Masha and the Bear is the most dangerous. The most harmful cartoon "Masha and the Bear": provocation or truth? View of the doctor of psychological sciences L.V. Matseva about the cartoon "Masha and the Bear"
Talk the cartoon "Masha and the Bear" is harmful to children? What is the cause of such fears of psychologists? What is the negative component of this animation masterpiece?
More recently, in the autumn of this year, Russian psychologists have drawn up the rating of the most harmful to children's psychology of cartoons. What was the surprise of Russians, when the masterpiece of the Western animation cinema called "Sponge Bob Square Pants" was the leader of this anti-Range, and our domestic product is "Masha and the Bear".
Masha and the Bear are the most harmful cartoon, is it?
This animation tape created by domestic designers and programmers using the most modern achievements of the IT industry. True, at first glance, the quality of the cartoon simply shakes: great detailing, excellent color depth, the game of light and shadows, truly live animation, exciting its realism.
Even despite the fact that the film is already about 7 years old, he now looks very worthy. It is clear that we are talking about a present breakthrough in the field of animated cinematography of domestic production, which benefits from its recent years, which is advantageous.
As a basis, the eponymous Russian folk fairy tale is based on, but it will be more correct to say that the cartoon is based on the traditional Russian epic and with the original has only a few similar plot line, which at the very beginning will dramatically led to some not quite understandable side.
From the point of view of children's perception, everything is created absolutely competent. The creators obviously stood a specific task - to captivate the attention of children by creating a tape that would like the most wide children's audience and force parents to lay out money at the cinemas and counters of stores selling thematic products. And it should be noted that they did it perfectly.
What is harmful to the cartoon "Masha and the Bear"?
If you abstract from the quality of animation and degree of earnance graphic elements of the multiplication world, the causing behavior of the main character simply rushes into the eyes. From the first moments of the appearance of it on the screen, the whole animal world begins to turn off legs on the head, the beasts are hiding in their own nora, but it is rather the only negative reaction of the cartoon world on a malicious girl.
From the very beginning, the opposition of a restless child to the world of animals is laid. Many psychologists know that children are more willing to associate themselves with representatives of the animal world, perceiving themselves as part of nature and seeking to live in harmony with her. In the cartoon, everything happens exactly the opposite.
Further development of events contributes to raising the age strap for the viewer. Let me remind you, the tape is deprived of any age limitations. You can watch it literally from the first days of life - Rating 0+.
The main heroine behaves defiantly and constantly violates any social norms. Her behavior leads to the emergence of the mass of problems in others. It methodically builds various Caverza, because of which the second main mountain falls into an awkward position - the Bear.
The image of a bear may, according to the creators of the tape, personifies the image of the Father. Masha behaves in such a way that no doubt remains in the complete absence of any respect for the eldest, and the bear, instead of punishment or at least conviction, constantly forgives the main heroine all her pants.
How can I interpret the events of this cartoon from the point of view of the psychology of a child, no matter, a boy or a girl: the world is an amazing place where you can be yourself and do what I want. Any pranks, mischief, the absolute irregularity of the eldest, everything will be forgiven. For bad actions will not follow any punishment. The present incarnation of the phrase "This world belongs to you," although it is completely from another story.
Opinions of psychologists
From the point of view of children's psychologists, the cartoon has a bright antisocial orientation. Therefore, it was included in the list "Harmful cartoons for a children's psyche". Penetrating the ideas of the ribbon, children may not form the face of permitted and extrapolate the actions of the animation tape for real life: if it was allowed by some Masha from the cartoon, why do I forbid it to do, why do me scold me for what Masha was allowed?
Child psychology will not find an intelligible response to these issues, and moving along the path of least resistance, hurry to declare his victims of their distinguished adults.
I suppose should not be explained to how much a destructive there may be such a situation in which the child is firmly confident that adults do not like it, but only try to build a goat, constantly angry it. Long stay in such a state can lead to defects of personality formation, developing a resistant dislike for parents and to the mass of other no less dangerous complexes.
Conclusion
Answering the question: whether the cartoon "Masha and the Bear" is the most harmful to the child a masterpiece of animated cinema, I suppose will be difficult to answer unequivocally.
Of course, if you just sit down the baby in front of the TV, turn on the cherished channel and go about your business, in this case, probably, yes - is. This animated series can pose a threat to child psychology.
On the other hand, if the view will be joint, and the parents can clarify the child in time that this is an antiprode and such behavior is unacceptable, perhaps the children's reaction will be another and in the consciousness of a small person he will consolidate the understanding that Masha is not too good a character.
Tuesday, July 09
Day of reddish sheep, 9 red Maine, Element - Sky. A favorable day for shipping on the road, processing land, carrying out water supply, trade and exchange, meetings with a famous scientist or sister. Good day for born in the year of snake, horses, pigs and mice. It is not recommended to cut hair, Give things off, the starter to treat the disease, lay the foundation for the house, lead the bride into the house and play the wedding, move, make bloodletting and cavity, make a medicine. An unfavorable day for born a year of monkeys and chicken.
Wednesday, July 10
Yellow Monkey Day, 8 White Maine, Element - Water. The day is good for the production of goods, learning astrology, entry into friendly relations, trading, departure on the road, debt return, artistic processing of iron. Hair cut - to longevity.Good day for born in the year of pigs, mice, cows and dragon. It is prohibited to catch fish, take an oath, dig a well, bring the bride to the house and play the wedding, dance and celebrate, draw clothes. An unfavorable day for born in the year of the snake and horses.
Thursday, July 11
DAY Yellowish chicken, 7 red Maine, Element - Mountains. A favorable day for learning the alphabet, reading books, the drive of the bride into the house and wedding, making medicine, seeding, planting trees, trade, bookmarks at home. Hair cut - to strengthen the senses.Good day for born in the year Tiger, hare, monkeys and chicken. It is not recommended to score cattle and hunt, start a big deal, to make bloodletting and cavity. An unfavorable day for born in the year cow, dogs, sheep and dragon.
Non-easy Masha!
I propose an article of a psychologist (in some reduction), under which you fully subscribe: "Let's take a closer for example, as affecting children a cartoon series" Masha and the Bear ". It is made according to the laws of children's perception and therefore like the children. But, as we know, not all that you like the child, it is useful for him. As a specialist, I believe that this animated series does harm children the psyche, moreover, from a psychological point of view is a "informational bomb", laid under the Russian mentality. Historically, it so happened that in Russia the woman is the one who supports a man helps him in his work, emotionally and energy feeds, takes, selflessly regrets, sympathizes. The maximum embodiment of this role is a loving and disinterested mother. It is this position that the women who helped our country to overcome difficulties, while preserving themselves. It is this image that is embodied, including in art. Now, thanks to the emergence of information technologies, created by someone animated films can see many children. What images do they lay in them and how many of these images correspond to our mentality?
In the first series of cartoon, acquaintance with the heroes. We still do not see everyone, but as soon as the girl appears on the screen, we see the reaction of animals - all the animals are hiding hopefully, as there is a destructive force that is dangerous. From the very beginning, the opposition to the child and nature is laid. As psychologists, we know that small children, on the contrary, often associate themselves with animals, they perceive themselves as part of nature and is in harmony with her. The authors of the cartoon this connection destroy, showing the child that the world around and everything who lives in it is just a means to achieve your goal.
How does the plot develop further? We see that *** it is very difficult to determine the boundaries of your behavior. We can remember the ancient Russian fairy tale about Masha and the Bear: having come to the house to bears, the heroine of this fairy tale does not sit at the table to the place of the Pope Bear, and chooses the place adequate to his age a bearish place, that is, the place of the younger. Unfortunately, the cartoon heroine behaves differently, manifesting disrespectful to the bear (which simultaneously embodies the image of the animal for our country, and the image of the Father) and constantly violates social norms with impunity, receiving positive reinforcement for this. That is, the father is not authority, the father can be used by anything. A message that is hidden getting girls when watching this cartoon: "The world is an interesting place where you are - Home, you can play with this world and do whatever you want. Even if you break all the social taboos, everything will be fine with you. " It acts scary for children, because positive reinforcement teaches them what behavior is safe and desirable. But, as adults, we know - it is not.
The spectrum of emotions that demonstrates Masha is very limited - even not the most advanced child is experiencing much more emotions than the heroine. In fact, all her emotions are manifested only in the field of cognitive experiences - something is interesting for her, she surprises something, I am amusing and she wants to know something. It's all. She does not sympathize with anyone and even their own pain, for example, when falling, she does not experience. As a biorobot, it does not perceive criticism, the state of others is indifferent - in one of the episodes it creates a very difficult situation for Santa Claus (sacral, archetypal character) and amuses it. And such examples can be given a set.
As a specialist, I am most worried about that the authors of the multiplication series for some reason, consciously or unconsciously, created a heroine for our children, which is deprived of the ability to love. It does not have a female start - making, sympathy and tenderness. We know that children learn to perceive this world, imitating favorite heroes. The image of the heroine is an example to which a little girl will be focused, so psychologists and parents need to carefully look at the image of the heroine that the authors created, and decide for themselves - whether they want the children to perceive the world and communicate as Masha communicates ? And how will this giving Masha be treated for your own children? It's not a secret that modern mothers often refuse to breastfeed their child, afraid to spoil the shape, and refuse them to take care and love when they cry on a three-week or three-month aged, or closer to the year, believing that the child manipulates them with his cry. And in fact, the child is simply intestinal colic or the teeth begin to cut, it just hurts and scary. It is enough for my mother to hug it and press him, and the pain and fear go, but for this grew up Masha should be able to feel someone else's pain as his own, but our Masha from the cartoon is practically not experienced.
Returning to the beginning of the conversation: I want to emphasize that the problem of correct certification of media products is now very relevant. Psychologists should, in collaboration with other specialists, protect children from uncontrolled media content. "
For many years in a row, people who (like me) rose on the beautiful Soviet cartoons, complained that Russia, as a country, the manufacturer of children's animation, disappeared from the world map. The situation has changed several years ago, primarily thanks to the cartoon "Masha and the Bear", which became a global hit. He is watched in different countries, people are far from Russian folklore, with his eternal theme of the girl wandering closer to bears.
"Just a couple of weeks ago in the states. We sit with relatives in a Japanese restaurant, sushi rush, we communicate ... Here the daughter says "something familiar sounds somewhere." Listened - it seems that something somewhere, but I did not remember ... The daughter came to walk, returned slightly in misunderstandings: in a couple of tables sits black woman with her daughter (the same) and daughter "Masha and the Bear" on the table"- read yesterday in Facebook.
Something similar today can be seen in many countries: from France to South Korea. Moreover, the general opinion that can be read in the reactions in different languages: this series refers to the rare category that adults can look along with children. And together to fill in laughter.
But not everyone is satisfied with the series. There are critics that warn about the dangers that Masha can cause children's psyche, public consciousness, state ideology. Twenty years ago, one little hysterical head of an incomplete family (in the surprise: a single mother) told me:
- And why no one draws attention that the fairy tale "Wolf and Seven Cats" is about the problems of non-trap.
- Walker?!
There is no goat. Goat one children raises. No goat.
This woman could be understood. I did not argue.
But it was with this method of interpretation approached the cartoon "Masha and the Bear" critic"Gaaretz" Rogel Alper, sawing in the popular Russian cartoon "Annoyable and gloomy sediment, dotted in a double day." Seeing this news onwebsite Izrus I didn't believe it first.
Rogel Alper, following my friend's interpretation method, discovered the main problem in the absence of parents: "Girl, where are your mom and dad?". He managed to diagnose in a cartoon a whole bundle of unhealthy and ideologically harmful complexes: from paranoid existential fears of loneliness in a girl who is afraid that the bear will run away from her, because they ran from her before (where are the parents?), Before the unhealthy sense of guilt and unrealized debt Dreaming escape from the child of the predator. With animal seriousness analyzed the alper relationship of Masters and animals, which prevents a little girl in all his nose. "Masha is a foreign body in this environment that is placing with its existence," the alper concluded, calling for parents to pay attention to the frightening essential content of the Russian cartoon. After all, children can involuntarily absorb these psychologically unhealthy, ideologically harmful and nasty ecology of sending.
People who read the text immediately began to brand the "left bastard" and "Russophobia", began to mock "that they smoke in this Garetz" I have a hurry to assure. Alper - so not one. Russian professor Lidia Vladimirovna Matveyeva, who heads the Monitoring Commission for the Implementation of the Federal Law 436 "On the Protection of Children from Information Having Having Haval Health and Development" with the Commissioner for the Rights of the Child under the President of Russia for the Rights of the Childshared with the "psychological newspaper" with their reflections on what impact is on the psyche of the child, the series "Masha and the Bear". Lydia Vladimirovna - Man Diezhen Serious - Professor of the Department of Psychology of the Faculty of Psychology of Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Head of the Research Group "Psychology of Mass Communications", studying the problem of the impact of the media to the human psyche and the problem of human psychological safety in the information global space. She is a scientist official authorized by the state to supervise over content. And the sentence does not sound like a childish seriously.
"Let's, for example, consider how the cartoon series" Masha and the Bear "affects children. It is made according to the laws of children's perception and therefore she likes the children. But, as we know, not all that you like the child, it is useful for him. Like a specialist, I believe that this animated series makes harm to the children's psyche, moreover, from a psychological point of view, this is the "information bomb", laid under the Russian mentality, "says Lydia Vladimirovna. The sentence is so strict that it is completely incomprehensible why it does not encourage to ban the cartoon, and its creators send not so distant.
Her a lot of charges of the cartoon. And pictures in the cartoon, as it seems a professor, move too fast, and therefore the child may have logoneurosis. And in it there is a "mismatch of the hierarchy." In the old folk fairy tale, coming to the house to bears, the girl does not sit at the table at the place of the Pope Bear, and chooses the place adequate to his age, that is, the place of the younger, then Masha from the cartoon, to great professorship, behaves differently. "Showing the bear (which simultaneously embodies the image of the sacred animal for our country, and the image of the Father) and constantly violates social norms with impunity, receiving positive reinforcement for it. That is, the father is not authority ...". And if today allow the girl to violate the taboo in relation to the Father and the Bear, then tomorrow, growing, she will turn on and on the "bear" party "United Russia", and even, it is terrible to think about the All-Russian Father President Putin!
And the emotional limitations of Masha: "even not the most developed child is experiencing much more emotions than a heroine. In fact, all of her emotions are manifested only in the field of cognitive experiences - it is interesting to her, I am surprising something, I am amusing and she wants something Find out. It's all. She does not sympathize with anyone and even his own pain, for example, when falling, it does not experience. As a biorobot, she does not perceive criticism, it is indifferent to the state of others. " Indeed, here you can agree with the professor. In the image of the machine, the theme of the fifth size of civil liability is not disclosed, and the willingness line to die for Russian spring near Lugansk.
And the accuracy of the status role of the Russian woman also affected the image of a small girl of Masha. "Historically, it so happened that in Russia a woman is the one who supports a man helps him in his work, emotionally and energy feeds, accepts, selflessly regrets, sympathizes." And the little Masha, as we see in the cartoon, far from complying with this high standard. She pulls the bear, and does not support. It does not help in work, but interferes and spoils.
But in this note, we are interested in items in which the supervising professor is similar to the criticism of the liberal newspaper. And the similarity is amazing. Matveyeva also condemns the film for the fact that the girl in the forest is a foreign body, the destructive principle, which all animals are afraid: "In the first cartoon series, there is a familiarity with the heroes. We are not yet visible, but as soon as the girl appears on the screen, we see the reaction of animals - All animals are hiding more accurate, as there is a destructive force that is dangerous. "
The head of the monitoring commission for the execution of the law "On the protection of children from information that hurts their health and development" also believes that the cartoon is harmful from an ecological point of view, since it destroys the connection of the child with nature, with the environment, part of which the smaller man must feel . Professor brand emotionally limited masha for the inability to love, irresponsibility, etc.
And the topic of the relationship of children and parents who are absent in the cartoon, Professor Matveyev also worries: "And how does this giving Masha be treated for their own children?". Interviews of Professor Matveev generally full of pearls. And I am on my non-hearth efforts to stop quote, because it has already repeatedly exceeded the size of the notes recommended by the editors of the site.
Verious conclusions will not do. I will not list the arguments of aesthetic, ethical, psychological plan in defense of Masha and the Bear. This masterpiece does not need this masterpiece. I have only one question: why is the opinion of the liberal author of the progressive newspaper "Gaaretis" so much coincides with the opinion of the Russian reactionary Derportord?