Why do they love Pechorin if he brings suffering? if you can only in your own words! Is evil really so attractive (why do they love Pechorin, if he brings grief) (School compositions) Why do they love Pechorin.

Why do I love Pechorin? Perhaps, few asked these questions after reading the famous novel by M.Yu. Lermontov's "A Hero of Our Time". Some believe that this character is sharply negative, not entitled to correction and remorse. But for me personally, his soul is a dark room in which it is very easy to stumble. However, as soon as you turn on the light, kindle even a small flame, it will become something more than darkness and emptiness.

I love Pechorin for his honesty with himself.

He is ready to confess all his sins, "because he is used to confessing everything to himself." The pages of his magazine are confessions. How difficult it is at times to write about your misdeeds and fears, but He writes about feelings from low envy to insane love. Pechorin is honest. He is honest with himself, with his soul, which means he is free.

I am impressed by Grigory Alexandrovich because he can surrender to feelings with all his passion. He has the ability to control his emotions, and, due to this restraint, he can be called a callous person who does not have an idea of ​​bright feelings. But how Pechorin can love! "Faith has become more dear to me than anything else - dearer than life, honor, happiness!" At the same time, he asks the question: "Can I love?" in these two phrases - the contradictoriness of his soul and the opposition of reason and emotions bursting out.

I appreciate Pechorin for trying to understand himself, in his character. We can often find in the novel the reflections of the protagonist about what kind of person he is. He turns to his childhood, and I think that it was this period of his life that changed Pechorin, shaped his life principles and character. In his monologue, he isam speaks about this - "Yes, this is my fate since childhood ..." In addition, the hero throughout the entire work tries to find even more reasons for his vices and, along with them, suffering.

I am also attracted by the principled character of the hero. Yes, quite often she hurts not only other people, but also himself. Obsessed with staying free. Pechorin in the final conversation with Mary hurt the poor girl and himself - “another minute, and I would have fallen at her feet”, but “no matter how passionately I love women, if she only lets me feel that I have to marry her , - forgive me, love! " At the same time, his adherence to principles and coldness of reason played into his hands in a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin, knowing about the enemy's plan, did not retreat and did not show his weakness and uncertainty.

I love evil in Pechorin. His life has turned into an endless game, where his pawns are the fate of other people and his own life. And his own pleasure gives him, it seems, has long lost all meaning. He compensates for the senselessness of his existence with excitement in the game: provoking people, finding ways out of the most difficult situations, managing people like puppets ... No, "in no one is evil so attractive."

What is hidden behind the darkness of the room - the soul of Pechorin? When does even the smallest light illuminate it? First, you will see things lying on the surface and accessible to everyone. But beneath them is the main treasure: his secret experiences, broken dreams ... happy memories. And if we try to get to him, then we will understand and love Pechorin. After all, "we almost always excuse what we understand ..."

Updated: 2018-10-04

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, select the text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thus, you will be of invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for the attention.

Answer left by: Guest

The main attention is paid to Pechorin in the novel. Lermontov first makes it possible to find out the opinion of other people about the Pechorin, and then only what this young nobleman thinks of himself. despite the fact that Pechorin is a strong, strong-willed, gifted person, he, by his own just definition, is a "moral cripple." his character and all his behavior are extremely contradictory. this is already clearly reflected in his appearance, reflecting, according to Lermontov, the inner appearance of a person. this image is attractive because Pechorin is a man of mystery. he is stately, handsome, smart .. his character is complex and contradictory. "The less we love a woman, the easier she likes us," Pechorin once again reminds us of a simple truth. this hero is strong, decisive. he is cynical, but it decorates him, gives zest.

Answer left by: Guest

The fifth chapter of the novel "Eugene Onegin" takes place at Christmas time. In the first part of the chapter, the central place is occupied by Tatyana's dream. Here the heroine finds herself, as it were, on the verge of two worlds: the otherworldly and the ordinary. In general, the description of a dream has been used in literature since ancient times. This allows you to reveal the spiritual world of the character, including those aspects of it that relate to the world of feelings, intuition, and subconsciousness.

Tatiana's dream is important for understanding the future events of the novel. It is important to note that it is the image of Tatiana Larina that is most closely associated with the folk world, with folklore, folk beliefs. In addition, Pushkin looks at the whole village nature, at the beauty of the seasons that replace each other with the eyes of his beloved heroine.

So, what is Tatyana dreaming of? She dreams of "sad haze", snow, she feels the winter cold. The heroine sees a "trembling, disastrous bridge" through which she must certainly get over. This crossing of the river symbolizes, as it seems to me, a move to the other world, the kingdom of the dead. It is no coincidence that Tatyana's guide through this kingdom will be a bear - the owner of the forest. It is in the center of this other world that there will be a hut with terrible monsters, in whose leader Tatyana recognizes Onegin:

At the table

Monsters sit around:

One in the horns with a dog's face

Another with a cock's head ...

There is Karla with a ponytail, but

Half-bull and half-cat.

Bark, laugh, sing, whistle and clap,

Human rumor and horse top!

All this evil spirits, seeing Tatiana, reached out to her. But Onegin imperiously uttered the cherished word - "Mine!", And all the monsters instantly disappeared. The hero is left alone with the girl, but a love date does not work out - Lensky and Olga appear inappropriately. Onegin kills Lensky with a knife.

The second part of the chapter describes the holiday on the occasion of Tatyana's name day. Guests begin to gather at it:

... whole families

Neighbors gathered in carts,

In wagons, carts and sleighs.

In the front there is a crush, anxiety;

... Lai mosek, smacking girls,

Noise, laughter, crush on the doorstep,

Bows, shuffling guests,

Nurse cry and cry of children.

The attentive reader will immediately note the overlap of this description with the description of the Sabbath in the forest hut. “Uyezdny frantik Petushkov”, one of the Larins' guests, reminds us of the “cock's head” from Tatyana's dream. The rhyme "Monsieur Triquet" - "in a red wig" will bring to mind "cancer riding a spider" - "revolves in a red cap." Lensky and Onegin will quickly enter: “Suddenly the doors are wide open. Lensky enters / And Onegin is with him ... ". Just as in Tatyana's dream, Lensky enters with Olga: “Suddenly Olga enters, / Lensky is with her ...”.

Thus, we can confidently say that Tatyana's birthday scene is the embodiment of her mysterious prophetic dream. The second part of the fifth chapter is, as it were, a mirror image of the first. And everything that was predicted and seemed to Tatyana in a dream will come true.

The name day episode contains another interesting theme. The theme of a feast, ball, holiday appears in the novel many times. The holiday in the Larins' house conveys the comfort and atmosphere of the manor estates of the early 19th century. This is a cozy evening for which only “their own” - provincial neighbors gather. These are Tatyana's name days opposed to the St. Petersburg balls.

In addition, two conflicts begin to develop in the name day scene: the external one - the duel of Lensky and Onegin and the internal one - the conflict between Eugene and himself. We see the main character, who is sickened by the presence at this holiday:

An eccentric, hitting a huge feast,

I was really angry.

... He pouted, and indignant,

Vowed Lensky to enrage

And take revenge in order.

Eugene dislikes society, albeit a provincial one. He wants to protect himself from him, to become free from him. But the hero does not succeed. The murder of Lensky proves this best of all: Onegin once again followed the public opinion.

In the scene of Tatiana's name day, we see a large number of household details. No wonder V.G. Belinsky called the novel "Eugene Onegin" "an encyclopedia of Russian life." In addition, this episode was in many ways a turning point in the fate of the heroes. If it weren't for the name day, Onegin would not have quarreled with Lensky and would not have killed him in a duel. Who knows, maybe with Tatiana the hero would have had a different story. But Onegin went on about his character and made a fatal mistake.

Lermontov's novel is a work born after the Decembrist era. The attempt by “a hundred warrant officers” to change the social system in Russia turned into a tragedy for them. In The Hero of Our Time, the writer's intense reflections on the general laws of human development and the historical fate of Russia were refracted. In the novel, as in the poem "Duma", Lermontov's attention is focused on the contemporary author's era.
In the image of Pechorin, Lermontov embodied the typical features inherent in the younger generation of that time. According to the author himself, "this is a portrait made up of the vices of our entire generation in their full development."
With the image of his protagonist, the author sharply raised the question of the fate of an extraordinary human personality in an era of timelessness, of the hopelessness of the situation at that time of the best young people from the nobility.
Belonging to the highest circle of the noble society led to disunity with the people, a complete separation from the life of the people. The inability to get close to people from other circles of society led Pechorin first to loneliness, and then gave rise to individualism and egoism in him. Raising the question of the tragedy of the fate of outstanding people and the impossibility of finding a use of their forces for them in the conditions of Russia in the 1930s, Lermontov at the same time showed the perniciousness of being locked in “proud loneliness” (Belinsky). In the socio-political conditions of the 30s of the XIX century, the rich forces of Pechorin could not find a use for themselves. He is wasted on petty adventures. He writes in his diary: “Why did I live? For what purpose was I born? And it is true, it existed, and, it is true, it was a great purpose for me, because I feel an immense power in my soul ... "
Pechorin is a richly gifted nature. He is eager for action, constantly feeling the need to find a sphere for applying his forces. In the story "Princess Mary" Pechorin, finding no other way out for his thirst for activity, plays with the fate of people, but this does not bring him either joy or happiness. Wherever Pechorin appears, he brings grief to people: smugglers leave their house, Grushnitsky is killed, Princess Mary is deeply wounded, Vera does not know happiness, Bela dies, Maxim Maksimych is disappointed in friendship. “How many times have I already played the role of an ax in the hands of fate! As an instrument of execution, I fell on the head of doomed victims ... My love did not bring happiness to anyone, because I did not sacrifice anything for those whom I loved ... "
Pechorin's thoughts about himself, his conviction that he “had a high assignment,” suggest that he dreamed of the fate of a person who could play a great role in the life of nations. In his hero, the author strove to embody his own lofty impulses and serious spiritual quests. Belinsky even shrewdly noticed that Pechorin was internally close to the poet himself. Coming into life, Pechorin dreamed of living it like Alexander the Great or Lord Byron: “How few people, starting life, think to end it like Alexander the Great or Lord Byron, and yet they remain titular advisers for a whole century”. He categorically denied for himself the opportunity to go through life as a titular adviser, dreamed of fame and happiness.
One of the main features of his character is inconsistency: he has a discord between feeling and thought, thought and deed. “I have an innate passion to contradict; my whole life was just a chain of sad and unsuccessful contradictions to my heart or reason, ”he writes. His character is marked by contradictions, his ideas are also contradictory. Pechorin himself admits that there are two people in him: one lives in the full sense of the word, the other thinks and judges him. Pechorin considers this discord to be a moral “illness”.
Emphasizing the duality of the hero, Lermontov seems to say once again that Pechorin is a victim not only of his immediate environment, but also of the social system in which people of outstanding talent are morally suffocated.
However, despite the author's condemnation of Pechorin's egoism, the central idea of ​​the image of Pechorin is still to distinguish him from the environment as a strong, bright, effective and at the same time tragic personality.
It is no accident that Belinsky said that "... in the very vices of Pechorin, something great gleams, like lightning in black clouds, and he is beautiful, full of poetry even in those moments when human feeling rises against him."
No one before Lermontov in Russian literature gave such a deep analysis of the human psyche. Here, to the smallest detail, "developed and outlined", in the words of Chernyshevsky, the character of Pechorin, comprehensively disclosed human passions. The image of the hero of his time created by Lermontov is a deep typical generalization. The author reflected the aspiration of the most advanced part of Russian society to get rid of the “disease” and made people think about ways and means of changing life.
The tragic fate of Pechorin is historically determined. Lermontov's hero is deprived of the glorious lot of the Decembrists. He is dying from melancholy, from the absence of a sphere where his activity and great opportunities would be realized. Pechorin is a logical link in a series of “strange people” in Russian literature, of which Chatsky Griboyedova and Onegin Pushkina are striking examples.
"Pechorin," wrote Belinsky, "is the Onegin of our time." Like Pushkin's Onegin, Pechorin is a purely Russian phenomenon, generated by the circumstances of Russian life. Pechorin is distinguished from Onegin primarily by his personal qualities, which elevate him to the rank of an extraordinary person, an exceptional personality. At the same time, Pechorin, like Onegin, is perceived in a single row of the all-European galaxy of “sons of the century”.

Lermontov's career began in the era of the dominance of poetic genres. The first prose work - the unfinished historical novel "Vadim" (the name is conditional, since the first sheet of the manuscript has not survived) - refers to 1833-1834. The main character...

1. The novel "A Hero of Our Time" was written by Lermontov in the last period of his life, it reflects all the main motives of the creative poet. 2. The motives of freedom and will are central in Lermontov's Lyrics. Poetic freedom and inner freedom of the individual ...

How cleverly in the innocent maiden I revolted the dreams of the heart! Love involuntary, unselfish She innocently surrendered ... Well now my chest is full of melancholy and hateful boredom? ... A.S. Pushkin In the novel "A Hero of Our Time" Lermontov sets before himself ...

The novel "A Hero of Our Time", when it was published, caused conflicting judgments among the readers. The image of Pechorin was unusual for them. In the preface, Lermontov gives his own explanation for this: “Why does this character ... find no mercy with you? It’s not because ...

Pechorin is the protagonist of the novel by M. Yu. Lermontov. He is a plot-forming character that holds all parts of the work together. This is a romantic in character and behavior, by nature a man of exceptional abilities, an outstanding mind, a strong will. He evokes involuntary respect for his unusual courage. It is he who rushes first into the hut where Vulich's killer hid. He, according to the testimony of Makim Maksimych, went to hunt a wild boar alone. Pechorin is not afraid to die in a duel. The hidden powers and spiritual capabilities of the protagonist are emphasized by his associative connection with the image of the sail, which is important for Lermontov. Pechorin sometimes feels like a sailor, born and raised on the deck of a robber brig, his soul as if "merged with storms and battles."

Pechorin's good aspirations did not develop. His moral character is ugly, and his vital activity is extremely low. Before us in the novel appears a cold, cruel egoist who, in his proud loneliness, sometimes hates people. He plays them like pawns. For the sake of a capricious whim, without hesitation for a second, he tore Bela out of her usual environment and thereby ruined her life. And, most likely, death really became a deliverance for the poor girl. Makim Maksimych correctly says that Pechorin did not know what to do with her. He would, of course, "leave her sooner or later." And then what would happen to the girl? She, after all, fell in love with Pechorin.

Of course, I condemn Pechorin for the fact that he offended Maksim Maksimych, a good man and sincerely loving him. When we met, Pechorin did not find a single warm word for his old friend.

Thus, communication with Pechorin brings all those around him only disappointment, suffering, unhappiness. He destroyed the family life of Vera, grossly insulted the love and dignity of Princess Mary. Even the peace of the "honest smugglers" was disturbed by him for the sake of empty curiosity. Pechorin brings only pain and grief to the other heroes of the novel.

It would seem that neither the suffering nor the joy of others will ever hurt the feelings of Pechorin. But it is not so. For example, at the Ligovskys' evening he felt “sorry for Vera”. During the last meeting with Mary, there was such a moment when he almost fell at the girl's feet.

The situation with Grushnitsky is also interesting. Pechorin ruined him, And yet when comparing the protagonist with Grushnitsky, it is clear that Pechorin is not a scoundrel. Moreover, describing the conversation he overheard, the hero says that if Grushnitsky did not agree to participate in the conspiracy, he would "throw himself on his neck." However, he agreed, and "poisonous anger" filled Pechorin's soul. Here they are - the people surrounding the protagonist of the novel. First, they are sometimes worse than him. Pechorin is at least honest with himself and others, does not cheat, does not hide behind beautiful phrases. Secondly, the smart and honest Pechorin, probably not for the first time in his life, met with betrayal. Such an environment could not but harden him, not lead to disbelief in friends, in love. Another thing is that Pechorin does not look for good in people and does not value good people.

I condemn Pechorin for the fact that, having great inclinations by nature, he does not know where to put his strength and talents, he wastes them on worthless deeds and empty amusements. However, the position and fate of the "hero of the time" are perceived as tragic. He evokes sympathy for himself by the fact that he feels an acute dissatisfaction with himself, there is no self-satisfaction, narcissism in him. He is not satisfied with the surrounding reality, nor with his characteristic individualism and skepticism. He is constantly tormented by doubts. So, for example, Pechorin tells Maksim Maksimych that he has an "unhappy character", that he often becomes the cause of the misfortunes of others, but he himself is no less unhappy. He cannot help himself, although he understands that this is bad consolation for the people who have suffered because of him.

In my opinion, Pechorin would like some meaningful activity, but he does not find the use of his powers in the circumstances in which he lives. He was easily given sciences, but they quickly bored him, because he realized that nothing depends on his scholarship. He could enjoy life like the people of his circle, he could waste money, but he was disgusted with it. Most rich people, both then and now, would be quite happy with Pechorin's life.

Pechorin is an egoist, of course. He sometimes quite easily "steps over" people, disturbs their peace of mind, breaks their fates. And for that I blame him. But Pechorin is not just an egoist. He is selfish by choice, according to the circumstances that determine his character and actions. This is how he evokes sympathy for himself. In the image of Pechorin, Lermontov strove to show that the state of society caused Pechorin's skepticism and pessimism. Yes, Pechorin does not take into account his class, he judges society, sometimes without having the right to do so, since he himself is cruel to people. But he is dissatisfied with his aimless life, he has not found his ideal. And yet he asks himself the question: "Why do I live?" Pechorin judges himself, first of all, he is honest and this is what causes sympathy for himself.