Fast passage

As soon as the beginners are a little mastered in the world of rates, their attention attracts a variety of tactics and systems of the game developed by professionals. One of the first ways to the proper distribution of the bankroll novice betters try the Dalamber strategy. She carries the name of their creator, the Great French Mathematics and Physics.

Principles and Rules of the Dalamber Strategy

The system of an outstanding scientist is a complicated Dogon version based on algebraic progression. The player is invited to choose a certain fixed amount and designate it per unit. This figure will be the first rate, as well as the size of the step. In case of losing the sum of the next one, it is necessary to increase on this unit and so on, until you win. After victory, the amount of the bet must be reduced to the same size of the initial bet. Events, it is desirable to choose with coefficients 3 - 4. The more CEF, the more steps can be made to a victorious end. Consider the Dalamber strategy in more detail on the example.

As part of the prestigious tennis tournament, there are two famous athletes Rafael Nadal, representing Spain and Serb Novak Jokovic. We will put on a break in each game for the coefficient of 3.5. Take for a fixed unit of 100 rubles and make the first bet:

Net profit amounted to: 1050 + 1400 - (100 + 200 + 300 + 200 + 300 + 400) \u003d 950 rubles.

It is best for the Dalamber strategy for drawn outcomes and rates for taking someone else's filing.

Counter Dalamber

Starting betting each caper thinks about the plan, which will be followed during the conclusion of transactions. Choosing several sports for analysis, it should be remembered that the strategy of the game will be varied. Based on the famous Dalamber system, the reverse tactics of the game was invented. Her differences from the original version:

1. When the rate is winning, its amount increases on the size of the initial bet.
2. When losing - its sum, respectively, decreases.

Example on counter-dalamber

The principle of operation of the counter-Dalamber system will look at football. In the Spanish Premier League there is a team of the Allas, matches with her participation often end in a draw. We will put on such an outcome.

1. A modest Las Palmas arrived at the club, we put 100 rubles to the coefficient 3 that the game will end with an accomplice. The summary of the meeting: 1: 1, our forecast was faithful. The winnings amounted to 300 rubles. (Net profit 200).
2. According to the system on the next fight, we increase the amount of the bet per unit equal to 100 rubles. Now Allas is already playing an example of Eibara. Suddenly, for many, the match again ends the world: 0: 0. And our bid played again. We are in the plus already at 400 rubles.
3. We increase the amount for another one and set 300 rubles to the next game. This time, the Allas accepts the Betis team, located at the very bottom of the tournament table. Predictive victory remains for the owners: 1: 0. Our bid lost. We are in the red for 300 p.
4. Reduce the bid per unit, now its amount is 200 p. The next game will be held in Bilbao, where the Allas team is waiting for a local athletic. The club reaffirm his tendency to draw no results. The account is not open, 0: 0. And our bid won, plus 400 rubles net profit to the bank.

In this particular example, net profit after four games amounted to:

200 + 400 - 300 + 400 \u003d 700 rubles.

Efficiency of the Dalamber Strategy and Counter Dalamber

Above, we considered examples with a positive outcome of the system use, but does it mean that the strategy is win-win? Unfortunately no. Of course, such a tactic has its own risks, and use it mindlessly, relying only for good luck, should not.

The main disadvantage of the strategy is that the long-wing series (more than 6 defeats in a row) does not allow to get out in a plus or at least return their money back. Consider on the example:

So, inspired by the situation described above, we chose the same Alaves team and we will make forecasts for a drawn result with a coefficient of 3, but our rates fell on another playing segment of time.

Now we calculate whether the last win has been able to cover previous lesions:

600 * 3 - (100 + 200 + 300 + 400 + 500 + 600) \u003d -300 rubles.

As a result, we are in the minus, and after all, the hopeless series could be more, then our bank would lose even larger amount.

conclusions

By itself, the counter-Dalamber strategy is ineffective and is able to drive a player into a significant minus, but using its own brains, statistics and intuition, on its basis you can create a completely competitive system. Good luck!

Danish strategy betting

The system received its name in honor of the country where it was applied for the first time. Its basic rules are similar to the Dalamber strategy, but there are also fundamental differences. Consider at the examples how to use the Danish strategy of bets, we define the advantages and disadvantages.

The essence of the Danish strategy of rates

Danish strategy of rates in essence can be used in Live, because with the losses of the same rate, the CEF rises, but not always enough to overlap the size of the previous losses. The player chooses a fixed amount from which the game begins. After each loss, the new rate increases at the initial size and is considered a step. But that's not all. Not only the amount of the bet is increasing, but also the coefficient. Consider more details on the example:

After winning rates, the cycle begins again. And now I consider clean profits:

500 * 3.5 - (100 + 200 + 300 + 400 +500) \u003d 250 rubles.

The advantages and disadvantages of the Danish strategy of rates

First consider the main advantages of the presented system:

• it makes up to 13 errors and allows you to easily go into a plus (unlike the same Dalamber strategy);
• the risk of the sum of the initial bank is much lower than with the usual catch with an increase in each next rate by two times.

And now the minuses:

• if the better failed to win in the next first attempts, in the future it will be much more complicated, because The coefficient is inexorably growing;
• is not a win-win, there is a risk to merge the entire bank, in the case of a long series of unsuccessful betting.

Tips on the use of Danish strategy rates

Best of all, football is suitable for rates on the system, namely (after the first - second attempt) - expressations from predictable events. Such are the rates on obvious favorites with 1.2 - 1.4 coefficients, or a total of 1.5 by a lot of clogging and missing commands.

The first 4 bets are lost, we need to dial events on the coefficient of 3.5. We will choose the victory of obvious favorites:

Manchester City - Crystal Palace P1 1.35

Granada - Real Madrid P2 1.40

Napoli - Cagliari p1 1.40

Bavaria - Darmstadt 1.32

Common coefficient: 3.5

The likelihood that some of the favorites will not be able to win over the outsider is, but it is small. Especially difficult to submit that on this principle you can lose 13 expressings in a row.

Output

The Danish strategy has the right to exist, however, without additional knowledge, it is hardly effective. A pre-assessment assessment of statistical data and other additional information will allow the system to perfection to perfection and win up to 3 - 4 rates of rates, not risking with impressive sums.

Kelly's criterion

Stably earn at the bets without using strategies or using only one, almost impossible. Moreover, sporting events are very distinguished by their effectiveness and probability of outcomes. In the twentieth century, tactics were widespread in betting, based on mathematical calculations. In honor of his creator Edward Kelly and the calculation system was called - Kelly's criterion. Further on the examples.

Calculation Rules Kelly Criteria

The strategy on Kelly's criterion is based on a mathematical formula that allows you to determine the rate of rates taking into account statistical data, the theory of probability and your own knowledge, as well as collected information.

The correct calculation of the Kelly criterion implies that the better, its use, is not an ordinary amateur, and a professional capable of soberly evaluate the game situation and express the likelihood of a gain in percentage ratio.

Formula for calculating Kelly Criteria:

(K-T BC * Ind. PR - 1) / (K-T BK - 1) * PPK * 100 \u003d The desired rate size,%,

K-T BK - this is the coefficient offered to the event by the bookmaker's office;

Ind.PR - the probability forecast of the winnings appointed by the player himself, its value must be between 0 to 1;

PPK - the increasing-lowering coefficient, on which the degree of risk depends on what it is more, the larger the win. His digit chooses the player himself usually for a long period of time. Betters using a constant-based strategy are rarely used in the formula of the coefficient above 0.4;

The desired bet size - The final percentage of your bank, which must be put on the selected event.

How does Kelly strategy work?

It is clear to understand the criteria of Kelly will help the following example. So, we will put on football. Within the framework of the English Premier League, London has a local arsenal and Manchester United. At the victory of the host bookmakers give a coefficient of 2,11. In our opinion, the figure is clearly overpriced, because guests have recently been a very important match in the Europa League, and the team is focused on this tournament, moreover, the club is crowded, in the upcoming meeting on the field there will be no key players.

Suppose our bank is 1000 rubles. We consider how much we must put on the event "victory of Arsenal". The bookmaker's office gives the coefficient of 2.11 that is slightly less than 50%. Our individual forecast is 70% (0.7). PPK chosen 0.2. Now we substitute the numbers in the formula:

(2.11 * 0.7 - 1) / (2.11 - 1) * 0.2 * 100 \u003d 8.6% or 86 rubles.

The match ended the victory of Arsenal with a score of 2: 0, our bid played:

86 * 2,11 = 181,5;

181.5 - 86 \u003d 95.5 rubles - net profit.

Now our bank amounted to 1095.5, and it is from this amount that should be repeated in the following calculations.

Is it possible to earn on Kelly's criteria?

Unfortunately, the use of only this strategy will not lead to a win. Sooner or later, the player simply sits the entire bank. For the successful application of Kelly's criterion, it is necessary to have deep knowledge in the selected sport, follow the games and conduct serious work on the study of statistical data.

Strategy Martingalea

In the bookmaker, it is difficult to find a strategy that would be as popular as the Martingale system. Its simplicity, availability and efficiency attract plates for many years. What is the essence of this method and really so everything is rosy, as I would like?

The essence of Martingale's strategy

Initially, the method was thoughtful as the tape tactics for bets on the red / black or any other casino game, where the main choice is between two outcomes. But very soon she was borrowed by betarata specializing in sport forecasts. Its meaning is to constantly increase the amount of the rate twice in the event of another loss. In this case, the coefficient to the outcome must be a minimum of two. That is, the amount set on the con kindliness must double.

Consider on the example.

We will put on an odd number of points in a party on the minimum permissible coefficient.

Calculate the resulting profit:

1600 * 2 - (100 + 200 + 400 + 800 + 1600) \u003d 100 rubles.

Despite the prolonged successive series, we still got into a plus. But such a bet will play if there has been enough budget to winning betting, but earnings at such risks is equal to the size of the first bet from the series.

Disadvantages of the Martingale Strategy

At first glance, using the Martingale strategy and having a decent initial bank, it is impossible to lose, but it is not. The loss series can last as much as you like and even having a good stock, you can lose a large amount. The fact is that the bookmakers have long started setting the top border of the bet, thereby bringing all the advantages of this method of conclusion of transactions.

In addition, wanting to get a little winnings, Better risks a much larger amount, which only speeds up bankruptcy. Thus, there is no win-win such a method of financial management as a Martingale strategy cannot be called. It is not recommended for the use of beginners and very gambling players. And also do not forget that the bankroll should not affect the financial position of the family. Be prudent and then luck will be on your side!

Miller Management

History knows not enough betters who have achieved success with the help of their own knowledge and the systems developed by them. J. Miller became one of these lucky. The American not only rich himself, but also shared his strategy with millions.

Basic principles of Miller's financial management

The system developed by a talented handicapper will not help you guess the outcomes of sports events, it is designed only for the correct distribution of funds from the initial bank.

Peru Miller owns many articles in which he justifies from a scientific point of view, the main mistakes of most betters. His strategy will help to avoid the temptation to increase the rates and earn due to the correct allocation of its funds.

In order for the Miller's strategy to really work, it is necessary to turn off the head, to defeat all gambling emotions and firmly assimilate that the probability of winning the current rate does not depend on the previous won or lost outcomes. The author of the methodology convincingly advises to choose events with two possible outcome options and coefficients of 1.85 - 1.91 (in each office in different ways, they depend on the margin that the bookmaker takes itself as an intermediary). In other words, Miller's financial management is used for events whose probability is 50%.

And now the essence of the system. Miller offers betting on small fixed amounts that make up 1% of the total bank. And to increase them only in the case when the initial capital increased by 25%. The rate itself rises on the same number.

Our bank is 10,000 rubles, i.e. The rate of rates will be 100 rubles. As soon as the total amount increases by 25% and reaches 12,500, raise a bet to 125 rubles. In order for the strategy to bring profits, it is enough to guess 52.85% of all predicted events.

Miller Financial Management Strategy Disadvantages

The key to the success of his method Miller calls the timely review of the amount of the rate and the competent distribution of the bank's money, but the result of the rates depends on the player itself. The use of alone strategies for profit is not enough, it must be combined with a deep analysis of statistical data and other information about the upcoming game.

Tank Attack method

Financial strategies, unlike gaming, teach betters to properly distribute the initial bank and do not allow to merge all the money, trying to recoup in case of the only failure. One of the most interesting tactics of this kind is called a "tank attack".

The essence of the tank attack strategy

The financial principle is easy to explain in the game form. Bets are tanks who spoke entire next to the enemy, and each loss is a loss of one of them. The initial bank is divided into several equal parts. They can be 3 or 5, or 7 ... and for each one is made its forecast. If the rate wins, the attack continues, and the entire amount is placed on the next event. If the forecast was incorrect, the tank fell and dropped out of the struggle.

Our initial bank amounted to 3000 rubles. We divide it into three equal parts of 1000 and make bets (it is desirable to choose events with small coefficients, in the victory of which you are confident):

1. Manchester City - Crystal Palace: We put 1000 for the victory of the hosts for 1.30, the final account: 5: 0, winning 1300.
2. Amkar - CSKA: We put 1000 for the guests of the guests for 1.60, the final account is 0: 2, winnings 1600.
3. Barcelona - Villarreal: We put 1000 for the victory of the hosts for 1.20, the final account is 4: 1, winnings 1200.

Next series of tank attack:

1. 1300 on Liverpool - Southampton - the victory of the owners for 1.50. The game ended in a draw, the rate lost.
2. 1600 in Lazio - Sampdoria - P1 for 1.35. Total account: 7: 3, winnings 2160.
3. 1200 at Granada - Real Madrid - Victory of guests for 1.15. Final account: 0: 4, winnings 1380.

After the second series, we lost one tank, we continue:

1. 2160 in Chelsea - Middlesbrough - the victory of the owners for 1.50. Final account 3: 0, winnings 3240.
2. 1380 on Kievo - Palermo - the victory of the owners for 1.56. The game ended in a draw, 1: 1. The rate lost.

After the tank attack, the amount equal to 3240 remained in our bank.

3240 - 3000 \u003d 240 rubles - net profit.

Now we divide this amount into several equal parts and continue the game.

The above is the events with 1.15 - 1.60 coefficients than they are less, the greater the likelihood of winning. When to finish the "attack" decides directly the player himself, if in the example we stopped after the second stage, profit would be:

2160 + 1380 = 3540;

3540 - 3000 \u003d 540 rubles.

Tank attack strategy. Is it possible to win?

The success of the strategy directly depends on the Beether's skill to analyze and competently use the information obtained. Even small coefficients do not guarantee the winnings and, if blindly choose only the numbers, sooner or later the entire bank will merge.

Strategy of rates on the Oscar of Grind

Using several strategies in the sport rates, the chances of success always increase. Many financial systems are built on the principles of the tactics of the game Martingale and represent its advanced copy. This is the strategy of Oscar Grand.

The essence of the Oscar Grade rates

Unlike the notorious Martingale strategy, when using which the amount of the bet grows after losing, in the Oscar System, the amount of the amount occurs after the win. If your forecast has been defeated, you don't need to change anything.

The maximum value of the bet per event cannot be greater than 1/12 of the total bank, and the ratio to the selected outcome of at least 2.

Increasing the amount after winning occurs once, even if you managed to win twice, from the third forecast, the series will begin again. Consider Read more System of Oscar of Gyunda on the example:

Our initial bank is 1200 rubles, i.e. The amount of the first bet will be 100 rubles. Select an event with a coefficient of 2:

The final bank amounted to 1,400 rubles, net profit: 1400 - 1200 \u003d 200 rubles.

As can be seen from the example, the strategies really earn guessing 50% of the rates.

Is it possible to win on the Oscar Study strategy?

The experienced betters that have tried the strategy on themselves, extremely skeptical about it, believing that sooner or later it will lead to full losing. Experts in the field of probability theory came to the same conclusion.

For a stable plus, a player must guess at least 50% of rates with a ratio of at least 2. In practice, it is practically unrealistic. Given the margin that the bookmaker takes, the probability of events is less than 50%.

The advantages of the system can be attributed to the protection against bookmakers and the impossibility of the rapid drainage of the bank.

The Oscar Strategy is perfect for use in a short period of time, but its long-term use is almost one hundred percent probability ended in failure. Learn to properly distribute money at the rates, both after losing and after the victory. And then permanent profit or temporary preservation of the bankroll will be provided.

Paradox Monty Hall.

The use of bankroll distribution systems and rates selection strategies will save each better from the possible loss of the entire budget. Experienced players are verified that it is necessary to apply different ways of playing in practice, especially since there are quite a few such methods. Paradox Monty Hall is one of many. The unique strategy was named after the leading transmission popular in the United States. For the first time, its explanations showed exactly there.

The essence of the Paradox of Monti Hall

In the transfer of the Paradox of Monty Hall due to a simple mathematical riddle. The subject was offered to choose which 3 doors, for one of which was the main prize - a car, for two others - goats. The probability of opening the right door in each of three cases, according to mathematical theory, was 33.3%. After the participant pointed to the door you like, the presenter opened one of two with the goat (the fact that the player did not call) and offered to change his choice.

Most often, the subjects insisted on their initial opinion, without understanding one simple thing. The probability that the machine is hidden behind the door selected originally and will remain 33.3%, when the probability of finding a car behind the second door will grow to 66.6%.

And if the doors are not 3, and 100, and the lead in turn will open 98 with goats, then the likelihood of guessing, changing its opinion, increases to 99%.

Paradox Monte Hall in Examples

Consider the use of the Paradox of Monty Hall on the example of bets in the bookmaker offices.

In the Italian series, and the end of the season is approaching. Each team remains to play only one match. Suppose three teams: Crotone, Palermo and Pescara fight for survival in the highest league and have approximately equal chances of success. The clubs that earn more points in the last game will continue to perform in the series A. The probability of each of them go further is 33.3%. We bet on Palermo. The first playing Pescara and tolerate defeat. The probability of passage Crotone increases to 66.6%. Now it is necessary to bet on this command, and its amount should cover a possible loss from the first forecast and bring profits from above.

conclusions

At first glance, the decision contradicts all the basics of logic and common sense. However, if you think a pretty, everything will fall into place. The strategy of the Paradox of Monti Hall clearly shows the beta of their main mistakes, the inability to really evaluate the possibilities of winning outcomes.

Control

Play at the bets without a plan and consistently earned almost unreal. Therefore, all successful betters after testing from different systems, use 3-4 constantly or create their own, which significantly increases the chances of winning. Here we consider the strategy of sports betting on the antihodes. The counterpart rate is very similar to the fork system, so long adhering to its principles with a positive result, you can attract "attention" bookmakers to your account.

Principles of controversy strategy

In the rules of the system, the opposition to figure out is very easy. The player is express, and then insures it with the help of orders. The only mandatory condition for execution - events should take place at different times. Consider in more detail on the example.

As the events we need choose football matches in the English Premier League and amounted to express:

1. Southampton - Arsenal P1 for 2.00.
2. Everton - Watford P1 for 1.45.
3. Crystal Palace - Hull City P1 for 2.05.

General ratio: 5.95.

Let the amount rate be 200 rubles. Before the first game, we need to inspire express and put the ordinar on the opposite outcome:

Southampton - Arsenal X2 for 1.85

We put 250 rubles on it. If the ordinar wins, our winnings will be:

250 * 1.85 \u003d 462.5 rubles.

Could consider clean profits. To do this, I will submit the rate of bet and lost express:

462.5 - 250 - 200 \u003d 12.5 p.

If the ordinar lost, go to the next event in express and make a new bid. Its amount is chosen with the previous loss:

Everton - Watford X2 for 2.85

We put 250 rubles on it. If the ordinar wins, our winnings will be:

250 * 2.85 \u003d 712,5 p.

Net profit:

712.5 - 250 - 250 - 200 \u003d 12.5 rubles.

If the ordinar lost, go to the last event in express. Currently we set the amount of 700 rubles. In case of success, the expression gain will be 1190 rubles, i.e. On the last ordinar, we left 490 rubles:

Crystal Palace - Hall City X2 for 1.82.

The winning of this bet will not cover the tools spent, and we will be in the minus. What to do? The counter-forward strategy does not work?

The experienced betters, using the rates by the opposite, are recommended to leave the event in which you are sure most of all and abandon the last ordinar. However, it rarely comes to this. In reality, express with a large common coefficient loses at the very beginning, in the first or second progress.

conclusions

The controversial strategy is not a win-win, but the competent distribution of events in express will help stably win a small amount of the safety rate.

Rating system "+ 60%"

Most tactics of games in betting in bookmakers are prefabricated systems from existing popular strategies. "+ 60%" is one of them. It includes elements of the classic Martingale strategy and the less well-known FLET system, which consists in the fixed amounts for each selected event.

The essence of the system "+ 60%"

The main principles of the strategy "+ 60%":

1. Select events with a ratio of at least 1.7.
2. We divide the bank to the parts and put, starting with 1% of the total money, increasing the amount in case of losing in such a percentage: 1; 3.5; 9.5; 24.5; 61.5.
3. In order for the strategy to bring profit can not allow more than 5 losses in a row.

The strategy is distinguished by a high degree of risk, because Even a professional player has losing series of 5 or more rates.

And yet to lose 5 bets one by one another with coefficients of 1.7 - 1.8 is not so simple. The probability of victory of each of them is about 56%, and defeats 5 times in a row - 1.7%.

The initial bank is 1000 rubles. We will put on events with a coefficient of 1.8.

1107 - 1000 \u003d 107 rubles - net profit.

conclusions

The system "+ 60%", as well as others, is not a win-win, but the likelihood of income to its use is much higher than on the same Martingale strategies and "Fixed profits".

Composite coefficients

One of the sources of income bookmakers is margin. This is the difference between the real probability of winning and the coefficient provided by the office, the part that the stock exchange takes for mediation. In some BC margin, the game is so great that the game for any of the well-known financial strategies is doomed to failure. The system "Composite coefficients" allows you to increase the amount of winning due to the separation of bets for two.

Using the strategy of compound coefficients

The proposed system is suitable for volleyball, basketball and tennis, those sports, where the overall victory in the game develops from victory in separate sets, quarters or half.

Consider in more detail on the example.

On the tennis court there are two long-time opponents Italian Fabio Famini and Spaniard Rafael Nadal. On the favorite of the match (Nadal) give the coefficient of 1.74, and we will put on it. Now let's look at the line offered by the bookmaker, namely, we will pay attention to the accurate account on the gameam. In case of Victory Nadal, the game will end with a score of 2: 0 for the coefficient of 3.0 or 2: 1 for 3.40 in favor of the Spaniard. If, instead of putting on a regular victory, break the bank and make 2 forecast to the exact account, our profits will be higher.

Disadvantages of the strategy of composite coefficients

The system of composite coefficients has one, but a significant disadvantage. The game can go to a completely different scenario, and you will lose all the money. It is always preserved the likelihood that even the most hopeless outsider can beat the mastty favorite.

Strategy "1.01 - 1.02"

Play with a bookmaker without tactics is not quite a good idea. In any confrontation there should be a victory plan. In the sports betting, players use not even one such plan, and also spare and safety. Experienced betters are used by proven strategies, the "1.01 -1.02" strategy has become popular in LIV mode.

Principle of operation of the system "1.01 -1.02"

When a meeting is held between approximately equal commands, any event in the game is interpreted by bookmakers in one direction or another, and the coefficient varies to several tenths or hundredths. If a pair has an explicit favorite, the coefficient changes only from 1.01 to 1.02.

According to the strategy at the very beginning of the match, the player at the coefficient of 1.01 puts "against" a small amount, for example, 100 rubles. After the coefficient has changed to 1.02, we make a second bet, this time "for". The amount should be equal to the potential win from the first bet. If the favorite wins, our bank is increasing by 100 rubles, if the outsider wins miracle - we go out in zero.

Subtleties of the strategy "1.01 - 1.02"

You can use tactics repeatedly even within the same game, however, due to high demand for minimal coefficients, the rates may not pass and blocked by the bookmaker.

For the successful application of the system, it is necessary to have access to a direct broadcast without delay, otherwise you can simply do not have time to force the strategy.

The system "1.01 - 1.02" is more oriented on betters with experience capable of skillfully playing coefficients in Lyiv. Newbies better choose another strategy.

Fixed percentage of bank

To become a successful better, there is little knowledge in the subject of sports events, one of the most important factors of preserving and increase funds is the correct distribution of bankroll. Using management mania very simplifies life not only to players at rates, but also traders, investors and other people who invest their own money. The "Fixed Percentage of Bank" rates refers to financial management strategies.

The essence of a fixed interest strategy from the bank

First of all, the player must determine the initial bank. Each bet will be a fixed percentage of this amount.

The general bank is 1000 rubles. We will put 10% of the bank, i.e. 100 rubles. Suppose our bid lost, the amount remained in the account:

1000 - 100 \u003d 900 rubles.

Suppose our rate with the coefficient 3 won:

90 * 3 = 270.

General Bank:

900 – 90 + 270 = 1080.

Throw 10% again - 108 rubles, etc.

At first glance, using this financial strategy cannot be lost, but in fact sooner or later the player will overtake the failure strip, and the bet drops to the amount less than the minimum tariff of the bookmaker. This automatically means the drain of the entire bankroll.

conclusions

By itself, the strategy of a fixed interest from the bankroll does not represent any value for betters who dream of beating a bookmaker, but using it in combination with other systems can bring a positive result. A modified fixed interest tactic from the bank is Kelly's criterion, which successfully enjoy professional players at rates.

Most strategies and tactics for playing in bookmakers have moved from the classic casino. It was there that a variety of systems were born, designed to provide regular winnings in roulette or black jack. It is worth noting that dozens of years, enthusiasts are trying to create a win-win system. However, this strategy has not yet come up.

There are several most popular BC systems. Some of them suggest a precise adherence to certain progressions, others do focus on correct work with the bank. Each tactic has its pros and cons.

Flat

This system implies a constant rate. At the same time, the result of previous forecasts is completely income. Capper originally selects the value of the bet. Of course, it can be revised, coming to intermediate purposes. Flat tactics does not provide large winnings and losses. Success curve or failure is very smooth. The strategy enjoys a huge success in kapper. Often, it is her professionals. They know exactly that the sharp jump of the winnings is replaced by the same (at best) losses. Therefore, the "smooth" game is the most effective way to get a small, but stable profit on the long distance.

Dogon

Dogon strategy provides a dynamic increase in the bet in case of losing or a series of failures. The main task for the player is the refund of the tools spent, as well as receiving fixed profits. The formula for calculating the rate is as follows:

C \u003d (B + P) / (K-1), where C is the value of the next bet, in the desired winnings, P is the lost amount, to the coefficient.

The individual case of the Dogon system is the Martingale system (K \u003d 2; B - the initial rate).

Dogon tactics does not allow you to withstand long series failures. At a short distance, it may seem fairly effective, but if the Kapper will lose 5-6 bets, then it will already need an impressive amount to cover costs. The rapid growth rate can be reduced due to the high ratio or the use of expressions. However, it often significantly reduces the likelihood of the winning of the forecast.

Percentage of bank

Proportional rates tactics use serious popularity. It remotely resembles a flash strategy, but the jumps here will be sharper. The idea is to put a certain percentage of the bank every time. If the account increases, the rate increases. And vice versa.

For example, the initial bank was equal to 1000 monetary units. Kapper determined that it will constantly put 5%. The first rate 50 on the coefficient 2.0 played. Now in the account of the Typer 1050. So the next rate will be 52.5.

Wa-Bank game

This strategy is absolutely not suitable for professional capperus. However, novice players think that the bet Wa-Bank can be good tactics. Even if you play for minimal coefficients (1.1 or 1.05), a rather soon a player will lose the entire bank. If you take more substantial quotes, the bankruptcy will occur even earlier.

Among all possible tactics, Kapper chooses the most suitable for its own and goals. But each player must understand that a series of winnings is always replaced by the series of failures. Based on this, it is worth picking the system to play in the bookmaker.

The beginning and renewal of a football match: How does this happen?

Even before the starting whistle, the judges captains take part in ...

Expression "Strategies of rates" It is one of the most requested in search engines, in the subject of "Sport rates". This is due to the fact that players are trying to find a win-win strategy strategy, in which the risk of money loss in the bookmakers will be minimal. The following requests are in popularity sport rates strategy: Football and tennis.

Soccer betting strategy

In this section, you can get answers to what exactly football strategies are best betting. Do not forget, a win-win strategy is a myth, any team can, how to lose and win. Despite this, football is a safer bid, than the rest, since the accident factor is minimal.

Tennis bet strategy

Despite the fact that tennis is not included in the top 3 of the most popular sport, queries on tennis strategies more than abuse. This is due to the accident rate, because only 2 players will come to the court (in paired meetings 4) and the probability of plum / losing match the leader is sufficiently large to meet the needs of all players and receive a profit from the right strategy, the best strategies of bets on the BetAdvise resource.

Also in this section presents strategies in Lyiv on basketball and hockey. By choosing profitable rates strategy, you can earn a clearly built scheme. The competent built bet strategy and the financial management of the Gaming Bank is the main key to the success of the player of the bookmaker.

There are diverse strategies of bets in bookmakers: some are quite universal, others are suitable for certain sports or for specific types of rates. Many sports betting strategies with minimal risk are based on systems developed by the regulators of the casino. There are also very new systems. The best sports bet strategies with detailed descriptions are collected in this section of our site.

For the success of the sport rates, you need to use profitable and reliable strategies. With all the variety, they can be divided into 2 large groups:

• financial strategies based on the principles of monetary management;
• game strategies for sports betting, depending on sports layouts.

Financial Management Strategies

These are proven bid strategies based on bank management. Before starting the game, the Bettor determines the amount that can dispose of - a gaming bank. The winning strategy of bets in the bookmaker office is primarily avoiding bankruptcy. So, the amounts of rates need to be determined with such a calculation so as not to exhaust the entire bank.

• danish system;
• percentage of initial bank;
• kelly's criterion is the percentage of the current bank;
• flat - fixed total rate;
• fixed profit;
• a number of numbers are a profitable bet strategy for the long run, if the bank is large enough.

Gaming strategies

Strategies of bets, winning for some sports, for others may be meaningless, for example:

• the strategy of three-way throws is applicable exclusively for basketball;
• dutch strategy - for Formula 1;
• games against the favorite - for those sports where transfers are carried out.

There are universal work strategies for sports:

• for rates on total, more or less;
• for stakes of even a basketball, volleyball (Dogon strategy is usually applied);
• strategy of long-term rates (futures) for tournaments.

Many novice players are interested in whether there are win-win strategies for sports betting. Conditionally such are:

• forks - bets on opposite events from different bookmakers;
• corridors - paired bets, of which at least one will definitely wins.