Why Malakhov left the first channel: the latest news. The real reason for the dismissal of Malakhov from the first channel Opinion of Andrey Malakhov

Why Malakhov left the first channel: the latest news.  The real reason for the dismissal of Malakhov from the first channel Opinion of Andrey Malakhov
Why Malakhov left the first channel: the latest news. The real reason for the dismissal of Malakhov from the first channel Opinion of Andrey Malakhov

Almost all viewers are already aware that now the TV journalist has become the host of the Live TV program. Earlier, as you know, he hosted the talk show "Let them talk."

Channel "Russia 1" updated the program, and now it is called "Andrey Malakhov. Live". Moreover, Malakhov became not only her presenter, but also a producer. Moreover, this was not all, and he will also host the author's TV show "Tonight". The TV journalist wrote about this on his page on the Instagram social network.

The devoted fans of the TV journalist again began to wish him success in new TV shows and promised to watch all the TV programs that he leads without fail, and it does not matter to them which channel will broadcast them.

Relatively recently, the presenter Andrei Malakhov explained the reasons why he left Channel One, where he worked for 25 years. On the website of his own publication Starhit, he published an open farewell address to his colleagues on Channel One. In his publication, he not only explained the reasons for his important decision, but also expressed his gratitude to each employee.

From the words of Malakhov, when he turned forty-five, he understood that he needed to go beyond the standard framework, strive for something new, and move forward.

An additional impetus was the transfer of the program to another studio.

According to the TV presenter, they called him and made a tempting offer to conduct a program where he himself would decide what and how to do, and not carry out the tasks of the leadership.

In his farewell letter to Channel One, he thanked all employees for their common, team work and for the experience gained.

Later, in one of his interviews, he said that Channel One gradually began to "destroy" what he had been building for so long and everything that was dear to him.

"Despite the desire to leave the project, I brought the season to the end, and only then said goodbye."

Rumors that Andrei Malakhov left Channel One because of the appearance of Natalia Novikova, the TV presenter himself refused to comment on.

There were various rumors in society about the reason for Malakhov's departure from the channel: conflicts with the leadership, unstable payment of money, the appearance of Novikova and others.

Andrei said that the salary for "Russia 1" is exactly the same as it was there.

“If you have been observing me and my career growth for a long time, then you know that it is unusual for me to change something and I never wanted especially new changes, but this time everything happens differently,” Itartass-sib reports. And I am grateful to fate that it is supportive of me and helps me in this, ”continues Malakhov.

Finishing the story with a little story.

You know, my presence on the First can be described as follows: “It's like the first love, at first you enjoy what is happening, and then it develops into a habit and dullness, which does not surprise, does not inspire and does not even give an incentive to go further. People with less experience, than I have been running their projects for a long time, but as I was and remained an errand boy. "

Andrey Malazov, latest news: Malakhov is losing ratings

The famous Russian actor Nikolai Burlyaev, "having clicked on all 40 TV channels, could not continue to watch and turned off the TV." He is worried that now on the blue screen "moral values ​​and patriotism are not in vogue," he is quoted by EG.

The artist has already talked with Malakhov and Korchevnikov more than once, asking them questions why they are digging in dirty linen, for which they pull it out on screens every evening. And in response I heard the same thing - "People are watching."

After the personnel reshuffle on the "first button", many wondered who would take the main place on the "Let the Talk" program and where the presenter himself would go. They even talked about Malakhov's maternity leave. And he replaced Boris Korchevnikov in the "Live" talk show.

All the rumors about the fate of the two TV presenters have significantly increased the ratings of the channels. But for how long.

"Live" in Russia on Monday collected a rating of 5.1% and an audience share of 20.8%, on Tuesday - 3.2% and 13.7%, respectively, on Wednesday - 3.2% and 14.1%. Information on Thursday is not yet available.

Let them talk ratings have indeed dropped in recent years, but not too much. For example, in April 2017, according to the analytical service Mediascope, the rating of the program was 6.2% with a share of 18%. The year before, in April 2016, the rating was 6.8% with a share of 20.8%. The rating and share of the program on the Diana Shurygina case amounted to 7.1% and 19.6%, respectively. At the same time, on the YouTube channel "Let Them Talk" is released more than 17 million times.

“Today we were supposed to have filmed Live TV for the first time after the summer holidays, but they were not there, because Boris Korchevnikov was not there. And everyone is talking about Malakhov, who will take his place, ”said a representative of the country's main television channel.

Passions around Andrei Malakhov do not subside. They just dissuaded them on the topic “Let them talk” and Andrey’s scandalous transition to the channel “Russia”, they were only glad that Malakhov and his wife Natalya would become parents. Suddenly - a new story. As the organizers of the competition told us, Andrey will become the host of one of the concerts that will take place within the framework of the "New Wave" (details).

Today Ksenia Sobchak is the most discussed figure in the Russian show business. The editor-in-chief of LʼOfficiel Russia magazine announced last week that she intends to run for the presidency of the Russian Federation in 2018. Now journalists sleep and see how to interview a TV presenter. So, yesterday Ksenia appeared on the air of the "Live" show. She talked with Andrei Malakhov about the upcoming elections, and also told the whole country why Andrei left Channel One.

Ivan noticed that, in fact, Mitya was going to leave Channel One, but he chose a very unfortunate moment for this, since all attention was focused on the story with the “Let them talk” star. Urgant named layoffs leading First“The great outcome”: “The outcome, when Andrei Malakhov brought out two more leaders (Alexander Oleshko and Timur Kizyakov. - Ed.). And this despite the fact that all the Jews, as it were, remained on the channel. "

Why Malakhov left Channel 1 what is the reason. Breaking news.

“In our digital era, the epistolary genre is rarely addressed, but I came to Channel One in the last century, when people were still writing to each other. letters, not SMS. Therefore, forgive me for such a long message. I dare to hope that you know the real reasons for my unexpected transfer to Russia 1, where I will host the new program Andrey Malakhov. Live ", engage in Saturday shows and other projects," the Starhit website quotes the text of the letter.

Malakhovgate is entering ever new orbits, coloring the bleak television landscape of August. Recall the host of the show Channel One“Let them talk” Andrei Malakhov leaves Channel One with a scandal. Officially, the parties are known to be silent. But unofficially they frolic to the fullest, honing their wit. (details).

“I did not comment on your recent video against the background of the castle, because if money were in the first place in this story, my transfer, as you can imagine, would have happened nine years ago,” Malakhov said in particular.

“Nikonova is a professional, of which there are few. At the First, she developed a stormy activity, seizing the reins of control of the Malakhov program, and even offering the management of ideas for new projects, including the recently launched show by Dmitry Shepelev, "the Komsomolskaya Pravda website quotes an employee of the First.

But the reason for Malakhov's departure from Channel One, again on the basis of rumors, is the conflict with the new producer “Let them talk”. Rumor has it that Andrei simply did not want to turn his show into a political project, because he believes that people are interested in ordinary human stories.

Malakhov left channel 1 for 2. Last details.

“Well, have you lost me? I'm here: Andrei Malakhov, Live broadcast, Russia TV channel, ”the presenter said in the video.

After Malakhov, the team of editors moved to the second button, which prepared all the high-profile broadcasts - looking for stories, topics, twists and turns. The most scandalous heroes, among whom, by the way, Diana Shurygina and Dana Borisova, will also "move" to competitors.

Malakhov left video channel 1. Breaking news.



Work on Channel One proceeded as usual: smoothly and harmoniously, and there was no information that Malakhov was leaving for another job because of some kind of conflict. A few days later, Andrei Malakhov put forward a refutation of this rumor, telling in a short interview about why he is not going to go anywhere and continues to work on Channel One as usual. That the channel is undergoing technical work and some changes, due to which his project temporarily stopped appearing on television screens.

At the same time, the TV presenter with Tina Kandelaki pranked the audience, spreading the rumor that Malakhov was going to become one of the commentators of the Match-TV channel. The result of a joint effort and a couple of comments under the clumsy edited photo was waves of indignation from the fans and the expectation of the "worst".

  • What really happened
  • Andrey Malakhov's opinion
  • Friends support

What really happened

In October 2017, the news that Malakhov was still leaving Channel One, replacing it with Russia-1, was confirmed by both the TV presenter and his employers. The audience received the answer to their questions quite recently. The ambitious presenter, who had 25 years of experience, was prompted to change the place of work by an interesting proposal to become a participant in a new project. He will now be the face of the game show The Wall.




The unique program will reveal the destinies of brilliant and ambitious people who, unable to earn big money, are building the future of their beloved country. Their stories will reveal the background of events in which little people doing small things improve the quality of our lives. It was such an interesting program that caused the change of place of work.

Andrey Malakhov's opinion

In the modern world, there are no longer such barbaric methods as poaching famous stars of TV shows and programs with the help of promises of higher fees and increased bonuses. Ambitious presenters with big names independently choose the place where they are comfortable working. That is why it is impossible to say that Malakhov, having decided to leave, encroached on a financially more profitable offer than on Channel One.

He just got tired of acting in the usual and already annoying role of a TV presenter, who acts in the same type of programs and talk shows. Therefore, the offer to participate in a new project in which he can develop as a person and explore what is really interesting to him became the main criterion in choosing a new place of work.




In recent years, Malakhov regarded his work in the Let the Speak project as a tender in which the one who pays the most wins. To take a scandalous, shocking interview, he had to persuade people to take part in this show, deliberately pulling into the thick of not always pleasant events. He had to bribe celebrities in various ways, which Malakhov did not like at all, because his character does not allow him to overstep certain principles. But the show regularly demanded to make deals with oneself.

Now Andrei Malakhov does not need to sacrifice his precious time and go against his moral principles in order to create a unique and amazing show. It is enough for him to tell the truth, talking about people who, with their discoveries and inventions, make the world a better place, embodying their innermost dreams in it.

Friends support

Quite often it happens that a TV presenter who runs his project on one channel takes with him all the developments and the command staff. Malakhov, choosing the show "The Wall", did the same. But convincing others of the correctness of the decision was not as easy as it seemed initially. After all, his team is used to working at a certain, measured pace and mode in the program "Let them talk." Not all employees wanted to change their place of work and, accordingly, life. Innovations and changes are not to everyone's liking and not always.

The episode was never aired, and Ernst threw me out from the first. But I still publish this program in an abridged version and in text. The main meaning of the transmission is conveyed correctly.

Why do pharmacies offer outdated and dangerous medicines, while hiding from people the truth about the new drug from the Research Institute of Rheumatology. VA Nasonova, which is distributed at the expense of the budget of the research institute. How is it that the drugstore mafia makes hundreds of millions for the health of people, ruining their eyesight?

For a conversation, we invited the chief specialist of the research institute, Lyudmila Antonova, to the studio.

Andrey Malakhov: "Lyudmila Viktorovna, how do you assess the situation with the risk of diseases associated with vision?"

Lyudmila Antonova : Many people think that poor vision is not a very dangerous type of disease, which threatens only with the loss of part of the image. This is a fundamentally wrong opinion. Poor and fuzzy vision with age or with pathology is extremely dangerous and even at an early stage of development, can kill a person and make him blind. At first, any vision disease is a precancerous disease. Even at an early stage, conjunctivitis can lead to cancerous growth. Most often it is bone marrow cancer or blood cancer. Both are extremely difficult to heal and deadly. This is perhaps the most underestimated in terms of its danger complication arising in people with sick and poor eyesight. Secondly, Blurred vision often leads a person to go blind completely. Suddenly no longer seeing any of the eyes, distant images or near ones are not visible - this is a very common complication that occurs in many patients. To be blinded condemns the patient to essentially existence as an "intelligent vegetable." Which is not much different from death. Thirdly, a banal decrease in visual acuity can completely "close" vision and cause complications of any organ - from the liver to the heart. The brain is the heart of the central nervous system. And if it is violated, there are malfunctions in the work of internal organs, which can lead to a wide variety of complications.

Andrey Malakhov: "That is, everyone who has poor and fuzzy eyesight is in danger?"

Lyudmila Antonova : Among specialists, vision diseases are considered one of the most dangerous. Unlike many other diseases that arise in humans, they do not lead to some temporary health problems, but develop only incrementally, gradually bringing the person to the grave.

Vision diseases are the cause of millions of people with blindness. It's like a time bomb that doesn't necessarily go off right away, but with a 100% chance of exploding sooner or later. In addition, the situation with poor vision is such that at the first stage the patient cannot distinguish the disease from the usual symptoms that come with age. He realizes the problem when the disease has already gone through the body and it is essentially too late to cure it.

Every year in Russia, hundreds of thousands of people go blind from reduced visual acuity, provoked precisely by diseases with age. Each of them suffers terribly. Patients over 40 are in a special risk zone.

Worst of all, until recently there was no effective way to prevent the onset of blindness. If a person had a disease in a moderate or severe stage, then the maximum that medicine could offer him were drugs that relieve symptoms. No more.

Andrey Malakhov: “How are diseases associated with vision treated now? "

Lyudmila Antonova : In most cases, patients are offered treatment with chondoprotectors and other drugs that, with the best result, can slow down the development of a particular disease, nothing more. In some cases, people are treated with injections or surgery.

The first option (chondoprotectors and other pills) is essentially useless. The second and third are extremely dangerous. Injections can only remove pain and slightly increase clarity, while in no way affecting the disease itself.

As a result, a person will see better by 15 percent and thinks that everything is in order, while a retinal disease may already develop in the body. And operations on the retina in general very often end in disability or other serious complications. They are shown to be carried out only in the most extreme cases.

It is precisely because of the low efficiency of the classical approach to treatment that the minds of specialists have always been occupied with the development of a drug that can really treat vision and restore health to people. At the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute, we have created the first of its kind medicine that can really restore vision.

Andrey Malakhov: "Can you tell us about him?"

Lyudmila Antonova : Of course. This is "Optivision" - a unique drug that has no analogues both abroad and in Russia.

At the moment, Optivision has undergone clinical trials and has shown extremely high performance indicators. It helps even in advanced and severe cases, restoring vision and returning to a healthy mood. According to its indicators, the medicine is unique. No other drug can effectively restore poor vision by returning a person to a completely healthy state.

In addition to Russia, he has successfully completed clinical trials in Switzerland and the USA. But until we provide them with the entire population of Russia, it will be available only within the country.

Andrey Malakhov: “How did it happen that such a drug is not allowed in pharmacies? "

Lyudmila Antonova : The fact is that the research institute is not engaged in commercial activities. AND we do not sell the drug, but distribute it for a purely symbolic price, within the framework of a special program. This is precisely the main conflict with pharmacy chains. They want to make money on sick people, squeezing the maximum out of them, even old and ineffective drugs, such as Blueberry Forte, are ideal for this. While our drug not only solves the problem forever, it is also distributed virtually free of charge.

However, we found a way out - the specialists of the research institute created a special site where you can leave a request for "Optivision" and get it. All you need to do is just leave your name and contact details. After that, you will be contacted to clarify a convenient delivery time. We tried to make everything as simple as possible so that everyone can get the medicine, even if they have not ordered anything via the Internet before.

Andrey Malakhov: “Besides you, Viktor Sedelnikov, the chief ophthalmologist of Russia, is present in the studio today. A question for you Viktor Fedorovich - why is it that a unique medicine created in Russia and distributed at such a price does not reach the population? "

Victor Sedelnikov Andrei, I want to note that despite the position, the chief ophthalmologist is mainly engaged in the coordination of scientific research and strategic issues. I have no influence on commercial pharmacy chains. All I can do is recommend a drug to them.

Of course, "Optivision" was recommended from my side. Actually, the entire scientific community understands what a colossal breakthrough in the field of vision treatment has been made. To my deep regret, the pharmacy chains did not react in any way. Which is generally understandable and logical, since in the event of a massive distribution of the drug, they will incur multimillion-dollar losses.

We are currently working on the issue of distributing Optivision through government clinics and hospitals. True, there are bureaucratic troubles, but I hope that the issue will be resolved within the next 10-12 months.

Andrey Malakhov: “It turns out that at least another year will pass before Optivision appears in clinics. What should people do until doctors see him? "

Victor Sedelnikov : The research institute has an official website for the project, where everyone can leave an application and receive "Optivision drops". So far, the only way out is to use it. Moreover, as far as I understand, they deliver the drug very quickly and are able to reach any number of people.

Lyudmila Antonova : A small remark about "any number of people." At the moment, the research institute does not have enough production volumes in order to cover the entire country. Therefore, we alternately conduct promotions in different regions of the Russian Federation. At the current time, the drug can be obtained not only in the city of Moscow, but also throughout Russia. There the program will be valid until November 25, 2018.

Andrey Malakhov: “What can you say goodbye to our viewers? "

Lyudmila Antonova : I want to draw the attention of readers that diseases of vision and retina are "getting younger", as many people began to spend their time in front of the monitor and on the phone. You don't have to wait until bone marrow cancer appears or your visual acuity drops and you just wait for your blindness.

Important! It was concluded that October and November are the best times to start treating eye diseases. Due to the stabilization of the average temperature, the metabolism is accelerated, the blood circulation in the body increases, the flow of blood and oxygen to the internal organs increases, the effect of using the drug increases. Recovery from blurred vision, and also associated diseases, occurs 67% faster than it would happen at other times of the year. The restoration of body functions occurs 100% during the entire course of treatment.