The essence of the "silent scene. Eloquent silence N.V.

Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol is a great Russian writer. His works are immortal: the typical of Gogol characters is far beyond the limits of time in which the writer lived and worked. One of these "eternal" works - the play "Auditor".

In Comedy, Gogol decided to laugh at the fact that "really worthy of a ridicule of universal." He managed in his play "gather everything bad in Russia in one pile, which he then knew, all injustice. The topic of the "auditor" itself was acute political in nature. But the most important thing that he wanted to show Gogol is not the defects of individual people, but false concepts about the duties inherent in most officials of that time. Due to this, a small stubble town, where the arbitrariness reigns, where there is no police order, where the authorities form a group of fraudsters and robbers, perceived as a symbol of the entire Nikolaev system.

Many recognize that how many times they did not watch the "auditor" were always captured by the final, striking on beauty, by the power of emotions, on the unusual and perfect surprise of the plot. Gogol as the playwright achieved that the auditorium in the final of the plays "was shocked by one shock." What is this shock?

Gogol attached great importance to the final scene, which begins after the stunning phrase of the gendarme about the arrival of the "new" auditor. This news shocks the officials of the city of N, waving at the same time readers and viewers. "Silent scene" is one of the climax in the play. The degree of shockness of the heroes after the report that "the official who arrived in the nominal command from St. Petersburg requires you the same hour to yourself," it is better and expressing impossible than affected by silence. Silence because there is nothing to speak in such a situation of disgraced officials who themselves drove themselves into the trap.

The plot of the comedy is pretty simple: in the crucial town of a passing person (Klezlekov) accepted for the auditor, which at this time was expected to be the bosses. Until the end of the comedy, the development of the plot is based on the frightened psychology of officials. At the same time, the clearer, the Glezlekov game becomes more clearly, the greater the city and officials are convinced that it is precisely the St. Petersburg auditor. A clear deception they take for a thin masking of inspection instances. The fact that Khlestakov "does not pay" for nothing, makes it makes it turning every step every step, every word of the hero: it means a large chin!

The zag "the auditor" is also chosen unusually convenient. The news of the auditor, hurt everyone for the living, immediately exposes each official as one of the participants of the Plutov company. Their subsequent conversation and mutual reproaches create an unsightly picture of universal fraud, bribery and arbitrariness. All of them - the generation of the age-old bureaucratic system, none of them feels civil debt, everyone is busy with their insignificant interests. The spiritual and moral level of their extremely low. But these are people in the hands of which the fate of the people is, the fate of all Russia!

Now that we will see what wanted to show us the playwright in their work, back to the final stage. It is a symbolic character, emphasizing the idea of \u200b\u200ban imminent retribution, which seems like "Thunderstorm in the giving the right law."

Very eloquent poses of each acting face of this scene. The most expressive posture of Governed ("in the middle in the form of a post with open hands and thumps his head"), as if writing to God. Gingerbile at this moment understands that he did not deceive him, and he himself was deceived. And, undoubtedly, he is the main character in a dumb scene. His wife and daughters are standing "with the right movement of the whole body." To whom they still rush to protection? .. The poses of the remaining characters are expressed either a question or a shock, or confusion. The postmaster turns into a question mark, Luke Lukich has a lost face expression. Especially the author put the strawberry, a judge, Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky on the left side of him, to show who he trusted over the entire stay of the horstykova. In a mute scene, there are only people deceived in any way. Therefore, there is no horstykova - a false "auditor".

Gogol in a mute scene uses the word "petrified." People are inactive, die from the realization that they did so with them. If their conscience was clean, they would certainly find that they would answer the offender, but how to be, if they mocked themselves in bribery, deception, self-smuggling? It remains only to be silent ...

Now we see that a dumb scene is not only an effective emotional impact, in this scene the basic meaning of the work is concluded. Could Gogol finish a comedy "Auditor" otherwise? I think there is no. Catching will be held, Gingerbread, will surely find a way to get out of this situation, but this is another story. The main thing is that deception is sooner or later revealed and no matter what: truth or other deception.

A mute scene caused a wide variety of judgments in the literature about Gogol. Belinsky, without entering a detailed analysis of the scene, it emphasized its body for general design: she "excellently closes the purpose of the plays."

In academic literature, the focus was sometimes raised on the political subtext of a silence. For H. Kotlyarevsky, for example, it is "apology of government alerting power": "Untera, who forces the head of the city and all the highest officials to become and turn into Eastukanov, - a clear example of the author's bivalve."

According to V. Hippius, a dumb scene also expresses the idea of \u200b\u200bpower and law, but peculiarly interpreted: "Realistic-typed images of local authorities ... he<Гоголь> opposed the naked abstract idea of \u200b\u200bpower, which involuntarily brought to another generalization, to the idea of \u200b\u200bretaliation. "

A. Voronsky, relying on the conclusions of Andrei White (in the book "Gogol's skill") about the gradual "sorting of gesture" of Gogol Heroes, considers a dumb scene with a symbolic expression of this killing: "It all happened because the living people" evenings ", merry pastries, The range ... gave way to mannequins and puppets, "live corpses".

According to M. Khrapchenko, the emergence of the gendarme and a mute scene represent "external junction". "The genuine junction of the comedy is enclosed in a monologue of Governing, in his angry statements at its address, at the address of the clicks, paperman, in his sarcastic words:" What are you laughing? Laugh! .. ". Episode with gendarme is only a mechanical lack of play.

B. Yermilov, on the contrary, is convinced of the psychological plausibility of the Comedy finals. "PSYCHOLOGICAL" reason to stagnation of actors in the comedy finals
It is clear: having survived so many unrest and hassle, it is necessary to start everything again, and after all, the new auditor just may be a partic person; And for sure he will be aware of the scandalous story with Lesserizor. But not in this, of course, the meaning of the amazing finale. We have a parade of carved adhesion and vulgarity frozen in amazement before shook her the most abyssful of his own nonsense. "

It would be possible to increase the summary of various statements about a scene. But mostly all of them are reduced to the above points of view.

And how did Gogol himself interpret the scene? It is not known that he spoke about this to the presentation of the "auditor". After the presentation, the writer emphasized many times that the mute scene expresses the idea of \u200b\u200bthe "law", upon the occurrence of which everything "turned pale and shook" (the red editorial office of the "Theater Covery ..."). In the final text of the "Theater Covers ..." "The second artist of the arts", the closest Gogol in his views (he, for example, belongs to the statements about Aristofane, about the "public comedy"), says that the omission of the play should remind of justice, Government's debt: "Give God, so that the government always and everywhere hear the calling to his - the representative of Providence on Earth - and so that we believed in it, as ancient believed in Rock, overtaking crimes."

We have no reason to doubt the sincerity of Gogol, that is, the fact that the idea of \u200b\u200bthe law, to protect the government of justice, actually contacted them with the comedy finals. Gukovsky is inaccurate, believing that the author's comment on a scene originated in the 40s when the writer "rolled ... to the reaction." The sketch of the "Theatrical Reinforcement ..." was made shortly after the premiere of the comedy, and meanwhile, Gogol's interpretation of the final is mainly pronounced here.

But the thing is that it is no more than the conceptual design of one idea. This is the so-called "key", which usually want to replace the whole reading of artistic things. But Gogol in the second edition of the "Union of the Auditor" invests in the mouth of the first comedian, such a note: "The author did not give me the key ... The comedy would come back on the allegory." A dumb scene is not an allegory. This is an element of the figurative thought of the "auditor", and as such, it gives the way out of complex and holistic artwork. In a word, the task is to read the final of the "auditor" as an expression of an artistic thought.

Some strokes of this reading are outlined in the explanations of the scene given above. The attention is drawn to the fact that the "idea of \u200b\u200bpower" is expressed in the final abstractly in contrast to the full-blooded concreteness - household, psychological, public - the whole play. More precisely, Gogol has some concreteness, but brings it to a certain turn. A concretization trend clearly detects the creative history of the final replica. In the first draft editorial office: "A coming official requires Governing and all officials to themselves." In the final edition: "Come by nominal command from St. Petersburgthe official requires you the same hourto yourself". A new auditor is somewhat specified and rises in its rank. His instances sent clearly: Petersburg and king. There is a hint of the urgency of the case and, perhaps, the angryness of the arrived auditor. But then Gogol does not go. The fact that the auditor will take and what faces officials, nothing is reported.

"The second lover of arts" said that a mute scene should force contemporaries to believe in the government, "how ancient believed in rock ...". This resembles the poisonous remark of Vyazemsky: "In our comedies, the authorities often occupy the place of rock (Fatum) in ancient tragedies." The appearance for such a comment was the final of the Fonvizynskiy "cheap", where the masses of a positive character (PREDIN) are reported to the characters in the vicious (space): "The name of the government you order the same hour to collect people and peasants of yours to announce the declaration of the declaration that for the inhuman of your wife, before Which painted her extremely poorly, commanding me the government to take your house and villages in the custody. "

But the fact of the matter is that the final of the "auditor" does not report any specific measures, about the punishment in the direct legal administrative sense of the word.

This kind of nonhability is the characteristic property of the artistic thought of Gogol. "Picture us our honest, direct person," called Gogol in the Petersburg scene ... "and repeatedly attended this task. But before the second volume of the "dead souls", he portrayed "our honest, direct person" (in modern times) only on the threshold - on the threshold of a honest case, like a certain "very modestly dressed man" in the "Theatrical Drive ...", or even On the threshold of conscious life: "She is now like a child, - thinks chicchik about the governor's daughter ... from her everything can be doneit can be a miracle, and maybe the rubbish will go out, and the rubbish will come out! " On the half-word is interrupted by Gogol and thought in the "Revolution". It is given as a hint, as the idea of \u200b\u200bproper and desired, but not real and implemented.

But the main thing is still not in this. We have already said that the Russian comedy to Gogol distinguished not so much the triumph of justice in the final, how many heterogeneity of the two worlds: the implanted and the one that was implied behind the scene. A happy junction flowed out of the existence of the "big world". It could not be within the limits of stage action (for example, in the "Yabed" punishment of the defective vice: the robes were captured and imprisoned; but the officials are not yet convicted), but still it was implied as an opportunity.

Gogol has no ideal implied world. The intervention of the highest, fair, punishing force does not follow from the heterogeneity of worlds. It comes from outside, suddenly overtakes all the characters.

We take a look at the outline of a mute scene.

In the "comments ..." Gogol draws attention to the integrity and instantry of the actions of the characters in a mute scene. "The last uttered word should make an electric shock at once, suddenly.The whole group must change the position in one MiG Oka.The sound of amazement must escape all women at onceas if out one chest.From non-compliance, the entire remarks may disappear all the effect. "

We note on that the circle of acting persons is expanding at the end of the play to the limit. A lot of people gathered - extraordinary events who were crowned with Khlechkov, probably raised, probably from their places and such that, using the expression from the "dead shower", had long been "could not be lured out of the house ...". And all of them struck the terrible news of the arrival of the real auditor.

However, no matter how large a group of characters in the final scenes, there is no "merchants and citizenship". The real motivation of this is simple: they are not equally equal. Only the highest circles of the city gathered. In a graphic drawing of a mute scene (which is thought out to be thought out of Gogol), there is also a "hierarchical shade": in the middle of the city, next to him, right, his family; Then on both sides - officials and honors in the city; "Other guests" - at the very edge of the scene and in the background.

In a word, a silent scene graphically represents the top of the pyramid of the "national team". The blow fell at its highest point and, losing a little in its strength, spread to lower layers of the pyramid. Pose of each character in a mute scene plastically transmits the degree of shocks, the strength of the hit. There are many shades - from the frozen "in the form of a pillar with outstretched hands and throw back the head" Governing to other guests, which "remain just pillars." (The character of the character and behavior during the action was also reflected in his posture; naturally, for example, that Bobchinsky and Dobchinsky froze with "riding hand movements to each other,crushed mouths and praised each othereyes. ")

But on the face of three ladies, guests, only the "most satirical expression of the face" was reflected at the address "family of Goverling". What will happen to you now, doves? - As if they say their pose. In general, among guests seeking (in a scene) "look into the face of Governing", they probably were those who personally had nothing to be afraid. But they froze with terrible news.

Here we come to the most important "paint" of the final scene, to the fact that it expresses me, and universalpetrification. In the "passage from the letter ..." Gogol wrote: "... The last scene will not have success until you can't understand that it is just a dumb picture that all this should represent one petrified groupthat the drama ends here and replaces her numb mimic ... that all this should be done in the same conditions as they require the so-called live paintings »(In the latter case, Gogol).

The petition had a long-standing, more or less sustainable value in Gogol Poetics. Since we will specifically talk about it in relation to all the work of Gogol (in chapter VII), now we will now be limited to the literally one or two examples. In the "Sorochinsky Fair" when the "terrible pork face" appears in the window, "the horror of all those who were in the hut. Kum turned into a stone with an open mouth. " In the "Nights before Christmas", when in the bag instead of the expected palls, sausages, etc. discovered Dyack, "Kumova's wife, Ostolbenyev, released a foot from the hand, for which the prick from the bag began to pull."

In both cases, petition expresses a special, the highest form of fear caused by some strange, incomprehensible event. In the "portrait" (the editors of "Arabesok") Gogol so determined this feeling: "Some kind of wild feeling, not fear, but the inexplicable feeling that we feel when oddityrepresenting nature messor, it is better to say some madnessnature....»

So, petition and fear (in its special, higher form) are associated in the artistic thinking of Gogol. It sills the light on the genesis of a mute scene of the "auditor".

It is possible that a mute scene player wanted to bring the idea of \u200b\u200bretaliation, the celebration of state justice. For this, not only the author's comment on the final, but the well-known specification of the very image of the real auditor. However, he expressed this idea by means of fear and petition.

No, a dumb scene is not an additional junction, not letting the comedy. This is the last, completing the chord of the work. And it is very characteristic that it completes both trends of the "auditor": on the one hand, the desire for universality and integrity, and on the other - the elements of the "Miracleness", "Mirages Intrigue".

In a mute scene, the universality of experiencing heroes, the integrity of human life receives a plastic expression. Different degree of shocks - it increases with the "wine" characters, that is, their position on the hierarchical staircase. Their poses are diverse - they transmit all sorts of shades of characters and personal properties. But the uniform feeling joined everyone. This feeling is fear. Like during the action of the play, the fear was in the most different experiences of the heroes, and now the seal of a new, higher fear lay down on the physiognomy and poses of each character, regardless of whether he was burdened by the personal "wine", a crime or had the opportunity to watch "Satirically" at Governing, that is, on the affairs and misconduct of the other.

Because with all the fragmentation and disintegration of people in modern life, humanity, "says Gogol," united by a single fate, a single "face of time".

Further. From the universality of the shocks of the characters, Gogol reckoned the bridge to the universality of the same experiences of the audience. "The theater is not at a strand and not an empty thing at all, if you want to make a crowd of five, six thousand people in it, and that all this crowd, who does not seem to do, disassembled by units, may suddenly shake one shockburied some tearsand laugh one universal laugh("On the theater, about one-sided look at the theater and in general about one-sidedness"). Universality reaction is a special sign of extraordinary experience of the audience, corresponding to the significance of what is performed on the stage. However, this is an indication that only togetherpeople can resist Lhill, just like - on the stage platform - all characters togetheraffected by its destructive effects.

And here we must again pay attention to those lines that have already been brought at the beginning of the analysis of the "auditor" - to withdraw Gogol on the "last day of Pompeii". Speaking that the picture of Bryullov "chooses strong crises that felt by the whole mass", the writer explains: "This whole group stopped in a minute of impact and expressed thousands of different feelings ..."All this he has so powerfully, so boldly, so harmoniously coated into one as soon as it could arise in the head of the genius of universal." But isn't the dumb scene of the "auditor" captured the "whole group" of her heroes, "stopped at a minute of impact"? Is this a petition (like, in Gogol, and petitions of the Heroes of Bryullov - a kind of scene scene) a plastic expression of a "strong crisis", felt by modern humanity?

Gogol escaped the underground shocks, shook the XIX century. He felt alogure, the ghostity, the "scenitous" of the modern life, which made the existence of humanity with unstable, subject to sudden crisis and catastrophes. And the dumb scene issued and concentrated in themselves these sensations.

What a terrible irony is hidden in a mute scene! Gogol gave her at that time when the community of people caused by the "Situation of the Auditor" was threatened to get enough. The last effort she had to keep this community - and kept, but instead of people in her power, there were damaged corpses.

Gogol gave a dumb scene as a hint of the triumph of the fellowship, the establishment of harmony. As a result, the feeling of disharmony, anxiety, fear of this scene has increased many times. In the "Union of the Auditor" one of the characters states: "The most this appearance of the gendarme, which, exactly some executioner, is in the doorway, it is petrolwhich suggests on all his words, who announced the arrival of the real auditor, who must destroy them all, erase from the face of the earth, to destroy completely - all it is somehow inexplicably scary! "

In the literature on the "Auditor" often raises the question: What will the city and others take the advent of the new auditor? It is said that with the arrival of the gendarme everything became in its place and returned to the initial position that the Gingerbile will hold an arrived auditor, as he spent them before, and that everything remains unchanged.

In these comments, it is true that the outcome of the comedy of Gogol is not idealization, but the exposure of the foundations of social life and that, consequently, the new revision (as well as the previous one) would not change anything. But still the artistic thought of Gogol deeper. There is no doubt that the city would have deceived if he had retained the ability to deceive. But the final does not discard the heroes to the original positions, and, having spent them through the chain of shocks, hesitates into a new mental state. It is too obvious that in the final, they are finally knocked out of the rut of usual life, forever, and durability of a scene: "almost a minute and a half" on which Gogol insists

Yermilov V. Genius Gogol. M., Soviet writer, 1959. P. 301.

The comedy "Auditor" is one of the most famous works of Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol. The author managed to show the true face of Russia of the 19th century in this play. Gogol with the help of various means of artistic expressiveness, the speech of the heroes, "talking" names of the names of the human defects, namely greed, hypocrisy, falsehood, irresponsibility, stupidity. An important role in the aforementioned pen was played by such a reception as a "dumb" scene at the end of the play. What is its ideological meaning? Let's try to figure it out.

Before answering the question, it is worth a little referring to the plot of the comedy. In the city of N, where the riots reign, where everyone will chase benefits and do not fulfill their duties, the auditor must come. Having received another person for him, Khlleskov's cunning, officials care for him, as they can, give money "borrow", just to leave a good impression about themselves.

At the end of the play, the characters learn that it was not an auditor and that the real will come soon. It was this news that was the cause of the "dumb" scene. The most believed message literally "paralyzed" the heroes. They realized that Khlestakov is still "flowers", they will soon have to survive all over again, only truly. Gingerbread hand spread and threw back the head up, as if questioning the sky: "For what?!" His wife and daughter rushed to him, looking for protection. The strawberries bowed his head of the Welcome, listening to something. This cunning person, as it turned out, never succumbed to a crazy panic. On the contrary, he reflects on how he gets dry out of the water at the moment. Lyapkin-Tipkin made a movement of lips, as if he wanted to say: "Here you, grandmother, and Yuriev day." He was very frightened. Bobchinsky and Dobchinsky rushed to each other, calculating support.

The ideological meaning of "dumb" scene is to show without replies the entire essence of the heroes, their vices, fears, character. After all, it is in the extreme situation that a person takes a mask and opens its true face. Gogol was successfully succeeded. Moreover, he managed to push the comedy framework, turn it out of public in moral, philosophical. So, with the help of a small element, Gogol reminded everyone that for their actions sooner or later still will have to answer.

Effective preparation for the exam (all items) - start training

Updated: 2017-10-16

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl + Enter..
Thus, we will have the invaluable benefit of the project and other readers.

Thanks for attention.

The idea of \u200b\u200bcompleting the play ("Silent" scene) was born from Gogol immediately after the start of his work on the "auditor" and in the process of creating a comedy has never changed more. Gogol believed that this scene should make a strong impression on the audience.

Download:

Preview:

Theme of the lesson: the final lesson on the comedy N. V. Gogol

"Auditor". Analysis of "Silent" scene of comedy.

MKOU "Rodnikovskaya Sosh"

Chelyabinsk region, Trinity R-she

Russian language and literature teacher

Impressova Nadezhda Aleksandrovna.

Objectives lesson:

1. Educational: Help students to realize the philosopher, not only the final, but also the whole coma diya as a whole through a comprehensive consideration of this scene.

2. Developing: the development of analytical skills and students' skills.

3. Ripping: Formation of positive moral orientations.

View: lesson consolidating knowledge, skills and skills.

Technologies: methods of problem learning, work method under the guidance of a teacher, reproductive.

Preparation of students for lesson:

1. Must know the content of the work of N. V. Guo's "Auditor".

Equipment: computer, projection device, reproduction of paintings by K. P. Bryullova "Last Day Pompeii", poster "Auditor", reproduction of paintings to the comedy "Auditor".

During the classes:

I. Orgmant. Start lesson.

II. Actualization of the lesson theme.

Slide 1 (portrait of N.V.Gogol).

1. Teacher's word: The idea of \u200b\u200bcompleting the play ("Silent scene") was born from Gogol immediately after the start of his work on the "auditor" and in the process of creating media no longer changed. Gogol believed that this scene should make a strong impression on the audience, and insisted that the "dumb scene" is not less than 2-3 minutes. Only at the insistence of re zeisser and actors of the Alexandrinsky Theater, which at the rehearsals of the "auditor" by the end of the action of the play were so exhausted and were exhausted that they could not withstand the stresses of the last scene and fainted, the duration of it was stabbed to one and a half minutes.

Output: Thus, we see that for Gogol, the final scene was equally important than all the previous comedy actions.

Why did Gogol insisted that this scene was so long? (Students expressed different assumptions.)

Come to the conclusion:

The writer sought the effect of universal understanding: the audience (reader) should understand that someone from the heroes standing on the stage is to some extent he himself.

"Silent scene" is like fascinating the characters of the phrase of Goverling: "What are you? - Laugh on yourself! ... "

The main question of the analysis of the text is the question of the coming and semantic feasibility of the "dumb scene".

Why does Gogol introduce this scene, because with the arrival of the gendarme comedy, you can consider the finished and lower the curtain? But Gogol does not just decide to complete the comedy, but also in detail the position of each hero on the scene and insists on such a compositional construction of the final (the last phenomenon is a "dumb scene").

Upon reading (viewing in the theater) of the "auditor", students feel how, starting with the IV action, Paphos Plays changes - from comic to tragic; Tragism reaches its apogee in the final "scene".

(Message makes a student prepared.)

Memories of contemporaries about the premiere of "Auditor" in the Alexandrinsky Theater in St. Petersburg:

1. "Laughter at times was still overwhelmed from the end of the hall to another, but it was some kind of timid laughter, immediately disappeared, it was almost at all. But intense attention, convulsion, strengthened, followed all the shades of the play, sometimes dead silence showed that the case, which took place on stage, passionately capturing the hearts of the audience. "

2. The most stress of the final, caused by the appearance on the stage of the gendarme and transmitted through static, paintings, but the frozen position of the characters, according to Gogol, should cause the audience the only one, but a very strong feeling - fear, horror.

"Despite ... the comic position of many people ... As a result, it remains ... something monstrously gloomy, some fear of our unrest. The most this appearance of the gendarme, which, exactly some executioner, is in the doorway ... it's somehow unexplainably scary! ".

1. Role of posters ( projection of posters).

Slide 2.

Name the characteristic features of the Reviy Zora posters (the analysis of the posters was given time on the pen in the lesson). /

Student responses: First, the entire city is presented in the bill (representatives of the bureaucracy system of any Russian city are introduced in the comedy), and in a wider understanding - and all Russia (not by chance, Nicholas I stated: "Well, the play! All It got, and me more than all! "In addition, the conflict of the comedy itself is social; it is not only the social position of heroes, but also the name of the coma diya - the" auditor "- the state official); Was-second, the only person acting in the comedy, but not specified in the poster, is gendarme.

Does this circumstance do this condition meaningful and does not allocate him in the system of comedy images?

Think why gendarme turns out to be not gone in the poster.

Messages of students:

1. Gendarme is a representative of state power, which seeks to roast the vices of the social bureau of the multi-structure, which herself has created (this is also indicated by the main conflict, and the intrigue of the comedy).

"It's not funny that the play can not end without government. It will certainly appear, it is definitely non-relay rock in tragedies in the ancients. - ... Well? There is nothing wrong here, God forbid that the government always and "everywhere heard the calling to his representative about the vision on earth and so that we believed in Him, as ancient believed in Rock, overtaking crime" (N. V. Gogol "Theater Track") .

1. Gendarme is the envoy of providence, higher strength, more powerful than the highest ranks of the state system. This is exactly what makes such a strong impression on the heroes of the comedy and gives rise to horror and fear in them (and the audience). Gogol in the "junction" of the "auditor" wrote: "What do not say, but the terrible auditor is terrible, which is waiting for us at the door of the coffin."

Teacher:

In the consciousness of the author of the "Auditor", gendarme - a figure is not how much mystical: it appears unexpectedly and NITIVE where, and the words, they spoke, "amazed as the thunder of everyone; So, the whole group suddenly changed the position remains in petrol. " And the real auditor, sent by gendarme with the news of his arrival, becomes a face mystical; This sense of mysticism has also strengthened the fact that the auditor does not appear on the stage: only one news about him turns the actors of the comedy to horror, which is transmitted to the auditorium

Slide 3 (projection of the photograph "Silent" scene):

Pay attention to the location of the heroes on the scene: Gingerbread and postmaster, since the rest of the acting persons are "the item in a picture that outlines with one squeezing of the brush and is covered with one color" (Gogol): they are only the background, they are somehow again and again Concentrate the attention of the viewer in the figures (rodnichy and mailmaster).

Students celebrate the unusual of the poses in which they froze.

Let us turn to the description of the position of the heroes. "The city of the thoroughties in the form of a pillar, with open-out hands and thumbs up the head."

Students noted that the city ranks cent.

Doesn't the figure of Governing Cross remind?

Conclusion: "Silent scene" introduces into comedy, firstly, biblical motives, and secondly, the motive of death (compare the auditor, which is waiting for us at the coffin door).

So social conflict comedy gets a philosopher a boring interpretation: the origins of the company's defects are rooted in the spiritual organization of a person, and not in the system itself.

We define the location of the postmaster on the scene.

This character, "turned into a question mark", addressed to the audience, is behind the city.

Word a question that Gogol draws to the audience and which receives such an allegorical embodiment on the stage. ("What are you laughing? ")

Appeal to the reflections of Gogol about the picture K. P. Bryullov "Last Day Pompeii".

Slide 4 (projection of reproduction).

Student Message: The picture was written by Bryrylov in 1833 in Italy, then in 1834 she was brought to Peter Burg and put up for Furnishing in the Hermitage from August 12 to 17. She produced at Gogol such a strong chatting that under her influence he wrote an article "On the next day Pompeii (Painting Bullov)".

Pay attention to the landscape that performs the function of the background and the location of human figures.

Name the features of the fine manner of the artist (the sky and the earth, between which there is no Gam NIC, are withstanding in the brown and red gamma; Hu Major masterfully transfers the horror and fear of people in front of the chaos of the last day). The thought of the tranquility of earthly beauty and twisted in this "terrible phenomenon" the coming "end of the world" as a whole, defined by the estimate of Gogol painting K. P. Bryullov. The writer was delighted with the genius of the artist, which horror in front of the "end of the world" managed to transfer the way of the petrified figures: "We are feeling it," Gogol writes, "only the terrible position of the whole crowd," But we would not see a person who would be All the horror of the visible destroy themselves "(N. V. Gogol" Last Day Pompeii (Car Tina Bryullova) ".

Output: The principle of the image of people covered by the horror of the Judgment Day is transferred to the writer on the day of the "Auditor" page; The heroes froze, petrified, but in this fossil there is a movement - not an external, but the internal spiritual world of people. Gogol believes that public defects are a kind of projection of the disadvantages of the human-world human world. Therefore, a person must change before. Cleansing the inner world, according to Gogol, it is possible only through the tragedy: the shock causes a person spiritually reborn. In the "Silent Scea not" Gogol, as well as on the picture of Bryullov, heaven and the sinful earthly world, suddenly, in one minute, merge, mix. The shift of the space "Verkha" and "Niza" is embodied in the image of the gendarme.

Slide 5 (painting reproduction).

Reggerer I ask to formulate that the question that Gogol addresses the viewer in the "encrypted" form in the allegorical images of the city and mail of Maister.

"What are you laughing? - Over yourself laughing! ... ".

(Students offer their issues.)

We choose one, most accurately, in our opinion, reflective the meaning of the final scene: "How do you, the viewer (reader), will you meet the day?"

Is the real auditor look like a horstykova or is it a complete opposite of this "official from St. Petersburg"?

Who is the auditor, sent by the gendarme, is the chole of staks number 2 or the highest strength, providence?

III. Summing up the lesson.

Teacher's word:

There is no definite answer. This ambiguity of the Lovela Islands, firstly, the fact that the auditor itself does not appear on the stage, and secondly, the fact that the gendarme is a messenger of the Visor - not stated in the poster, thirdly that the final of the media open. I propose to conduct an experiment:

Let's try to bring to the scene of the real auditor and suppose how the action of the play after the "mute scene" will develop, if the auditor is a copy of the horstykova and if it is its full priority.

Suppose that the real auditor is similar to Khlestka Kova, then after the "scene" the action of the comedy will recently, with the only difference that, instead of Chle Stakkova, a real auditor will act.

If the auditor is the providence itself (as indicated by the analysis of the "mute scene"), then the development of the play of the Posp Le "Silent scene" is unpredictable, and the final, such a thing, becomes a symbol of the last - the day of the city's life.

In the event that the first trips for the image of the auditor, the comedy loses its satirical significance; Vices can not be eradicated, they only vary change. "Meal scene" loses its relevance, it can be neglected without prejudice to the general structure and idea of \u200b\u200bthe auditor.

IV. Homework: Written task, Reply: "What interpretation of the image of the auditor turns out to be significant for Gogol? " Justify your opinion.

R.8. (necessary comments to the lesson)

The main didactic purpose of the lesson is the formation of certain skills. The most common structure of the lesson consulting the studied is as follows:

Checking homework, refinement of the actualization of the studied material;

Message Topics, goals and objectives of the lesson, Motivation of the teaching;

Reproduction of studied and its application under standard conditions;

Transfer of acquired knowledge and their primary use in new or altered conditions in order to form skills;

Summing up the lesson;

Setting homework.

What is the role of a mute scene in the comedy of the auditor? Please tell me very much !!!

• The last one, the scene in the auditor comedy was very important for Gogol himself.
  He paid a lot of attention to her and considered her key in understanding the general sense of comedy. The heroes remain on stage in the frozen state for a very long time - "almost one and a half minutes", which allows the viewer to carefully consider everyone separately, as well as get the overall impression of the situation.
  The author of this scene wants to reveal to the viewer of each hero, because at the moment of inactivity you can see the essence of each of them.
  Through a series of different events occurring in the play, it is not always possible to catch the individual traits inherent in the heroes. And the scene just leaves the viewer alone with each hero.
  In the comedy finals on the stage, all heroes that have previously operated, with the exception of Klezlekov, are provided.
  Everyone is going to pronounce congratulations to the family of Goverling, after which the blows of fate begin to pour them one by one. First, the postmaster appears on the scene, which brings the news that struck everyone. After reading the letter comes a period of universal perturbation and indignation, which unexpectedly breaks with a message about the arrival of this auditor.
  "Pronounced words hit everyone like thunder, ... the whole group, suddenly changed the position, remains in petrol."
  This remark relating to a dumb scene allows a lot to understand from the copyright. First, the expression "like thunder", in my opinion, creates the impression of the highest, divine punishment.
  The fact that Gogol wanted to create a comedy from the audience an impression of petition is also of interest. This not only allows the reader and the viewer to observe the first reaction of the heroes, but also makes you think about the "fossil" of the souls of people, about the fakes of their feelings.
  If you pay attention to the poses in which the heroes of the comedy are frozen, immediately striking their unnaturality and comicness. Moreover, despite this, all the postures do not better express the mood of heroes, their behavior throughout the play. Very great importance for the play have poses of the city and its meaning.
  Luke Lukich, "lost in the most innocent way," just as "lost" during communication with the rest of the heroes, especially with Khlestakov. The postmaster, who is constantly afraid of expressing his own opinion and for all the time asks more questions than claims, as a result, the play simply turns into a question mark.
  The "helpful and fussy" strawberry, whom Gogol at the very beginning of the play characterizes as a prone and a plut, as if he listens to something, as if he wants to find a loophole, to once again somehow avoid trouble.
  In addition, there are also other heroes in a mute scene - Korkin, three ladies, guests, openly expressing their mockery over a foreign comic position here, whereas during the whole play they thoroughly hid it.
  Thus, a dumb scene is probably the most truthful scene in the whole comedy. It personifies the emotional dependence of the heroes and thereby tells the idea of \u200b\u200bthe work.
  Heroes do not have the opportunity to say anything, moreover, they do not move, forced to frozen at the time of their first reaction. Thus, being unable to lie, they briefly look truthfully.

  In fact, this is the climax of the work.

• The final of the Piesen N. V. Gogol "The Auditor" is an unusual and amazing phenomenon in Russian drama. The so-called dumb scene that comedy ends, follows the gendarme ... announced the arrival in the city of the real auditor. Shocked officials froze waiting for an imminent violence. Gingerbread is standing in the middle of the scene; Epitester turned "to a question mark addressed to the audience"; The judge sat down almost to the ground and as if he wanted to say: "So you, grandmother and Yuriev day! »Who is amazed who are amazed who is gloating - all officials make up a very picturesque and expressive group. And this dumb scene, serving an important completion of the comedy, and spectators, and critics, and literary criticians interpreted in different ways.

  N. V. Gogol himself said that a mute scene expresses the idea of \u200b\u200b"the law", with whose occurrence, everything "turned shocked." That is, the finals of the comedy is the thought of the coming retaliation. V. G. Belinsky spoke of the limited scene, but most critics agree on the author. So, V. Hippius believed that the mute scene expresses the idea of \u200b\u200bpower and law, V. Yermilov saw in a mute scene "Crade of carved meanness." A special point of view at M. Khrapchenko: He saw in a mute scene an external junction, and a genuine junction - in the words of Goverling: "What are you laughing? Over yourself laughing! .. "

  But, perhaps, the most interesting point of view expressed Y. Mani, literary critic, a lot of work dedicated to Gogol creativity. He believed that a mute scene was the final chord of the work, in it experiences the heroes receive a plastic expression, as if the generalizing the events of human life. As a result, this gogol hint at the celebration of justice strengthens the feeling of anxiety, fear. Indeed, fear that arose at the beginning of the scene, and then safely melted when officials looked off from the "auditor" and calmed down, returned. But now the feeling of anxiety increases many times - officials turn out to be in an even worst situation than at the beginning of the play. After all, throwing all the forces on the fellowship of Khlestakov, they did not bother to bring in their affairs at least an external order.

  That is why the appearance of a real auditor leads heroes to a mute scene.

• Comedy N. V. Gogol "The Auditor" at one time became one of the most innovative works of dramaturgical art. Many techniques used by the author were previously never applied by playwrights and were not embodied on the theater scene. Such innovative techniques belongs to the aforementioned "Silent Scene", which ends the final part of the comedy "Auditor". What did the author wanted to achieve, completing the work of a scene? What effect expected?

  It is believed that a dumb scene, finalizing the comedy "Auditor", was introduced into the work by the writer under the impression of the famous picture of the Russian artist Karl Bryullov "Last Day Pompeii". It is this picture that the man who considers it, the strength and expressiveness of frozen emotion. The image is still, static, but at the same time the faces of the people depicted in the picture, their figures, the poses they accept, testify their inner state better than any words. The erectivity of static scenes, their expressiveness - it is these properties that were subtly notified by N. V. Gogol and later were successfully used by a writer. After all, the "auditor" is far from the only work of the writer, in which there is a "dumb scene" (in another extremely popular work - the lead "Viy" - the author also applies this technique). If we consider the artistic techniques used by N. V. Gogol, in more detail, you can see a certain pattern: the reception of "death", a kind of "petition" is based on the basis of many characteristic Gogol characters (for example, the same landowners in the "dead souls"). In the "Revision", the same scene is a climax, and it must be the most eloquent. Failure in an expressive posture (with the poses of all characters, they differ that emphasizes their individual personal qualities) is a real pantomime. Gingerbread, members of his family, postmaster, strawberries, Luke Lukich - they all become for some time mimes, actors in the "Theater of Mimici and Establishment". And the words here are not needed, maybe even unnecessary. Pose, facial expression can express an incomparable greater surge of emotions than words.

  Especially since the scene in the "Auditor" is also a massive - everyone stands like a thunder struck, and this circumstance emphasizes how shocking and staggering has become the news for all the characters that "... who arrived in the nominal command from St. Petersburg It requires you the same hour to yourself. "

  Gogol became the first Russian playwright that used the reception of a pause, which many directors, scripts and writers were successfully used. Today, the reception of the pause is one of the most frequently used dramatic techniques.