Soviet nonconformist artists become classics. Nonconformism in Soviet culture: origins and originality Nonconformism in art artists

Soviet nonconformist artists become classics. Nonconformism in Soviet culture: origins and originality Nonconformism in art artists

Currently, unofficial art of the 1970s has increasingly begun to attract the attention of collectors and researchers, while discouraging both, both by the lack of meaningful publications, and by the many myths that have grown up on the basis of unreliable and sometimes deliberately distorted information emanating from from the subjective preferences of artists, art historians and collectors.

BANNIKOV Nikolay (1942)
YOUTH. 1970s

The era from Khrushchev's defeat of the left wing of the Moscow Union of Artists in the Manege in 1962 to the "Bulldozer Exhibition" in 1974, rallied a small group of the sixties - nonconformists - initiators of the exhibition action, which ended in a bulldozer defeat.


BANNIKOV Nikolay (1942)
YOUNG WOMAN. 1970s

The ensuing clamor and scandal in the Western media forced the Soviet ideologues to slightly ease the pressure on some artists, and to allow, under the watchful eye of the "organs", "metered" expositions in a small room. Such a place became the trade union of graphic artists on Malaya Gruzinskaya 28, under which a painting section was created, which included this particular group of artists of unofficial art. The first exhibition of the section took place in March 1976. Prior to that, there were two exhibitions of unofficial art: in February 1975 in the pavilion "Beekeeping" and in September of the same year in the pavilion "House of Culture" at VDNKh.


BANNIKOV Nikolay (1942)
ZANDER. 1968

The decision to indulge a small group of recalcitrant artists was not an act of goodwill, but a forced retreat under the onslaught of barbarity accusations from the West following the unprecedented scandal over the destruction of paintings at the exhibition dubbed "The Bulldozer."


MAKHOV Ivan (1938)
THE MYSTERY OF THE FLYING DUTCH. 1978

Thus, initiative pressure from the inside, from the active group of non-conformist artists, and from the outside, from the Western ideological propaganda, set a precedent: the authorities opened an exhibition space that is well monitored and significantly reduces the reason for criticism from the previously mentioned pressure vectors.


BARINOV Mikhail (1947)
AFTERNOON # 1. 1978

This is the beginning of the history of "Malaya Gruzinka", which showed the most striking exposition discoveries up to 1980. The decision of the authorities was influenced not only by the above events, but also by the facts of apartment exhibitions in the 60s - early 70s, as well as the activities of some apartment salons, such as the Sychevs' salon on Rozhdestvensky Boulevard or Nika Shcherbakova's salon on Sadovo- Karetnaya street. Foreign diplomats also visited here, who met with dissidents, acquired paintings, thereby supporting unofficial art.


BELUTIN Eliy (1925)
TALK. CONVERGENCE. 1981

There is an opinion of contemporaries of the events described above that by creating a small "sediment tank" for the exhibition activities of rebel artists, the KGB simplified its task of controlling the situation and possibly suppressing certain ideologically colored provocations by nonconformists. At the same time, the role of apartment expositions decreased, tracking which required more complex operational work. There is also an opinion that the KGB sought to dismember the groups of unofficial artists, preventing them from developing a unified position, limiting their initiative and creative experiment as much as possible.


VOROSHILOV Igor (1939-1989)
TWO. 1980s.

It is no coincidence that the generation of nonconformist artists who began their career at the dawn of the 70s is sometimes called the generation of “outcasts”. The contempt and enmity on the part of the representatives of the official art left them little cause for optimism. The rigid framework of ideological unacceptability determined the unique features of the work of non-conformist artists of the 70s; with the exception of protest art, it could not be focused on meaningful social resonance, reflection, broad discussion, or commercial success.


BLEZE Sergey (1945)
COMPOSITION No. 20. 1975

At best, the audience was a narrow circle of friends and admirers. Working "on the table", "in the corner of the workshop" for someone opened the way to freedom of experiment, mastering the inner space of consciousness, its expansion; others were driven into despair, binges. There was a stratification of a small group of nonconformists - some chose a formal experiment over syntax, composition design, technological and stylistic components.


BLEZE Sergey (1945)
COMPOSITION No. 13. 1974

Another, smaller part, went into a spiritual search, deep into the metaphysical content of the picture, into the study of the image, as a transformer and sublimator of the consciousness of both the creator and the viewer. It was this aspect of the creative search in the sphere of the semantic space of the painting that led some of the artists of this group to theoretical comprehension, and then to the practical assimilation of religious experience.


VULOKH Igor (1938)
LANDSCAPE. 1970s.

The lack of direct contacts with contemporary Western art and the inaccessibility of information about the domestic avant-garde of the 1920s created an atmosphere of vacuum, “brewing in its own juice,” which gave the work of nonconformists of the 70s certain specific features. Fragmentary information about the Western avant-garde came through the art magazines of the socialist countries. camps and rare editions of "Skir" that fell through the cordon.


HAYDUK Hope (1948)
ODESSA. 1974

This stimulated the process of creating some myths, both individual and group, about the work and life of artists. It is no coincidence that the seventies are sometimes called "personal mythologists." Despite all the difficulties, meager dosed exhibition activity at Malaya Gruzinka 28 became a creative laboratory of artists in the field of stylistic experiment and technology, a field of mutual professional exchange of experience, creative search and growth. The conceptualism of the sixties was enriched with new discoveries in the field of shaping, deepening of content.


HAYDUK Hope (1948)
STROLL. IN MEMORY OF A. TIKHOMIROV. 1981

The line of Vasily Sitnikov's students was developing, moving towards the development of the metaphysical and mystical levels of the compositional dimension. The original line of neo-naive art, as well as neo- and post-symbolism, developed. Personal versions of surrealism, minimalism and hyperrealism were developed. An original trend in religious painting emerged.


HAYDUK Hope (1948)
MOSCOW YARD. 1976

Performance and group meditation materialized, experiments in stage movement and avant-garde scenography; the creativity of "instant painting" by Anatoly Zverev reached its dawn; a whole trend of neo-expressionists took shape. Neo-historical painting, metaphysical landscape and even a new version of genre painting were developed.


GLUKHOV Vladimir (1937-1985)
LANDSCAPE. 1970

The formation of the artistic language of the nonconformists of the seventies took place against the background and in opposition to the official line of the union of artists with its professional attitudes, norms, cliches and prohibitions. By the mid-70s, the decline of the "severe style" takes place and the "left wing" of the Moscow Union of Artists is trying to find new plastic languages ​​within the framework of what is permitted.


GORDEEV Dmitry (1940)
YARD IN KISHLAK. 1977

Basically, these are interpretive "moves" from the styles fashionable in the West, which could be adapted to the "general line" of socialist realism. This, for example, is the line of variations on the theme of "naive art" that were "slipped" under the ideology of "folk, native" - ​​or the line of "neoclassicism", starting from the monumentalists of the Italian Proto-Renaissance.


Zhdan Vladislav (1940)
STILL LIFE - PORTRAIT. DEDICATION TO B. PASTERNAK. 1969

Or, for example, the Soviet version of American hyperrealism, which insured itself ideologically both by the “documentary plot” and by the “realism of being made” and presented itself as a fashionable and innovative line of social realism. By the end of the 70s, a separate line of the left MOSKh became a variation of German expressionism of the 20s, adapted to socialist realism, combined with the technological innovations of American neo-expressionism of the 40-60s, the line of Pollack and his followers.


PRYADIKHIN Vladimir (1947)
OFFICE. 1994

Thus, in the 70s, the scope of official art expanded significantly, including some plastic developments of the Western mainstream, adapted to the national ideology and mentality of art functionaries who distributed orders, the procurement policy of the Ministry of Culture, the Art Fund, the Union of Artists.


ZUBAREV Vladislav (1937)
COMPOSITION. 1971

A separate plastic line against the background of the artistic life of the 60-70s was the school of Elia Belyutin, and also closer to the beginning of the 80s, the school of Zubarev.


KALUGIN Alexander (1949)
EXPECTATION. 1972-73

These were attempts to "legalize the avant-garde" through the methodology of teaching the visual arts, construction and composition. The experiment was "legalized" in these schools within the framework of the method of teaching plastic language, considering this language as a formalized pattern. Although these methods were carried out in a purely local framework of the pedagogical process, they influenced the consciousness and formation of the artistic language, a number of non-conformist artists.


KISLITSYN Igor (1948)
LAMP. 1974

During the exhibition activity in the 70s of the basement on Malaya Gruzinskaya, individual representatives of the "left wing" of the Moscow Union of Artists participated in a number of exhibitions, but in general, the artists of this wing were in opposition to nonconformist artists, not to mention the bulk of the members of the Union of Artists, jealously and hostile to their work. A feature of the exhibition life of the basement on Malaya Gruzinskaya was that artists of different generations exhibited in it, ousted from official art or openly opposing themselves to it.


KOLOTEV Vasily (1953)
ARREST OF THE PROPAGANDIST. 1979

By 1980, some of these artists left the USSR. In 1981, the leadership of the trade union carried out a "cleaning" of the ranks of the painting section and from there, a number of objectionable opposition artists were expelled, under the pretext of lack of information on abnormal cooperation with publishing houses.


KOLOTEV Vasily (1953)
NINTH SHAFT. 1979

Exhibition activity continued in the 80s, but by the beginning of perestroika time, nonconformism was increasingly pushed aside by various versions of salon, kitsch art, fake variations of pseudo-avant-garde, which by the end of the 80s began to prevail, creating, alas, a negative opinion about the painting exhibited in the famous basement.


KROTOV Victor (1945)
DEDICATION TO GOYA. 1975

Unfortunately, time has mercilessly dealt with the legacy of the nonconformists of the 70s. It is not possible to recreate, even if only in approximation, a complete picture of the creative process of that time. First, due to the physical death of many participants in this era, the disappearance of their works abroad without a trace.


PROVOTOROV Vladislav (1947)
VISIONS. 1984

Secondly, the lack of exhibitions, discussions, publications about such a phenomenon as the unofficial art of the 70s, not on individual persons, but on the process as a whole, led to the fact that much disappeared from social memory, and the rest was overgrown with mythology, individual and group, both ill-wishers and survivors of the events.


KUZNETSOV Constantine (1944)
TSARITSINO. 1982

The proposed small exposition poses a modest task - whenever possible, to identify and acquaint art lovers and collectors with at least some of the nonconformist artists from the "first call" of the exhibition activities of the hall on Malaya Gruzinskaya 28, in their composition until the early 80s. Most of the artists represented have participated in the exhibition process since the first exhibition of the painting section in March 1976. Projection for the future also consists in more fully, on a personal level, acquainting viewers with the work of these artists.


LESHCHENKO Vladimir (1939)
ARMENIA. 1982

This exhibition is a tribute to the famous American collector of Soviet unofficial art - Norton Dodge - the author of the term "Soviet non-conformism". I would like to note the fact that this exceptional researcher, discoverer and philanthropist not only drew attention to the protest political aspect of this cultural phenomenon, but also to its uniqueness as an artistic event of the 20th century.


SHIBANOVA Natalia (1948)
STILL LIFE. 1972

Within the framework of the history of world art, N. Dodge, thanks to his museum collection, has preserved and passed on to subsequent generations that page of Russian history that committed domestic art critics and modern ill-wishers - “actualists” and co-workers of the globalization of culture deliberately wanted to silence.

Member of the Moscow Union of Artists S.V. Potapov

Zebra - Fri, 20/11/2009 - 12:23

participant

Instead of portraits of production leaders - portraits of lovers. Instead of the vast expanses of the Motherland, there are extraterrestrial civilizations in red tones. Instead of five-year construction projects - Zamoskvoretsky courtyards, beer and crayfish placers. No bargaining with your own creativity, no compromises. An exhibition of non-conformist artists has opened in Moscow.

Tatiana Flegontova is the author of the idea and curator of the "Nonconformists" project. "It's just another art," she explains. "Unofficial. There were canons of socialist realism, they didn't paint according to these canons."
This is the first collective exhibition of former representatives of the Soviet underground of the 60-70s. But not the first in the history of Moscow unofficial art. On September 15, 1974, Oscar Rabin, Vladimir Nemukhin, Vasily Sitnikov, Vitaly Komar exhibited their works in the open-air Bitsevsky Park. They had no other chances to go out to the viewer. The works were suspended for only 30 minutes, after which the artists and visitors were dispersed by bulldozers.

The exhibition has gone down in history as a "bulldozer". It was 35 years ago. However, it was she who laid the foundation for official recognition. "An artist is like a child. If he does something, he must be shown! Otherwise he cannot live!" - says one of the masters.

Art officials called them unambiguously - formalists. But they were very different. Anatoly Zverev, Ernst Neizvestny, Alexander Kharitonov and Vyacheslav Kalinin did not have a single credo. They were united by a rejection of official art and a desire for self-expression. Lydia Masterkova, who began with realism, felt genuine freedom only in abstract painting.

Giant flat faces of unthinkable colors - the discovery of Oleg Tselkov. They contain not an image of an individual person, but a general portrait of humanity. A rebel since childhood - already at school he did not want to paint classical still lifes.

Oleg Tselkov wrote at a time when the choice of colors was small, so the artists had to invent a lot themselves. Sometimes they wrote down their recipes right on the back of the paintings. For example: "For a liter of water - 100 grams of edible gelatin plus chalk, the soil is treated with pumice."

In what in what, but in the inventiveness of the artists you will not refuse. Boris Sveshnikov wrote his work "The Funeral of a Child" in the camp, on an ordinary oilcloth. Convicted on charges of anti-Soviet propaganda, the 19-year-old artist pondered a lot about death. She became a character in almost all of his works.

Oscar Rabin is considered the informal leader of the Soviet underground. It was in his small room, in the Lianozovo barracks, that independent artists and poets gathered. The first screenings of paintings were also held here. Friends jokingly called Rabin "the underground minister of culture."

Today their works cost tens of thousands of dollars and adorn the best museums in the world, and yet in the middle of the 20th century they were outcasts, unwilling to write under dictation, and therefore living from hand to mouth. They were accused of all mortal sins, they were not accepted into the Union of Artists, they were not hired. And they were just experimenting. In other words, they did what they wanted.

I will write a little about the artists and exhibit a few works of each.

Fri, 20/11/2009 - 12:39
Zebra

participant

Fri, 20/11/2009 - 14:11
Zebra

participant

Fri, 20/11/2009 - 16:08
Zebra

participant

Re: Nonconformists

NEMUKHIN VLADIMIR NIKOLAEVICH

Born in Moscow on February 12, 1925 in the family of a native of the countryside who became a worker. He spent his childhood in the village of Priluki (Kaluga region), on the banks of the Oka. In 1943-1946 he studied at the Moscow art studio of the All-Union Central Council of Trade Unions. He followed the advice of the artist P.E. Sokolov, thanks to whom he discovered the art of post-impressionism and cubism. For some time (1952-1959) he earned a living as a designer and poster artist. He took an active part in private-apartment and public exhibitions of avant-garde art, including the scandalous "bulldozer exhibition" at the Moscow vacant lot in Belyaevo. Since the late 1960s, his painting has found more and more recognition in the West. Lived in Moscow.

After the early Prioksky landscapes in a traditional manner, as well as experiments in the spirit of cubism and pictorial abstraction, he found his style in the random motif of maps on the beach sand.

By the mid-1960s, this spontaneous motif took shape in semi-abstract "still lifes with maps", which became an extremely distinctive manifestation of "informal" - a special abstractionist movement based on combinations of pure pictorial expression with a dramatic and symbolic element. Then Nemukhin varied his find for many years, sometimes transforming the surface of the canvas into an object "counter-relief" plane, reminiscent of an old wall or the surface of a gambling table, wasted by time. He often wrote - in a mixed, as it were, pictorial and graphic technique - and on paper (Jack of Diamonds series, late 1960s - early 1970s).
The assimilation of the painting to the subject brought his works of the 1980s closer to pop art. During this period, he repeatedly turned to sculptural-three-dimensional abstractions, biomorphic or geometric, then more and more often, exhibiting his works, he accompanied paintings and graphic sheets with large installations.
"Dedication to Bach"

At the turn of the 20th century. lived mostly in Germany (Dusseldorf), constantly visiting Russia, where in 2000 his works took a prominent place in the Tretyakov Gallery and the Moscow Museum of Modern Art. In 1999 the book Nemukhinsky monologues was published.
https://slovari.yandex.ru/dict/krugosvet/article/3/37/1008877.htm

Fri, 20/11/2009 - 16:58
Zebra

participant

Re: Nonconformists

SITNIKOV, VASILY YAKOVLEVICH

Born in the village of Novo-Rakitino (Lebedyansky district of the Tambov province) on August 19 (September 1) 1915 in a peasant family that moved to Moscow in 1921. In 1933 he studied at the Moscow ship-mechanical technical school, becoming addicted to the manufacture of models of sailing ships. An attempt to enter Vkhutemas (1935) was unsuccessful. He worked on the construction of the metro, as an animator and model for the director A.L. Ptushko, showed slides at lectures by professors of the V.I.Surikov Art Institute (hence the nickname "Vasya the Lamplighter"). Having become a victim of libel, in 1941 he was arrested, declared insane and sent for compulsory treatment in Kazan. Returning to the capital (1944), he was interrupted by odd jobs. During the "thaw" he joined the "unofficial" art movement.
The formal source of his work was the traditional system of academic teaching, based on nude work and meticulous graphic shading.

In Sitnikov's work, however, the academic nature turned into surreal eroticism, and the shading turned into a shaky air element, enveloping forms in the form of snowy haze, swamp fog or light haze.

To this were added the characteristic features of the "Russian style" in the spirit of Symbolism and Art Nouveau. This is how his pictorial and graphic series of the 1960s-1970s were born - nude, sexy grotesque, genres with a "monastery with snowflakes"
,
steppe landscapes (often also with the central motif of the monastery).
His very way of life was a kind of work-happening, continuous artistic foolishness, beginning with the famous inscription "I'll come right now" on the door of the apartment, where a valuable collection of church antiquities and oriental carpets was kept.
Since 1951, the artist has been actively teaching, fulfilling his dream of a "home academy".

His pedagogical system included many shocking paradoxes (advice on how to learn to tone, "shading" newspaper photos, or how to paint a landscape with a floor brush from a trough with a colorful solution). A number of prominent masters (V.G. Weisberg, Yu.A. Vedernikov, M.D. Sterligova, A.V. Kharitonov, etc.) were associated with the "school of Sitnikov" - both by direct apprenticeship and by creative contacts. However, in general, with some exceptions (such as those listed above), this school over the years has degenerated into the production of "underground souvenir" picturesque kitsch.

In 1975, the master emigrated through Austria to the United States. He donated the most valuable part of his collection of icons to the Andrei Rublev Museum of Old Russian Art. His own things "scattered" almost without a trace - not counting reproductions and individual works in museums. He had no success abroad.
Sitnikov died in New York on November 28, 1987.
From early works in the spirit of academism, he moved in the 1950s (first of all, in the cycle of the "wounded", expressing the painful memory of the war) to a distinctive style that combines the features of symbolism and cubism with violent expression.

His works are usually cast in bronze, in the largest compositions the sculptor prefers concrete.
The works of the Unknown, embodying the process of eternal becoming, a kind of "flow form", are composed in large cycles, both sculptural and graphic (and later pictorial): Gigantomachia (since 1958), Dostoevsky's Images (since 1963; in 1970 in the series "Literary Monuments" published the novel Crime and Punishment with his illustrations).

Since 1956, the artist has been working on his main, most ambitious idea - the Tree of Life
,
the project of a giant sculpture-environment, where the motives of a tree crown, a human heart and a "Mobius leaf" are bizarrely combined, symbolizing the creative union of art and science.

An unknown person received large official orders (a monument in honor of the friendship of peoples, the so-called Lotus Flower at the Aswan Dam in Egypt, 1971; decorative reliefs for the Institute of Electronics in Zelenograd, 1974, and the former building of the Central Committee of the CPSU in Ashgabat (now the House of the Government of Turkmenistan, 1975 ); and etc.). Having got acquainted with N.S. Khrushchev, it is true, during a scandal at an exhibition in the Moscow Manege, he subsequently performed his tombstone (1974), emphasizing the contradictory nature of Khrushchev's rule with symbolic contrasts of forms. In 1976 he emigrated, and from 1977 he settled in the United States, in the vicinity of New York.
TEFI

Since 1989, the master often came to Russia; here, according to his designs, a memorial to the victims of the Gulag in Magadan (1996) - with a giant concrete Face of Sorrow, - as well as the Renaissance in Moscow composition (2000) were erected. In 1996 he received the State Prize.

Beginning in 1962 (article Discovering New in the magazine "Art"), and especially in the decades of emigration, he presented theoretical articles and lectures on the symbiosis of Faith and Knowledge in art, designed to combine the artistic experience of the archaic and the avant-garde. Published white poems figuratively commenting on his art. In Uttersberg (Sweden) there is a Museum "The Tree of Life" dedicated to the work of the Unknown.

https://slovari.yandex.ru/dict/krugosvet/article/0/0c/1007903.htm
Wow, what a talented one, and I only heard nasty things about him before !!!

Recently, an exhibition dedicated to the 40th anniversary of the INAKI group of artists, which includes Viktor Bogorad, Sergei Kovalsky and Boris Mitavsky, opened at the Pushkinskaya-10 art center. Presented are their work over the years. What can you see here? The good old works have probably already been sold out, so for ten new ones (created after 1991) there is only one old one (before 1991). Hence the problem.

There is a 1973 manifesto in which artists insisted that their work should not be classified as abstraction or surrealism. Unfortunately, one cannot do without this, at least in relation to new works. To be precise, we are dealing with salon surrealism, easily understandable.

In cinematography, there is the term "exploitative cinema", when a certain banal theme is exploited in the film in order to maximize earnings with minimal investment. We can see something similar in the example of actual nonconformism, which is often engaged in the exploitation of itself, the images that were invented back in the Soviet Union. Of course, it happens that some topics do not lose their relevance for a long time. But in fact there are not so many of them as the artists imagine.

One of the problems of that generation of artists was the oppression of official art by the competent authorities in the USSR. For this reason, being at the peak of their creative activity, they could not find suitable conditions for development. As a result, art was created for internal consumption, it was fed only by its environment, and this lasted quite a long time. It was difficult not to get used to it. To this day, the game of nonconformism continues, which ends with the production of similar Soszart stories. There is one more problem that I don’t want to talk about, but you cannot pass it by. Alcohol. He killed many artists ...

Artist Sergei "Africa" ​​Bugaev singles out another problem, a more global one. The isolation of the Russian, and above all the St. Petersburg, artistic community, fixation on oneself. It is no wonder that artists find themselves cut off from everything that happens in world art.

“There is no circulation within artistic activity. There is a moment of stagnation, - says Bugaev. "At the same time, we still have a division into official and unofficial art." In this sense, the boundaries can now be erased altogether, because that former nonconformism could have long been the official glamor.

Africa also suggests that there is currently a lack of a good exhibition and museum infrastructure that allows artists to exhibit their work in other cities. Objects of art stagnate. Indeed, the lifetime of the exhibition is less than a month. And then what? Then the paintings will return back to the workshops ...

As for the issue of internal consumption of art, this is, in fact, a manifestation of snobbery in relation to those who “do not understand”. It turns out that owning objects of art is the prerogative of “those who understand” (just not everyone has money for this “understanding”).

In modern society, folk art is often treated as something shameful, unreal. Despite the fact that the Russian Museum is filled with just the works of folk art.

But in Germany, for example, buying a picture of a young, interesting, relevant artist, who in his works demonstrates opposition to the system, is considered normal.

Rector of the Academy of Arts. I.E. Repin, Semyon Mikhailovsky urges not to reflect on "Pushkinskaya-10", since for a long time neither it as such, nor everything connected with it has existed. Of course, the artists of the old generation should be remembered, but it's time to stop perceiving their work as actual art. The concepts of nonconformist art are outdated, and if we somehow position ourselves in the context of a museum, then accordingly. It makes no sense to artificially marginalize ourselves, otherwise it will turn out to be just an attempt to create a contrived conflict. Such exhibitions are for the most part really done for themselves, and the art market is not interested in the authors themselves. For those people for whom "Pushkinskaya-10" is an outside phenomenon, such topics are simply not interesting.

Do you want to commit an act of a true nonconformist these days, to do something contrary to the official ideology and unofficial art? Hang a classic socialist realism painting of students lifting the virgin soil at home. Nice and against the system.

Non-conformism. Under this name, it is customary to unite representatives of various artistic trends in the visual arts of the Soviet Union of the 1950s-1980s, who did not fit into the framework of socialist realism - the only officially permitted direction in art.

Nonconformist artists were actually ousted from the public artistic life of the country: the state pretended that they simply did not exist. The Union of Artists did not recognize their art, they were deprived of the opportunity to show their works in exhibition halls, critics did not write about them, museum workers did not visit their workshops.

1. Dmitry Plavinsky "Shell", 1978

"The creation of human thought and hands is sooner or later absorbed by the eternal element of nature: Atlantis - by the ocean, the temples of Egypt - by the desert sand, the Palace of Knossos and the labyrinth - by volcanic lava, the Aztec pyramids - by jungle vines. and her death and the moment of birth of the next ... "

Dmitry Plavinsky, artist


2. Oscar Rabin "Still life with fish and the Pravda newspaper", 1968

“The further, the more acutely I felt that I could not do without painting, for me there was nothing more beautiful than the fate of an artist. However, looking at the paintings of official Soviet artists, I completely unconsciously felt that I could never paint like that. And not at all because, that I didn’t like them - I admired the craftsmanship, sometimes openly envied them - but in general they didn’t touch them, left them indifferent. Something important for me was lacking in them. "

“I didn’t feel any influences on myself, I didn’t change my style, my creative credo also remained unchanged. I could convey the diversity of Russian life through the symbol - a herring on the Pravda newspaper, a bottle of vodka, a passport - everyone understands this. Or I wrote the Lianozovo cemetery and called painting "Cemetery named after Leonardo da Vinci." In my art, in my opinion, nothing new, newfangled, superficial. What I was - remained the same, as the song is sung. I do not have my own gallery, which feeds and directs me my creativity. I would not want to be a pet rabbit. I like to be a free hare. I run wherever I want! "

Oscar Rabin, artist

3. Lev Kropyvnitsky "Woman and Beetles" 1966

"Abstract painting makes it possible to get as close as possible to reality, to penetrate the essence of things, to comprehend all that is important that is not perceived by our five senses. I felt modernity as a combination of dramatic accomplishments, psychological tensions, intellectual oversaturation. I tried and I try, based on the experience and felt, to create a pictorial form corresponding to the spirit of the times and the psychology of the century. "

Lev Kropivnitsky, artist.

4. Dmitry Krasnopevtsev "Pipes", 1963

"The picture is also an autograph, only more complex, spatial, multi-layered. And if by the autograph, by the handwriting they determine (and not unsuccessfully) the character, condition and almost illness of the writer, if this decryption is not neglected even by criminologists, then the picture gives incomparably more material for guesses and conclusions about the identity of the author.It has long been noted that a portrait painted by an artist is at the same time his self-portrait - this extends further - to any compositions, landscapes, still lifes, to any genres, as well as to non-objective abstract art - to whatever the artist depicts. And with any of his objectivity, dispassion, if you want to get away from yourself, become impersonal - he will not be able to hide, his creation, his handwriting will betray his soul, his mind, heart, his face. "

Dmitry Krasnopevtsev, artist.

5. Vladimir Nemukhin "Unfinished Solitaire", 1966

"The inventory of the elements of the pictorial language consists primarily of objects. They were before - trees, banks, boxes, newspapers, that is, seemingly simple, recognizable objects. At the end of the 50s, all this turned into abstraction, and soon this abstract form itself began to tire me. This is the state that renews interest in the subject, and he, in turn, reciprocates. I believe that the subject is very important for the vision, because the vision itself is visible through it. "

"In the 58th year I began to make my first abstract works. What is abstract art? It made it possible to break immediately with all this Soviet reality. You became a different person. - a new vision. Art must be vision, not reasoning. "

Vladimir Nemukhin, artist.

6. Nikolay Vechtomov "The Road", 1983

"My life is the creation of my own artistic space, which I always tried to enrich and for this I tried a lot. I realized that each of us is always alone with the cataclysms of the twentieth century."

"We live in darkness and have already become accustomed to it, we completely distinguish objects. And yet we draw light from there, from the glow of the sunset Cosmos, it is it that gives us the energy of vision. Therefore, it is not objects that are important to me, but their reflections, for in they are lurking the breath of an alien element. "

Nikolay Vechtomov, artist.

7. Anatoly Zverev Portrait of a woman. 1966

"Anatoly Zverev is one of the most outstanding Russian portrait painters born on this earth, who managed to express the tremulous dynamism of the moment and the mystical inner energy of the people whose portraits he painted. Zverev is one of the most expressive and spontaneous artists of our time. His manner is so individual, that in each of his paintings one can immediately recognize the author's handwriting. With a few strokes he achieves enormous dramatic effect, spontaneity and instantaneousness. The artist manages to convey a sense of direct connection between him and his model ."

Vladimir Dlugi, artist.

"Zverev is the first Russian expressionist of the 20th century and a mediator between the early and late avant-garde in Russian art. I consider this remarkable artist one of the most talented in Soviet Russia."

Grigory Kostaki, collector.

8. Vladimir Yankilevsky "The Prophet", 1970s

"Nonconformism" is a constitutive feature of real art, as it opposes the banality and the stamp of conformism, giving new information and creating a new vision of the world. The fate of a true artist is often tragic, regardless of the society in which he lives. This is normal, since the fate of an artist is the fate of his insight, his statements about the world, which breaks the established stereotypes of perception and thinking created by "mass culture" and intellectual snobbery. To be a creator and to be "in due time" a canonized "hero" of society, a superstar is an almost insurmountable paradox. Attempts to overcome it are the path to a career of a conformist. "

Vladimir Yankilevsky, artist.

9. Lydia Masterkova "Composition", 1967

"All the time, with unabated strength in her abstract compositions, magical colors burn, then sparkle, then flicker with a dying fire. It seems that she is coming all the time from different sides to the magical surface of the canvas. recall Bach's organ chords, and sometimes greenish-gray, intertwined planes associated with biological forms, are associated with "The Creation of the World" by Millau. Masterkov's drawing says a lot. He organizes spots on the plane and the character of colorful accents. He is original and very expressive of the author. "

Lev Kropivnitsky, artist.

10. Vladimir Yakovlev "Cat with a Bird", 1981

"Art is a means of overcoming death."

Vladimir Yakovlev, artist.

"Vladimir Yakovlev's paintings look like a night sky full of stars. There is no light in the night, light is a star. This is especially evident when Yakovlev depicts flowers. His flower is always a star. Hence, there is some special sadness of joy when we contemplate it. paintings".

Ilya Kabakov, artist.

11. Ernst Unknown "Heart of Christ", 1973-1975

"I divide artistic activity (writing, musical, and visual) into two types: striving for a masterpiece and striving for flow. Striving for a masterpiece is when an artist faces a certain concept of beauty that he wants to embody, create a complete, capacious masterpiece. The desire to flow is an existential need for creativity, when it becomes analogous to breathing, the beating of the heart, the work of the whole personality. For artists of the flow, art is a materialized existence, moving at every second, arising and dying. And when I want to build my "Tree life ", I am fully aware of the almost clinical, pathological impossibility of this plan. But I need it in order to work. And plurality does not scare me, because it is sealed by mathematical unity, it is self-contained. All this is an attempt to combine several principles, an attempt to combine the eternal foundations of art and its temporary content. Xia constantly and eternally in faith in order to become noble, majestic, meaningful. "

Ernst Unknown, artist.

12. Eduard Steinberg "Composition with fish", 1967

"I can't say that I'm on some right path. But what is truth? This is a word, an image. Here Camus has a wonderful" The Myth of Sisyphus ", when an artist drags a stone up a mountain, and then he falls down, he again lifts it, drags it again - this is approximately the pendulum of my life. "

"I practically did not discover anything new, I just gave the Russian avant-garde a different perspective. Which one? Rather religious. I base my spatial geometric structures on the old catacomb murals and, of course, on icon painting."

Eduard Steinberg, artist.

13. Mikhail Roginsky "Red door". 1965

"I forced myself to recreate reality, based on my idea of ​​it. This is what I still do."

Mikhail Roginsky, artist.

The Red Door is an outstanding work that played a pivotal role in the history of Russian art of the 20th century. Together with the subsequent cycle of fragments and interior details (walls with sockets, switches, photographs, chests of drawers, tiled floors), this work laid the foundation for a new subject realism. "Documentaryism" (as Roginsky preferred to call his direction) predetermined the emergence of not only pop art, but a new avant-garde in general in the Soviet "underground" art, focused on the world artistic process. The "Red Door" sobered and brought back to earth many of the Soviet artists, carried away by utopian and metaphysical searches, surrounded by communal life. This work prompted artists to carefully analyze and describe the aesthetic aspects of everyday Soviet life. This is the limit of the painterly illusion, the bridge from the picture to the object.

Andrey Erofeev, curator, art critic

14. Oleg Tselkov "Golgotha" 1977

"I absolutely do not need to exhibit now. In half a century it will be extremely interesting for me to show my works. Today I am surrounded by the same fools as myself. They understand no more than me. People write in order to comprehend something. The artist's hand is not driven by striving. exhibit, and the desire to tell about what I have experienced. When the picture is painted, I no longer have power over it. It can remain alive or perish. My paintings are my letter in a bottle thrown into the sea. Maybe no one will ever catch this bottle, and it will crash on a rock. "

Oleg Tselkov, artist.

15. Hulot Sooster "The Red Egg", 1964

"In his view of nature there is neither spontaneity, nor surprise, nor admiration. It is rather the view of a scientist striving to penetrate the secret of things. The artist seems to be looking for some ideal formula of nature, its centricity, a formula as complete and as complex as form eggs".

Free admission days at the museum

Every Wednesday admission to the permanent exhibition "Art of the XX century" and temporary exhibitions in (Krymsky Val, 10) is free for visitors without a guided tour (except for the exhibition "Ilya Repin" and the project "Vanguard in three dimensions: Goncharova and Malevich").

The right to free access to exhibitions in the main building in Lavrushinsky lane, the Engineering building, the New Tretyakov Gallery, the house-museum of V.M. Vasnetsov, A.M. Vasnetsov is provided on the following days for certain categories of citizens:

First and second Sunday of every month:

    for students of higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation, regardless of the form of study (including foreign citizens-students of Russian universities, graduate students, adjuncts, residents, assistants-trainees) upon presentation of a student card (does not apply to persons presenting student cards "student-trainee" );

    for students of secondary and secondary specialized educational institutions (from 18 years old) (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries). Students-holders of ISIC cards on the first and second Sunday of each month have the right to visit the exhibition "Art of the XX century" of the New Tretyakov Gallery free of charge.

every Saturday - for members of large families (citizens of Russia and CIS countries).

Please note that conditions for free admission to temporary exhibitions may vary. Check the information on the pages of the exhibitions.

Attention! At the box office of the Gallery, entrance tickets are provided with a face value "free" (upon presentation of the relevant documents - for the above visitors). Moreover, all services of the Gallery, including excursion services, are paid in accordance with the established procedure.

Visiting the museum on holidays

Dear visitors!

Please pay attention to the opening hours of the Tretyakov Gallery on holidays. The visit is paid.

Please note that e-tickets are admitted on a first come, first served basis. You can familiarize yourself with the rules for returning electronic tickets at.

Congratulations on the upcoming holiday and are waiting in the halls of the Tretyakov Gallery!

The right to preferential visits The Gallery, except for the cases provided for by a separate order of the Gallery's management, is provided upon presentation of documents confirming the right to preferential visits:

  • pensioners (citizens of Russia and CIS countries),
  • full holders of the "Order of Glory",
  • students of secondary and secondary specialized educational institutions (from 18 years old),
  • students of higher educational institutions of Russia, as well as foreign students studying at Russian universities (except for student trainees),
  • members of large families (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries).
Visitors to the above categories of citizens purchase a discounted ticket.

Free admission right The main and temporary exhibitions of the Gallery, except for the cases provided for by a separate order of the Gallery's management, are provided for the following categories of citizens upon presentation of documents confirming the right to free admission:

  • persons under the age of 18;
  • students of faculties specializing in the field of fine arts of secondary specialized and higher educational institutions of Russia, regardless of the form of study (as well as foreign students studying at Russian universities). The clause does not apply to persons presenting student cards for "student trainees" (in the absence of information about the faculty in the student card, a certificate from the educational institution is presented with the obligatory indication of the faculty);
  • veterans and invalids of the Great Patriotic War, combatants, former underage prisoners of concentration camps, ghettos and other places of detention created by the Nazis and their allies during the Second World War, illegally repressed and rehabilitated citizens (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries);
  • conscripts of the Russian Federation;
  • Heroes of the Soviet Union, Heroes of the Russian Federation, Full Cavaliers of the Order of Glory (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries);
  • disabled people of groups I and II, participants in the liquidation of the consequences of the disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries);
  • one accompanying person with a disabled person of group I (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries);
  • one accompanying child with a disability (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries);
  • artists, architects, designers - members of the corresponding creative Unions of Russia and its subjects, art critics - members of the Association of Art Critics of Russia and its subjects, members and employees of the Russian Academy of Arts;
  • members of the International Council of Museums (ICOM);
  • employees of museums of the system of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation and the relevant Departments of Culture, employees of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation and ministries of culture of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation;
  • Museum volunteers - entrance to the exhibition "Art of the XX century" (Krymsky Val, 10) and to the A.M. Vasnetsova (citizens of Russia);
  • guides-translators who have an accreditation card of the Association of Guides-Translators and Tour Managers of Russia, including those accompanying a group of foreign tourists;
  • one teacher of an educational institution and one accompanying group of students of secondary and secondary specialized educational institutions (in the presence of an excursion voucher, subscription); one teacher of an educational institution that has state accreditation for educational activities during an agreed training session and has a special badge (citizens of Russia and the CIS countries);
  • one accompanying group of students or a group of conscripts (in the presence of a guided tour voucher, subscription and during a training session) (citizens of Russia).

Visitors to the above categories of citizens receive a free entrance ticket.

Please note that conditions for preferential admission to temporary exhibitions may vary. Check the information on the pages of the exhibitions.