Dmitry Shepelev will check the stars with a lie detector. The lie detector confirmed that Dmitry Shepelev did not spend the money of Rusfond: the TV presenter was asked sharp questions in the studio “Let them say Has the lie detector passed the lie detector father of Jeanne Friske

19/06/2017 - 20:33

On Channel One, they again recalled the story of Zhanna Friske, who died of cancer two years ago, on June 15. Until now, the scandal between Zhanna's civil husband and his parents has not subsided, and in the program “Let them talk” Andrei Malakhov decided to put an end to it.

The loud scandal after the death of the singer Zhanna Friske has not subsided for two years now. The 20 million that disappeared without a trace, collected by a charitable foundation, litigation between Shepelev and the parents of Jeanne and the son of Platon, who at such a young age was left without a mother. The whole country is watching the continuation of this story and is waiting for the end of the epic between Jeanne's relatives. On the talk show "Let them talk" put an end to this high-profile case - Dmitry Shepelev and Zhanna's father passed the lie detector.

I’ll tell you how it was "Really", so that I will never come back to it. Today at 19:50. First channel. Publication from Dmitry Shepelev (@dmitryshepelev) Jun 19 2017 at 5:19 PDT

An end was also put in the trial of Rusfond, which for almost 2 years was looking for 20 million rubles, which were missing after Zhanna's death, which the whole country collected for the singer for treatment. The court's decision is as follows - the debt in the amount of 21 million is divided between Vladimir and Olga, Jeanne's parents and her son Plato.

I am glad that in the Rusfond case there were dotted and dots. Alas, the court decided to collect 21 million rubles from the heirs: Jeanne's parents and our son Plato. On the other hand, it is good that no one else has any doubts about who took the charitable money. Neither I nor my son, of course, touched this money, because they did not have access to charitable accounts. I feel a tremendous relief - it is very difficult to live for two years surrounded by speculation. My conscience is clear and my reputation has been restored. In court, evidence was presented that the collected charitable funds a few weeks before Zhanna's death were withdrawn from the account by her mother Olga Friske. Obviously, it is impossible to spend this money in a few days on the treatment of an already hopelessly sick, dying person. I do not know how they were spent. It is paradoxical that the court did not qualify these actions in any way, I don’t know how to call it other than theft. I do not understand. The main thing, in my opinion, is that Plato should not be responsible for this. I understand how important this business is for the charitable movement in Russia and I am glad that the reputation of the RusFond charitable foundation has been restored. But as a father, I am indignant, because the bargaining chip in this terrible and shameful story is my only son, who received debts and endless gossip after his deceased mother. I will continue to fight for the only important thing for me in this situation - the well-being and peace of my son and, of course, I will appeal this court decision. Publication from Dmitry Shepelev (@dmitryshepelev) May 19 2017 at 11:48 PDT

Dmitry Shepelev returns to Channel One. According to some media outlets, the former producers of the "Live" talk show are launching a new program. It is reported that this will be a psychological program in which close people sort things out, and the presenter checks the truth of their words on a lie detector. Presumably, the creators of the program have already filmed a pilot episode, reports Starhit. So far, Dmitry Shepelev himself has not commented on the information in any way.

ON THIS TOPIC

Note that the idea of ​​such a talk show is not new. Similar programs have already appeared on Russian television several times. For example, several years ago, Channel One was broadcasting the Lie Detector program, hosted by the notorious Andrei Malakhov.

Earlier, there were rumors in the media that Dmitry Shepelev would take the place of Boris Korchevnikov in his "Live" program. Dmitry himself commented on the information on his Instagram. "Well. It seems my long" vacation "has come to an end. Here is a new presenter of the program" Live "on the TV channel" Russia ". The start is already in March, - wrote Dmitry. - Who, if not me? :-)". However, until now, the show is still hosted by Korchevnikov. Shepelev has not yet been seen in the program.

Publication from Dmitry Shepelev (@dmitryshepelev) Feb 8 2017 at 3:33 PST

But back in February it was announced that Boris was leaving the "Live" talk show. Informed sources named the host's personal circumstances and health problems as possible reasons for this decision. In 2015, he revealed that he underwent surgery to remove a brain tumor.

By the way, Korchevnikov himself is doing great on the issue of employment. Boris will leave "live" in early July. Korchevnikov will take an enviable post. On the official website of the Moscow Patriarchate, as early as May 3, an announcement appeared with information about where the host of the popular Live Show will now work.

Zhanna Friske passed away two years ago. Until now, the artist's family and her common-law husband cannot improve relations. In addition, talk about the loss of 20 million, which was collected by the Rusfond organization, does not subside. The common-law husband of the artist Dmitry Shepelev came to the studio of Andrey Malakhov's program “Let Them Talk” to honestly answer all the questions that concern thousands of the singer's fans and her friends. The TV presenter agreed to have specialists check him on a lie detector.

Dmitry Shepelev admitted that he was very tired of the scandals that denigrate the name of Jeanne. According to the man, he could not sleep a wink on the eve of the filming of the program.

“I have not slept, to be honest, and at the same time I have a great sense of gratitude for the meeting we can have today. I'm worried, genuinely worried. To my horror and my misunderstanding, the story of Jeanne and everything connected with her is not left alone. All this continues to be discussed and condemned, ”Dmitry said.

Shepelev noted that many questions still remain unanswered. According to the TV presenter, he came to the program to dot the i's. Most of all, the public is concerned about the disappearance of funds from the accounts of Rusfond, which were collected for the treatment of Friske. Recall that the court ordered the return of all the money of the artist's heirs, including Zhanna's mom and dad, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich, as well as her son Platon. Dmitry Shepelev on the collection of millions: "Plato should not be responsible for this"

“I must tell you about this money separately. This is special money, which should not be treated like pieces of paper, it is the equivalent of love. With this money, people all over Russia and around the world supported their seriously ill beloved Zhanna Friske, "Shepelev said.

The TV presenter explained that the remaining funds were to go to seriously ill children in need of help. Dmitry showed statements from Rosbank's accounts, where Rufond's money and the singer's personal savings were kept.

“This is a written confirmation, which was used in court, confirmation that all the funds were withdrawn by her mother 10 days before her death,” Shepelev said.

During a lie detector test, Dmitry was asked who paid for the purchase of a country house, which took place at a time when Zhanna was already sick. According to Shepelev, they bought a plot for two.

“Half of the house and half of the land belongs to me. The purchase was made jointly. The repair was done with my money, ”said the presenter, answering questions from specialists.

A few days before the release of the program, I met with Zhanna's father, Vladimir Friske, to hear his position. The artist's dad claims that Shepelev did not give a penny of money, but constantly only withdrew funds from the card.

“He is arrogant, he does not consider people for anyone at all. The man who came from rags to riches. Now he has eight guards, ”said Vladimir Borisovich.

“All accounts have been emptied. This is dry banking statistics, "Shepelev replied.

According to the journalist, Jeanne's parents also reset their daughter's personal accounts. “It’s not in my head how, seeing a dying daughter, you can go to the bank and think about money. I don’t understand this, ”Dmitry said.

In an exclusive reportage, Shepelev showed the house they bought with Zhanna. Nobody lives there at the moment. According to the man, the artist herself was there twice.

“It was a remarkable day. It was winter. We had a small picnic at the entrance to the house, drank homemade wine, ate barbecue, told different stories, ”Dmitry recalled about his second trip to the site.

“The son was not only left without a mother due to tragic circumstances, but also due to human stupidity and greed, he was left without a home,” the TV journalist noted.

According to the latest data, the cottage now has four owners. In addition to Dmitry and Platon, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich Friske have the rights to the house. “I don’t need anything else, I want my son to live in peace,” said the TV presenter.

Jeanne's father claims that they will go to great lengths to see their grandson more often.

“I will fight for Plato. What right does he have to take away Plato from us? This is our blood there, ”said Friske.

Dmitry claims that he does not forbid grandparents to see their grandson. On the detector, he honestly admitted that the last meeting took place three weeks ago. “The essence of the conflict is that grandparents do not want to visit their grandson,” Shepelev said. about the family meeting with Plato: "It seems that he recognized us"

According to the TV presenter, in the future he plans to explain the current situation to the child. “Regardless of who says: me or Jeanne’s parents, pain speaks in us, we also need to make allowances for this. And you only need to believe in your own heart and the confidence that it is needed and loved. I hope that this disgusting story will not affect him in any way, ”Shepelev said.

According to the presenter, he constantly tells the boy about his mother. Dmitry would like Plato to be proud of his parents in the future.

“For Plato, the time has come for the endless whys. I answer these questions 1000 times a day ... I speak to him directly. He knows about everything: he knows my mother’s voice, he knows what my mother looks like. By the way, he was in our house and asks: "When are we going to live in our house?" - Shepelev said.

For Plato, mother is still alive in songs, films and in his heart. Shepelev condemns the current situation. According to the TV presenter, the boy's last communication with the Friske family was very intense.

“It was very difficult. After the meeting, Plato's temperature rose. I called a doctor. He told me that it was an emotional reaction to this meeting. That is why I insist that a psychologist be present at the meetings, ”Shepelev said.

According to Zhanna's civil spouse, all claims were filed by the Friske family. The court ruled that they can see Plato for an hour and a half a month. The mother of the deceased singer presents the whole situation differently. The program showed an excerpt from another program with the participation of Olga Vladimirovna, in which she talks about her grandson.

“We met in the psychologist's office in the presence of a nanny, Dima. We were still guarded by eight guards. It was about 30-35 minutes, ”the woman recalls.

The conflict between Vladimir Borisovich and Dmitry Shepelev caused a strong resonance, when a serious fight almost broke out between them. “He looks down on people. They are like manure for him, ”Father Friske says about the TV presenter.

According to Shepelev himself, he admits that the singer's father may kill him. The TV journalist admitted this during a lie detector test. Polygraph examiner Roman Ustyuzhanin, who worked with Dmitry, commented on his answers.

“On the issue of money, we have no questions for Dima. He answered it honestly. The issue with the grandson was removed by itself, because the court made a decision, ”the expert said.

The program editor showed a conversation between Vladimir Fricke and Dmitry Shepelev. According to this conversation, the journalist was threatened. The TV presenter appealed to law enforcement agencies, but he was refused to initiate a case over the words about the murder. Dmitry does not want to deal with the involvement of the court, as he is worried about the future of his son.

“For Jeanne's parents, I am like a red rag for a bull. In their eyes, the reason for the loss of their daughter is me, ”said Dmitry.

At the end of the program, they showed how Shepelev pleased Plato. The TV presenter has prepared a surprise for the boy. Plato is very fond of motorcycles and an iron horse decorated with balls was waiting for him on the street.

“I’ll tell everyone in the kindergarten,” said the satisfied child.

Many were waiting for an answer to two main questions: did Dmitry really love Jeanne and whether he regretted not being with her on the day of his death. The TV reporter really cannot forgive himself that he was absent at that moment. Then he and Plato flew to the sea.

“I love her today,” Shepelev said, answering a question about feelings for the singer.

Yesterday, the former common-law husband of Zhanna Friske (34) became a guest of the studio of the program "" and its presenter Andrei Malakhov (45). The theme of the release is the struggle of Dmitry with the family of Jeanne for the son of Plato (4). Shepelev immediately said that he wants to finally dot the i's: “To my horror, Jeanne’s story is not left alone. All this continues to be discussed and condemned. People are still approaching me: "We are for you" or "How could you have done this." And it scares me that there are so many questions that are in the air. I want to answer any question and put an end to it forever. "

The first question he asked concerned the missing 20 million rubles - where did the money that the whole world was collecting for Zhanna's treatment got to? “I continue to insist and say that the money was withdrawn by Vladimir (Friske's father - ed.)... This money is the equivalent of love for Jeanne. With this money, people from all over the country supported a seriously ill girl. Therefore, you need to account for every penny. Just imagine how many seriously ill children could be saved with these 20 million. 10 days before Jeanne's death, her mother withdrew the entire amount from the account. In addition, not only Rusfond's money was withdrawn, but also Zhanna's personal funds. All accounts were emptied. I don't understand how it was possible, seeing a dying daughter, to think about money and leave the grandson without the lion's share of the inheritance, ”Dmitry said and showed an official document from the bank confirming that Zhanna’s mother had withdrawn the funds from Rusfond. Do you remember that Vladimir Friske claimed that Dmitry had withdrawn the money from the account and built a luxurious country house on it? According to Dmitry, he bought the cottage together with Zhanna, but after her death he now has four owners - he, Plato and Zhanna's parents.

Malakhov asked if the son of Jeanne and Dmitry was seeing his grandparents. It turned out that for a long time she had not been trying to interfere with the meetings of Vladimir and Olga with Plato: “I said to my grandparents:“ Don't leave your grandson. You know my phone, you know where we live and where the playground is. " “We will not go, bring it to us,” they said. And instead of going to their grandson, they went to court so that the court would determine the order of communication. The court appointed: 1.5 hours a month. Is this normal for a family? Not okay. But the court assessed the actions of the grandparents: threats, meetings and the amount of attention they paid to their grandson. "

Dmitry not only talked with Andrei Malakhov, but before recording the program, he passed a lie detector test - he was asked the same questions that were asked during the broadcast. And Shepelev answered only the truth. Note that Vladimir Borisovich also agreed to undergo a polygraph test, but did not find the time for this.

Recall, when it became known about Zhanna Friske's illness (she was fighting a brain tumor), Channel One, together with Rusfond, organized a fundraiser for the singer's treatment. They raised more than 20 million rubles, but then this money was gone. Vladimir Friske accused Shepelev of the loss of funds.

The key idea is to separate the truth from the lie. This talk show began as a confrontation between once close people whose relationship was broken, but did not completely break the lie, as an opportunity for the first time in a long time to speak frankly, ask vital questions and get truthful answers. It is impossible to lie in our studio - the heroes are connected by sensors to a polygraph. This turns every program into a psychological thriller.

I feel in my place. The events of the past few years have literally turned my life around. There were a lot of lies around, a lot of betrayal and hypocrisy. Crowd condemnation. Therefore, I know better than anyone how important it is sometimes to find out the truth, to explain to the world, how important it is to be heard.

By the way, I myself offered to be the first to be tested on a polygraph and answer the questions that our “colleagues” have been savoring for many years now. And after that, I think that I have every right to ask frank questions to my guests. I am very proud of this program. Over the summer, we managed to beat the ratings not only of old direct competitors (18% share - Ed.), But also the rating of our new rivals - former colleagues on Channel One.

I heard that it is still possible to deceive the detector. The whole question is how to answer the questions.

I don't know how to trick the detector. I think this is impossible. Before recording the program, our heroes undergo preliminary polygraph testing. This is a long process. And it is only in the studio during the shooting that we finally learn what is true and what is false from what they said.

The experts ask a lot of additional questions. From many answers, an incontrovertible truth is formed, so it is impossible to deceive a polygraph. Even if someone manages to "slip through" the first question, the additional ones will still lead to clean water. Therefore, polygraph examiners often do not give a verdict immediately, but ask additional questions.

By the way, the hero is watched not only by a polygraph examiner - a specialist in working with a polygraph, but also by a profiler who analyzes the emotions, facial expressions of the program hero, his speech, signs invisible to an inexperienced observer, by which you can always understand: a person is lying or telling the truth. Sometimes they are joined by a criminologist - a specialist who works with motives of crimes. Believe me, if our experts take on a guest, he will not get out. It's impossible to lie.

How do you manage to persuade people to participate in the program? What kind of technology are you using: torture, blackmail, bribery?

No matter how loud and pathetic it may sound, the desire to be heard for many is much more important than anything else.

People want to defend their truth, and we help them in this.

You yourself were in a similar position and you understand that it is very difficult to open up, to tell the details of your personal life in front of a large audience.

Yes, for me, the polygraph test and the need to talk about personal things were a terrible shock. The first such interview was devoted to the release of my book "Jeanne" last fall. And the second - on the eve of the airing of the project "Actually". It was damn hard. But I had the main help - the truth is on my side. Therefore, it was not easy to agree to this conversation, but it was a great relief to tell the truth. Psychologists know how reticence and lies destroy human destinies.

But you surely pay people money to participate?

Do you really think that money is the decisive argument for our man? Seeking justice is a much stronger motive.

An actor participated in one of the first programs. After all that this man has done, doesn't he make you feel disgusted? Why would such people give ether?

Speaking of me, the last few years have been greatly reshaped, I, in principle, try not to judge or condemn.

As part of the program, I am not interested in doing moralizing - it is not for me to decide what is good and what is bad. My personal task is to try to understand the guest.

And if a criminal comes to the studio, I ask: why? And I will try to hear it. This does not mean to justify.

In the program "" s said that "television of botox, silicone and vodka on the bottom" is a thing of the past. People are tired of it. It seems to me that Dibrov is mistaken. Such television will never become a thing of the past. What do you think about this?

I am convinced that television should remain socially significant. In my opinion, the story of the "crystal boy" Sasha Pushkarev is more important than the history of expensive gifts for Anna Kalashnikova, because it speaks to the heart, shows an example of resilience and dignity!

We called Dibrov on the phone after the recording you mentioned. We talked for a long time. I agree with Dmitry's arguments: the topic can be anything everyday: "silicone and botox", unequal marriage, infidelity, rape, illegitimate children. This is all vital.

Our task is television, as I see it, and the skill is to make from life history not washing dirty linen, but literature.