Selling of a complex offer 7. Syntactic disclation online

Selling of a complex offer 7. Syntactic disclation online
Selling of a complex offer 7. Syntactic disclation online

§one. What is a syntactic parse that its specificity

Syntactic analysis - This is a complete grammatical characteristic of a syntactic unit:

  • phrases
  • simple sentence
  • complex offer

When syntaxed analysis, it is important to be able to distinguish the units of syntax, to realize that these are units of different levels, and understand what signs is characterized by each of them. Syntactic analysis requires not to confuse the phrase and a simple proposal, as well as a simple and complex proposal and know how to disassemble each of them.

§2. What you need to know and be able to do

The syntactic analysis requires knowledge and skills.

Need to know:

  • what is the difference between the phrase and proposal
  • what is the difference between a simple and complex proposal
  • how the phrase is built, and what they happen (view of the main word)
  • syntactic ties of words in phrases: coordination, control, adjoining
  • what signs characterize the proposal: the purpose of statement, meaning and intonational finality, the presence of a grammatical basis
  • what are the suggestions on the number of grammatical foundations: simple, complex
  • what are simple sentences in their structure: double, single-part (called, definitely personal, vaguely personal, generalized personal, impersonal)
  • what are the complex suggestions: by the nature of the syntactic connection of their parts: allied, non-union; Allied: Difficult and Compactified)
  • what is the syntactic role of words in the sentence (analysis of the sentences)

You need to be able to:

  • to determine how syntactic units refers to a single unit
  • allocate phrases in the proposal
  • find the main and dependent word in phrase
  • define a type of syntactic
  • define the grammatical basis
  • determine the type of proposal for a grammatical basis (double-maintained - single-maintained) and by the nature of the main member (for single-delivery proposals)
  • define members of the sentence
  • define complicating components: homogeneous members, separation, introductory elements (introductory words and suggestions, plug-in designs), circulation, direct speech and citation
  • determine the number of parts in the complex sentence
  • determine the type of syntax and type of complex offer

§3. The procedure for parsing syntax units

Phrase

1. To determine the main and dependent word, allocate the main thing, to put the question to the dependent.
2. Determine the type of phrase on the main word: nominal, verbal, nareny.
3. Determine the view of the syntactic connection: coordination, control, adjoining.

Simple sentence

1. Perform a disclaimer by members of the sentence: to emphasize all members of the sentence, determine than (in a word which part of speech) they are expressed.
2. Give a characteristic for the purpose of the statement:

  • narrative
  • questionative
  • wise

3. Give the characteristic according to expressed emotions and intonation:

  • unkonsectant
  • exclamation

4. Determine the number of grammatical foundations and determine the type of sentence for their number:

  • simple
  • sophisticated

5. Give the characteristic by the availability of the main members:

    • doubles
    • sosta

a) single-maintained with the main member subject: called
b) Single-part with the main member of the taught: definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal

6. Give the characteristic by the presence of secondary members:

  • common
  • non-proliferated

7. Give the characteristic of the fullness (availability of members of the proposal required by meaning):

  • full
  • incomplete

8. Determine the presence of complicating components:

    • uncomplicated
    • complicated:

a) homogeneous members of the sentence
b) separate members: the definition (agreed - inconsistent), the addition, circumstance
c) introductory words, introductory offers and plug-in structures
d) appeal
e) design with direct speech or quoting

Note:

With the expression of the separations involved and consistent turnover, as well as comparative structures, characterize the separation of separation

Difficult sentence

1. As in the simple sentence, determine the members of the sentence.
2. As in the simple sentence, give a characteristic of the purpose of the statement:

  • narrative
  • questionative
  • wise

3. As in the simple sentence, give a characteristic of expressed emotions and intonation:

  • unkonsectant
  • exclamation

4. By the number of grammatical foundations (more than one), determine that the proposal is complex.
5. Determine the type of syntactic connection between parts of a complex sentence:

  • with union tie
  • with non-union connections
  • with a combination of union and non-union

6. Determine the type of complex offer and communications:

  • complexed (: connecting, separating, interpreted, connecting, explanatory or gradual)
  • complexed (: temporary, causal, conditional, target, consequences, seed, comparative and extreme, as well as allied words)
  • nezuzoyny (communication in meaning, pronounced intonational)

7. Determine the type of complex proposal (for example: complex with the apparent variability).
8. Next is characterized by each part of a complex proposal (according to a simple proposal scheme - see a simple supply pavement scheme, PP. 5-8)
9. Create a scheme of a complex proposal reflecting

The syntactic analysis is one of the most difficult topics in the Russian language program. Many do not understand what a syntax analysis is and why it is needed. It is this analysis that allows you to see the structure of the sentence, and this, in turn, increases the level of punctuation literacy. You can conduct a syntactic analysis of the phrase, simple supply and various types of complex proposals.

Syntactic analysis of phrases

First, it is necessary to identify the phrase from context that interests us. Secondly, it is necessary to determine what word is the main thing, and what is dependent. Determine what parts of speech is each of them. Name the type of syntax inherent in this phrase (matching, adjustment or management).

The syntaxial analysis of the phrase is a relatively simple analysis in the Syntax section. Let us give an example of the parsing of the word "folding". In this phrase, the main word "says". Saying how? Folded "Folding" is a dependent word. The main word "says" is the verb of the present time in the editorial inclination, the third person, the singular. "Folding" is adverb. Type of communication in phrase - adjoining.

Syntactic offer analysis

In this part of the article we will try to tell you what syntactic analysis of the sentence and from what stages it consists. The syntactic analysis of the proposal is an analysis aimed at studying the structure of the supply and relations between its components. The syntax analysis consists of several consecutive operations.

Simple proposal analysis scheme

  1. It is necessary to determine what is the proposal for the purpose of the statement. All offers in this regard are divided into narrative, questionative and motivating. If at the end of the sentence is an exclamation mark, it is necessary to note this and indicate that the proposal is also exclamation.
  2. Find the grammatical basis of the offer.
  3. Describe the structure of the sentence. Single-maintenance - only a legend or only subject to grammatical basis. In this case, specify which this proposal is: definitely personal, vaguely personal, impersonal or called. The proposal may be twisted - there is also subject to, and led. Specify, non-prolonged or common proposal is, that is, whether there is an add-on, definition, circumstances in the proposal. If they are (secondary members), the proposal is common; If not - unprosted. You also need to specify, full or incomplete is the proposal. If incomplete, then you need to specify which member of the sentence is missing.
  4. Determine the complicated offer or uncomplicated. Complicated is the proposal in which there are homogeneous members, applications, appeals, introductory words.
  5. To determine what a member of the sentence is every word and which part of speech they are expressed.
  6. If the proposal is punctuation signs, explain their alignment.

Now we will explain what the syntactic analysis of a simple supply, on the example of the sentence: "The girl sunbatched on the beach and listened to music."

  1. Narrative, unkonsectant.
  2. The grammatical basis: the girl is subject to, inflamed - the lean, listened - the lean.
  3. Twisted, common, complete.
  4. The proposal is complicated by homogeneous legend.
  5. The girl is subject to expressed nouns. kind in units h. and they. case Inflated - a lean time, expressed by the verb of the past time in units. h. and wives. kind; on - preposition; The beach is a circumstance expressed by a noun husband. kind in units including offers. case and - connecting union; He listened - a fault, expressed by the verb of the past time in units. h. and wives. kind; Music is a direct addition, expressed by the nouns of the female family in the unit. including vinit. Padge.

On the example of the analysis of the phrase and simple sentence, we explained to you what is a syntactic analysis. There are also syntactic parsing of complex proposals.

Remember:

Member sentence

Indicates / shows

Answers the questions

Emphasized

Subject

main members sentences

about whom or what is said in the proposal

who? what?

Predicate

calls what the subject does his condition, what is he

what is he doing? what have you been doing? What will do? what?

Definition

secondary sentences

sign of subject

what? What? What? what kind? whose? whose?

Addition

for which item or phenomenon is directed

who? What? who? What? who? what? by whom? than? O Com? about what?

Circumstance

how is the action takes place when the action is made, where the action is made, for what reason the action takes place, for what purpose is performed

where? where to? when? where? why? what for? And How?

Write out the offer.

Do this : FROM high mountains board ringing cutters.

1.Onvani offer:

the proposal says streams, hence, cutters - this is subject to

board, hence, board - This is a failed.

2. The proposal is secondary members.

I ask the question from subject to:

cutterswhat kind?- ringing - This is a definition.

I ask the question from the subject:

boardwhere? - with mountains - This is the circumstance of the place.

with mountains What? - high - This is a definition.

39. Offset parsing scheme (syntactic analysis).

I. Type of proposal for the purpose of the statement.

II. Type of proposal for intonation.

III. The basis of the proposal (subject to both).

IV. Type of proposal for the presence of secondary members.

V. Secondary members of the sentence.

Write out the offer.

Do this : FROM high mountains board ringingcutters. (Anticipation., Non skins., Prison)

This is a sentence

I. narrative.

II. Unkonsectant.

III. Proposition:

the proposal says streams, hence, cutters - this is subject to

about the streams say they board, hence, board - This is a failed.

IV. In the proposal there are secondary members, so it is common.

V. I ask the question from subject to:

cutterswhat kind?- ringing - This is a definition.

I ask the question from the subject:

board where? - with mountains - This is the circumstance of the place.

I ask the question of secondary members of the sentence:

With mountains What? - high - This is a definition.

Remember:

III. Punctuation

40.Salue of punctuation at the end of proposals (.?!).

Write the offer correctly. Invent your or find a sentence in the textbook with the same sign. Stress punctuation sign.

Do this : Glory to our homeland ! Glory to Labor !

41. Uniform members of the sentence.

Write out the offer. Right fold signs. Emphasize homogeneous members of the sentence. Draw a proposal scheme.

Do this : Grachics, skvortsy and zhavoron flew into warm edges. (O, o and about)

Signs of punctuation with homogeneous members:

Oh yes (\u003d and) about

Oh yes (\u003d but) about

both oh and oh and oh and about

or about, or oh, or oh, or about

Oh and oh and oh and about

42.Send offer.

Write a proposal correctly. Stress grammatical foundations. Schemes.

Do this:

Dormut fish under water, wEST som. Gray.

[ ], [ ].

43. Statements with a direct speech.

Write the proposal correctly. Make a scheme.

Do this :

1) Oleg reassured her mother: "Everything will be fine."

2) He shouted: "Forward, guys!"

3) He asked: "Where are you from, the guy?"

4) "I will not give you," Ivan promised.

5) "Fire!" - shouted Tanya.

6) "Who was it?" - asked Olya.

7) "I am a doctor," he said, - today is duty. "

"P, - A, - P".

8) "Our presence is necessary," Petrov graduated. "We leave in the morning."

"P, - A. - P".

9) "Why in five?" Brother asked. "It's very early."

"P? - A. - P".

10) "Well, perfectly!" Exclaimed Anya.- Let's go together. "

"P! - A. - P".

11) "He is from our group," said Ivan.- Sit, Peter! "

"P, - A. - P!"

Teacher and parents

"Memo to fulfill work on errors in the Russian language" consists of three sections: "Spelling Rules", "Types of Platforms", "Punctuation".

In the first and third section, instructions are given about what operations and in what sequence should be carried out by students when performing work on errors. In order for the student to be quickly and easily found in the memo, the desired orphogram, each rule has its own sequence number.

We offer work on the memo as follows. The traditional designations of errors on the fields to attribute the number of the orthogram placed in the memo. After verified, skip two lines and on subsequent lines to specify these numbers.

The student, having received a notebook, must perform work on errors strictly by memo. Every job, the teacher checks and evaluates, and the correctness and accuracy of correction takes into account.

For example: in the street Strong Moros - the student sees in the fields | №20. He opens a memo book and reads the algorithm of work:

№20 MORO. z. - Moro. z.s.

Thus, the main types of independent work of students over errors are:

Independent correction (then you can offer self-finding) errors;

Self-discharge of words in which an error is allowed;

Selection of test words;

Repeat rules.

Given the need for the continuity of the initial and medium learning step in drawing up the third section "Types of dissembly" (morpheme, phonetic, morphological, syntactic) we relied on a textbook for grade 5 of general educational institutions, authors of T.A. Ladyzhenskaya, M.T. Baranov, L.A. Tostentsova et al.

"Memo to fulfill work on the Russian language errors" can be used in academic work on any primary school program, both in the group form of work and in the individual, independent work of the student in the classroom or at home.

Literature

1.Russian language: Grade 3: Comments on lessons / S.V. Ivanov, M.I. Kuznetsova.- M.: Ventana-Count, 2011.-464 S.- (elementary school of the XXI century).

2.Russian language: Theory: Tutorial for 5-9 CB. general education. studies. Vehicles /V.V. Babayitseva, ld Chesnokov- M.: Enlightenment, 1994.-256 p.

3. Russian language: student. For 5 CL. general education. Institutions / T.A. Malezhenskaya, M.T.Baranov, L.A. Tostentsova and DR.- M.: Education, 2007.-317 p.

4. Handbook for primary classes. Manual for students of 3-5 classes, their parents and teachers. / C. Shklyarov - M.: "Dims", 2012, 128 p.

Words and phrases are the components of each sentence on a letter and oral speech. It should be clearly understood to be clearly understood which communication between them should be to build a grammatically correct statement. That is why one of the important and complex topics in the Russian language school program is the syntactic analysis of the proposal. With this analysis, a complete analysis of all the components of the statement is carried out and the connection is established between them. In addition, the definition of the proposal structure allows you to properly place the punctuation marks in it, which is quite important for each competent person. As a rule, this topic begins with the parsing of simple phrases, and after children it is taught to conduct a syntactic analysis of the sentence.

Territory Collection Rules

Analysis of a certain phrase, taken from the context, is relatively simple in the Syntax section of the Russian language. In order to produce it, determine which of the words is the main thing, and what is the dependent, and determine which part of the speech each of them relates. Next, it is necessary to determine the syntax link between these words. All of them are distinguished.

  • Coordination is a kind of verification connection in which the genus, the number and case of the case for all elements of the phrase determines the main word. For example: a distant train, flying comet, luminous sun.
  • The control is also one of the types of verification, it may be strong (when the case of words is necessary) and weak (when the dependent word is not predetermined). For example: Waterflowers - Water from the watering can; The liberation of the city is the liberation of the army.
  • The adjoining is also the subordinate type of communication, but it applies only to unchangeable and not inclined by peredry. Dependence Such words express only meaning. For example: riding riding, unusually sad, very scary.

Sample of the syntactic parsing of phrases

The syntactic analysis of the phrase should look something like this: "Beautifully says"; The main word - "says", dependent - "beautifully". This connection is determined by the question: says (how?) Beautifully. The word "says" was used in the present time in the singular and the third person. The word "beautifully" is adverb, and therefore the syntactic connection is expressed in this phrase - adjoining.

Syntactic pavement scheme

The syntactic analysis of the proposal is slightly similar to the analysis of the phrase. It consists of several stages that will learn the structure and attitude of all component components:

  1. First of all, the purpose of the statement of a separate proposal is determined, all of them are divided into three types: narrative, questional and exclamation, or motivating. For each of them is characterized by its mark. So, at the end of the narrative sentence telling about any event, it is worth a point; After the question, naturally, a question mark, and at the end of the motivating - exclamation.
  2. Next, it is necessary to highlight the grammatical foundation of the sentence - to be both faithful.
  3. Next Stage - Description of the structure of the sentence. It can be single-maintained with one of the main members or twisted with a complete grammatical basis. In the first case, it is additionally necessary to specify what exactly the proposition is in the nature of the grammatical basis: verbal or called. And then determine whether in the structure of the statement of secondary members, and specify whether it is common or not. At this stage, it should also be specified whether the proposal complicated. Complications consider homogeneous members, circulation, turnover and introductory words.
  4. Next, the syntactic analysis of the proposal provides for the analysis of all words by their affiliation to parts of speech, family, the number and case.
  5. The final stage is an explanation of the punctuation marks in the proposal.

An example of a simplicity of a simple sentence

The theory of the theory, but without practicing it is impossible to fix a single topic. That is why in the school program a lot of time is paid to the syntactic exams of phrases and suggestions. And for training you can take the simplest suggestions. For example: "The girl was lying on the beach and listened to the surf."

  1. Offer narrative and unkonsectative.
  2. The main members of the sentence: the girl is subject to, lying, listened to - said.
  3. This offer is twisted, full and common. As complications are homogeneous taled.
  4. Disaster of all words of the sentence:
  • "Girl" - acts as subject to and is a nouns of the female kind in the singular and the very nominal case;
  • "Ly" - in the sentence is a taught, refers to the verbs, has a female genus, the only number and past time;
  • "On" is a pretext, serves to communicate words;
  • "Beach" - answers the question "Where?" and is a circumstance in the proposal expressed a noun male race in the proposed case and the singular;
  • "And" - the Union, serves to connect words;
  • "Listened" - the second lean, the verb of the female race in the past time and the singular;
  • "Surf" - in the sentence is a supplement, refers to the name of the noun, has a male genus, the only number and is used in the vinegenic case.

Designation of parts of the sentence on the letter

When syntaxially analyzes phrases and proposals, conditional underscores are used, which indicate the belonging of words to one or another member of the sentence. For example, the subject to be emphasized by one line, the previous one, the definition is denoted by a wavy line, the addition - dotted line, the circumstance is a dotted line with a point. In order to properly determine exactly what a member of the sentence before us should put on it with a question from one of the parts of the grammatical framework. For example, the definition is responsible for the questions of the adjective, the addition is determined by the issues of indirect cases, the circumstance indicates the place, time and cause and answers the questions: "Where?" "Where?" and why?"

Syntactic analysis of the complex offer

The procedure for the analysis of the complex proposal is slightly different from the above examples, and therefore should not cause special difficulties. However, everything should be in order, and therefore the teacher complicates the task only after the children learned to disassemble simple proposals. For analysis, a complex statement is proposed, which has several grammatical foundations. And here should adhere to such a scheme:

  1. First determine the purpose of statement and emotional color.
  2. Then allocate grammatical foundations in the proposal.
  3. The next step is the definition of communication, which can be carried out using or without a union.
  4. Next, you should specify, by any connection two grammatical foundations are connected in the proposal. It may be intonation, as well as writing or subordinate unions. And immediately conclude, what is the proposal: a complex, complex or non-union.
  5. The next stage of the parse is a syntactic analysis of the proposal in its parts. Produce it according to the scheme for a simple sentence.
  6. In the conclusion of the analysis, the proposal scheme should be built on which the connection of all its parts will be visible.

Communication of pieces of complex offer

As a rule, unions and allied words are used in complex proposals to communicate in complex proposals, which are necessarily a comma. Such suggestions are called allied. They are divided into two types:

  • Complex proposals connected by unions a, and, or, then, but. As a rule, both parts in such a statement are equal. For example: "The sun shone, and the clouds sailed."
  • Complexed proposals that use such unions and allied words: to, as if, where, where, because, though other. In such proposals, one part depends on the other. For example: "The sun rays will fill the room as soon as the cloud passes."

Syntax is the most difficult section of the modern Russian language. At school, the syntactic analysis of the proposal almost always causes serious difficulties, since when analyzing it is necessary to use the previously obtained knowledge comprehensively: to be able to distinguish part of speech, refer to information from vocabulary, it is excellent to navigate in the semantic load and functions of different sentences, correctly indicate simple proposals in the composition Complex and determine their role.


At school and university, various requirements for syntactic analysis of the sentence are presented. Schoolchildren usually denote parts of speech, when analyzing commenting on every word. The requirement is due to the fact that for the correct analysis it is necessary to know the morphology well, it is impossible to confuse the concepts of syntax and morphology (there is a common error when the parts of the speech and the members of the sentence are mixed). At the philological faculties of various higher educational institutions, the scheme of the syntactic parsing is individual: it depends on which learning complex is being trained, which there are methodological developments on the Department. When preparing for admission, the applicant will need to find out the requirements of a particular university, otherwise the analysis can be recognized as incorrect.

To properly make a syntactic analysis of the sentence, you need to master the large amount of theory, be able to accurately use terms, get a practical skill. Practice plays a particularly important role, so it is advisable to regularly train, analyzing the proposals of a different level of complexity.

Strict requirements are presented to the syntactic analysis: it can only be done on a clear scheme, not retreating from the given algorithm. Often, it is also necessary to draw a graphical scheme of the sentence, reflecting in it levels of membership, the dependence of simple proposals from each other. Also, members of the sentence are graphically allocated by different signs directly in the text (several types of substitution lines).

General scheme of syntactic discharge offer
There is a general scheme for which a syntactic analysis of the proposal is carried out. It varies depending on specific requirements, but the main base remains the same.

  1. The purpose of the statement is indicated: a narrative, incentive, question offer.
  2. At this stage, it should be written, what proposal is to intonation: exclamation or non-visible.
  3. The type of sentence is determined: simple or complex consisting of several simple.
  4. Sophisticated offers you need to specify the type of design: simple (single-type), complex (different types of communication between simple proposals in the composition of complex).
  5. It is indicated by the type of communication of the proposals: allied, non-union.
  6. Allied proposals have two types: complex and complex.
  7. For a complex proposal, the type of appendage is determined: the definition, thantening, circumstantial, attachment;
  8. It is necessary to designate the type of circumstantial pressing proposal:
    • image image;
    • places;
    • time;
    • conditions;
    • measures and degrees;
    • comparisons;
    • concessions;
    • consequences;
    • goals;
    • the reasons.
  9. If the proposal is complex, a description of the communication of parts in the complex is performed. Parts are numbered, all types of communication are indicated (non-union and union, supervisory and writing), if necessary, make membership on levels.
  10. Then go to the characteristic of each simple sentence, indicating its number.
  11. An analysis of a simple proposal continues the indication of the main members: single-maintained or twisted.
  12. A single offer is determined by its type: called, generalized personal, impersonal, definitely personal or vaguely personal.
  13. At this stage, you need to write a type of faith: PGS (simple verbal led), ghps (composite verbal led) or SIS (composite nominal leakage).
  14. Now it is necessary to determine the presence of secondary members: common (secondary members), unpropered (secondary members are missing).
  15. In this pale, the discretion indicates whether the proposal is complicated than exactly it is complicated.
  16. At the end of the analysis, it is necessary to determine the type of offer on the fullness: complete or incomplete. Incompletely called proposals in which the main or minor members are omitted, but they can be easily restored from context.
Also, it will also be necessary to graphically designate members and borders of proposals in the text, draw the schemes, pointing out the numbers of offers, alliances, asking questions to the receiving proposals from the main.

Methods for expressing members of the sentence
Knowledge of ways to express members of the sentence will help make a syntactic analysis of the proposal properly, not by the way it is part. Often, students of schools are hard to determine even the main members of the proposal, since there are a number of difficulties, and generally accepted stereotypes prevent true to find the basis and accurately analyze secondary members.

It must be remembered that different parts of speech have almost unlimited possibilities and can be almost any suggestions, with rare exceptions. Often, schoolchildren are getting used to that subject - this is a noun, and the legend is verb. We have not seen suitable parts of speech in the sentence, they find themselves in a difficult position and do not know how to disassemble it in composition. In fact, it is impossible to make an analysis in such a framework.

Subject Responsible to the identity of the nominative case and is expressed by different parts of speech: noun, pronouns, numerical. Also subject can be expressed:

  • adjective (red - my favorite color);
  • communion, which passed into the noun (surrounding silence);
  • union (and - Connecting Union);
  • an uncertain form of verb (for example, an indefinite form of verb with a visional case: have a serious advantage in the house).
Predicate answers questions: What does the subject do? What happens to the subject? What is the subject? What is he?

To distinguish different types of fagged, it is important to recall the lexical and grammatical meaning of words. Lexical significance reflects the meaning of the word, and the grammatical contains grammatical categories (for example, inclination, time, number and genus). Types of fag:

  • PGS: The failed pronounced personal form of the verb, in which the GZ and the Lz coincide. Sometimes PGS is expressed by phraseologism containing a hidden verb form.
  • SGS: should consist of at least two words. Each word carries its value: the infinitive of the verb (lexical value) and the modal or phase bunch (grammatical meaning). The phase bunch indicates the phase of action, and the modal reflects the attitude towards action. The bunch can be expressed by words reflecting the assessment of action, desirability, necessity, brief adjectives.
  • SIS: must consist at least from two words. Named part (LZ) and formal or semi-significant bundle (GZ). More common formal bunch: verb be. In the role of the nominal part protrude all registered parts of speech, adverb, phrase. The semi-significant bundle there are verbs to make, become, to appear, to appear, and others; Condition verbs, movement.
Definitions answer what questions? whose? They are divided into consistent and inconsistent.
  • The agreed definition of learn is easily, it is pronounced - adjective, adjective, communion, ordinal numerical. The main thing is not to confuse it with the name of the SIS.
  • The inconsistent definition is usually expressed by nouns in indirect cases, but sometimes there are adverbs, phrases, infinitives, adjectives of comparative degrees. There are also inconsistent application definitions.
Addition answers questions of indirect cases. More often expressed nouns.

Circumstance answers the overall question like? It is expressed by adverbs, nouns. Circumstances are divided into discharges:

  • time circumstance;
  • places;
  • image image;
  • the reasons;
  • comparisons;
  • concessions;
  • conditions;
  • goals;
  • measures and degrees.
It is necessary to take into account the nuances of expressing members of the offer with different parts of speech in order to correctly perform the syntactic analysis of the proposal.

Types of departing offers
Analyzing the complex proposal, it is important to correctly determine the type of the pressing offer. It can be a circumstantial, thanks to and definitive.

  1. Candidate spectacular proposals respond to questions of indirect case. Unions, allied words are associated as a means of communication.
  2. Puttingular definition proposals relate to noun, joined with the help of allied words, sometimes unions, answer questions? What?
  3. Puttingular circumstances are distinguished depending on the discharge:
    • By places answer questions where? where? Where? joined with the help of allied words;
    • In time answer questions to how long? how long? when? for how long? The connection is common with the help of unions only when, as long as, etc.;
    • According to measures and degrees answer questions to what extent? How much?, belong to the word expressing the concept that may be degree of manifestation;
    • According to the image, they answer the question as?, Main part can be inserted in this way, so;
    • According to the conditions answer the question as provided?, Connecting unions - when, if, as soon;
    • For the causes reveal the question of why?, Unions due to the fact that, since, because, due to the fact that;
    • For purpose: Questions for what purpose? what for? etc. Unions only if, in order to;
    • By investigation: Corollary follows from the first part, the Union so;
    • Concessions: questions Contrary to what? Despite what? All the unions, for nothing, despite the fact that;
    • By comparative: Questions How what? Like which? Unions as if, exactly, like;
  4. Approaching attachments do not answer questions, do not express the semantic relationship circumstances, but provide additional information to the main part. Means of communication: Union words (relative pronouns that, where, from where, when, how, why, why, why).
In the polynomialic sentences you need to specify the type of submission. It is consistent: the first appendage is subordinate to the main, the second apparent is first, etc. With parallel submission, the apparent depend on the main thing, but respond to different questions. When the submission is homogeneous, the apparent depend on one main word, respond to one question.
Universities are mainly the polynomials of proposals, therefore, there are levels of membership, the relationship between them, indicate all blocks and features of their relationships among themselves, draw complex schemes. The school is usually limited to suggestions consisting of two or four simple.