The relationship between Bazarov and Arkady. Final friendship of the main characters

Arkady and Bazarov are very different people, and the friendship that has arisen between them is all the more surprising. Despite belonging to the same era, young people are very different. It must be taken into account that they initially belong to different circles of society. Arkady is the son of a nobleman, from early childhood he absorbed what Bazarov despises and denies in his nihilism. Kirsanov's father and uncle are intelligent people who value aesthetics, beauty and poetry. From the point of view of Bazarov, Arkady is a soft-hearted "barich", a weakling. Bazarov does not want to admit that the liberality of the Kirsanovs is the result of a deep education, artistic talent and high spirituality of nature. Bazarov denies such qualities as completely unnecessary. However, in this case, we are talking not only about intelligence, but also about the deep continuity of the experience of previous generations, about the preservation of traditions and the entire cultural heritage.

The family theme played a big role in Russian literature, so the demonstration of intra-family conflict turned out to be revolutionary. The integrity and harmony of society were measured by the unity of the family. Consequently, such problems turned out to be not just problems of the family, but also problems of the whole society.

Bazarov attracted Arkady with his sharpness, originality and courage. For a young "baric" such personalities were a curiosity. Arkady has become a kind of embodiment of youth, which is drawn to everything new and unusual, easily carried away by new ideas, has a keen interest in life in all its manifestations. Arkady is looking for his own life path by trial and error. His attitude to traditions, authorities and other things important to his father is rather frivolous. He lacks the wisdom of years, tolerance and attention to other people that his father has. The conflict between Arkady and Nikolai Petrovich does not carry any political beginning, it is cleared of social motives. Its essence is the eternal misunderstanding between youth and old age. However, this position is not at all contrary to the nature of things. On the contrary, old age is a guarantor of the preservation of moral values, cultural heritage and traditions in society. Youth, in turn, provides the movement of progress with its craving for everything new and unknown.

Evgeny Vasilyevich Bazarov is a completely different matter. He came from a simple family, he is even somewhat ashamed of his parents. He is harsh, at times rude, resolute, categorical in his judgments and peremptory in his conclusions. He quite sincerely believes that a good chemist is worth twenty poets. He does not understand the role of culture in society. He offers to destroy everything in order to start writing history anew from a clean slate. By this, he sometimes drives Pavel Petrovich, with whom he argues, into despair. We see the maximalism of both sides, taken to the extreme. Neither one nor the other is willing to give in to each other and recognize the correctness of the opponent. This is their main mistake. All parties are right up to a certain point. Pavel Petrovich is also right, speaking about the need to preserve the heritage of his ancestors, rights, and Bazarov, speaking about the need for change. Both sides are sides of the same coin. Both of them are sincerely concerned about the fate of their native country, but their methods are different.

The friendship of Bazarov and Arkady Kirsanov begins to crack when Bazarov falls in love with Odintsova, and Arkady with Katya. This is where their difference comes into play. If the feeling is hard for Bazarov, he cannot surrender to love, then Arkady and Katya learn to be themselves. Bazarov moves away from his friend, as if feeling his rightness, and not his own.

The image of Arkady was drawn in order to set off the image of Bazarov and show the versatility of human nature and the same social problem. This makes the image of Bazarov even more lonely and tragic. Bazarov is considered, like Rudin, Pechorin, Onegin and Oblomov, "an extra person." He has no place in this life, although such rebels always arise in troubled times.

In the novel by Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev, one can find examples of a wide variety of relationships between characters: romantic, platonic, family, friendly and hostile. Evgeny Bazarov is a very ambiguous person, evoking the love of some and the hatred of others. His relationship with Pavel Petrovich, his uncle - Yevgeny's friend, who invited him to stay at the Kirsanov family estate for the holidays) is especially interesting, since these seemingly complete opposites are not so unambiguously antagonistic.

The dispute between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich reveals new facets of each personality. Read more about the features of the characters of the two heroes and their relationship in this article.

Pavel Petrovich - a proud military man

In Pavel Petrovich, at first glance, a proud person is guessed. Even his costume reflects this. When the hero first appears before the reader, the narrator notes that he had long neat nails, that although he is no longer young, he still remains an attractive man, and that Pavel Petrovich carries himself with unchanging aristocratic elegance. And how interesting are the disputes between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich! The "table" of their relationship includes opposition even in appearance.

What are Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich arguing about?

While the narrator notices these conspicuous details, Bazarov immediately guesses in Pavel Petrovich a man who thinks too much of himself. In the eyes of Yevgeny Vasilyevich, his pride is unfounded and absurd. The dispute between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich, their confrontation, thus, begins with the very acquaintance of the characters.

As we learn a little more about this retired military man's past, we begin to better understand why he behaves the way he does. This military man was the favorite son of General Kirsanov and, in contrast to his brother Nikolai, was always a man of action. By the age of twenty-seven, Pyotr Petrovich was already a captain in the Russian army. He knew how to behave in high society and was popular with women. Thus, Pavel Petrovich from a young age got used to respect and admiration.

Rude young Bazarov from the very beginning was destined to become the antagonist of this man. They were united by extreme vanity, and, even without taking into account the fact that the opinions of the two heroes differed in everything, each saw a threat to himself in the image of the other. From the point of view of Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is a proud old man, into whom he himself can one day turn. In the eyes of the aristocrat, the young man was an arrogant upstart who had not yet earned the right to be so self-confident. Even before Pavel Petrovich knew anything about Bazarov, he began to dislike him because of his untidy appearance and too long hair.

After Arkady discovered that Bazarov is a nihilist and informed his uncle about this, Pavel Petrovich has a clue that can be used to justify his dislike for the guest. The nephew tries to argue, saying that a nihilist is one who critically evaluates all things, but Pavel Petrovich rejects this philosophy as a new fad of young people who do not recognize any authorities.

He compares this way of thinking with unfortunate examples from history, in particular with the ideas of supporters of Hegelian logic, and with the manner of a connoisseur says to Arkady: "Let's see how you will exist in the void, in Paul appeals to his experience and wisdom and speaks as if he already knows in advance that nihilism is a deeply vicious philosophy of youth.

Argument about principles. Views of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov

When Pavel Petrovich involves Bazarov in a dispute, he appeals to the English system of values. The main idea of ​​this aristocrat: "... that without self-esteem, without respect for oneself - and in an aristocrat these feelings are developed - there is no solid foundation for a public ... bien public, a public building." Thus, the retired military associates with aristocratic values, gradually developing this thought. So the dispute between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich continues.

On the other hand, in the discussion, he gradually moves to the absurdity of the existence of those who have no principles, and presents the enemy with a whole set of principles from high society, which he considers indisputable. Although Pavel Petrovich, perhaps, would begin to deny this, it is still important for him not just the presence or absence of values ​​as such. The presence or absence of aristocratic values ​​is more important. This is what Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich are arguing about.

As the plot develops, both the shortcomings and the virtues of this aristocrat clearly emerge. His military pride makes him challenge Bazarov in the form of a duel, which ends for Pavel Petrovich in a complete fiasco.

It's not just that the old aristocrat gets hurt, but that he had to explain to everyone that it was his fault.

However, the military's assertion that a person cannot live without values, and his sense of self-respect, is ultimately justified. We learn this mainly from the isolation and confusion that Bazarov's attempts to find his place in the world lead to. Arkady, who was not endowed with such a strong will, but at the same time was not so devoted to traditional values, arranges his life quite happily. Almost without remembering himself, Eugene follows the path of a retired military man and becomes entangled in his failed love. The dispute between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich seems somewhat absurd at this moment, because the life lines of the heroes and their behavior turn out to be so similar ...

History of Pavel Petrovich

When Bazarov begins to laugh at Pavel Petrovich, Arkady decides to tell him the story of his uncle, in the hope that this story will arouse sympathy in his friend. We learn that unsuccessful love played a big role in the life of Pavel Petrovich. He fell head over heels in love with a mysterious woman named Princess R. Pavel Petrovich courted her, and after he succeeded, his obsession with the princess only increased.

Rejected lover

When his beloved ran away from Paul and her family, Paul resigned and followed her. He was ashamed of his behavior, but her image sunk into Pavel Petrovich's soul too much, and he could not get it out of his head. It is not clear what exactly attracted the military princess R. Perhaps, by her mystery, by the fact that it was impossible to fully understand or conquer her.

In Baden, Pavel Petrovich managed to meet her, but a few months later the princess ran away again. After that, he returned to Russia and did his best to play his former role in society, although he did it without his former enthusiasm. After Pavel Petrovich heard that the princess had died in Paris in a state close to insanity, he gradually lost interest in life and stopped doing anything.

The Irony of Fate

Bazarov did not like this story. He believed that it was not masculine to give up after being defeated on the love front, and suggested that Paul spent the rest of his days teaching young people, and could not do anything worthwhile with his own life.

By an evil irony of fate, Bazarov subsequently, like a former military man, becomes obsessed with Anna Sergeevna and cannot cope with this feeling and accept the fact that he was rejected.

However, the disputes between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich do not stop there. Who is right?

Hidden motives

When we meet Pavel Petrovich, the narrator describes him like this: "A lonely bachelor entered that troubled, twilight time, a time of regrets, similar to hopes, and hopes, similar to regrets, when youth has passed, and old age has not yet come." The vague feeling of despair that owned the hero can explain many of his actions. It also explains why he clung so desperately to his pride and his family, since there was nothing else to cling to.

As the story progresses, the softer side of the elderly aristocrat is revealed to us. Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich, the dispute between which never stopped, of course, were enemies. However, the real reason for his duel with Bazarov was that he wanted to defend his brother's honor, not his own. His last wish was for Nikolai to marry Fenechka and be happy.

Although Paul was unable to achieve his own happiness, he tries to make those around him happy. The hero lives the life of a brother, but still cannot forget the betrayal of Princess R. and become happy. He doesn't choose to be unhappy, he just can't help it.

The attraction of Bazarov

The strength and weakness of Bazarov's position in the dispute with Pavel Petrovich are present at the same time. It is easy to condemn Eugene. He thinks he is the best. He is rude. Eugene does not recognize any of those things that fill our lives with meaning (love, for example). Bazarov's disputes with Pavel Petrovich sometimes cause bewilderment. At times, Eugene is so stubborn that he is completely unable to admit his own wrong. But still...

Bazarov inspires. For the first time we see him with the admiring eyes of Arkady, and later we learn that his friend is just one of his students. As soon as these two move away from each other, we begin to see Bazarov in a more objective light, to see him as a born leader. He is a powerful, dignified person. When Yevgeny Vasilievich says to Pavel Petrovich: "At the present time, denial is the most useful - we deny," the reader cannot help but succumb to the power of these words and this person.

This topic is discussed in great detail in the dispute between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich. The topics of their disputes cannot be covered in one article. We recommend that you refer to the original source for a deeper understanding. The lines of dispute between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Kirsanov can thus be continued.

Final scene

Turgenev himself admired the strong, almost magnetic personality of Bazarov. He admitted that he cried when he described the scene of the death of Yevgeny Vasilyevich. The character of Bazarov is fully revealed in this final scene. He's not just a haughty young upstart. This man was really talented and wanted to do something great with his life.

Looking into his past, Bazarov thinks: “And I, too, thought: I’ll break off a lot of things, I won’t die, where! There is a task, because I’m a giant!” Although he does not show the fear of death, yet its approach makes Eugene feel his own insignificance, and not just talk about it. However, in the end, the fact that Bazarov is not remorseful is what makes his character so compelling. Eugene is the epitome of audacious youth with its delusion that we will never die. After all, why should we die?

Is there any benefit in denial?

When the novel "Fathers and Sons" was first published in 1862, Turgenev was severely criticized by the younger generation, because the youth believed that Bazarov's character was a parody of her. Of course, Ivan Sergeevich did not have such an intention when creating the work, but at times Evgeny really resembles a parody, but not of youth in general, but of himself. One involuntarily recalls the sharpness of a retired military man, launched into his address: "He does not believe in principles, but he believes in frogs." Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov in an ideological dispute reveal both their strengths and weaknesses.

Bazarov has a complex character. It is impossible to put forward a simple argument against him, but Eugene was deeply mistaken. Perhaps it is his shortcomings, rather than what makes the character of this young nihilist so interesting and convincing.

Analysis of the scene of the conversation between Bazarov and Arkady under a haystack

in the work of I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"

In the middle of the 19th century, a large number of progressive youth appeared in Russia, and the eternal conflict between "fathers and sons" escalated. At this critical time, I.S. Turgenev wrote his novel “Fathers and Sons”. In the composition of the work, Bazarov’s conversation with Arkady under a haystack occupies one of the key places. It is here that Bazarov expresses his attitude to life, death, the essence of being.

Evgeny pronounces the following monologue here: “The narrow place that I occupy is so tiny in comparison with the rest of the space where I am not there and I don’t care, and the part of the time that I will be able to live is so negligible before eternity, where I am not was and never will be... And in this atom, in this mathematical point, the blood circulates, the brain works, it wants something too... What kind of disgrace? What kind of trifles?" Thus, all philosophy, all revolutionary ideas suddenly turn out to be only a special case, a speck of dust in the face of eternity.

Being under the influence of elemental feelings, Bazarov felt the insignificance of human existence before eternity. From the microscope, he was drawn to the telescope, looking at the sky, although he himself, mocking the romantics, said that he looked at the sky only when he wanted to sneeze.

Bazarov reflects on human insignificance in front of the endless cosmos. He is not comforted by the judgment of man as a "thinking reed" who, the only one of all creatures on earth, is given to realize the greatness of the Universe and his own insignificance before it. Thus begins Bazarov's rebellion against the very foundations of being. The fatal questions of spontaneity and drama, love and knowledge, the meaning of life and the mystery of death now do not receive an answer for the hero in the studies of the natural sciences, it is no accident that he is drawn to philosophy. The former view of man as an unchanging biological entity has now turned out to be powerless in the face of the complexity of human existence. Feeling his insignificance in front of nature, space, Bazarov reconsiders his attitude to social progress, as evidenced by his tirade about burdock.

Bazarov felt the absurdity of being, the insignificance of man in front of the elemental forces of nature. Eugene's rebellion is his anger, irritability, his constant thoughts about death. This explains the behavior similar to the risky movement near the abyss, the "abyss". The hero loses the sense of permissibility, wants to look beyond the line beyond which a mere mortal cannot look.

Bazarov begins to think about human weakness before the blind forces of nature, about the inevitability of death, thoughts about which in a new way allow us to evaluate the essence of human life. Before us is another person, not the former cold nihilist who was eager to fight, "to break more firewood", to rebuild the world for himself. The new Bazarov begins to think about the mystery of life, and it is not explained by any materialistic theories.

After its publication in 1862, Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" caused a flurry of critical articles. None of the public camps accepted Turgenev's new creation. Liberal criticism could not forgive the writer for the fact that representatives of the aristocracy, hereditary nobles are depicted ironically, that the “plebeian” Bazarov constantly mocks them and is morally superior to them. Democrats perceived the protagonist of the novel as an evil parody. The critic Antonovich, who collaborated in the Sovremennik magazine, called Bazarov "an asmodeus of our time."

But all these facts, it seems to me, just speak in favor of I. S. Turgenev. As a real artist, creator, he was able to guess the trends of the era, the emergence of a new type, the type of democrat-raznochintsy, who replaced the advanced nobility.

The main problem posed by the writer in the novel already sounds in its title: “Fathers and Sons”. This name has a double meaning. On the one hand, this is a problem of generations - the eternal problem of classical literature, on the other - the conflict of two socio-political forces that operated in Russia in the 60s: liberals and democrats.

The characters of the novel are grouped depending on which of the socio-political groups we can attribute them to.

But the fact is that the protagonist of the novel, Yevgeny Bazarov, turns out to be the only representative of the “children” camp, the camp of democrats-raznochintsev. All other heroes are in a hostile camp.

The central place in the novel is occupied by the figure of a new person - Evgeny Bazarov. He is presented as one of those young people who "want to fight". Others are people of the older generation who do not share Bazarov's revolutionary democratic convictions. They are depicted as small, weak-willed people, with narrow, limited interests. The novel presents nobles and raznochintsy of two generations - “fathers” and “children”. Turgenev shows how a raznochinets democrat operates in an environment alien to him.

In Maryina, Bazarov is a guest who differs in his democratic appearance from the landlords. And he disagrees with Arkady in the main thing - in the idea of ​​\u200b\u200blife, although at first they are considered friends. But their relationship still cannot be called friendship, because friendship is impossible without mutual understanding, friendship cannot be based on the subordination of one to the other. Throughout the novel, the subordination of a weak nature to a stronger one is observed: Arkady - Bazarov. But still, Arkady gradually acquired his own opinion and ceased to blindly repeat after Bazarov the judgments and opinions of the nihilist. In disputes, he does not stand up and expresses his own thoughts. One day, their argument came close to a fight. The difference between the heroes is visible in their behavior on the Kirsanov estate. Bazarov is engaged in work, studying nature, and Arkady is sybaritic, doing nothing. The fact that Bazarov is a man of action is immediately evident from his red bare hand. Yes, indeed, in any situation, in any home, he tries to do business. His main business is the natural sciences, the study of nature and the verification of theoretical discoveries in practice. Passion for science is a typical feature of the cultural life of Russia in the 60s, which means that Bazarov keeps up with the times. Arkady is the complete opposite. He does nothing, none of the serious cases really captivates him. For him, the main thing is comfort and peace, but for Bazarov - not to sit back, work, move.

They have a completely different attitude towards art. Bazarov denies Pushkin, and unreasonably. Arkady tries to prove to him the greatness of the poet. Arkady is always neat, tidy, well dressed, he has aristocratic manners. Bazarov, on the other hand, does not consider it necessary to observe the rules of good manners, which are so important in the life of the nobility. This is reflected in all his actions, in habits, manners, speeches, in appearance.

A serious disagreement arose between friends in a conversation about the role of nature in human life. Arkady's resistance to Bazarov's views is already visible here, gradually the "student" is getting out of the power of the "teacher".

Bazarov hates many, but Arkady has no enemies. “You, gentle soul, are a weakling,” says Bazarov, realizing that Arkady can no longer be his associate. A “disciple” cannot live without principles. In this he is very close to his liberal father and Pavel Petrovich. But Bazarov appears before us as a man of a new generation, who replaced the "fathers" who were unable to solve the main problems of the era. Arkady is a man belonging to the old generation, the generation of the “fathers”.

Pisarev very accurately assesses the reasons for the disagreements between the “student” and the “teacher” - between Arkady and Bazarov: “Bazarov’s attitude towards his comrade casts a bright streak of light on his character; Bazarov has no friend, because he has not yet met a person who would not give in to him. Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are almost no elements related to it at all.

Arkady wants to be the son of his age and "puts on" Bazarov's ideas, which definitely cannot grow together with him. He belongs to the category of people who are always guarded and never notice guardianship over themselves. Bazarov treats him patronizingly and almost always mockingly, he understands that their paths will diverge.

After its publication in 1862, Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" caused a flurry of critical articles. None of the public camps accepted Turgenev's new creation. Liberal criticism could not forgive the writer for the fact that representatives of the aristocracy, hereditary nobles are depicted ironically, that the “plebeian” Bazarov constantly mocks them and is morally superior to them. Democrats perceived the protagonist of the novel as an evil parody. The critic Antonovich, who collaborated in the Sovremennik magazine, called Bazarov "an asmodeus of our time."
But all these facts, it seems to me, just speak in favor of I. S. Turgenev. As a real artist, creator, he was able to guess the trends of the era, the emergence of a new type, the type of democrat-raznochintsy, who replaced the advanced nobility.
The main problem posed by the writer in the novel already sounds in its title: “Fathers and Sons”. This name has a double meaning. On the one hand, this is a problem of generations - the eternal problem of classical literature, on the other - the conflict of two socio-political forces that operated in Russia in the 60s: liberals and democrats.
The characters of the novel are grouped depending on which of the socio-political groups we can attribute them to.
But the fact is that the protagonist of the novel, Yevgeny Bazarov, turns out to be the only representative of the “children” camp, the camp of democrats-raznochintsev. All other heroes are in a hostile camp.
The central place in the novel is occupied by the figure of a new person - Evgeny Bazarov. He is presented as one of those young people who "want to fight". Others are people of the older generation who do not share Bazarov's revolutionary democratic convictions. They are depicted as small, weak-willed people, with narrow, limited interests. The novel presents nobles and raznochintsy of two generations - “fathers” and “children”. Turgenev shows how a raznochinets democrat operates in an environment alien to him.
In Maryina, Bazarov is a guest who differs in his democratic appearance from the landlords. And he disagrees with Arkady in the main thing - in the idea of ​​\u200b\u200blife, although at first they are considered friends. But their relationship still cannot be called friendship, because friendship is impossible without mutual understanding, friendship cannot be based on the subordination of one to the other. Throughout the novel, the subordination of a weak nature to a stronger one is observed: Arkady - Bazarov. But still, Arkady gradually acquired his own opinion and ceased to blindly repeat after Bazarov the judgments and opinions of the nihilist. In disputes, he does not stand up and expresses his own thoughts. One day, their argument came close to a fight. The difference between the heroes is visible in their behavior on the Kirsanov estate. Bazarov is engaged in work, studying nature, and Arkady is sybaritic, doing nothing. The fact that Bazarov is a man of action is immediately evident from his red bare hand. Yes, indeed, in any situation, in any home, he tries to do business. His main business is the natural sciences, the study of nature and the verification of theoretical discoveries in practice. Passion for science is a typical feature of the cultural life of Russia in the 60s, which means that Bazarov keeps up with the times. Arkady is the complete opposite. He does nothing, none of the serious cases really captivates him. For him, the main thing is comfort and peace, but for Bazarov - not to sit back, work, move.
They have a completely different attitude towards art. Bazarov denies Pushkin, and unreasonably. Arkady tries to prove to him the greatness of the poet. Arkady is always neat, tidy, well dressed, he has aristocratic manners. Bazarov, on the other hand, does not consider it necessary to observe the rules of good manners, which are so important in the life of the nobility. This is reflected in all his actions, in habits, manners, speeches, in appearance.
A serious disagreement arose between friends in a conversation about the role of nature in human life. Arkady's resistance to Bazarov's views is already visible here, gradually the "student" is getting out of the power of the "teacher".
Bazarov hates many, but Arkady has no enemies. “You, gentle soul, are a weakling,” says Bazarov, realizing that Arkady can no longer be his associate. A “disciple” cannot live without principles. In this he is very close to his liberal father and Pavel Petrovich. But Bazarov appears before us as a man of a new generation, who replaced the "fathers" who were unable to solve the main problems of the era. Arkady is a man belonging to the old generation, the generation of the “fathers”.
Pisarev very accurately assesses the reasons for the disagreements between the “student” and the “teacher” - between Arkady and Bazarov: “Bazarov’s attitude towards his comrade casts a bright streak of light on his character; Bazarov has no friend, because he has not yet met a person who would not give in to him. Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are almost no elements related to it at all.
Arkady wants to be the son of his age and "puts on" Bazarov's ideas, which definitely cannot grow together with him. He belongs to the category of people who are always guarded and never notice guardianship over themselves. Bazarov treats him patronizingly and almost always mockingly, he understands that their paths will diverge.