"In my comedy twenty-five fools on a healthy person; And this man, of course, in anti-russia with society, his surrounding, no one understands him, no one wants to forgive, why he is a little higher, "he wrote A.S. Griboedov about her plays. With this author's point of view, it is quite possible to agree, and the central question made in the work, I would formulate this: why is a smart person rejected by society and his beloved girl? What are the reasons for this misunderstanding?

This kind of issues may arise at any time in the most different social environment, and therefore they do not lose their relevance over time. Perhaps, that is why "Chatsky will never be built," as I was noticed by I.A. Goncharov.

In fact, the era of Kareet and palaces and palaces have long been riveted; People seem to live in completely different conditions, but everything is also difficult to find an understanding in society, everything is also difficult to explain to him with loved ones, everyone also brought stereotypes over people, which is very difficult to destroy. Probably, in such a "supreme" formulation, the problem of the mind in comedy is one of the secrets of the longevity of this work, its modern sound.

The problem of the mind is the ideological and emotional rod, around which all other issues of socio-political, philosophical, national-patriotic and moral and psychological nature are grouped.

In connection with the special significance of the problem of the mind, a serious controversy unfolded around it. So, MA Dmitriev believed that Chatsky only cleans, despising others, and in his claim, it looks like a comedian one. From other positions, but also critically assesses the mental abilities of the main character of the play A.S. Pushkin. Not the dedication of the depths of thoughts expressed by Chatsky ("Everything he says is very cleverly"), the poet claimed: "The first sign of a smart person is to know with whom you deal, and not throw beads in front of the reheetling ...". Skeptically responded about the formulation of the problem of P.A. Vyazemsky, who said that "in the midst of fools of different properties", Griboedov showed "one smart person, and even that mad."

V.G. Belinsky initially expressed an opinion about Chatkom, close to what he spoke about the hero Dmitirev: "It's just a cripoon, a phrase, the perfect noise, at every step, the opposite of all the holy saying. Are you really going to society and start scolding fools and livestoms to be a deep person? ". But later, the critic revised his point of view, seeing in the monologues and replicas of the Chatsky outpouring "bile, thunder-indignation at the sight of a rotten society of insignificant people", whose sleepy life in fact "is death ... any reasonable thought."

Thus, there was a radical turn in the assessments of the mind of the principal hero, which was reflected in the view of D.I. Pisareva, attributed to Chapsky to the number of characters suffering from the fact that "questions have long been solved in their mind, can not even be represented in real life."

Such a point of view found a final expression in the article I.A. Goncharova "Millon Torzania", where Chatsky is called the smartest face in comedy. According to the writer, the main character of the "grief from the mind" is the universal-typological figure, the inevitable "with each change of one century to others," much out of his time and preparing the arrival of the new one.

As for the ability of Chatsky to recognize people, then Goncharov believed that she had it. Not intended to initially set out their views in the Society of Famusov, having arrived only in order to see Sophia, Chatsky turns out to be hidden by her coldness, then he will make the demands of her father and, finally, psychologically, he does not stand the tension, starting to respond to a blow. The mind is not in Ladu with a heart, and this circumstance leads to a dramatic collision.

Remembering the Pushkin principle to judge the writer "According to the laws of themselves, they are recognized about themselves," to appeal to the position of Griboedov, to the fact that he himself invests in the concept of "mind." By calling the Chatsky smart, and other heroes - fools, the playwright expressed its point of view unequivocally. At the same time, the conflict is built in such a way that each of the opposing parties considers smart, and insane those who do not share her views.

The mind of Famusov and the characters of his circle is the ability to adapt to the existing living conditions and to extract the maximum material benefit. Life success is expressed in the number of souls of serfs, in obtaining title and rank, profitable marriage or marriage, in money, luxury items. The one who managed to achieve this (regardless of the means of achievement) is cleared by smart.

The example of "smart" behavior is clearly demonstrated in the story about the uncle Maxim Maxim Petrovich, who seemed to be an absolutely lost situation (in front of the Empress "fell, and so that there is a slightly naolet"), instantly oriented, managed to turn into a winning for ourselves, deliberately falling again, having merging Catherine and receiving compensation for this in the form of its special location.

Such examples of "smart behavior" are shown by Sophia, and Molchanin, and rockosub. From their point of view, a person who refused the post and career, who does not want Lucavit, openly expressing his views, reaching against generally accepted, who had had so many enemies who had gone for himself in one evening, cannot be considered smart - only madness can be done.

At the same time, many representatives of the Famow Society are well aware that the glances of Chatsky are not insane, but are built on a different logic that differs from their own and melting threat to their usual state of complacency.

The logic of an intelligent person, according to Chatsky, suggests not just the ability to use the already established living conditions and not only the formation (which in itself is mandatory), but the ability to freely and unpredict the conditions themselves from the point of view of common sense and change these conditions if they Common sense does not match.

So, while at the head of the scientist committee, it makes no sense with a cry demand "oath, so that no one knew and not learned." How long can you hold out this post with similar views? Not only dishonest, but really stupidly updated for servants, who saved the "life and honor" of Barin, "Borzy Three Dogs", for who next time will save him life!

It is meaningless and dangerous to use material and cultural goods, without providing any access to them to the people, the very "smart, cheerful" people, who just saved the monarchy from Napoleon. It is impossible to restrain more at the courtyard using the principles of Maks Petrovich. Now there is not enough personal loyalty and the desire to please - now it is necessary to be able to do the case, as government challenges are greatly complicated.

All these examples clearly show the copyright position: the mind, which only adapts, thinks with standard stereotypes, Griboedov is inclined to be stupid. But the essence of the problem is that the majority always thinks standard and stereotypically.

Griboedov does not reduce the conflict only for opposing the minds inherent in people of different generations. So, for example, Chatsky and Molchalin can be attributed to one generation, but their views are diametrically opposed: the first is the type of the identity of the "century of the current" and even most likely the century of the future, and the second, with all his youth, is the "century of the past" because It is satisfied with the life principles of Famusov and the people of his circle.

Both heroes - and Chatsky, and Molchanin - smart in their own way. Molchanin, making a successful career, occupying at least what, but the place in society, understands the system that lies in its basis. This is quite consistent with his practical mind. But from the standpoint of Chatsky, who fights for the freedom of personality, such behavior due to stereotypes adopted in society cannot be considered smart:

I'm strange, and not strange who is?

One who is on all fools looks like;

Molchanin, for example ...

According to Chatsky, a truly smart person should not depend on others - this is how he behaves in the house of Famusov, as a result of which he deserves a reputation as crazy.

Thus, the problem of the mind in the comedy is not simply connected with an attempt by part of the youth asserted, but with the fact that the incentive basics of the native of the nobility actually outlined themselves. The most far-sighted people have already understood that, while the other, feeling general disadvantage, all means are striving for these basics to preserve or be satisfied with only superficial changes.

It turns out that the nobility is mostly as a force responsible for the arrangement of life in the country, has ceased to meet the requirements of time. But if you recognize the point of view of the Chatsky, which reflects the position of the smaller part of society, the right to exist, it will be necessary to somehow respond to it. Then it is necessary either, realizing her right, change in accordance with the new principles - and this does not want to do this, but most simply not under power. Either it is necessary to deal with the contrary to the former value system of values \u200b\u200bby the position of Chatsky, which is happening throughout the second, third and almost only fourth comedy.

But there is a third way: to declare someone who expresses so unusual for most views, crazy. Then you can safely not pay attention to his angry words and fiery monologues. It is very convenient and fully consistent with the general aspirations of the Famow Society: as little as possible to bother with any concerns. It is quite possible to imagine that atmosphere of complacency and comfort, which reigned here before the appearance of Chatsky. Having traveled from the Moscow society, Famusov and his environment, apparently, for some time will feel calm. But only for short time.

After all, Chatsky is by no means a single hero, although in comedy he alone opposes the entire Famovsky society. Chatsky reflects a whole type of people who denoted a new phenomenon in society and discovered all his pain points.

Thus, in the comedy "grief from the mind" there are various types of mind - from everyday wisdom, practical mind, to the mind reflecting the high intellect of the free thinker, boldly entering into confrontation with what does not meet the highest criteria of truth. It is precisely such a mind "Mountain", his carrier is expelled from society and it is unlikely that he is waiting for success and recognition somewhere else.

In the same force of Griboedovsky Genius, which showing the events of a specific time and place, he turns to the problem of eternal - not only the Chatsky, who lives in the era on the eve of "indignation in St. Isaac Square", is waiting for sad fate. She is prepared by anyone who joins the struggle with the old system of views and tries to defend his way of thought, his mind is a mind of a free person.

Chatsky begins a new century - and this is all its meaning and the whole mind.

I. A. Goncharov

Comedy A. S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" played an outstanding role in the social and political and moral education of several generations of Russian people. She armed them to fight violence and arbitrariness, meanness and ignorance in the name of freedom and mind, in the name of the celebration of advanced ideas and genuine culture. We, like our fathers and grandfathers, admire the artistic perfection of "grief from the mind", the brilliance of the language, the strikingly bright image of the life and the morals, the realistic accuracy of Griboyedov's images.

The comedy shows the struggle of a new one with the old, which flared up more and more, penetrating into different areas of life, reflected in art and literature. Watching this struggle in life, Griboedov showed it in his comedy from the point of view of an advanced man of his time close to the views to the Decembrists. In the form of Chatsky Griboedov, for the first time in Russian literature, she showed a "new man" inspired by sublime ideas, raising a riot against a reactionary society in defense of freedom, humanity, mind and culture, raising a new morality that produces a new look at the world and for human relations. Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is a young man, nobleman.

Parents of Chatsky died early, and he brought up in the house of Famusov - a friend of his late father. Chatsky is not only a smart, but also developed man, with a feeling, or as the maid of Lisa recommends: Da-s, so to speak, speech, and does not hurt him; But be Military, whether it is Stat, who is so sensitive, and cheerful, and Oster, like Alexander Andreich Chatsky! In the "grief from the mind", all guests of Famousov Rabski copy customs, habits and outfits of French modists and rooted travels of passing people who have sang on Russian breads. All of them are expressing on the "Mixtures of French with Nizhny Novgorod" and they are unnecessary from delight at the sight of any lucky "French from Bordeaux." The litters of Chatsky Griboedov with the greatest passion was exposed to this unworthy Ralespiece in front of someone else and contempt for his:

So that the Lord has destroyed the unclean

Empty, slave, blind hypiems;

So that he rone in someone with a soul,

Who could have a word and an example

We hold down as a firm front,

From miserably nausea on the side of someone else's.

Chatsky famed to his homeland, but not the state of the kings, landowners and officials, and Russia is popular, with its mighty forces, cherished legends, mind and hardworking. This genuine love for the Motherland turned around with hot hatred to all sorts of slavery and oppression of the people - social, political, spiritual. The nobles of the Famówovsky circle are valued in people ranks and wealth, and Chapsky - sincere, witty, he laughs over the Magazov, is sharply by the Moscow nobles, their lives and pastime:

Is these robbing robes?

The protection against the court in friends was found, in relationship,

Magnificent coasoery chambers,

Where they bloom in feasts and mothers.

Yes, and to whom in Moscow did not clap mouth

Lunches, dinners and dancing?

Pharmuses trying to teach Chatsky:

"Weebe, brother, do not control the embarrassment.

And most importantly - a submitter service. "

Chatsky despises people ready

In patrons yawning on the ceiling,

Be silent, send, dine,

Substitute a chair, raise a handkerchief.

He believes that it is necessary to serve "the case, not to persons." Chatsky protects the human right to freely choose his own classes: travel, live in the village, "to use the mind" in science or devote yourself to "art creative, high and beautiful,", therefore, Magovyov announces a hazardous person who does not recognize the authorities.

Personal drama Chatsky - its unrequited love for Sofa. Sophia, with all his good mental deposits, still entirely belongs to the Famine Mir. She can't love Chatsky, who with the whole warehouse of his mind and his soul opposes the world. He loves seriously, seeing future wife in Sofa. Meanwhile, Chatskoma went to drink to the bottom of a bitter bowl, not finding anyone in a com "Specifications of Living," and leave, in with you only "Millon Torzania". Oh, that tell me the end of the end, who will go away for three years!

A. A. Chatsky is seriously preparing for social activities. "He writes nice, translates," says Pharmuses about him and everything is told about his high mind. He traveled, he studied, read, was taken, as can be seen, for work, was in intercourse with the ministers and went out. It is not difficult to guess why: "It would be glad to serve, - to serve nauseous."

One of the main distinguishing properties of Chatsky is full of feelings. She manifested itself and in how he loves, and in how angry and hates. In all, he shows a true passion, always hot soul. He is ditch, Oster, smart, eloquent, full of life, impatient. He is an embodiment of good adolescence, honesty, gullibility, a young limitless faith in himself and its capabilities. These qualities make it open for errors and vulnerable.

Chatsky is the only visible acting positive hero in Griboyedov's comedy. But it is impossible to be called exceptional and lonely. Thinker, the Decembrist wrestler and romantic join it, as they often joined the epoch in real people and real life.

He has like-minded people: we will learn about them thanks to the extraordinary characters (those referred to in the play, but which are not directly occupied in action). This, for example, professors of the Pedagogical Institute, who, according to Prinjean Toguhukhovskaya, "exercise in splits and belligers," this "crazy people", prone to study, is the nephew of Princess Prince Fedor, "Chemist and Botany". Chatsky in Comedy represents a young thinking generation of Russian society, its best part.

A. I. Herzen wrote about Chazkom: "The image of the Chatsky, sad, unwanted in his irony, who trembles from indignation, devoted to the dreaming ideal, appears at the last moment of the reign of Alexander I, on the eve of the uprising on St. Isaac Square. This is the Decembrist, this is a person who is Completing the era of Peter the first and is strengthened to see, at least on the horizon, the promised land ... "The comedy of Griboedov is still sheaven with the breath of life, which calls people ahead, at the present and future, and the most old, who recorded from his way.

The name in any product plays a huge role and, sometimes, is not only an overture to the subsequent, but also the thesis of the main thought, ideas. So, "grief from the mind." Why does Griboedov change the initial name "Mount Maew", inserting the pretext "from"?

The desire of Chatsky. Figure and image of Chatsky. Chatsky as the protagonist of Griboedov's work.

The name of any work is the key to his understanding, since it almost always contains an indication - direct or indirect - on the main idea, which is based on the creation, a number of problems comprehended by the author.

The comedy was an acute and angry satire on the life and morals of the Nobility of Russia, indirectly showed the struggle between the conservatism of destroyers, the backward self-containing and new moods.

"Millon Torzaniya" Chatsky. From the fire, he will be unharmed, who will have time to stay with you, breathing with the air alone, and in him there is a mind. A.S. Griboedov.

The subject of the essay is: "?" Student 9 Class "G" Sergeeva Grigory Konstantinovich Lecturer: Romanova Lyudmila Anisimovna Rating: Good "Mount from Wit" is one of the brightest works of Russian literature. The comedy was written after the Patriotic War of 1812, during the rise of the spiritual life of RO ...

The comedy "grief from the mind" became an event in the Russian literature of the beginning of the XIX century, was the rarest model of the accusatory, satirical direction.

The work considered aesthetics of the Decembrism in the views of the main heroes of the comedy.

The comedy "Woe from Mind" Griboyedov was written during the creation of the secret revolutionary organizations of the Decembrists.

Not being a professional writer, and with Griboedov remained in the history of our culture by the author of one ingenious work, which had a huge impact on the whole Russian literature.

The comedy of Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov "Mount from Wit" became an event in the Russian literature of the beginning of the XIX century, was the rarest model of the accusatory, satirical direction.

The comedy "grief from the mind" gives the overall picture of the whole Russian life of the 10-20s of the XIX century, reproduces the eternal struggle of the old and new, which with great power unfolded at this time throughout Russia.

The name of Griboedov opens one of the brilliant prints in the history of Russian literature. According to the expression V.G. Belinsky, A.S. Griboedov belongs to the number of "the strongest manifestations of the Russian spirit."

"Woe from Wit" is a socio-political comedy. Griboedov gave it a true picture of Russian life after the Patriotic War of 1812. In the comedy, the topical public issues of the time were delivered: about civil service.

"Woe from the mind" socio-political comedy. Griboedov gave it a true picture of Russian life after the Patriotic War of 1812.

The comedy "grief from the mind" had a huge impact on the further development of Russian literature. In this play, Griboedov showed an important problem of all times - the conflict between the "century of the current" and the "century of last".

"In my comedy 25 fools on one sensible person," wrote A.S. Griboedov Katenin. In this statement of the author, the main problem "grief from the mind" is clearly indicated - the problem of the mind and nonsense. She was put in the name of the play, which should also be paid close attention. This problem is much deeper than it may seem at first glance, and therefore it requires a detailed analysis.

The comedy "grief from the mind" was the best for his time. She wore an accusatory character, like all classic comedies. But the problems of the work of the "grief from the mind", the problems of the noble society of that time are presented in a wider spectrum. This became possible by using the author of several artistic methods: classicism, realism and romanticism.

It is known that Original Griboedov called his work "Mount Human", but soon replaced this title on the "grief from the mind." Why did this replacement happen? The fact is that the first name contained a moral note that emphasizes that in the noble society of the 19th century, a smart person will endure the persecution. It did not quite correspond to the artistic plan of the playwright. Griboedov wanted to show that an outstanding mind, the progressive ideas of a particular person may be untimely and harm to their owner. The second name was fully implemented to fulfill this task.

The main conflict of the play is the confrontation of the "century of the present" and the "century of the past", old and new. In the disputes of Chatsky with representatives of the Staromoshkovsky nobility, a system of views of the same and the other side of education, culture, in particular on the problem of language (a mixture of "French with Nizhny Novgorod"), family values, questions of honor and conscience are identified. It turns out that Famuses, as a representative of the "century past," believes that his money and position in society are the most valuable in the person. Most of all he admires the ability to "rely on" for the acquisition of material benefits or respect for light. Very much done by the Famusov and such as he, to create a good reputation among the nobles. Therefore, Famousov worries only what they will talk about it in the world.

Takov and Molchanin, although he and a representative of the younger generation. He blindly follows the ideals of destroyers. Having your own opinion and defend it - the imperceptible luxury. After all, you can lose respect in society. "My judgment should not be mixed in mine," this is the life of this hero. He is a worthy student of Famusov. And with his daughter Sofia he leads a love game only to heal in front of the influential father of the girl.

Absolutely all the heroes "grief from the mind", with the exception of Chatsky, have the same ailments: dependence on someone else's opinion, passion for the ranks and money. And the main hero of the comedy alien and disgusting these ideals. He prefers to serve "the case, and not to persons." When Chatsky appears in the House of Famusov and begins to imagine the foundations of the noble society with its speeches, the Famusov society announces an accusable to the crazy, thereby disarming it. Chatsky expresses progressive ideas, pointing to the aristocrats on the need to change views. They are in the words of Chatsky see a threat to their comfortable existence, their habits. The hero, called insane, ceases to be dangerous. Fortunately, he is alone, and therefore it is just expelled from society, where he is not pleasing. It turns out that Chatsky, being not at that time, not in the place, throws the seeds of the mind into the soil, which is not ready to take them and grow up. The Hero's mind, his thoughts and moral principles turn against him.

The question arises here: did Chatsky lose in the struggle for justice? It can be assumed that this is a lost battle, but not lost wage. Very soon, the ideas of the Chatsky will be supported by the progressive youth of the time, and the "past life" will be lowered ".

Performed into MONOLOGY MIRSOV, watching intrigues that neatly weave the silence, it is impossible to say that these heroes are stupid. But their mind is qualitatively different from the mind of Chatsky. Representatives of the Famow Society are accustomed to feather, adapt, driving. This is a practical, everyday mind. And the Chatsky has a completely new warehouse of the mind, forcing him to defend his ideals, sacrificing his personal well-being, and of course not allowing him to gain any benefit through useful ties, as they used to do the nobles of that time.

Among the critics, which fell on the comedy "grief from the mind" after her writing, the opinions sounded that he could not be called a clever man. For example, Katrenin believed that Chatsky "says a lot, scolds everything and preaches inappropriately." Pushkin, reading the plays brought to him in the Mikhailovsk list, responded about the main hero. So: "The first sign of a smart person - at first glance to know with whom you deal, and not throw beads before reheetling ..."

Indeed, Chatsky is represented very hot-tempered and somewhat tactless. He is in society, where he was not called, and begins to expose everyone and teach, not embarrassed in expressions. Nevertheless, it is impossible to deny that "We are talking with witty, as I.A. wrote Goncharov.

Such a variety of opinions, up to the presence of diametrically opposite, is due to the complexity and multiplicity of the problems of "burning from the mind" of Griboyedov. It should also be paid to the fact that Chatsky is an expressant of the ideas of the Decembrists, he is a true citizen of his country, opposing the serfdom, low-altitude, the Zasils of all foreign. It is known that before the Decembrists, the task was to directly express their ideas wherever they are. Therefore, Chatsky comes in accordance with the principles of an advanced person of his time.

It turns out that there are no frank fools in the comedy. Just two opposing parties defend their understanding of the mind. However, the mind can be opposed not only nonsense. The opposite of mind can be madness. Why does the society announce the Chatsky crazy?

Assessment of critics and readers can be any orient, but the author himself shares the position of Chatsky. It is important to take into account when trying to understand the artistic plane of the play. The worldview of Chatsky is the views of Griboedov himself. Therefore, society, rejecting the ideas of enlightenment, freedom of personality, serving the case, and not hearing is the society of fools. After having a smart man, calling him crazy, the nobility itself characterizes himself, demonstrating his fear of new.

The problem of the mind derived by Griboedov's title play is key. All clashes that occur between the lifestyla and progressive ideas of Chatsky should be considered from the point of view of opposing the mind and nonsense, mind and madness.

Thus, Chatsky is not at all the mad, but the society in which he was, is not so stupid. Just the time of such people like Chatsky, expressiveness of new views on life, has not yet come. They are in the minority, so forced to endure defeat.

Test on the work

Teacher:

Lessons 7-8

Subject. The problem of the mind in the comedy "grief from the mind"

Objectives lesson:

· educational -

disclose one of the main problems set in comedies;

· learning

"In the comedy" grief from the mind "who is a smart acting person? - Pushkin wrote in another letter. - Answer: Griboedov.

Do you know what is Chatsky? Forky, noble and kind small, who spent several times with a clever person (namely with Griboedov) and naked with his thoughts, sharpness and satirical remarks. "

Why did Pushkin doubt Chatsky's mind?

"The first sign of a smart person - at first glance to know who you deal with, and not throw beads in front of the reheetling ..." he wrote A. Bestuzhev, disassembling the advantages and disadvantages of "grief from the mind."

Lee Pushkin's right, arguing that Chatsky sees enough clearly, who he says, who preaches?

Let's try to understand the problem: Is Chatsky cleaned?

At the beginning of the Comedy, Chatsky - a fervor enthusiast, confident that the current successes of the mind and enlightenment is enough to update the Company. He decided that the "century of the current" rearranged the "century past". "Today, the laughter is afraid and keeps everyone in the ultrasound", no wonder the current "hunters will be embarrassed" "the Skupor's Skupor."

Chatsky expresses akin to the need to reorganize society. He is branding Moscow life and morals that should go back after the Catherine Epoch, serfdom, which is nothing more than medieval wildness, the dominance of all foreign in Russia, which undoubtedly ruins national spirituality and culture. All this is definitely fair. His speeches are smart and convincing.

But, on the other hand, Chapsky "lacks the mind" to understand that he mild beads in front of pigs.

Chatsky, loudly stimping a piece of phrak while everyone is busy with dancing or cards, clearly looks at the insane. And Griboedov emphasizes the final remark of the third action.

A clever man in a stupid position is such a paradox of comedy.

There are reasons for it. The first reason is that the mind of the Chatsky is special. This is the mind inherent in the Decembrist generation man. The mind of the Decembrists and Chatsky - rhetorical, sharp, straight.

The second reason is that the mind of the Chatsky "with the heart is not in Lada," love.

Incontinence in tongue, bile and at the same time ferventness, sensitivity, contempt for the entire Moscow Higher Society and at the same time love for the girl from this society is not a split, is it not a deep personal tragedy?

Hero Griboedov is not naive, perfectly understands the springs of the Moscow society, but in one person is still mistaken. This man is Sophia. Therefore, it is mistaken that he loves. It sometimes behaves arrogant, sometimes not reasonable, especially when it concerns Sophia, but we believe that it is typical of everyone in love.

Yes, Chatsky shows weakness, but the weakness of Chatsky is a feature that puts it in a special row of literary heroes - madmen, cranks: Hamlet, Don Quixote ... Highmadness.

The most essence of the image of Chatsky in this: he is a person, contrary to everything that believes that he can wake up in each person, reach the heart. Such heroes always existed in life and in the literature. And they will exist while the world is worth.

Chatsky refers to young people protesting against obsolete traditions. They want to serve not for the sake of the ranks and awards, but for the benefit and the benefits of the Fatherland. And to serve as a sense, they draw knowledge from books, removed from light and plunge into thinking, to the teaching, go on a trip.

The comedy finals represents us another Chatsky, mandaring, matured, pleasant. He understands that in this society he has no place, it pushes him.

Therefore, we do not decide to support the opinion of the criticism, although you can agree with something.

Output.

3. group.

1. Analyze all the statements of the representatives of the "Famovskogo society" on what it means to be smart in their concept.

2. Why does Chatsky can't take their point of view on this issue?

".... In my comedy 25 fools on a sensible person," wrote. But isn't Chatsky surround alone fools? The comedy, as Goncharov said, is the "Living Type Gallery", and each of the characters has their own mind.

Look, is there much fools in the play?

Famusov recalls his uncle Maxim Petrovich:

Surveneous look, appreciated by temper.

When it is necessary to refuel

And he bended to beggar ...

BUT? How do you think? In our opinion - it is silent.

And the Samos himself is not less "losing" in this kind of affairs.

Frankly stupid and primitive rockozub - the figure is purely farce. But he knows how to get a job: "And the Golden Bag, and Metit into the generals."

Remember how he himself formulates his life credo:

"... as a true philosopher I judge: I just had to go to the generals."

"And you judge nicely," the Magizov approves entirely.

Philosophy involves deep reflection, sometimes painful.

It was not by chance that the cliffs of the "philosophical" look at life also spoke about the "philosophy": this is the "philosophy" of the Famusov society.

After all, Pharmuses understand the philosophy as well:

Where as wonderful light created!

Pofoforming - the mind will be;

Then we take care, then lunch:

Eat three hours, and at three days it is not welded!

What is the flight of thought, what is the depth of philosophical reflection of this state husband!

Molchanin is ready to "please all people, without withdrawing," even the "dog of the janitor", and this is his philosophy, to "rewarding to take and having fun"

Sophia adopted a secular morality, according to which is valuable, the memorial is the type of mind.

Of course, from the point of view of the Famovsky society, a critical, fast, brilliant mind, the mind is a genius - "Plague". The mind "for the family" brings solid dividends: its owner is always "with the key and son, the key knew how to deliver," he could always "face a native little man."

Favorable mind. Comfortable. And it is possible to philosophize at the level of lunch and mining ranks - not higher ...

Output:

The mind of the Famus Society is another character: this is a practical mind aimed at achieving personal gain.

Chatsky cannot accept this "philosophy" of society surrounding him, because it is immoral and clearly does not agree with his life principles: "It would be happy to serve, to serve sissing," he strives to serve "the case, not to persons"

4. group.

1. Analyze the sayings of Chatsky about the existing

relationship to education.

3. What about this is the representatives of the "Famovskogo Society" and how does it characterize them?

Chatsky is dissatisfied with the formation in Russia, with bitterness, he notices that in the noble family, they are in a hurry, "Teachers of the shelves: by the number of more, the price is cheaper.

Famuses and Chatsky in something converge in views on the teaching of young people, Pavel Petrovich is annoyed "funns of languages \u200b\u200b- French with Nizhny Novgorod", the dominant of French novels, but immediately notes that he and "from Russians to sleep sweetly"

Famusovskoe society has never connected such two concepts as mind and education.

Famuses - an opponent of the mind as a study: "But, on the other hand," I would ask how the fathers did? We would have learned on the older looking ... "

That is, he understands how the ability to adopt, use the experience of older generations.

When it comes to true philosophers, about the rebellious spirit of penetration into the secrets of Mirozdanya, the Moscow light declares the mouth of the scalosis:

The scholarship does not overeat me, he even expresses the assumption that soon "will only learn in our way: once, two ..."

Moreover, the Famus world goes into the offensive attacks.

Magovsov quite definitely expresses their assumptions about education: "The scholarship is a plague", "I could stop the evil, pick up all the books would he burn!".

Output.

5. group.

1. What is the solution of the conflict and why is Famovskoe society find?

Chatsky weave the madman.

But is there a lot of slander in this, from the point of view of the Magazin Society? What laws do it live? His life is extremely regulated, this is the life of dogma and regulations, life, where the "Tabel about ranks" is honored for the Bible; Life in which everything happens according to the laws, established once and forever the grandfathers and great-grandfathers.

This is a society where moral what is profitable.The ideal of his purely pragmatic, rudely material: "One hundred people to services ... all in orders ... a century at the court ... in the ranks displays ... and pensions gives" ... not a person is important, but his need for his need, Ability to serve. Therefore, the gambler, the thief and the Zagoretsky thief albeit even hoispan, but everywhere adopted: after all, the "Master to serve".

And yet, the ardent monologues of the Chazki remain unanswered because those to whom he draws, aware of his rightness and cannot argue, but because no one gives his work seriously thinking about it. And why? Famós, silent, rockozubs and others are fully satisfied with their position, and preach the ideas of Chatsky - it's like to call for their suicide. In addition, his words about high so densely moved by bold, bile, evil coarse, which cause no desire to argue, and the most natural irritation.

In society, relations reign not between people, but between the ranks and titles. Think if the Moscow light is considered to consider Chatsky a sensible person? After all, it would mean that his beliefs are reasonable, normal. Or maybe the mind "for yourself", the mind is selfish considered the norm of the mind - "genius"? Of course not. Moreover, the society announces it out of law, Chatsky for Moscow light is a criminal or crazy. And the society itself is more convenient to see the madness in it: then all the chipsky chips are only the fruit of a sick imagination.

Chatsky-crazy society is not afraid - that's the main thing, that's why sofya slander so sincerely, easily and quickly believed the light! "Mad throughout," the Famówovsky world makes senses to Zagoretsky. And from this point on, the soundproof wall is afraid of the chanty and others: it is from now the stamp madness.

He can even sympathize:

And Chatsky I'm sorry.

In Christian so; It is pity worthy ...

They begin to relate to him condescendingly, even show how to the patient, weakly:

Highly! You are not in your plate!

From the road you need a dream. Give me a pulse. You are unhealthy.

And the ghost of madness gets up in front of the Chatsky himself: "And I listen, I do not understand ... confused with thoughts ... I expect something ..."

And finally, the main thing is uttered:

... From the fire will be unharmed,

Who will stay with you a day

Raisses the air one

And in it, the mind will destroy.

What conclusions can be done on the problem of lesson?

Chazki and Famusovskoe society are incompatible, they live as it were in different dimensions, therefore, in comedy, the characters cannot definitely relate to such a concept as the mind.

The light sees in the chazkom crazy, honing itself intelligent, normal. Chatsky, and of course, his world, his convictions considers the norm and sees only the focus of vices:

Tormentors crowd

In love traitors, in the enemy of tireless,

Neurotic story stories

Non-go clementers, shuffling spaces,

Old sinister, old people,

Drying over the fudges, nonsense ...

He sees not real people with his weaknesses and - let it be small - advantages. In front of him - Kunstkamera, Monsters gathering. Herdy's granddaughter briefly noticed very much: "Some freaks from the time // and not to talk to, and not anyone to dance"

One and a half hundred years have passed, and about the play still desperately argue.

The comedy "grief from the mind" is an eternal riddle, the same riddle as her author, who managed to put himself in one of the plays with those whom we call the classics of the Great Russian literature.

Perhaps Griboedov showed us only the top of the iceberg of his plan? After all, further, the tragedy of Dostoevsky begin to be deeper, because Raskolnikov, Karamazov, too, "Mind with a heart is not in Lada."

Perhaps Griboedov did not go on only because he saw such the abyss, in which he himself became scary to look ... "In this, probably, there is a major secret of the work, to solve it is completely simply impossible, although we all come close to it They tried.

Reflection.

Teacher.

We learned to work in groups, analyze the text, express and defend their point of view. Let's discuss whether we managed to do this, are the rules for the management of the debate?

"I think that today we have quite fully considered the problem, although I still stick to Pushkin's opinions."

- I realized that Griboedov in his comedy showed the philosophy of society, which comes down to achieving personal gain.

- I think that it is interesting to do so. This lesson teaches to receive information

alone.

- We learn to express thoughts, pick up the arguments, defend our opinion.

- We learn to listen to someone else's opinion and are not afraid to express our

- We answer more confidently, since everything has already become the subject of discussion in the group.

- We learn to competently argue, and this, I think, is relevant for our future life.

- It is interesting to discover the new in the work

- We practically prepared today to the composition.

Series of lessons on the topic A.S. Griboyedov "Mountain from Wit"

Creativity A.S. Griboedov

Lesson 1

Creative path and fate of A.S. Griboedov

The history of the creation of a comedy "Woe from Wit"

Objectives: to introduce students with the fate of A.S. Griboedov and the history of the creation of a comedy, repeat the specific features of the composition of the dramatic product and genre features of the comedy.

I.The Creative Path and Fate A.S. Griboedova (1795-1829).

1. Graduate teachers about Griboedov

1) childhood and youth writer

Griboedov is a leaving from an old nobility. 1803 - Training at the Moscow University Noble Guest House. 1806 - student of the verbal branch of Moscow University. Previously, the manifestation of giftedness: knew the main European, ancient, oriental languages, composed music, was a pianist - the improviser. Military service - 1812-1816.

2) the beginning of literary activities and civil careers

1815 - Griboedov's debut - playwright (comedy "Young spouses"); In the late 1810s - the Pieces "Student", "feigned infidelity"; 1817 - admission to the service in a collegium of foreign affairs in the rank of the provincial secretary; 1818 - secretary of the Russian diplomatic mission in Persia

3) 1812-1824 - work on "grief from the mind." The design of the comedy appeared in 1820

4) 1825-1829 - the last years of life. Attracting Griboedov to a consequence after the Decembrist uprising.

Griboedov in the Caucasus. The role of the Writer in the conclusion of the Turkmancian world (1828). Appointment by the Plenipotentiary Minister - Resident of Russia in Persia.

On January 30, 1829, Griboedov was killed during an attack on the Russian mission in Tehran Crowd of militant Muslims.

2. Individual student report:

• Griboedov and Decembrists;
• Griboedov and Pushkin;
• Griboedov - diplomat.

3. In a strong class - Overview of Roman Yu. Tynyanova "Death of Vazir - Mukhtara".

II.The ignition of typological features of the dramatic genus of literature, the specificity of the composition of the dramatic product and genre features of the comedy.

III. History of the creation of a comedy.

IV. Maximum task

2.Ronalize the dialogues of the Chatsky and Sophia: the behavior of the heroes, their attitude towards each other, the nature of statements.

3. What causes the condemnation of the Chatsky in the bushes of Moscow Baria?

Lesson 2.

Analysis of the first action of the comedy "grief from the mind"

Objectives: During the analysis of the first action, designate a comedy stronge, to form an initial understanding of the conflict, to continue the formation of the skill of the analysis of the dramatic work, taking into account its genre specifics.

I. Summary of the teacher

In 1919, through the century after the creation of "grief from the mind", the Great Russian poet Alexander Blok wrote: "The XIX century created immediately a great comedy. "The grief from the mind" is still unsolved and, maybe the greatest creation of all literature. "

Two centuries passed today, and the Griboedovskaya comedy not only continue to put on stage, but still, it is still desperately arguing about it. It seemed that everything was said about "grief from the mind": the images of the heroes are considered from all sides, the thought and pathos are interpreted to different frets, but the "housing gloss" does not prevent new readers to admire the skill of Griboedov and see for the textbook images of living people. Let us and together with Griboedovo "enter" to the house of Famusov.

II. Analysis of the first action.

What are the exposition and tying of the first action? What is the external conflict and how does it develop?

Acquaintance with the house of the Moscow Barina Famusov, the emergence of intrigues: the secret love of the Barskoy daughter and root secretary. An unexpected arrival of Chatsky - the tie of comedic action, a love conflict: Chatsky is in love with Sophia, she is in love with Molchanlin.

The dialogue of Chatsky and Sofia is a satirical loss of the Carts of Moscow morals. What is the condemnation of Chatsky in the lifestyle and behavior of the Moscow Baria? How does Nature of the Hero itself be revealed in his accusatory speeches? The tie of the socio-political conflict of the comedy between Chatsky and Moscow Barze.

III

The exposition introduces the reader with the house of the Moscow Barina Famusov. His 17-year-old daughter Sophia is in love with the poor secretary of the Father Molchalin. They are common from the Father. Helps in this maid of Sophia Lisa. From the conversations of Lisa and Sofia, we learn that three years ago, Chapsky, who was brought up in the House of Famós, left the "mind to search" to St. Petersburg, then abroad.

The string comedy is an unexpected arrival of Chatsky, which the Festival is confessed in the love of Sofye. So the external conflict arises: the struggle for the bride, the love triangle- - Sofya loves Molchalin, Chucksky loves sophia. The dialogue between Sofia and Chatsky opens the full indifference of Sophia to a friend of childhood. The conflict is complicated by the fact that the father of Sofia Famusov would not be pleased with the other contender: Molchanin is poor and anhydrous, Chatsky is also not so hard, in addition to Volnodumen, muster.

IV. Maximum task

1. Prepare an oral message on the first action of the comedy. Where is the comedy? What event becomes a bonded comedy? What intrigue drives action? How in the first dialogue of the Chatsky and Sophia reveals the ratio of the hero to the Barkaya Moscow?

2. Read the second action of the comedy. What is the essence of the conflict that has occupied between Chatsky and Famine? Mark the positions of arcing. What does Moscow look like in the perception of heroes? Describe the colonel of the scalosis.

3. What do you think is the conflict of plays? How does it develop in the second action?

4. Analyze the dialogues of Chatsky and Molchalin. Is it possible to call heroes with antipodes? Why?

Lesson 3.

Analysis of the second action of the comedy "grief from the mind"

Objectives: during the analysis of the second action, determine the ambiguity of the conflict of the comedy; show the clash of the "century of the current" and "century past" in the monologues of Famusov and Chatsky.

I. A spray oral summary of students on the first action (answers to homework questions).

II.Analysis of the second action

1. Second and analysis of the second action, phenomena 2.

What is the essence of the conflict that has occupied in the dialogues of Famusov and Chatsky? Remit the position of the arguing.

Denote the initial conflict between the Famusov and Chatsky as a conflict of generations. The younger generation to achieve something in life, should focus on the ideals of fathers - such is the position of Famusov; Uncle Maxim Petrovich as a sample for imitation.

Sermon a new lifestyle in the speeches of Chatsky, the refusal of ideals of Moscow Baria. Whose position is preferable? Is there any right in the statements of Famusov.

2.Moscow in the perception of heroes

For Famousov, the dimension and the magnitude of the Moscow life, the strength of traditions, the patriarchal structure is valuable.

For Chatsky Moscow - the world of oblique, conservative rules, habits, the emptiness is hated, the fussiness of the Moscow life, the lack of creative free thought, the cruelty of serfs.

Development of a socio-political conflict of comedy, a clash of old and new generations.

3. Characteristics of Colonel Scalozub. A new turn of love intrigue: Scalozub as a possible applicant for sofya's hand. A new turn of the public conflict: not so much a conflict of generations, how much conflict of advanced and conservative views, life values.

4. The modern interpretations of the comedy conflict, the ambiguity of the assessments, the desire to remove the class antagonism.

III

In the second action, not so much love is developing as a social conflict comedy. It can select several sides. The interpretation of the conflict of comedy as a conflict of generations (Pharmuses - Chatsky), as the collision of the "century of the present" and the "century of the past" can be regarded as true, but this is a rather narrow interpretation. A wider understanding of the conflict is a clash of advanced views on life and a bone, stagnant worldview (Barskaya Moscow and Chatsky).

IV. Maximum task

2. Analyze the scene of the ball as a culmination (see questions to the analysis during the next lesson on p. 64)

3. Recently and its role in the play.

Lesson 4-5

Analysis of the third, fourth actions of the comedy "Woe from the mind"

Objectives: During the analysis of the third, fourth action, summarize the idea of \u200b\u200bthe lifestyle and ideals of the Moscow Baria, to show the role of repetible in the play, to determine the climax and junction of the comedy.

I. Comedy's second action

Development of the love and social conflict of comedy. Views of the life of Chatsky and Famusov.

II.Analysis of the third action

1. Molchalin and his role in comedy. Dialogue Sofia and Chatsky about silence. Molchanin in the perception of Sophia - the moral ideal, essentially Christian, with his humility, love for neighbor, spiritual purity, readiness for self-sacrifice, unwillingness to judge, etc ..

Why does Chatsky perceive the words of Sofia as a mock over silent?

Molchanin in the perception of Chatsky - a low-color, man, deprived of autonomy, smoothie, ash, is extremely not a smart.

What is the worried silell?

He hypocrishes, hides his true face, all the time changes his behavior depending on the situation, there is nothing expensive for him, it is no principles and honor.

Chatsky and silelline as antipodes.

2. Analysis of the Bala scene.

Give the characteristics to guests on the ball. What is the role of the characters of the second plan in comedy?

In the play events are followed by one after another, but suddenly it would be suspended, giving way to the panoramic depiction of the Bala in the house of Famusov. The invited comes into the house. Ball begins with a peculiar parade of the guests, each of which first appears in the play. But with the help of just a few expressive strokes, first of all, speech characteristics, Griboedov can create a bulk image, alive, full-blooded character.

The first in the gallery guests takes a couple of kingulic. Platon Mikhailovich, the former colleague of Chatsky, now not just a retired military, and the "adorable husband", a man without will, fully submitted to his wife. His replica is monotonous and brief, but he does not have time to answer the Chatkom, for him it makes his wife. All he can say to the ex-friend: "Now, brother, I'm not that ...".

It seems to him that he is not the same, because he fell under his wife's heel. But in fact, "not that", first of all, because the previous ideals have lost. Without having the will decisively protect Chatsky against slanders, he eventually betrays his friend. And it's not by chance that in the fourth action under the jurisdiction of the rich, the boredom struggles and does not remember his slander comrade.

Renuits take place in front of the audience. Princes of Toguhovsky, concerned only to successfully give the marriage of daughters, the evil and stinging countess - the granddaughter who are flaws in each of those present; "Related fraudster, Plut" Anton Antonich Zagoretsky, a gossip and shoeler, but a service wizard; Old Hersech, the old Moscow lady, distinguished by rude directness.

Indicatively, the spore of the chilly with the Magazov, about how much the fortress shower in Chatsky. Everything is significant here: and the exact knowledge of the state of another person ("I can not know anyone else's estates!"), And the famous Kleztovskoe "everything is lying calendars", and the fact that the last word is behind it.

All the characters of the second plan are important in comedies in themselves - together, they are the world of noble Moscow, where they reign their laws and rules. In their environment, the alienity of Chatsky is particularly pronounced. If in a collision with a silent, the form, the rocks, they "converged" one to one, then the scene of the ball opened the complete loneliness of Chatsky.

3. Culmination of the play

The climax of the whole comedy is the gossip about the hero's madness. How did this happen? Was the announcement of the Chatsky crazy inevitable and flowed out of all the development of action, or is it all the accidents?

Why did the gossip about the madness of Chatsky spread so quickly?

Do guests believe to the end in Chatsky's madness?

What are the guests and members of the Famousov family see the signs and the causes of "madness" of Chatsky?

The first replica of Sofia: "He is not in his mind" - just broke away from her, but the secular gossips of G.N., then G.D. They saw the opportunity to challenge, spreading rumors. Then Sofya accepted a conscious decision, which was dictated by the offend for silence: "A, Chatsky, do you like everyone to ride everyone in the jeta, please try on yourself?"

The gossip spread with unusual speed. Why? First, from the point of view of the Famovsky society, Chatsky really looks crazy. Everyone of the chorus list Mikhailovich's doubtful Platon, not very normal actions of Chatsky:

Try about the authorities - and it will tell? (Migrant)

I said something I - he began to laugh. (Khlestov)

I was honored in Moscow to serve in the archives. (Molchanin)

I loved to make a modist! (Countess - Granddaughter)

And my husband gave my husband to live in the village. (Natalia Dmitrievna)

And the general verdict is "mad for everything."

Arriving on the ball, Countess - Granddaughter, entering the room, full of people will say grandmother:

Well, who comes early!

We are first!

It is difficult to assume that she did not notice at least a dozen people at this point in the room. Of course, no, there is a coup. Griboedov shows that among the guests of Famousov there is no friendliness or mental intimacy. It is amazing how this mutual hostility will turn into a complete unanimity with which all the gathered, forgetting about their own straws, will be collapsed in Chatsky. And here will already be not to their own small disord, because everyone will equally feel the danger emanating from Chatsky, for their world.

III. Translude

The scene of the ball is ends with the famous monologue of Chatsky about "Million Torzani". Exploring Russian culture, Y. Lotman wrote that the Decembrists loved "thunder on the ball and in society," express their advanced views publicly. But Chatsky pronounces his monologue to the void: declaring him insane, everyone forgot about him immediately. He speaks of the "empty, slave, blind priest" empty, slave, blind priest, but "everything in the waltz is circling with the greatest zeal." This episode strengthens the loneliness of Chatsky and to some extent demonstrates the meaninglessness of his speech - a knock on a closed door. Here, on the ball, he himself begins to feel his loneliness.

IV. Analysis of the fourth action

1.Catsky and repetitives. Self-discovery rehetylov.

Reetales gives himself for the man of advanced beliefs, although there is no conviction at all. His stories about "secret meetings" are exposed to all vulgarity, petty, the stupidity of this person. Reetales are a kind of parody of Chatsky. His appearance further aggravates loneliness and drama the position of Chatsky.

2. Comedy break.

V.Comocence

In the third action, the lifestyle and ideals of the Moscow Baria are brightly revealed - emptiness and monotony, lack of bright events, hatred for enlightenment and education.

Do guests believe to the end in Chatsky's madness? Yes and no. Of course, his acts are alogic from the point of view of Moscow Baria, but in many ways their desire to declare the hero insane looks like revenge, massacre with dissent. This is how not in the play, but in life with P.Ya. Chaadaev, in something similar to Chatsky.

Comedy conflict reached its logical finale on the ball in the house of Famusov.

Chatsky's libeliness has become synonymous with madness for his opponents.

VI. Maximum task

1. Individual task: Restore by the text of the play by the biography of Chatsky.

2. Examples from the text of the comedy, proving the ambiguity of the character of Chatsky.

3.Cormulate the point of view of the Chatsky on the main problems of time. Confirm quotes.

4. Written reviews about Chapkom A.S. Pushkin, I.A. Goncharova, I. Ilina comment on them.

5. Using the book M. Svetkina "Decembrists", to find parallels between the images of Chatsky and Decembrists.

Lesson 6.

Chatsky image (seminar)

Objectives: to summarize and systematize students' knowledge of the Hero of the Comedy, give the detailed characteristic of the image in the historical and cultural context, through historical - functional analysis to show the variety of interpretation and image assessment.

I.Biography Chatsky

Approximate response content

The biography of the hero is typical for the representative of the advanced noble youth of 1810-1820.

Chucksky's childhood passed in the Barsky House of Famusov. In the years, "When everything is soft, and gently, and immatched," the young heart is acutely reacting to the impressions of the life of Moscow Baria. The spirit of the "century past", "low-planness" and the emptiness of life early aroused boredom and disgust in Chaccom. Despite friendship with Sofia, Chatsky leaves the Famine.

... so it seemed to him boring

And rarely visited our house, -

says Sophia.

The independent life began. The Guard came at Moscow, who had just returned with a victory from foreign hiking. The hot patriotic feeling and the ideas of liberty embraced and a torture hero.

All this solved his fate. Neither a careless secular life, nor happy friendship, nor even youthful, but deep and then still mutual love for Sofye could not satisfy him.

He thought about himself high ...

Hunt Wear attacked him, -

continues his story about his life Sophia.

Chatsky falls into St. Petersburg just at that time, when the "liberalists" movement was originated there, first an indefinite program and plans, but full of winsted hopes and freedomiffs. In this atmosphere, the views, aspirations and mind of Chatsky.

He apparently became interested in literature. Even in Moscow to Famusov, rumors had reached that Chatsky "writes nicely, translates." The fascination of the literature was typical of the free-holding noble youth. Many of the Decembrists were writers.

At the same time, Chatsky carries out social activities. He has "with the Minister Communication". However, for a long time ... In the comedy it is clear that "with the ministers communication" ended in the Chatsky gap ("then gap").

After that, Chatsky may have visited the village. He, according to Famusov, "networked." Obviously, this "Blazh", which led to the "unfolding" estate, meant a humane attitude towards the fastened peasantry and progressive economic reforms.

Then Chatsky went abroad. At the "Travel" began to watch the Kosos, as on the manifestation of the liberal spirit and opposition independence.

Acquaintance of advanced Russian people with life, philosophy, the history of Western Europe was undoubted for their ideological development.

After three years, the absence of Chatsky returns to Moscow to the Famusov House.

II.Notciousness of the character of the hero; The inconsistency of his nature: laughing at others, he himself happens ridiculous, while not feels ridicule over himself and deeply suffers; It is quite insightful, and he himself is in power of self-deception "accusing others, never feels guilty. The ambiguity of the character of the hero causes both ambiguity of estimates: and irony, and compassion. Chatsky - At the same time, the hero is a lover included in the comic plot, and the hero is the resonant.

III.Rol Chapsky in the play and the history of literature is not determined by the character, but by convictions. The views of the hero characterize him as an advanced man of his time:

• protest against serfdom, humane attitude to serf;
• fighting ignorance, the need for education;
• condemnation of chinovation and careerism;
• call for freedom of thought and statements against the slave morality;
• protest against worship in front of a foreign one.

Iv.Russian criticism, starting with A.S., Grigorieva and A.Gezen, the image of Chatsky began to bring together with the Decembrists. This was facilitated not only to the glances of the hero, but also certain biographical parallels: Chatsky does not want to serve, left the service of ants and rings; Traveling in Europe as a sign of free formation; High system speech, oratory intonations ("says, as writes"), peculiar to the Decembrists.

The loneliness of Chatsky is softened by the fact that he has like-minded people: in the historical context, it is the Decembrists, in the play - insisting characters (cousin of the Scalozub, Prince Fyodor).

V. Skatsky - Figure tragicomic. "Double" tragedy is embodied in his fate: he rejected Sofia and society. The tragedy of Chatsky is a tragedy of a smart man, when his mind, talent, honesty is not in demand.

Vi.Chatsky in a criticism mirror.

A.S. Pushkin believed that Chatsky Neender, since "beads mosquito" before the reheetle, and the only clever man in the play is Griboedov himself.

I. Goncharov in the article "Millon Torzania" emphasizes that the Chatsky is a hero that appears when changing one century to others. He is "advanced warrior, a shotger, but always a victim."

I. Ilyin, the religious philosopher of the beginning of the 20th century, noted that the Chatsky drama is that his mind is overshadowed by pride. The mind, directed only to criticism and glory, becomes heartless and is a terrible and empty force.

In modern interpretations, Chatsky - personality, undoubtedly, bright, man advanced, formed, honest, but at the same time the mistaken and committing misses. His image is inherent in the tragic conflict between the mind, ideas, on the one hand, and the heart, the moral nature of man, on the other. Perhaps Chatsky will learn to live not only by the mind, but also in the heart, his ability to feel deeply feeling "Millon Torzany", which he is experiencing at the end of the comedy.

VII. Moving task

1. What problems raises Griboedov in his comedy? How are the title of comedy and her poetics?

2. What does it mean to be smart in the understanding of the Barskaya Moscow?

3. Did Chatsky? What is his mind manifest?

4. How do you understand the meaning of the winged expression "mind with a heart is not in Lada"?

5. Individual task: Prepare a message on the topic "What is the importance of the concept of" smart "in the Griboedovsky era?"

Lesson 7.

The meaning of the title of comedy and the problem of the mind

Objectives: to summarize and consolidate knowledge about the conflict and comedy problem, the system of characters, reveal the key to the play of the problem of the mind.

I. Summary of the teacher. Creating a problem situation.

"And how do you think? In our opinion, Lesmen, "says Famusa Chatskomu, talking about uncle, Maxim Petrovich. What does it mean "liking" "in our opinion" and "in your opinion"?

Sophia talks about Molchanina: "Of course, there is no this mind that the genius is for others, but for other plagues." What kind of?

The reader immediately sees that the key concept of the Comedy "Mind" is interpreted by heroes in different ways and in general is ambiguous. No wonder the word "mind" was carried out in the title of the plays.

II.Bested with class.

1. What does it mean to be smart in the understanding of the Barskaya Moscow?

For Famusov, Molchalin, the cliffness of the concept of "mind" is interpreted from everyday, practical point of view. This is the mind carrying prosperity of its owner: promotion, favorable marriage, useful dating. From their point of view, "it is impossible not to wish that with the Edaki mind," Chatsky does not want such well-being for himself.

It is impossible not to see that Sophia is smart enough. At the same time, although she stands on his head above his father with his surroundings, her mind is a very special kind. Dreamy and at the same time pragmatic, she sees his ideal in silence, because he is "compliant, modest, quiet" and will, as it seems to her, a wonderful husband. The rebellion and winster of the Chatsky are scared it: "Is the mind of the family attensely?"

2. Did Chatsky? What is his mind manifest?

From the very beginning of the comedy, the hero is assessed by other characters as a smart man. He does not refuse to face the Magician ("He's small with his head"), Sophia is forced to admit that Chatsky "Oster, a smart, eloquent." What is the mind of the Chatsky? First of all, in high intelligence, the formation, brilliant speech ("says, as writes"). Many of his statements are aphoristic, accurate, witty (give examples) and - derogatory (scalosub - "Creating maneuvers and Mazurki", Molchanin - "on tiptoe and not rich in words", etc.).

Chatsky is a carrier of new advanced ideas, its judgments reflect the courage and independence of views.

But what made sophia forced: "He's not in his mind?"

With all his mind, Chatsky often makes actions incompatible with the idea of \u200b\u200ba smart person. To all familiar to the statement of Pushkin that the Chatsky Neender, for "mosquito beads" before unworthy people who simply do not hear it. In addition, he is deprived of insight: he does not see anyone, besides himself, I miss the confession of Sophia about her love for silence, I am convinced that she could not love such an insignificant person.

Is it possible to call the smart critical sayings of Chatsky to the familiar and relatives of sofya in the first hours of their meeting after a long separation? Whether he did in the final of the play, when, becoming a witness to the shame and humiliation of Sofia, found his presence, and even said another accurate speech? Thus, the mind of Chatsky is manifested in comedy in his ardent speeches and judgments, it is not in behavior and actions. In the Chatsky, a dustless loving heart, but the mind is distracted and schematic, it is not for nothing that he himself notices that he has "his heart is not in Lada."

III. Troubleshit in the context of time (speech of a prepared student or a teacher's message).

In a democratic criticism, in the XIX century, the opinion was established that for Griboedov and other advanced people of that time, the concept of intelligent was directly related to the freedom-loving ideals of the era. In Griboedovsky times, the problem of the "mind" itself was extremely relevant and comprehended very widely, as in general, the problem of intelligence, enlightenment, career. The concepts of "mind", "smart", "smart", etc. Purchased at that time, besides usual, more and much importance. Then, with these concepts, as a rule, an idea of \u200b\u200ba person is not just intelligent, but free-live, about the man of independent beliefs, the provisional of new ideas.

IV

In Comedy Griboyedov, the problem of the mind, an understanding, which means to be smart, determines the main conflict of the comedy between the Chatsky and the Famovsky society and the behavior of heroes. Griboedov himself noted that in his comedy "25 fools on a sensible person," but during the play it becomes clear that the concept of mind is ambiguous. The mind in understanding Famusov and his guests is associated with the ability to "reach degrees of famous". The mind of Chatsky - in his education and advanced ideas, whose carrier it is. At the same time, often in specific situations, in communication with other people, the Chatcoma lacks subtlety and sensitivity, it does not always have a situation and can give an objective assessment of what is happening, that is, his mind is distracted, according to the hero himself, "with a heart not in Lada."

Calling a comedy "grief from the mind," Griboedov first of all had in mind the mind of Chatsky as a liberty, freedom-lithuance. Mount from the mind, intertwined with grief from love, became the "driving force" of the whole comedy action, determined his conflicts and issues.

Lesson 8.

Humor and Satire in Comedy A.S. Griboedov "Woe from Wit"

Objectives: to summarize students' knowledge on comedy poetics, emphasize the attention of students on the skill of Griboyedov - humorist and satirik, give a sample of monologic speech on a literary reference topic; To form a lecture perception skill in accordance with the plan, the record of the main theses.

Lecture teacher.

Plan lectures

1. Special Comedy as a genre

2.Uymore and Satire in Comedy

A) "double" plan scenes "grief from the mind"; The combination of dramatic and comic.

B) Satyric pathos in the chief of the morals of Moscow Baria. The relevance of satire.

C) Chatsky as "comic face".

D) the language of the play and its role in creating a special element of comedy movement.

3. Translation

A.S. Griboedov is the author of one work, but so bright and amazing that for almost two centuries it continues to carry readers and spectators. We laugh at the heroes of the famous play, sympathize with Chatkom, do not get tired of watching the comedy intrigue, again and again amazed the bright and figurative language.

The hostel is the idea that at the basis of "grief from the mind" - the struggle of the chief hero with the Magazovskaya Moscow, and the role of Chatsky - "the role of the suffering". I wrote about this yet I.A. Goncharov in their article "Millon Torzania".

Meanwhile, Mrboedov himself identified his play as a comedy, and the comedy suggests the presence of a comic story (that is funny) contradiction between characters, their views and actions, humor and satire dominate it.

Laughter permeates the whole play; Speaking by Gogol, this is a kind of positive comedy hero. The hero who wins the gloomy environment, silent by silent, rockozubs, hryuine, Toguhukhovsky. The force that felt in the Chatsky is spilled over the entire play and manifests itself at a crushing and cleansing laughter, which is perceived by us as an ally of the hero.

The main events taking place in the "grief from the mind" are essentially dramatic, and nevertheless, almost every scene of the play carries a double semantic load: in addition to serious contradictions, a humorous entity is exposed in it. So, during the collision of the main characters of the Magovyov, accusing Chatsky in liberalness, waiting for an answer, quickly forgets her ears, "he sees nothing and does not hear," as they say in the remark. There is a rockozub. In the whole stage, there is a lot of funny: Magazov, like a parrot, tires their "trial", and Chatsky vainly draws his attention to the fact that someone has come to visit. Famuses "does not see anything and does not hear", but shouting: " Riot? " There is a comedine - an exaggerated result of the feelings and thoughts of the well-memorated and loyal Pavel Afanasyevich. Newly this last replica - the character's hyperbole - not only a humorous meaning is concluded, but also a clear fear of Famousov opens in front of the thoughts. Humor is inferior to a different tonality, satire comes into rights.

In the image of the "century past", satirical pathos reaches its heat. Griboedov denounces the morals of Moscow Baria, makes fun of Famovsky views on a career, a stupid soldier. Skalozuba, subdivision and wordlessness of Molchalin. The edge of Griboedovskaya satire is directed against the mental and spiritual stagnation, against the world, where "noble rags" and podkhalima, seerful fraudsters and plows, jams and "ominous old women" are thriving, combined, as a circular place, an irreconcilable host to "free life." Unfortunately, it should be recognized that the defects were not to give rise to serfdom. Satira Griboedova is universal and relevant today more than ever.

It foresaw another I.a, Goncharov, noticing that "hardly the Griboedovsky Chatsky ever struggle, and with him the whole comedy."

The main character of Chatsky - "Personal", he enters into an irreconcilable conflict with the Famovsky society, his fate is dramatic. But the contemporary of the playwright P.A. Vyazemsky noticed that Chatsky - "comic face". He is "without memory in love" and therefore makes stupidity. Indeed, Griboedov was not afraid in some cases put the hero in the comic position. So, the disturbance of Chatsky about the love of Sofia to the silence is ridiculous, but for a similar image of the hero, the ability of Griboedov to create a non-rhetorical figure, but a living person. "Distrust of Chatsky ... Charming! - And as natural! " - Pushkin admired. But this comedy shade in the image of the Chatsky exists with the high potassium of genuine drama of the position and behavior of the hero, with the penetrating lyrism of the expression of his feelings.

The elements of the rapid comedian movement contributes, no doubt, and the poetic play of the play.

"Woe from the mind" is written by a multiple yamb. Such a size remarks alive, conversational intonations. No wonder the rows of the comedy became proverbs. Perhaps there is no other work in Russian literature, which would appreciate such an abundance of phrases sparkling humor.

"Ah, evil tongues of a terrible pistol!", "That's what it is not enough, you note with you," "Ah, Mother, do not finish the blow! Who is poor, you're not a couple, "" serve to serve, to serve nausea, "" Fresh legend, but hard to work. "

In general, the whole language, the stylistic element "grief from the mind" reflected the main features of speech, and therefore the national nature of the Russian man.

This very accurately wrote Pushkin in connection with the fables of Krylov: "... a distinctive feature in our nebaths there is some funny debris, mockery and a picturesque way to express ..."

Turning to the Griboedovskaya comedy, we admire her by catchy, capacious phrases, beating exactly in target, without breaking, follow unexpected turns of the plot, situations, complete irresistible humor and satirical energy.

Lesson 9.

Detergery

Themes of Works on the work of Griboedov

1) Why has not yet created Griboedovsky Chatsky, and with him and the whole comedy?

2) The conflict of two eras in the comedy "grief from the mind."

3) the topic of enlightenment in the comedy "grief from the mind."

4) The topic of national self-consciousness in the comedy "grief from the mind."

5) The problem of the mind in the comedy "grief from the mind."

6) Analysis of the episode and its role in the comedy composition (episodes: a ball scene, a meeting with a repetitive, dialogue of Chatsky and Molchalin).

7) Friends of Chatsky on stage and behind the scene (in the comedy A.S. Griboyedov "Mount from the mind").