Bazarov and people quotes. Quotes from the novel "Fathers and Sons" by Turgenev: interesting statements by Evgeny Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and others

23.04.2019

Gabriel Garcia Marquez What language did Marquez write in?

An essay on the topic: Pechorin is a fatalist (based on the novel by M

"Fathers and Sons" is a landmark novel by I. S. Turgenev, which was written in the 60s of the 19th century. Despite the fact that there are many metaphors in the novel, a comparison of man with nature, for example, when the characters went to the village of Maryino, Ivan Sergeevich described Russia before the abolition of serfdom by describing the winter weather: “in the middle of a red spring day, a white ghost of a bleak, endless winters with its blizzards, frosts and snows ”. But, despite all these descriptions and lyrical digressions of the author, "Fathers and Sons" is famous for its naturalness.

All the resulting characters from Turgenev seemed to exist in reality, as if this whole story took place in our life. Ivan Sergeevich is not just a writer, but a subtle psychologist who is well versed in personalities. The image of his character Bazarov literally comes to life from the pages of the book and, in principle, personifies all the then nihilistic youth.

In the novel "Fathers and Sons", a dispute between generations: the conservative Kirsanovs and the golden youth in the image of Yevgeny Bazarov enter the enmity of tastes and life, as well as religious and other preferences.

But we are all used to the fact that when someone argues, the person observing what is happening either moves to a position or remains in the neutral side. But in the case of a dispute that Turgenev described, things are different: even if the viewer adheres to the policy of the nihilist Bazarov, in most cases the thought flashes in his head that the Kirsanovs are also right in something.

Disagreements among generations will never exhaust themselves, so starting a dispute becomes meaningless, as they say, against a wall of peas: Bazarov was practically not convinced, and the Kirsanovs remained unconvinced.

Consider the characters in this wonderful book.

Evgeny Bazarov- a young doctor who is engaged in science throughout the day. He looks a little sloppy, the guy does not need to make an impression, as this aristocratic society does, Bazarov believed that the main thing in a person is the mind. Eugene said that he was an ardent nihilist, that is, a person who denies all human concepts: love, religion, friendship. In some of his statements, Bazarov is right:

“Nature is not a temple, but a workshop, and a person is a worker in it,” that is, a person must work all his life, not pleasing nature, but work to improve it.
“Every person should educate himself - well, at least like me, for example ...” - the fact that a person has his own opinion means that he is deeply developed as a person.

But Eugene strongly played with his image of a nihilist, which is more like youthful maximalism: he talked about great works of art that they weren't worth a dime, denied love, and romance was so disgusting to him. In any case, the young man contradicted himself: he said that "Love is rubbish, an unforgivable nonsense," "he considered knightly feelings something like ugliness or disease ...", although he was a female hunter. But no matter how he concealed, no matter how nihilist he was, a confession escaped from his soul:

"... So know that I love you stupidly, madly ... That's what you have achieved ..."

Now consider Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov, a wealthy nobleman. In disputes, he is right in his own way, but Nikolai Petrovich is sitting still, as if stopping in time. This landowner has something of Sobakevich from Dead Souls, but just a little bit: they are both inveterate conservatives. But from Manilov, he also has something: higher manners, but hopeless laziness, since Kirsanov was all bad with the economy. Moreover, Nikolai Petrovich does not miss the moment to show his education and aristocracy, for example, when he abruptly begins to speak French.

There is also another interesting hero - Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, one might say, one of the significant characters in the novel. He is proud, proud, educated and well-read. He is the main opponent in disputes with Bazarov. He does not like Russian traditions, he lives for the English taste. It is the image of a real aristocrat.

"... Without self-esteem, without respect for oneself, - and in an aristocrat, these feelings are developed, - there is no solid foundation"
"... Aristocracy is a principle, and only immoral or empty people can live without principles in our time ..."

Also throughout the novel shows his nature and the writer, Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev. The entire novel is permeated with his quotes, for example, "... Time (a well-known thing) sometimes flies like a bird, sometimes crawls like a worm; but a person is especially good when he does not even notice whether it is soon or quietly ..." Thoughts the author is forced to think.

In general, this book is a must-read, although Bazarov is a hero of his time, his thoughts and thoughts of everyone involved in this book make you think and help form your own opinion.

Bazarov is a representative of the young

generations. In his personality are grouped

those properties that are small

lobes are scattered among the masses.

D. I. Pisarev

In his article “Concerning Fathers and Sons,” Turgenev wrote about Bazarov: “... I excluded everything artistic from his circle of sympathies,” stressing that “I had to draw his figure in this way”. From the text of the novel it is clear that Bazarov rejects both art in general and its individual types, in particular poetry, life, music.

To Pavel Petrovich's question: "So you don't recognize art?" - Bazarov exclaims with a grin: "The art of making money." About poetry and poets, he speaks sharply negatively: "A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet," advises Pushkin to replace the materialist Büchner, poetry in this he calls "nonsense." About the greatest painter Rafael Bazarov says that he "is not worth a penny." Turgenev's hero considers music to be frivolous. In a conversation with Madame Madame Madame Odintsova, he frankly admits: "You do not suppose artistic meaning in me, but I really do not have it."

And at the same time, Bazarov knows works of art and literature: he quotes Byron's "The Abydos Bride" by heart, is familiar with the novels of Fenimore Kuper, the ballads of Schiller. Why does Bazarov treat art this way?

Bazarov denies art because it was in the 1860s that writers and critics from the camp of “pure art” placed it above those civic and political tasks that required the fastest resolution at that time.

It was an era of bitter struggle between democrats and liberals. In Bazarov's statements one can hear the echoes of the disputes between the "sixties" - democrats and supporters of "pure art". Among the first were those who, in the field of physics, attacking theorists of "pure art", were inclined to deny art itself. The democrats destroyed the noble aesthetics, and Turgenev attributed to them the destruction of all aesthetics, the complete rejection of art. He endowed his hero with such extreme views. And since the writer himself adhered to directly opposite views, then, naturally, Bazarov's attitude to art could not be fanned by the author's sympathies in the novel.

Representatives of the young generation of democrats answered their ideological opponents, the liberals, approximately as follows: if Raphael, whom you so praise, is above everything that is most dear to us, what we believe in and for what we fight, then in this case we do not need your Raphael. This is approximately what Bazarov said, only with his characteristic laconicism: "Raphael is not worth a dime."

The ideological struggle for Pushkin between democrats and liberals was that they valued the poet's work in different ways. For the democrats, headed by Chernyshevsky, the content of art was everything that aroused public interest. For them, Pushkin was the poet of "real life." He was dear to them as the author of freedom-loving poems, "The Captain's Daughter", "History of the Village of Goryukhin" and other works of a critical direction. For the liberals, who valued the poet as the author of romantic poems and elegies, love lyrics, Pushkin turned out in those years to be the banner of "art for art." The delusion of Bazarov, like of some of his real prototypes, was that they rushed to storm Pushkin himself, instead of exposing the liberals who misinterpret the work of the great poet. Material from the site

This misconception swept wide circles of student youth, who began to oppose specific sciences to art, and criticism of various social vices of society - to the sense of beauty. The democrat of the 60s could not like the fact that art was used by some liberal figures to cover up class and social injustice. The nihilist raznochin also transferred the enmity towards these figures to art as a means that they used.

All these facts were known to Turgenev. Therefore, creating the character of the raznochin-tsa-democrat of the 60s, he endowed his hero with harsh critical statements about art.

Bazarov's limitations are that he did not take into account the effective, educational, aesthetic power of art, which played a huge role in the development and formation of both an individual and society as a whole.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use search

On this page material on topics:

how bazarov felt about the art of quotation
how did bazaar feel about art?
bazaars in relation to art
the theme of art in the novel fathers and children
as the art of bazaars denies quote

The famous novel "Fathers and Sons" Turgenev wrote in 1862 and touched upon the deep philosophical, political and moral problems of the people of that time. The main character was a young commoner democrat Bazarov Yevgeny. In order to expand deeper into the topic "Bazarov's attitude to love", first let's figure out what kind of person he was. And let us mention in advance that it was love that broke this strong and strong-willed person by playing a cruel joke with him. But first things first.

Bazarov: attitude to love

Young Bazarov from the first meeting with other heroes of the novel is represented by a man from the common people, who is absolutely not shy about it and, on the contrary, is proud of it. The rules of etiquette of a noble aristocratic society, in fact, he never adhered to and did not intend to do so.

Bazarov is a man of action, firm convictions and uncompromising judgments, a nature very passionate about science and medicine. Nihilistic views make him something interesting, and something repulsive and incomprehensible.

That only is his reasoning about art. For him, the artist Raphael is "not worth a dime," the beauty of nature does not exist for him either, since it was created not to admire it, but as a workshop for man. - your own personal and hateful. Because he believes that it does not exist at all. Love in his understanding is only physiology and, if you like, the usual "needs of the body."

Bazarov's attitude to love: quotes

Before meeting the widow Anna Sergeevna Odintsova, he was a man of cold reason, sober and deep mind, proud and purposeful, confident in everything where possible, defended the ideas of nihilism, trying to break the usual stereotypes, everything old and unnecessary, and immediately added that building is not their business.

Not long ago Bazarov put "romanticism" and "rot" on the same level. However, he had to rethink his attitude to love. At first, Odintsova attracted him purely "physiologically" and he spoke of her like this: "What a figure, does not look like other women"; "She has such shoulders as I've never seen."

Odintsova

As for the topic "Bazarov: attitude to love", it should be noted that in the conversation, Odintsova began to choose topics that were interesting for him, they began to speak the same language, and this could not but have a positive effect on their relationship.

Love for this hero has become too serious a test of loyalty to nihilistic ideals. Bazarov had never experienced anything like this before and generally thought that he was not inclined to romance. But in fact it turned out that all people are the same in relation to love, because she does not ask when she comes. The attitude of Bazarov to becomes unhealthy eventually begins to differ.

Odintsova was a very intelligent woman, and it cannot be said that she was not carried away by this amazing person. Anna Sergeevna thought a lot about him and even challenged him to frankness, however, having received a declaration of love in return, she immediately rejected it, because the usual way and comfort were more dear to her than a simple fleeting hobby. However, here Bazarov could no longer control himself. His attitude to love began to change, and eventually finished him off.

Broken heart

Unappreciated love leads Bazarov to difficult emotional experiences and completely unsettles him. He lost the purpose and meaning of life. In order to somehow unwind, he goes to his parents and helps his father in his medical practice. As a result, he contracted typhus and died. But first, his soul perished from love, unable to survive love sufferings. And only then the body.

At the end of the work, Turgenev sums up that man was created in order to love, admire and feel. Denying all this, he is simply doomed to die.

In the section on the question, quotes about Bazarov's love. please aa given by the author Inquire the best answer is What does Bazarov say about love?
“Still, I’ll say that the man who has put all his life at stake for women
love and when this card was killed for him, he became limp and sank to the point that he was not capable of anything, such a person is not a man, not a male. "
Equally surprising is another of his words: “And what is this mysterious relationship between a man and a woman? We physiologists know what this relationship is.
You study the anatomy of the eye: where does it come from, as you say, a mysterious look? It's all romanticism, nonsense, rot, art. " He puts the words "romanticism" and "rot" in one row, for him they seem to be synonyms.
“Such a rich body! Even now in the anatomical theater "- this is how Bazarov estimates a beautiful specimen of" the same frog "- to Odintsova.
The attitude of the Kirsanov brothers to Fenechka. Pavel Petrovich, delirious, exclaims: “Oh, how I love this empty creature! "
Bazarov loves in a different way.
His views on a woman, on love are sometimes called cynical. Is it so?
In his attitude, for example, to Fenechka, there is more humanity and
respect than in Pavel Petrovich's absurd passion for her. “She is a mother - well, and
rights "(Bazarov)
The last aphorism in Bazarov's life is his words to Madame Odintsova: "Blow on the dying lamp and let it go out." Poetic. And these words were said not by the same Bazarov, who proudly proclaimed: "Raphael is not worth a dime." And not the same Bazarov who recommended “not to speak beautifully”.

That only is his reasoning about art. For him, the artist Raphael is "not worth a dime," the beauty of nature does not exist for him either, since it was created not to admire it, but as a workshop for man. Bazarov's attitude to love is his own personal and hateful. Because he believes that it does not exist at all. Love in his understanding is only physiology and, if you like, the usual "needs of the body."

Love for this hero has become too serious a test of loyalty to nihilistic ideals. Bazarov had never experienced anything like this before and generally thought that he was not inclined to romance. But in fact it turned out that all people are the same in relation to love, because she does not ask when she comes. Bazarov's attitude to love becomes unhealthy. Quotes about love eventually start to differ.