We write well: from idea to book. We write well: from the idea to a book why a person is called by patronymic

The widespread of foreign language borrowing in Russian touched not only vocabulary, but also etiquette (not characteristic of the Russian people) rules. In the Pyatigorsk Pravda, we are trying to fight it, adhere to classic canons, as we are convinced that the quality newspaper with a long history should be quite conservative.

If we talk about a general trend in the media, then it should be noted that in the second half of the 1980s, our fatherland "lost" patronymic. That is, the means of communication (television, radio, newspapers began to call people to Western manner, only by name and surname: not Yuri Alekseevich Gagarin, but Yuri Gagarin, not Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, and Boris Yeltsin, not Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev, but Mikhail Gorbachev . Currently, all media uses this truncated form: the name + surname. It is strange to hear on television and radio, as older, deserved people are called solely by name. Currently, the trinity is used more for identification purposes than as respect.

The tradition of calling each other by name-patronymic is the time of the centuries. This is a tribute to a person, part of Russian speech etiquette. Using only the name and surname, we like it (as one of my senior comrade often repeats) Ivanam, who does not remember kinship. After all, with what respect in the past times they applied to the famous Old Russian Bogatyr Ilya Muromtsu, "Light Ivanovich". Patronymic has always underlined the Russian man.

The custom is called by the departure dates back to the gray old old. According to researchers, the patronymic began to appear in the XI - XII centuries. The use of the name and patronymic in the dopamil period was originally pursued and a practical goal. It not only reflected respect for the memory of the parents, but also performed a legally enshrined sign of a peculiar right to property, spiritual and other heritage from his father.

Three-membered people name - name, patronymic, surname - is a feature of the Russian language. This formula arose in the era of Peter I, then spread to Ukraine and in Belarus, and then further, in other lands of immense Russia.

The adoption of the trinity in Russia is not by chance: at one time it also acquired a sacral meaning - as an Orthodox Christian Trinity (God Father, God Son, the God of the Holy Spirit) was opposed to the Western European "binary" (God Father and God Son).

The triune model (name + patronymic + surname) was adopted by almost all the peoples of Russia and the USSR. In Russia, there has always been a respectful attitude towards other peoples and their traditions: it is known that, for example, that at the balsalts, the inhabitants of the Caucasus and the Far North, with intra-national communication, patronymic is not accepted. Father's name is indicated only in official documents.

A dual form (albeit even the name will be complete), as the observations show, causes a different violation of a label nature: appeal to the interlocutor on "you", whereas the calling of him by name-patronycia pushes to "you". That is, in Russian etiquette everything is interconnected: one depends on the other. On the one hand, we seem to get rid of unnecessary sinovation (it is curious that some journalists are often represented only by name, even without a last name! When you ask my middle name, usually you hear: "We haven't been so accepted!" Who is not accepted? When? Why? - It is not clear), on the other, offend many people.

May argue that in a two-way formula (name + surname) is the desire of a language to compression, but is it really? And maybe this fact is one of the manifestations of "democratization" and vulgarization of the language, the mixing of Western European with Nizhny Novgorod?

27/03/05, Makushev Indoant
We are very often done with Lenka as aust. Call her "Viktorovna". She is not offended. And this (call for patronymic) much better than calling by last name. And she always calls us by the name. By patronymic (Viktorovna). And not by name-patronymic (Elena Viktorovna) is much easier and friendly, or something. And on joke.

27/03/05, smith
In my opinion, it sounds quite fun, at least you can laugh at the peculiarities of the culture of these people. But by patronymic is called not only in rural places, but also in schools in schools, when a student or a student has guessed something. If you speak in general, then I think it is a sign of some respect for a person, a good relationship to him, let's say, "brotherly" relationships of simple nomudine in the lives of people. Nothing bad in this, I think there is no.

28/03/05, ichoLainen.
In my opinion this mana must be taken over to many peoples! Is it bad in the name to remember the Father? Isn't that a gentleman's continuation!?

29/03/05, Brynza
And what ... This is our traditions. Well, let's like everyone in America: "Hey, Johnny," to eat hamburgers and whip the cola. Some familiarity is in this, but absolutely absolutely nothing. IMHO

29/03/05, Shimaza.
And in my opinion, nothing unpleasant in it ... People in a circle of friends communicate, calling each other any nickname, and no one seems to be offended ... And by patronymic appeal - this is the same nickname IMHO ...

29/03/05, smith
Let's call each other "Mr. Pavlov Pavel Pavlovich" or "Mrs. Anna Anna Annova." Call people by patronymic, I think this is the usual game of words, one of the natural properties of the Russian language. I do not think that there is something uncompatible or Khamskoye, especially Zhalla. Just for each moment a well-defined appeal - one, in the formal setting, with friends - the third. If I met the president, I would not tell him "Hi, Vladimirovich ..", as you understand :).

29/03/05, Old_ded.
Having lived all my life in the environment, where they applied or by the name of the patronymic, or (later) by name, I happened to live in the northeast of MSK, where among friends it was accepted at the departure. Found this custom is very cute .. Trying to try :)

30/03/05, Celina.
I like this. Imagine that in the company several people with one name, so that everyone responds when only one is called. And so one call by name, and the other by patronymic. So you can even if the patience is the same. In my opinion, patronymic, it is the same nickname or nickname, someone does not like and he asks him to be not called and others on the contrary

30/03/05, by chance by walking
In general, it is funny, but only out loud with unfamiliar people do not try. Especially ridiculous to call so (not loud, to yourself) people with non-standard patrimonies, for example, imagine only: Adolfych, Mammadych, Sulumbekich, Markovna (this is about Lyudmila). Ask familiar foreigners (if any), what is the name of their dads, again imagine: Shady, Francoise, Wolfganggych, Larsch, etc. Only not loud, suddenly they will be offended, and the mood was raised.

30/03/05, Rock Lady
"I have bosy from loneliness, at night I hear the voices ... I suddenly call me at the departure, I looked - fucking, that's miracles!")))) By the departure it is always better, even somehow more valid :)

31/03/05, Korshun.
i call a person by patronymic, I express my respect for him and the Father's ego, this man is my friend. It is important that it has been yours. Call someone else's person in patronymic and disrespectful.

01/04/05, Locust.
There are especially suitable for this patronyony - Petrovich, Ilyich, Ivanovich. Sounds cool. But the patronymic of my grandmother Vlasovna, in my opinion very beautiful, here is her all name - Vlasovna, and for some reason her sister is not called so, although she is also Vlasovna))

01/04/05, Rock Lady
"Alah, Kolyanovna?! At me, Vovanovna!" :))))) Plague !!! :))) You can call me Wovanovna, I like it so much :))))

03/04/05, Silent Baison
Call by name, it is to show friendly participation, a sign of friendship. So you can call our peers, parents, sisters / brothers, etc. But the name and middle name speak of respect for the person. I appeal to your grandmother and grandfather, and by name-patronymic to older people who respect and appreciate. But not to all ... if a person is older than me, but at the same time full zero in my opinion, then on you and, especially, in the name-patronymic I do not overcome ... only dear, deserved, or elderly people are worthy of such an appeal . Optionally all the indicators together \u003d)

03/04/05, Ladygerda.
It seems to me that there is nothing offensive or bad in it. Just our ancestors were very respected by a separate person (especially, young), and his genus ... And when you say (in the same village) that you (let's say) Kolya is one thing. Who gets like you there? But if you say - Petrovich or Mikhalych, many will remember - and, this is the son of Ivanich, who also built such a house .... and everything is clear to everyone. Although some patience is not very used separately ... Vladimirovna or Vsevolodovich. TM is better by name.

08/04/05, Red
He loved earlier at the school of literature to call Valerich. Nobody called me by permissions, because somehow it does not combine appearance and character with my patientity, but by name was the name of the time constantly.

09/04/05, Zaus.
I don't know, it hurts it. Sorely cool in an unfamiliar society. It is unusual, cool and generally ... nice.

04/10/05, Hello
Do you remember songs about Lenin? Here are some lines of them: "Ilyich welcomed the troops", "Ilyichevo Sun shines over Russia and never go out." "The asterisk from Kumacha is the grandchildren of Ilyich." So it's not so and vulgar to call a person just by patronymic.

04/10/05, Hello
I remember me, in Ukraine they turned "Palina!" The chef spoke to colleagues: "With these questions - to Pavlovna." Now for 7 years no one calls me by name-patronymic, nor just by patronymic. Well, this is not accepted in Israel - and that's it. And if in our territories, Moishevich, Khaimovich, Aricovna, Eliyev, were called each other ... Cool it would be.)))))))))

23/11/05, ENERGY
And mine is even good. Everything will be the old grandfather all my friends will be Ivanchy, Petrovichi, Mikhalychi, San Sanychi, etc.

08/03/07, Zasnik
Middle names are different, some cool pronunciation- For example, Mikhalych, Nikolaevna, Borisich, Petrovich ... and there are a horserystage, for example, andrevich ... And so, having fun, glades to click on the patrons, they are still so nuts because they did not expect them to call them in the father ... and in fact, cool ...

08/03/07, Slim
Zasnik, yes your patronymic is just intended for pronouncing! Not Andreevich, and Andreich! Class! Andreich is the most. So who is complicated - I am Leonidovna ... I even care even somehow :)))

The word "magnify" in modern Russian means to remove, exalt, glorify, honor, and also call for patronymic. In the public life, the magnitude was called the honors, rewarding to someone or the fact that he was praised, lifting all its good qualities, or what is called him by patronymic.

Patronymic - a sign of respect ...

Looking in the past, we understand that Russian culture left us an excellent tradition - to magnify each other, providing respect for themselves not only to yourself, but also our ancestors. The masterroom is part of the Russian speech etiquette. "Name called, according to the patronymic," says the Russian folk proverb.

The tradition of calling each other by name and patronymic is the Russians from the time of time. "What to call you magnificent?" - This expression is often found in folk fairy tales, legends and epics. We call the warmth and warriors, the defenders of the land of Russian: Dobrynya Nikitich, Volga Svyatoslavich, Mikula Selyaninovich, with great reverence we appeal to Bogatyr Ilya Murometsu "Light Ivanovich". Ancient Russian princes sometimes signed not only by his father, but also by grandfather and great-grandfather, since the antiquity of the kind was especially proud of.

In the folk songs, the epithets "Father Son", "Batkov Daughter" serve as synonymous with all kinds of values, meanwhile, as the epithet "Neurovsky Son" means the same thing that Nevezhi, a man without education.

Languages \u200b\u200bA. V. Suslova and A. V. Superanskaya in the book "On Russian names" argue: "In Russian, the traditional naming of patronymic includes an element of respect for a person, and the appeal without patronymic is perceived as familiar, property or disrespectful."

Formally, patronymic is an indication of relatives, belonging to the family, the head of which is called a certain name. In the dupress period, the use of the name and patronymic has a practical goal. "It not only reflected," Linguist S. I. Zinin points out, "respect for parents' memory, but also performed a legally enshrined sign of a peculiar right to property, spiritual and other inheritance."

As a sign of respect for the patronymic name, according to the annals of the XI century (according to N. M. Karamzin, S. M. Solovyova), first arose in relation to the princes (Prince Yuri Alekseevich Dolgoruky, Prince Izyaslav Yaroslavich and others), then to famous boyars , nobles.

Sometimes the origin of the famous person was marked by the name of not the Father, but grandfather, for example, Yuri Grandk Svyatopolch. In some cases, patronymic could be made not only on behalf of the Father, but also on behalf of the mother (sometimes due to the illegal origin of the child).

... and a sign of the classroom

Historically, the middle name was divided into several discharges. Hopes did not have it at all. Simply noble people received "half-day": Peter Osipov Vasilyev. The middle name for -vich became a sign of belonging to a classroom, aristocratic top.

Interestingly, Sufifix -ich, according to the studies of the doctor of Philological Sciences V. I. Maksimova and A. L. Maximova, participated in education and words like "Igorevich", Vladimirovich, and such as Popovich, "Prince " This community of word formation is not accidental: and in that, in another case, the suffix indicated not just to kinship or attitude to the head of the family, but also on the nature of this relationship. These are not only sons, but also the heirs of the dominated persons. Therefore, the patronymic of Nich (-OVICH) was originally limited.

In the XV century, as candidate of philological sciences M. V. Gorbanevsky notes, naming from -vich was considered a special privilege: they only called princes. A little more such right was given to the king for special merit. So, in 1610, the king of Vasily Shuisky in gratitude to the assistance of the merchants of Stroganov in the accession of the Urals and Siberia to the Moscow state commanded Maxim and Nikita Stroganov, their descendants and descendants of Seeds Stroganov wrote with "-vich" and gave a special title of "famous people." In the XVII century, the Stroganov was the only merchant name that was carrying this title.

Since the reign of Peter I, the Count "Patronymic" becomes mandatory in all documents, and all high-ranking persons may be referred to as the patrony of home. In addition, the official trice naming (name, patronymic, surname) comes into force. During this period, such a form of appeal, according to Linguist N. A. Petrovsky, "was a feature of Russian language and only then spread to Ukraine and in Belarus, and then further, in other lands of immense Russia." The custom of calling people by patronymic did not exist at the Western Slavs. It fixed only in the Slavic East and south.

Different forms of patronymic were enshrined under Catherine II, which is confirmed by its "official painting". In the unofficial situations, in everyday life, Russian people called each other on the names and patches in this form, which is familiar to us and now: the Music of Nashevich, -Evich, -One, -ovna, -Is, was not limited to. For example, Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky and Sophia Pavlovna calls the main heroes of the comedy "grief from the mind" A. S. Griboyedov.

When the speaker wanted to emphasize the special respect for the person, showing the shade of the location, love, the patronymic was used even instead of the name: Yaroslavna in the "Word about the regiment of Igor", Savelich in the story "Captain's daughter" A. S. Pushkin, Nilovna in the novel M. Gorky " Mother".

Do not replace from the Father and Fatherland

It is impossible not to notice the relatives between the words Fatherland, patronymic, father. In ancient Russian sources, they were not distinguished by the meaning of independent modern words "patronymic" and "Fatherland". The interpretation of them depended on the context: somewhere they meant "Motherland, Fatherland", somewhere - "Origin, Birth", in other texts - "Father's condition, paternity", in others - "Otcheech honor, dignity", "Properties Father ", and sometimes" Generic possession, which is inherited from ancestors. "

The "Father Naming" value for the first time appears in the current texts of the first half of the XVII century. The activity of the word "patronymic" in the XVIII century, although throughout the century "patronymic" and "fatherland" is still interchangeable. Only at the end of the XVIII century, the meaning of the "Naming to Father" is being enshrined, and for the second "homeland, depreciation". "But you need to first say his name, patronymic and surname. His name was Sanin, Dmitry Pavlovich "(I. S. Turgenev" Wounds ").

For colloquial speech of the XIX century, the expression "on the father" was characterized. "How, meaning her name?" - asked the bazaars. - Fuenus ... Fed, - answered Arkady. - And in the father? ... it also needs to know. - Nikolaevna. " (I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Children"). Currently, this turnover is noted as spacious and illustrated by examples from the literature of the XIX century. The expression "with fathers" in the meaning of the "Naming of the Father" was left of the language.

In the modern Russian language "Father name" we call the patronymic. Fatherland in an elevated, high, poetic speech, we refer to the country in which a person was born and whose citizen is. However, despite some kind of difference in the meanings, the words "Fatherland", "Patronymic" remain single-colored, related. And this laid a deep meaning.

In a broad sense, the country has grown us. In it, our roots, our soul. The norms and rules of life, the moral foundations are laid here in the depreciation. In the narrow sense, each of us came out of a specific family, we are children of a certain father and we carry his patronymic. And patronymic, and fatherland is our origin, generic communication, rules of behavior, moral foundations and traditions. And Fatherland, and the patronymic we do not choose, they are given to us from birth. Like our predecessors, we, on the one hand, are proud of our country (fatherland) and their origin (fathers and grandfathers), and on the other hand, we try to glorify our family, our fatherland. In general, patronymic indicates not only to belong to the family of his father, but also to belong to the Russian Fatherland, to Russian culture and Russian tradition.

It is not at all by chance in Russia, patronymic has formed on behalf of the Father. It was the husband who was considered the main thing in the family, the breadwinner and the defender, he had to be fully responsible for his family, including children for their upbringing. Patronymic said others about who brought up a child, reflecting the social component of his personality. The assignment of the middle name named after the Father traditionally emphasizes the whole way of family life, the authority of her husband, the head of the family, and in the Orthodox family - the head of the Small Church.

In recent decades, we observe the tendency to use patronymic only in purely official situations. Patronymic gradually disappears under the influence of English and Western communication manner. The Russian press is committed to the "democratization" of the traditional Russian naming, regardless of the age and public situation, and this affects the linguistic habits of the mass audience.

But should we replace from our roots, from the tradition, which is transmitted from generation to generation, from the possibility of magnifying each other, emphasizing in circulation polite, respectful attitude towards a person?!

Linguists on the pages of special magazines are increasingly raising this problem. "Are such liberty in the use of Russian patient? Rather, in their systemic non-use? " - asks the doctor of Philological Sciences I. A. Korolev. And the doctor of philological sciences M. L. Grachev concludes: "Using only the name and surname, we are like Ivan, who does not remember the kinship." It is difficult to disagree with it. In accordance with the rules of etiquette, the naming of patronymic is considered one of the most important requirements of moral attitudes towards people, recognition of the dignity of the individual. In his article, Dr. Philological Sciences N. I. Formanovskaya makes the following conclusion: "... called only by the name and surname, a person seems to be deprived of respect, and the text turns out to be contrary to the norms of the culture of communication, the rules of speech etiquette." This custom, it is necessary to assume, should be maintained and in contact with each other of Orthodox people, despite the rule in all the sacraments of the church, only their name received during baptism.

Irina Rokitskaya