my hands; Clean somehow strange, definitely strangers. " However, as soon as the cherry garden found itself in his hands, in Yermola Alekseyevich had a striking change.

Previously, he defiantly showed the care of Ranevskaya. He claims her: "Your brother, here Leonid Andreich, says about me that I am Ham, I'm a fist, but it's determined to me. Let say. I would only like to believe me still, that your amazing, touching eyes looked at me, as before. "

But here the garden he bought and, as everyone thought, could return it to those whose "amazing, touching eyes" quite recently extolled. However, Lopahin prefers to realize its venture with summer cottages and the destruction of the Cherry Garden, although it cannot but understand how it will be for Ranenevskaya, and for its adopted daughter Ani, which Yermolai Alekseevich loves. And begins, without even waiting until the previous owners leave the estate, cut down the garden under the root. Well, indeed, Ham and fist, how much would be offended by the leopard for this definition. "Eternal student?

"Petya Trofimov, who wants to find a way to a new, better life, gives him advice:" ... Do not swing your hands! Dumps from this habit - waving. And too, to build cottages, expect that from the dacnikniki with time there will be separate owners, it is also possible to expect it - it also means swing ... I love you, all the same, I love you.

You have thin, tender fingers, like the artist, you have a thin, gentle soul ... "In the last words Irony is heard. What a gentle soul's lopakhina! Moreover, the artistry of His Nature of Yermolai Alekseevich immediately illustrates the next attenuation: "I sowed a thousand tentine in the spring, and now I earned forty thousand pure.

And when my poppy bloomed, that it was for the picture! " He is aware of his superiority over all those people in Russia, which "exist is unknown for what."

But the main sense in the soul of the blades is a sense of owner. He proudly pronounces: "The cherry garden is now mine!

"All Russia, people like Lopakhin perceive as their property, despite the fact that sometimes they give high words, in fact, we are spiritual worn. "Cherry Garden", the last play of Chekhov, was written in 1903. To wave the hands of Yermola Alekseevich remained fourteen years - before the 1917 revolution. Czech Prosisa began with humes, with cooperation in a small press. Not so was the debut of Chekhov-playwater. His first play "Want's" with all the naivety and inexperience of the young author is a completely serious attempt to create a great dramatic cloth. Therefore, we can say: if the prosecaster Chekhov debuts as Antosha Chekhonte, then the Czech playwright begins immediately with the attempt to "become Chekhov".

In the center of the first play - Platonov, in which certain features of Ivanov, the main character of the Drama of the same name, as well as some other actors of Chekhov's plays of subsequent years. Platonic stands out sharply among the people around him with its extraordination. Life he leads a messy, far from sinless, but one trait attracts the reader to him: he is deprived of complacency, calm, all the time it is executed, it is executed that it is deprived of respect for himself. Here this "self-sharing" of the hero and brings him closer to Ivanov.

In Platonova, the type of Chekhov Hero is largely determined - a person of intense spiritual and moral quest, trying to find an answer to questions about the meaning of life, about the purpose of man. The Pieces "Want's" and "Ivanov" are built on the principle of "uniform" of the main character: it is he who acts acts in full sense as a central character. In the subsequent works - in Leshem, converted later to the "Uncle Vanya", and especially in the "Seagull" - Chekhov refuses this principle of the "unique" hero. In the "Seagull" there is no one through intrigue, it is not so easy to call the main character. Interestingly, when Chekhov began working on the "seagull", the author's attention focused around the young playwright Trepleva, his riot against theatrical routine. But gradually, in the course of work on the play, other characters were increasingly awesome - the mother of Trepleva Actress Arkadda, ejected and his game on stage; Writer Trigorin, spoiled by glory, calm and master; Nina Zarechnaya, who dreamed of glory and then learned how difficult the path to genuine art; Masha, hopelessly in love with Trepleva, her husband teacher Med-Vedenko, whom she almost does not notice. The action in the "seagull" does not roll on one main road, it all the time goes from one character to another.

The plot of the plays is built on the spiritual breakdown of the heroes, their painful "misconceptions". Teacher Medvedenko loves Masha, but she even married him, does not meet him reciprocity - all its mental attention and strength are given to Treplev. He loves Nina, but she is fond of trigorin, which soon throws it and returns to his old attachment - to Arkady. Even in such a brief, incomplete retelling, it feels completely unusual for the then readers, viewers, critics of the novelty of the play of the play, all its tragic inconsistency of the "Seagull" said that "Rude Life", but it is impossible to despair ("I will be able to carry your cross and faith" , "Say Nina in the final), that contemporary art mired in Routine. The ideas of the play on the confrontation of rude life, about the search for a new art were not just proclaimed, but turned out to be a sharp clash of opinions, manner of behavior, symbolic images. The first play after the failure of the "Seagulls" on the Alexandria stage and its triumph in the Moscow Art Theater - "Three Sisters". If the "seagull" was built on the painful spiritual "discrepancies" of heroes, then in this play, the plot turns out to be somehow, if you can express it, on a bunty-impervious action.

Three sisters of transverse - Olga, Masha, Irina - dream of going from the provincial city to Moscow. And - not leaving. Their brother Andrei dreams about how he will be a professor at Moscow University. And - not becoming. Instead of the professorship, he was taken by a pitiful goal - to be a member of the local council, where the chairman is a lover of his wife Natasha. Masha, having loved the lieutenant colonel of Vershinin, parted with him forever, she is doomed to life with a caught husband.

Irina, going married Baron Tuzenbach, hopes that it will begin to live in a new way, work. However, Tubenbach killed for duels. It would seem that all dreams collapsed. However, in the final, three sisters stand, closely clinging to each other, and under the sounds of a farewell march of the outgoing regiment say: "Our life is not yet over. Will live!" It is meaningless approaching the final of the plays from the point of view of everyday believing.

Blowing out of its limits, Chekhov finishes the play with a symbolic manner of three sisters - they have lost many illusions, but did not lose hope. In the "Seagull" through the whole play passed the image of a shot bird. In the "three sisters" symbolism is more hidden.

In the last play Chekhov, "Cherry Garden", again there is a pass-through image. This is an image of a garden, beautiful, blooming and reinforced by the tops of the new owner, the merchant of the blades.

Many sad in the play, which Chekhov wrote, already sighting the impending death. At the same time, it can be said that the sorrow here is Pushkinsky light. The final of the "Cherry Garden" is deprived of the "limb", it is open to the future.

Character comparison: Ranevskaya, Gaev and Lopakhin

Other essays on the topic:

1. "Cherry Garden" is the last completed play by A. P. Chekhov. The author's intent is to ridiculous the "nearestness" of the main actors ....
2. The plot line is Varya - Lopahin should be complemented by the third character - Ranevskaya, which acts as a fate of the fate of Fate. It...
3. In fact, the surprising success of the Hignes experiment is due primarily to the extraordinary personality of the Eliza itself. No newest and most effective methods ...
4. The historical basis of the poem "Hehetik". The poem "Yeretik" also has another name - "Ivan (Yang) Gus." It was so called her himself ...
5. Different paths fell on the "bottom" - inhabitants of the night. Vaska ash - a hereditary thief. Nastya does not know his parents at all. Baron ...
6. A. N. Dobrolyubov called the play of the Ostrovsky "Thunderstorm" the most resolute work, since "mutual relations of self-smuggy and fraud is brought in it ...
7. At the manuscript of the poem "MTSI" litter: "1839 August 5". But this is only the date of completion of work on the work. His idea rises ...
8. One of the beloved in the romanticism art system was the motive of the escape of the hero from the gray everyday life (Sh. Bajler, "Carry me from there cars ...
9. The cardinal problems affected in both novels are close to each other and, as it were, continue one another: this problem of generations, revealing through ...
10. "Ivango" is a historic novel. But it should not be studied on it. This novel is the reproduction of the memory of the events, and not ...
11. A. N. Ostrovsky is rightfully considered a singer of a merchant environment, the father of the Russian household drama, the Russian theater. His Peru belongs to about 60 ...
12. Let us dwell on the question of the prototypes of Lermontic characters. The contemporaries of the poet expressed a lot of assumptions about this, and in some cases not without ...
13. Comedy A. S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" is the brightest example of the connection of literature with the life of society. The topicality of the work is relevant and ...
14. Objectives of the lesson 1. Acquisition of skills for the allocation of object elements and comparing objects. 2. Fastening the skills of working with windows using the ...

The play "Cherry Garden" is called the Swan Song of Chekhov. This is his last play, she is written a year before his early death.

Written in 1903. For the first time was delivered on January 17, 1904 in the Moscow Art Theater. The playwright left on July 15, 1904. He was 44 years old.

The play is written on the threshold of the first Russian revolution of 1905 -07 g., There is a moment in it. There is a moment. There is no time for the Czechs of the subsequent historical events that he no longer succeeded.

The central image in the work is the image of a cherry garden, all the characters are located around it, each of them has its own garden perception. And this image is symbolic. During the Cherry Garden, the image of Russia rises, and the main topic of the play is the fate of Russia.

The play is imbued with the reflections of the author about the past, present and future of Russia, whose symbol is a cherry garden.

Ranevskaya and Gaev personify the past of the Cherry Garden and at the same time the past of Russia. The garden is cut down in the play, and the noble nest disintegrates in life, the old Russia, Russia Ranevskaya and Gigs, is observed.

Ranevskaya and Gaev are the images of the broken landowners-nobles. They are the descendants of the rich owners of a magnificent estate with an excellent cherry garden. In the past, their estate brought income to which his idle owners lived.

The habit of living with the works of others, without taking care of anything, made Ranevskaya and Gaeva people who are unsuitable for any serious activity, flavored and helpless.

Ranevskaya, externally charming, kind, simple, is basically an impersonation of levity. She is sincerely concerned about the unconnect of his adopted daughter Vari, regrets the faithful servant of the Firs, easily kisses the Maid Dulzha's long separation. But her kindness is the result of an abundance created by do it yourself, the consequence of the habit of spending money not counting.

The twin Ranevskaya, but the personality is less significant, is in the play of Gaev. And he is able to sometimes talk smart things, be sometimes sincere, self-critical. But the flaws of the sister are frivolism, impracticality, braveless - become Gaeva caricature. The love of Andreevna only kisses in a fit of the lunizing cabinet, Gaev says in front of him in "High-Style".

Gaev frankly ridiculously in his attempts to live as if nothing got changed, as if he did not go to the candy condition. He says almost always the nefple, says meaningless billiard terms, reminiscent of times of his fun youth. Gaev pity with their empty high speeches, with the help of which he is trying to revive the habitual atmosphere of the former well-being.

Brother and sisters have all in the past. But Gaev and Ranevskaya, after all, something is pretty for us. They are capable of feeling beauty, and the cherry garden itself is mostly aesthetically, and not utilitarian - as a source of berries that can be used in food or sell, or as a large plot of land, having a commercial value again.

In the play there is an elegic mood, the sadness of parting with a thorough past, in which there was a lot of bad, but it was good. At the same time, this is a kind of Chekhov's licoric comedy, which with some sled good nature, but still quite severely, with Chekhov sobriety and clarity, laugh at the nobility leaving from the historical scene.

Criticism that responded to the staging of the play in the art theater, regarded her as a final sentence to the noble class. One of the reviewers of the performance claimed that the "Vishnevian Garden" was delivered "a monument over the grave of pretty Belarusian, orchids, flashing for a foreign coffin", and "the sluggish conquest and the meekness fills them with horror and pity."

A completely different warehouse people come to replace such as Gaev and Ranevskaya, people: strong, enterprising, clever. One of these people is another play of the play of Lopakhin.

In the study of drama on actions there are different ways. Some offer commented reading, where the main goal is given to reading, which is subordinate to the analysis; Others - analysis with reading individual phenomena with associated comment. Each particular action takes its place in the ideological-dramatic plan, in the development of the plot, solving the artistic task of the entire play.

Observation of the development of the plot (actions) is cold from work on the characters of heroes. Preparing for the lesson on the play, it is necessary to select phenomena for reading and analyzing, put basic questions. It is necessary to determine which scenes are supporting, which phenomena should be allocated for detailed analysis.

1. Work on the play: reading individual scenes and analysis 1, 2 actions. Questions and tasks:

Your impressions of the first pages of the "Cherry Garden" play;

What are the unusual characters comedy?

What event unfolds 1 action of the play? Why is it so important for the author?

Find in 1 action stylistic elements typical of Chekhov image (lyricism, symbolism, monologues, memories, lexical repetitions, pauses, cliffs of phrases, author's remarks);

What role, in your opinion, play minor characters (epiphany, charlotte, etc.) in creating a socio-psychological "subtext" of the play?

Why does Chekhov celebrates the age of only 3-acting persons?

What do you think is a cross-cutting play of the play?

How is the entry of the entity of the images of Ranevskaya and Gaeva?

2. Questions and tasks for 3, 4 actions:

What amazing you in the affairs and actions of Ranevskaya and Gaeva?

What changes and why occur in our attitude to the owners of the Cherry Garden?

Trace how they behave in situations truly dramatic?

Give a detailed response characteristic "old garden owners".

(The characters created by Czech are complex, good and evil, comic and tragic are contradictory. Creating images of the inhabitants of the ruin of the noble nest of the Ranevskaya and her brother Gaeva, Chekhov emphasized that such "types" already "taught". They show love for their estate , Cherry Garden, but do not take anything to save the estate from death. Because of their idleness, impracticality is ruined so "sacred loved by" nests ", beautiful cherry gardens are destroyed.

Ranevskaya is shown in the play very kind, affectionate, but frivolous, sometimes indifferent and negligent towards people (the last golden gives the random passing, and the glooming at home lives); Laskov to Fours and leaves him a patient in the boarding house. She is smart, cardiac, emotionally, but the idle life corrupted her, deprived will, turned into a helpless creature.

Reading, we learn that she left Russia 5 years ago, which from Paris "suddenly he suddenly pulled into Russia" only after the catastrophe in his personal life. In the final of the play, she still leaves their homeland and, no matter how regretting the Cherry Garden and the estate, I quickly calmed down and cheated "in the premonition of departure to Paris.

Chekhov gives you to feel all the progress of the play that the narrow life interests of Ranevskaya and Gaeva testify to the complete oblivion of their interests of the Motherland. It seems that with all good qualities they are useless and even harmful, as they contribute not to creating, "not to increase the wealth and beauty" of the Motherland, but to destruction.

Gaevu 51 years old, and he just like Ranevskaya, helpless, lackless, is careless. The gentle appeal to his niece and sister is combined with a disregard for the "Chumazoma" to the blades, a "man and khamu", with a contemptuous-disguise attitude to the servants. All his vital energy goes to sublime unnecessary conversations, empty verbal. Like Ranevskaya, used to live "on someone else's account," does not count on their strength, but only help from the outside: "It would be good to get the inheritance, it would be nice to give Any for a rich man ..."

So, throughout the play, Ranenskaya and Gaev are experiencing the wreck of recent hopes, a serious spiritual shock, families are deprived, at home, but they are unable to understand something, to learn something, to do something useful. Their evolution for the play is ruin, the collapse is not only material, but also spiritual. Ranenevskaya and Gaevs freely or unwittingly betrayed everything that it would seem expensive to them: both the garden, relatives and the faithful slave of the Firs. The final scenes of the play shook).

Tell us about the fate of the blades. How will the author prompt?

What is the meaning of comparing the owners of the Cherry Garden and the Lopakhina?

Explanations:

When the blades characteristic, it is necessary to reveal its complexity and inconsistency, objectivity and a comprehensive approach to its image. Lopahin is different from Gaeva and Ranevskaya energy, activity, business grip. Its activities marks, undoubtedly progressive shifts.

At the same time, the author makes us disagree with the idea that progressive ideas should lead to the emptying of the Earth, the destruction of the beautiful. It is not by chance that the announcement of the new owner is replaced by sadness and bitterness: "Oh, rather, all this passed, would rather have changed somehow awky, unhappy life." In it constantly fights conflicting feelings. It is impossible to miss such a meaningful detail as the episode in the final of the play, when the ball of the ax is heard on cherry trees. At the request of Ranevskaya Lopahin orders to interrupt the roaster of the garden. But barely old owners left the estate, the axes are knocking again. The new owner is in a hurry ...

The word of the teacher.

But on the Lopakhina Chekhov, it seems from "historical distant", so sees for its subjective good intentions of only predatory and limited activities. And the estate, and the cherry garden he bought somehow "no discount." Only next to Ranevskaya, Gyevoy, Lopakhin can impress the figure, but Trofimov's plans of the blades "set up cottages" are "seemed insolvent, narrow."

So, what is the role of young characters in the play?

Why, approximate images of Petit Trofimova and Vari, the author opposes them to each other?

What is the inconsistency of the nature of Petit Trofimov and why the author refers to it is ironically?

Conclusions in the image of Petit Trofimova (can make a teacher or prepared student):

Creating the image of Trofimov, Chekhov experienced difficulties. He assumed possible censorship attacks: "I, mainly, frightened ... The lowestness of some student Trofimova. After all, Trofimov is the case in the link, then it is also expelled from the university ... "

In fact, a trophim student appeared in front of the viewer at a time when the public was excited by student riots.

In the form of the "Eternal Student" - the middle of the son of Lekary Trofimova shows superiority over other heroes. He is poor, tolerates deprivation, but resolutely refuses to "live on someone else's expense," to borrow.

Observations, generalizations of Trofimov wide, smart and valid: nobles live on someone else's account; The intellectuals do nothing. The principles of it (to work, live in the name of the future) progressive. His life can cause respect, worrying young minds and hearts. Speech is excited, diverse, although, sometimes, and not devoid of banalities ("We go uncontrollabically to a bright star ...").

But in Trofimov there are features rapping it with other characters play. The life principles of Ranevskaya and Gaeva affect it. Trofimov speaks with indignation about the idleness, "philosophizing", and he himself also says a lot, likes to teach. The author sometimes puts Trofimov in a comic position: Petya falls from the stairs, the old galoshes are looking unsuccessfully. Epitts: "Cellular", "Funny Freak", "Temptation", "Slap Barin" - reduce the image of Trofimov, is sometimes caused by a mocking smile. Trofimov, according to the writer's plan, should not look like a hero. His role is the awakening of the consciousness of young people who themselves will be looking for ways to struggle for the future. Therefore, Anya on youth enthusiastically absorbs the ideas of Trofimov.

In the classic drama, the characters make actions, pronounce monologues, won or die. In accordance with their role in the development of action, they are divided into positive and negative, main and secondary. There are no major and secondary actors in the Chekhov play. Epiphans The author is just as important as Gaev, and Charlotte is not less interested in rasen. Even the "random" passerby appearing in the finals of the second act, the face episodic, from the point of view of the traditional drama performs a certain semantic role in the Chekhov play.

The task

Who is represented by the local nobility in the play A.P. Chekhov "Cherry Garden"? Give a brief description of these characters.

Answer

The local nobility is represented in the play by the old owners of the Cherry Garden - Brother and the sister of Gaev and Ranevskaya, as well as a Simeonian-food.

Ranevskaya and Gaev are glorious, lovely good people in their own way. Ranevskaya sentimentalna, accustomed to idle life, squeaks money, her feelings are superficial, shallow.

The task

Tell us about Gaev. What does he look like Ranevskaya? What is interested in? Compare their monologues to the wardrobe. How do they characterize characters?

Answer

Gaev is in many ways similar to the sister, completely helpless in practical matters, phrase. He is already fifty, and he is still like a child. Gaeva still undresses Firs at night.

When Ranevskaya returns to the native house, she worries the resurrected past, it is surprised by the fact that everything is former here; This, which it was like time is not moving. This invariability of things leads to the delight of Gaeva. Only his enthusiasm is frankly funny. Highly and solemnly he refers to the closet. His love for the estate is limited by its own eloquence. It offers many plans to save the estate, but it is clear that they are all untenable.

Question

What is close to the owners of the cherry garden Simeon-Picker?

Answer

Those qualities that the Ranevskaya are surrounded by a haze of poetry, Gaeva reduced to the Commission, and in Simeon, the foods are revealed to the farce.

Question

How is Ranevskaya characterizes the attitude in Vare, to Ana, to the servants, to the lopakhin, to Trofimov? How can I appreciate the kindness of Ranevskaya?

Answer

Walked Ranevskaya Right with indisciencement. She kisses things and completely indifferently perceives the news of the death of Nanny: "My old man is", "she calls Firs. And then he is left in the house, where life has ended forever.

Ranevskaya leaves the cook, which loves, "as a native". For money Ani goes to Paris. He loves Any, crying about the deceased son, but leaves a 12-year-old Anya for 5 years with an unborn brother; hugs by the Firs, kisses Dunyash, but does not think that there is nothing in the house, etc.

Question

How does it characterize the refusal to offer a lopakhin? Why did everyone calmed down after the sale of the Cherry Garden?

Answer

Ranevskaya roads garden, but love is inactive. She hoped for that and so it would cost. And in the IV action Ranevskaya and Gaev completely calmed down. What worried about them passed, they no longer feel responsible in front of the cherry garden.

Questions

1. How to understand the words of Chekhov: "Ranevskaya play is not difficult, it is necessary only from the very beginning to take a faithful tone; We must come up with a smile and maneer laugh, you need to be able to dress "?

2. What is Ranevskaya considers it with his sins and is it sins? And what is her real sins?

3. Who is to blame for the fate of Ranevskaya? Was the opportunity to choose?

The task

Find a positive and negative in the images of the local nobility.

conclusions

Images of Ranevskaya and Gaeva - the incarnation of the world of the noble nest, for which time stopped. Dramaticism in their insecurity, simpleness. Common - in the contrast of speech and actions. Life wasted, future without hopes, life in debt, "for someone else's expense." "Selfish, like children, and flabby, like old men," says bitter about them.

Literature

1. D.N. Murin. Russian literature of the second half of the XIX century. Methodical recommendations in the form of the Pockery Planning. Grade 10. M.: Smio Press, 2002.

2. E.S. Corner. Russian literature of the XIX century. M.: Saga; Forum, 2004.

3. Encyclopedia for children. T. 9. Russian literature. Ch. I. From the epic and chronicles to the classics of the XIX century. M.: Avanta +, 1999.