Is there a supernatural in the world. How to find out your supernatural abilities

So is there a supernatural on earth? And got the best answer

Answer from Fen! X [Guru]
In front of me the road to nowhere
I do not know what the turn
And the mums of the coming scares sometimes
And tightly closed past gates
I'm in a cage, drove like a beast
But who is a hunter? Own thoughts
And in my head one word: Believe!
And only questions, no strength - Raskisli
But no one will give me any answers to my questions.
No one will tell where my fate
And I go ahead, not listening to the councils
And shines with a pale sparkle star ...
Inet
Source: But no one will give me answers to my questions .. Only yourself ...

Answer from Ѓlyana Golovinov[newcomer]
In the world there are a lot of inexplicable science of things, the ghosts were seen in many photos, there are a couple of topics that the time journey is possible and many other incomprehensible and inexplicable. So it can be safely assumed that yes - supernatural exists

Answer from Yutatkov Sergey[newcomer]
Supernatural: no one knows what can be over our or someone else's nature. The most mysterious is mysterious laws of nature.

Answer from Vanya Kovalenko[active]
i think that in any case why talk about what is not

Answer from Klavusik.[guru]
All that humanity did not understand and did not realize, are called supernatural.
In fact, this is my opinion - everything that exists (visible and invisible, disabled and unknown), for the universe - naturally.

Answer from Ivan.[guru]
Yes. But it happens from God and from Satan.
1 UFO is Satan's Kozny. Unpacking worlds do not have access to our sinful land.
2 No. The Bible is the word of God. Through it we recognize the will of God, she helps us understand the plan of salvation of mankind.
3 I do not know who it is. But that's what the Bible says:
4 Feedback with whom? With God is a prayer.

Answer from Lapp[guru]
If you get acquainted with research on quantum physics, you will open amazing things. To answer you may need not one hour. Do you want to break your questions?

Answer from .!. [guru]
UFOs are not always aliens ... But aliens exist, moreover, some of them are on Earth. But in the appearance of people, and they will not claim anyone about themselves ...
The person was created by alien civilizations, but they only technically participated in this.
By the way, they were disappointed in man ..
The Bible (not that you have on the shelf, but that would be if it would not be redone it) is indeed in some extent a message or knowledge ...
and Jesus was a messenger, but not aliens, and he was not God and he did not ask him to make an idol out of him, he just wanted to explain to people what and how (he really loved people, with the help of this "love" he felt in every person native)
and I did not jumped about "Krion" .. Different things were confused with such a name.
p, S: Can I not believe me, I just answered.)

Answer from Avicularia versicolor.[active]
Questions are completely simple to which it is easy to give a normal answer 😉
- UFO unequivocally answered. This may be an anomalous zone, human own abilities, an object of man-made nature or simply hallucination. Then it is necessary to raise the question of what an extraterrestrial mind.
- Bible metaphorical text describing reality, people who have reached the level of knowledge higher than the average. Well, in principle, yes, here it will be better to turn to the cab.
- Crane, well, suppose theoretically that this is a person communicating with Lemurians from the parallel world. Well, what can they teach us? They are no better in terms of development, everyone wants to appear in our world.
- Feedback is always in any, everyone is included in the system. Let me give an example. The man sitting in the kitchen behind the beer's bank, read the Bible and thinks, and the man I am good, won, how I did not go to the goats of the devil of the tempter, to know and the cosmic forces in me are interested. Or maybe how it will develop, whatever they are more interesting. Weighing categories are different.

Suppose that the supernatural exists and consists of creatures / forces that can interact with our natural universe in ways that contradict the natural laws of this universe (at least as we know them).

Take any common or historical example of supernatural, such as miracles, spiritual / supernatural revelations, sixth senses (in some contexts), angels / demons, various explanations of God / gods, vampires / iswolves, etc., what you like or is your beloved . In general, you just need a creature that exists in another measurement / plan of existence and can at least unilaterally interact with our in a way that "violates" the laws of nature.

What evidence may exist or can be obtained for these creatures / forces / events that are really supernatural? Is it possible that they can be scientifically checked or proven? To what level or degree?

Any supernatural event that can be observed (for example, healing faith) may have witnesses that provide a certain number of legal / historical evidence, but is there a way to expand it in a more stringent scientific test? For example, if we could know that the supernatural event should have happened at a certain point in time, and fix any data we want, can it ever achieve a higher level of evidence than the evidence in the style of the courtroom?

Note: This probably applies to many other similar issues, such as proof of one of many multi-valued hypotheses, proof of freedom of will / dualism, etc. I think it can also work to proof collisions with aliens ...

Court ammon

What do you determine how "really supernatural?" I found with this particular theme that the treatment "supernatural" gets dominates in the subsequent discussion. As one of the trivial examples: if the supernatural means "not explained by natural means", and science seeks to prove everything with "natural means", science will never prove the supernatural, because it is defined as incoming otherwise.

Philip Kloeking ♦

Supernatural \u003d not in nature, surpassing it. Proof \u003d attitude to / explanation by fact in nature (adopted as the sum of all facts, the field of science and experience, etc.). Therefore, the supernatural by definition means unprovable. Not provable means that it is meaningless if it is not transcended to something to the provable. Total 2 Cantian cents.

LightCc.

@virmaior Corre me if I am mistaken, but isn't it philosophically to reflect on how a person proves that it is real and what is the main nature of reality?

Philip Kloeking ♦

@LightCC: If this is your only question, first read the questions that answers are already given on this topic, they are right from "related" and have already been allocated to you when writing this issue.

Answers

Court ammon

I think that your question is difficult to answer, so this is what it depends on the meanings of several words:

• Supernatural
• Proof of
• witness
• evidence

Many of them are known to determine independently. Attempting to determine them together often leads to trivial results.

For example, trivially demonstrate that there can be no evidence of supernatural. Any supernatural effect would have to be unpredictable by our existing empirical models. His research will lead to one of the two results:

• This is not amenable to scientific analysis, and in this case it is not proven scientifically
• It obeys scientific analysis, and in this case he becomes part of "nature". (See quantum mechanics for excellent example positive fancy Results woven into the model empirically protected with experiments, and is now considered "natural")

In contrast, religion constantly declares the existence of supernatural and offers its supernatural history as evidence. This proof is clearly not scientific (although some are trying), but it is considered evidence for them. To abandon their claims, we must define "prove" in such a way as to eliminate their claims. A lot of definitions were proposed, but most of the criteria of "unscientific evidence" do not correspond to the fact that we tend to call "proof", as well as scientific "evidence", as a rule, do not correspond to the fact that mathematics are called "proof".

There were dozens, if not hundreds, attempts to prove the supernatural, conducting statistical studies of "witnesses" to try to determine the criteria for gulling for them. Generally speaking, witnesses proved their unreliability in this regard.

To deepen in this area of \u200b\u200bphilosophy deeper in these vague terms. Epistemology studies what can be known and has many terms that are more suitable for the enterprise: deduction, induction and abductions are particularly useful examples of terms. This even serves as an effective approach to the concept of "witness", which at first glance seems more difficult. If you look at the epistemology, you will learn approaches and words that can be used to formulate your question in such a way as to get less trivial response. This is a good question line, it's just a question that is difficult to cope in the Stack Exchange Q & A format if you first do not get the local language.

LightCc.

I freely recognize that I am a philosophical layman and I do not own all the necessary terms. I agree that you can trivialize the answer to define the term. For me, this is usually (but not always) is simply a way to avoid the initial question. But there are cases when it is clearly wrong. Thanks for the answer - I am always ready to learn, but often lazy in terms of learning a better technical dictionary for such requests ...

Philip Kloeking ♦

@Lightcc: Well, philosophy is, in fact, the development of a more technical dictionary for studying and explaining the logical scheme of terms. Otherwise, each carrier of the language can be a "philosopher" only due to the ability to correctly use the language. Especially Philosophy.se encourages to ask and respond to specific technical use of specific philosophers.

LightCc.

In addition, I am not sure that the expansion of the natural kingdom so that it contains any future proof of the supernatural, is always the destruction of the supernatural. This certainly was in many cases in the latest history (the last 400 years or so). But let's say that we find a way to translate ourselves to another dimension in which there are "Angels / Demons" and another set of "laws of existence". It would seem, to expand our world of nature, including this new multi-sense, and say that he is no longer "supernatural" ... I'm not sure that the word for this is pretentious? Deceptive? Just wrong?

LightCc.

@ Philipklöcking I will increase my game then! :)

Court ammon

@LightCC What if we translate ourselves to the measurement where the inhabitants of this measurement can demonstrate to telepathy or even run right through solid walls, as if they were not even there? Some may even exist in the regions where you can prove that no one can survive. Will we include them as a "natural law" or they will be considered as unnatural, because you had to leave the world that you know to get there? The study of supernatural essentially leads to the study of natural. (By the way, these behaviors are anthropomorphisms of ordinary behavior of quantum mechanics)

Nelson Alexander

Yes of course.

You can * scientifically prove ** what is considered supernatural. But as soon as you do, they are no longer supernatural. They are "natural", as methods show natural science

Nevertheless, you probably spend your time on various hobgoblines and the terrible abilities that you list. We do not see such phenomena, isortic than, resurrection or control over the mind that require a scientific explanation. First you need to demonstrate them in public and repeatedly, which in most cases does not definition.

As the UM noted, under the "miracle" we understand exactly what you can not be predicted, control or repeat experimentally. Now we fly, treat the plague, we pass voices for many miles and make others previously "wonderful" actions. But they are no longer "miracles", except metaphorically.

Similarly, magnetism, sessions, ghosts and the like were often interested in encouraging scientists and philosophers. William James with his tolerant epistemology, for example, "loved to muffle the light to give miracles a chance," as Oliver Wayndel Holmes put it. The search never ends, the possibilities are never finally excluded.

Thus, it is possible that some of the frauds of the strange world, which you mentioned can be involved in science. Previously, we have never seen X-rays, so you may be discovered significant "auras". We never worked with direct neural entry machines, therefore, such power can be somehow designed telenischically. We have never created genetically monstrous mice or luminous rabbits, therefore, possibly arewolves right around the corner.

The fact is that you are mistaken in categories. Everything can be the object of the scientific method. But as soon as it is adequately demonstrated, contextualized within the framework of existing theoretical partitions, experimental testing and test results will be repeated "at will", we will no longer call it "supernatural". And, of course, there is a problem of research financing ...

LightCc.

Thanks Nelson, but I want to note that I did not limit the discussion by research or proof (although scientific evidence is not limited to the scientific method and may include only empirical data). It seems to me interesting (and actually quite funny) that you can replace the "supernatural" in my question with something like "aliens" and can almost the same as the same question, leave unchanged ... and have those same answers.

LightCc.

So, thinking about it a bit more, the essence of your answer is that the combination of evidence shows that scientific research responded to a natural explanation that people who lived to the era of the mind would call "supernatural" that the proof plank is so high that not Can be met?

Nelson Alexander

I do not know that the bar is "high." Science is just a method for determining, falsification, predictions, experiment, etc., ending with a hypothetical consensus, which is always open to revision, given new evidence. Of course, there are many things that we do not know. Many may contradict or revise our current "laws of nature." But it is assumed that things that we call "supernatural" do not belong to the field of "natural science". They can be simply intermittent, unmanaged, random, perceived only by little. As such, they are not "proven" in the "scientific" sense.

Alexander with King

I think you need to divide the supernatural into two categories:

• Religious supernatural: miracles, divine intervention, angels, etc. ... By definition, they go beyond science and cannot be checked. Testing requires reproducibility and falsification, and none of them apply in the case of religious supernatural events. The whole point of miracles is that God allegedly created the rules on who works in the universe, and he is the only one who can break them.
• Occult Supernatural: Vampires, Werewolves, Fairy, Witches, etc. ... If someone ever proves the existence of such creatures, then we will simply have to update the laws of science to take into account their existence. You can already see it in the literature that deals with this type of fantasy - those who deal with these types of creatures depicted as scientists who simply specialize in unusual areas of research.

In any case, to prove without a doubt that something supernatural happened, very unlikely. If something really happened (let's say, a person levitating or truly incredible healing occurred, such as a person with an amputated limb, which was restored by his natural limb), that is, only two ways to convince normal rational people in their truth:

• Or you can somehow be able to play an event at will.
• The event happened to a significant number of independent witnesses, which all indicate its incident.

Philip Kloeking ♦

As indicated in the comments above, other explanations should also be excluded. It is much more than just having a huge group of witnesses. We have them in every "magic" show in Las Vegas every day, but nothing supernatural does not happen, there is simply no obvious explanation for them.

LightCc.

I appreciate the answer. Thank you. I do not think that angels / demons fit into the first category, because, as far as I understand, myths / literature do not have unlimited strength. As for your initial statement that wonders / Divine intervention are not verified - I am not sure if your first answer is potentially contrary to this statement at the end?

Alexander with King

"I'm not sure if your first answer really does not potentially contradict this statement?" No - because testing and proof are two different things. We can rely on witnesses or archaeological evidence to prove that something happened, but you will never be able to check it out.

LightCc.

I agree that you will need some kind of repeatability and / or interaction for testing. I need to know that the event is approaching that I can collect data. For example, if Ginn gave me 3 desires, but I used only 1 ...

Mozibur Ulla

IN logic Hehels in the introduction to the first book about being the following:

So much is logical for a person, this is its nature. If, however, we oppose nature as such as the physical area, and the spiritual region, then we must say that logic is supernatural An element that permeates all its natural behavior, his ways of perception, intuition, desire ...

And logic has its own methods of evidence and demonstrations.

LightCc.

I take this definition of supernatural for explaining it from the point of view of dualism. Natural creature is physical, and the supernatural is spiritual. But it is not clear to me what is the requirement of evidence. Did hegel say that the fact that we are logical, is the supernatural element inherent to us? Would it be proof (by definition?) That we are dualistic in nature, right?

Conifold.

If the test is interpreted as it is usually interpreted in science, at least two conditions must be made. First, the supernatural must be recurrent and / or reproducible, or we can observe some violation of natural laws into predictable moments of time (for example, bleeding from crucifixes in certain dates), or, even better, to put experiments that cause such violations . Secondly, he had to be manifested, sublime mystical experience, private for a person, regardless of how experienced and trustworthy, he will not suit. However, I suspect that if these conditions are fulfilled, whatever phenomena have been delivered, they would be moved from the supernatural in a natural pillar and are studied from a scientific point of view.

Single events, supernatural or not, can be the subject of something like a historical study, and there is a confirmation concept based on the presence of reliable and documented accounts. Nevertheless, it trust often includes the idea that at least these accounts are physically believable. So miracles in the singular say that to overcome the gap in truth, the extraordinary level of documentation will be required.

Supernatural, as in violations of natural laws, is often associated with unlikely events, such as "unlikely" shoots or healing. They are not supernatural, even if they are in conversational speech hyperbolized as "nothing else like a miracle." We know that human probabilistic intuition is very erroneous and sees miracles where they are not, due to the error of the base rate. For example, the Vatican standard for wonderful healing is that the recovery should be "full", "instant", "long" and "inexplicable from a scientific point of view." However, from a scientific point of view, statistical accidents, although inexplicable, but are not wonderful. Again, there must be a repeating pattern and a high level of confirming documentation to make a statistical conclusion about some kind of supernatural.

LightCc.

I appreciate the answer and inclined to agree with the analysis. I think there is a place for possible testing, if you can find a way to cause a repetition of the event. For example, capture the vampire and conduct experiments (for fun example!). The healer of faith capable of repeatedly heal may be different. But in general, I agree with the recommendations that you offer.

James Kingsbury

Much of this, of course, will depend on who you are asking. In my own religious tradition, it is argued that miracles rarely happen (that is, they happen, but even the circumstances under which they occur are not a repeated conventional process). In the Catholic Church there are groups that ask another, but associated question: for this statement about something wonderful (for example, healing a miracle or phenomenon), was it really a miracle?

It is known that there is the concept of "lawyer of the devil", whose work was to pierce miracles in claims, showing that they were fraudulent or explained by natural reasons.

Recently, people in the city of Medjugorja argued that they saw Maria (Mother of Jesus), and later the Catholic Church said that this was not enough evidence.

Many studied Lourdes as an example, where there are many messages about wonderful healing. It was shown that individual healing There are beyond the limits of scientific knowledge of humanity, but since the healing process itself is not repeated, it is impossible to experiment with scientific meaning.

In these three examples or in any other, which could be brought, it is important to note that they take the form of a rather test or historical research, and not a scientific experiment. Since (at least, Catholics argue) Miracles are not repeated historical events, it seems appropriate to use an approach, more similar to the question like "Caesar conquered Gallia?" and not "how much time do you need that this object fell?"

LightCc.

Like other answers, appreciate additional quotes. Consensus is represented only by historical / test / empirical proof, which means that you need to solve for yourself, based on evidence - no scientific method is possible. If you cannot constantly call or force a supernatural creature to constantly call supernatural events.

As a time of 13 seasons of the series "Supernatural" we enjoy the company of charismatic brothers surrounded by different nonlessness, angels and demons. And where there is a mysticism in the plot, there will definitely have something interesting and in the shooting, stories and real life of actors. For the fans of the series, we collected the most interesting facts about the "supernatural".

Photo: Commons.Wikimedia.org / BeatleSoriginals

Shooting

As ideally, Eric Crypt the series was supposed to last no more than 3 seasons. After stunning success, the end moved to the 5th season, where the storyline would seem to and sums up to logical conclusion. But the continuation followed and at the moment it is about the release of the 14th, final season. The series will consist exactly of 300 episodes.

2. 16 instead of 22

The third season of the series came out in 2007. This is the only season where there is not 22 series, but only 16. It happened because of the strike of the scenarios, requiring an increase in deductions from the trade union.

3. Cripper - all head

The first plan of producers was the storyline - a pair of journalists collects urban legends and publishes them in a column of the newspaper "Unnatural". But with the arrival of Eric Crypt, the storyline turned into travel tape. By his plan, every little town tells his story. And after the director and and - there was no doubt - the duet must be nominated for the fore.

Thanks to the crip and the famous "supernatural", the winchester family and their faithful satellite appeared.

4. Why Kansas?

The screenwriter and producer chose the habitat of the Winchester Winchesters, Kansas, because of the proximity of the town to the legendary cemetery of the steel. After all, it is with him a lot of interesting legends, collected as a crypt for 10 years.

5. Who could think

Before approving the script already known to us, for the pilot series there were such options for the risk of history:

- Brothers brought up uncle and aunt;

- Sam's girl became a demon;

- Dean was a serial killer and killed her father (according to Sam, so he left to learn);

- The father of the brothers dies in the Jessica's house.

6. I demand rock!

In addition to music, written specifically for the TV series, a large number of original logging groups are used in the show. It was expensive, because their use is not a cheap pleasure, and the cripper rushed to leave if he was not allowed to apply them. Some tracks are taken from the Personal Collection of Crypt. Fan of your business, what to say.

7. Crypt is not Forever?

After the release of the fifth season, Eric left the project. This fact was terribly upset by the series fans, although the screenwriter promised that it would continue to participate and prompt interesting ideas to the new team.

8. Real from "Supernatural"

All sites held by the plot of the series authors created in real life. Now from all of these addresses there is a redirection to the official resource of the film studio. Another Dina's real phone number was also used. He could be seen in the series about the ghost rider. There it was possible to call and hear the message left by Eclas, the same as in the film.

9. Book cult

According to the scenes of the series, 12 books have written from 2007 to 2013. These are novels written by different authors.

10. Anime

In 2009, one season of Anime series was filmed on a Japanese film studio, in it 22 parts. Padaleks voiced in English Sam in all episodes, Eclaz was able to take part only in the pair of the last series.

11. Exorcism

The series uses real texts for exorcism. They are taken from the texts of Psalm 67 (68) and the Romanesque ritual prohibited in the 14th century, although some parts of this ritual are taken from the Bible.

Characters

12. Fathers and children

In real life, Actor D.D. Morganu, who has played the father of the Winchesters brothers, older than its "serial" eldest Son of Eclas for only 12 years. But the difference between the "brothers" and in the plot, and in life - coincides, 4 years.

13. Winchesters or Charissons

Crypt - Fan Harrison Ford and wanted the family of hunters to be the name Harrison. However, in Kansas, the real Sam Harisson lived and the legal aspect made to change the surname. With hard drives, it was also not all smoothly, I found a live Jack Winchester (so originally called Father Sam and Dina), I had to change the name of the character, and John Winchester appeared.

14. When the result exceeded expectations

Many people who loved us were conceived as episodic. These include:

- Bob Singer - had to appear in the same series;

- Crowley (Mark) was considered a guest character to 10 seasons;

- Misha Collins did not even dreamed that Castila would last so much and will be included in the main composition;

- Mark Pellegrino - Lucifer, is included in the main team only in the 12th season.

15. King of Ad

Crowley is the only mystical character, in real life is not such. Alistair Crowley is a real person, an occultist, a researcher and in many sources of the practice of Kabbalah, the creator of the Tarot Toto deck. Of course, Alistair consisted in the most famous occult organizations. Therefore, his British person came to the way on the role of the colorful king of hell.

16. SAM or DIN

Initially, ECLZ was tried to be the role of Sam, but rereading the script, he decided that Dean was closer to him in spirit. ECLZ took part in the casting of actors to Sam's role.

17. Castiel (Castiel)

In the Christian Scripture, there is no mention of such an angel, but there is in the Kabbalistic, where Cassiel is the strongest angel and is not able to appear in front of a person in a true appearance, because it kills ordinary mortals.

Creatures

18. Demons

All the characters of the demons (except the Crowley mentioned) are mostly taken from occult, kabbalistic and esoteric writings, some are taken from Christian scriptures, mythology of different countries. In particular, Kabbalah, Book Enha, Old Testament, Myths and Legends of Scandinavia, Greece, Rome.

19. Leviafany

According to the Scandinavian mythology, Leviathans are huge sea monsters living on the day of the Mariinsky depression. In other words, the snakes of the Yörmunganda carrying the end of the world. In the series, they were slightly stylized, but the essence of their existence was kept.

20. Monsters

Most monsters are taken from legends, legends, mystical, occult books. But there are those whose origin of the hands of the authors of the series.

21. Residents of Heaven

Among the Bible known to us are Archangel, Angels, Serafima, Nefilima. Apparently to divine creatures include both the reins that collect the souls and send them to their intended distribution.

22. Other essences

Among the many villages found on the path of the villages, there are various fabulous characters, ghosts, lost souls and entities from other cultures of our big planet.

I would like to note that the series "Supernatural" is not just an entertaining show. He introduces us with mythology of different countries, epochs and religions.