What does the expression "not a warrior alone in the field" mean? One in the field is not a warrior meaning of the proverb Similar proverbs one in the field is not a warrior.

"One in the field is not a warrior." Where did this proverb come from?

In this and old saying, there is a clear hint that if a person is alone, then some moments in life he will not be able to go through on his own or defeat some kind of enemy.

And a given person in a large field will not become a warrior, but if he unites with others like himself, then an army will turn out that can defeat the enemy in an open field.

And any community of people or their unity, in fact, means a huge force that can cope with any task or fight with the enemy.

And in order to go to their achievements, even in ancient times they understood that they need a community and a close-knit team. Such is the story.

This proverb is very, very old

It was often used back in the days of the USSR.

One in the field is not a warrior

This means that it is quite problematic to do some things alone.

Therefore, if you are offered help, do not refuse, it will be much easier

Everyone needs friends - this is another hidden meaning of this proverb.

Origin.

There is nothing sensational about the etymology of this saying. The territory on which all the main military battles took place has always been called the field. If a person (even being in a military dress) went out into the field alone, then he became not a winner, but a very good target for enemies. The target is not a warrior, but a victim.

Meaning.

Over time, the field has ceased to be associated only with battles. Not only do they fight in the fields, they also grow bread. And when it ripens, the battle for the harvest begins. And the proverb, becoming figurative, is again confirmed. A loner who has entered a peaceful field will never become a good warrior. A person must be in a team in order to qualify for some significant success. Thus, the modern sounding of the proverb about the field and the warrior has expanded many times and is explained as follows: No big deal alone is beyond the power of anyone.

I will tell you how in my Soviet childhood they explained the origin of this proverb at school. Everyone knows about the Golden Horde and about Igo. True, now the version is walking, that it was not him, but not about that. So, as they explained to us why they could not defeat the Tatar Mongols for so long. Because the principalities were all scattered, civil strife tortured, local squabbles, it was not up to the external enemy that everyone was and could not agree among themselves the princes to come out together and give a collective rebuff to the Horde. And when Dmitry Donskoy managed to convince and unite several farms, then only Russia was able to resist and free itself. From there came such a popular saying that

Does the version have the right to life? Perhaps. But then, then one finger is not the master of the situation, that's for sure. The hand and fist are strong when the fingers are tightly clenched, and one by one they are a very fragile substance.

1) The first meaning. It means that only the one in front of whom there are enemies can be considered a warrior, and if you are alone in the field, then there is no one to fight with, which means that at this moment you are not a warrior.

2) Second meaning. Or maybe it means that if you stand alone in the field against the army, then you are not a warrior, since you have no chances. Why in the field? Because the field is an open area where you cannot hide and you will be quickly shot. And in other places, where there is something to hide behind, and one can pose a threat to several. This, for example, was in the film Commando... But since this saying was created in the past, when there were no current technologies, it is no longer quite relevant. For example, the person from the movie iron Man could well have withstood the whole army of the time when this proverb was invented.

This proverb is ancient and refers to those proverbs that claim the advantage of several over one - for example:

A classic example of such a comparison is the problem of a twig and a bundle of brushwood proposed by a father to his son. Therefore, one should not look for a different meaning in this proverb, as well as produce its origin from other versions of the proverb. For example, it is assumed that initially the proverb sounded like one in the field is not a warrior, that is, not a plowman, but this option could hardly have arisen in an ancient society where collective farms did not exist and most of the peasants just worked the land individually or, at best, with a family. ... But the fact that one in the field is not a warrior is willingly believed, because the battles were fought by men and always in an open field. The siege of cities is not exactly a Russian tradition of warfare. Addition to this proverb a traveler sounds like a later version, from the times when frequent internecine wars are a thing of the past and it became possible for travelers to walk alone in the fields.

From ancient times it was clear that a man is not an epic hero who alone coped with an entire army, but a mere mortal who lives in society and must, together with other soldiers, defend the Motherland. No wonder they now say:

Strength is precisely in cohesion, community, unity.

The full version of the proverb goes like this:

Did you know that this proverb has a full version, with a continuation? One in the field is not a warrior, but a traveler.

Only a truncated part of the proverb has survived to us. Its origins are deep: even in antiquity, fathers taught their sons that one cannot defeat an enemy, that is how brotherhood and a sense of collectivism were forged.

An interesting proverb, on the one hand calling for collectivism and on the other - devaluing the concepts of heroism and personal courage. The fact is that initially the proverb sounded One does not fight in the field; that is, not a plowman, since one must lead the horse and the other hold onto the coulters. From the word ratai there was the word army - an irregular military militia of peasants and warrior - member of rati. The proverb sounded: One in the field is not a warrior;. Then army began to mean simply an army and there was a replacement for warrior. This is how peasant wisdom turned into a military one, which led to its ambiguity.

Initially, this proverb looked like this:

Don't fight alone in the field.

That is, a ratai is a farmer (plowman). The proverb encouraged joint work.

Later, instead of the word ratai, they began to use the warrior, which means an ancient warrior.

From that moment on, the proverb began to relate to military affairs with the same meaning.

The modern version is already presented in this form:

There is safety in numbers.

"One in the field is not a warrior" - usually in this way they regretfully comment on the struggle without a chance of victory for one person with superior forces, for example, with the system.

The meaning of the proverb "One is not a warrior in the field"

This old Russian proverb belongs to the category of those that suggest several versions of their origin. According to one of them, in this phrase there was a replacement of concepts due to their consonance. It is assumed that the original expression sounded like "One in the field, do not battle." At the time of the proverb's appearance, the word "ratai" meant a plowman who alone would not have been able to plow a large field. "Ratay" was consonant with the word "warrior", that is, a member of the rati, an irregular peasant military unit. Subsequently, the "army" was transformed into an "army", and the "warrior" into a "warrior".

The second version indicates that the concept of "field" envisaged not only agricultural value, but also military.

Proverbs about soldiers and warriors Mother Russia has gone through many wars and battles, has raised more than one regiment of valiant warriors. Many were destined to become heroes, others died fighting for their homeland. The soldiers, military affairs were always taken seriously, with great honor:

The soldier is close - bow low to him.

Proverbs tell about the soldier's life and character:

The soldier will hide in the sky and stand up to sleep, shave with a bayonet, wash with dew, brush his hair with the wind, cook porridge in the air, warm up in battle, rest on one leg - and again forward.

A soldier without courage is like a nightingale without a song.

Military proverbs instruct, preach, often sound like slogans:

Homeland is a mother, know how to stand up for her.
Perhaps, I suppose, drop it at the front.

It will be useful for future defenders of the Fatherland to familiarize themselves with the piggy bank of Russian folk proverbs about soldiers and warriors. This is the experience of generations, our history, our mentality.

Since ancient times, the proverb “one in the field is not a warrior” has been known. Of course, this proverb makes sense, showing that it is possible to defeat the enemy, and indeed to achieve some great goal, only through joint efforts. But in reality - can one person fight an entire enemy army? Maybe the heroes of the Great Patriotic War proved this too. "And there is one soldier in the field, if he is tailored in Russian" - such a conclusion can be drawn from the exploits of the soldiers of the Red Army, which we will talk about in this post.

The heroism of the Russian soldier amazes the Germans

In July 1941, the Red Army retreated. The Germans still hoped to implement the "blitzkrieg" plan - the lightning-fast defeat of our army, which would open up the possibility of unhindered seizure of the entire country. A key element of the blitzkrieg strategy was the use of tank corps, which were supposed to break through the front and, moving quickly, encircle our troops. The blitzkrieg strategy worked perfectly in Europe, the Germans successfully used it against Poland.

Here is even a history of exploits. This is a personal decision of one soldier! This is not an order from the commander. Alexander Matrosov closed the enemy embrasure with his chest, freeing the way for the rest of the soldiers to attack at the cost of his life. The commander did not order him. It was just that at that moment he was “one warrior in the field” and there was no one to hope for.

So there may be only one warrior, but “tailored in Russian” is a warrior, no doubt!

The fascists' ideas about the people of Soviet Russia, into whose territory they invaded on June 22, 1941, were determined by an ideology that portrayed the Slavs as “subhuman”. However, the very first battles forced the invaders to change a lot in these views. Further, documentary evidence of soldiers, officers and generals of the German Wehrmacht about how Soviet soldiers appeared before them from the first days of the war.

"There is safety in numbers". The meaning of this saying was completely refuted in the summer of 1941 by a simple Russian guy, artilleryman Kolya Sirotinin. What he did fits into the widespread liberal phrase - "they threw corpses." Only now the Germans threw their corpses at him. Nikolai Sirotinin died, but exchanged his life very dearly - for 11 tanks, 6 armored vehicles and more than fifty enemy soldiers. This is how it was.

July 17, 1941. The tank columns of the 4th division of General Guderian were rapidly approaching the Belarusian town of Krichev. Their goal is Moscow. Our 55th Rifle Regiment had no opportunity to restrain their onslaught in that sector. The regiment was retreating. The only thing that ours could oppose was to set up a screen from one cannon. Only one USV cannon with a caliber of 76 mm., And only one artilleryman - senior sergeant Nikolai Sirotinin, were supposed to cover the withdrawal of their unit.

Or an article about how Western forces, using words that are flattering to the Russian ear, create proverbs aimed at destroying Russian Unity and spreading the "cult of a loner." This phrase has a double meaning. On the one hand, it is true and emphasizes the courage, ingenuity and courage of the Russian person. When left alone with the enemy, in most of us the ancient instincts of a representative of the Russian civilization wake up, thanks to which we are able to defeat even a superior enemy.

But, on the other hand, this proverb carries a latent threat aimed at destroying Russian Unity. Like - do everything yourself, only for yourself, believe in yourself and the like. But, let's present the most commonplace example. You are alone. War time. Enemies and marauders are all around you. Do you think they are dumber than you? You are one, and there are many of them.

ADVANCES AND SPELLS ABOUT THE ARMY

An army without a commander is like a tiger without a head.

Perhaps, I suppose, drop it at the front.

The machine gun and the shovel are the soldier's friends.

Army youth - you can't find it more fun.

You cannot take a fortress without courage.

Without knowledge - not a builder, without weapons - not a warrior.

You will be vigilant - you will achieve victory.

The battle is red with courage, and the soldier with friendship.

The enemy is near - hit with the butt.

In battle, you need ingenuity, courage and hardening.

In battle, an order is a holy law, it is dearer than life.

All ranks before the charter are equal.

In the banner is your honor, in the weapon is your glory.

There are few words in the order, but they are pronounced strictly.

To visit the battle - to find out the price of life.

Fight not by number, but by skill.

Think with your head, and fight by force.

Where there is courage, there is victory.

The guards mortar will find the enemy everywhere.

The general of a shattered army is better off not talking about battles.

Sayings and proverbs about the army begin to interest most of our fellow citizens only at a certain time. When the time for urgent service is right. This does not apply to career officers. But this is only now the case. But before, every second boy dreamed that when he grows up he will be either an astronaut or a soldier. The formation of such a worldview was influenced by patriotic education, which began in the younger groups of the kindergarten. I still remember all the poems about the Soviet Army that I taught in kindergarten. And we were also introduced to proverbs and sayings about the army.

People are taught from early childhood that they should have many friends. They must behave well not only in society, they need a good reputation, and this continues almost all their lives. Why all? Because one in the field is not a warrior. But what this saying means, we will explore in this article.

Fireman

There are forms of human activity in which one has nothing to do: firefighters, police, doctors. In these professions, no matter how brilliant a single subject may be, he cannot cope without a team.

Imagine a house is on fire. A firefighter runs to rescue people captured by the fire. Even if we are very well disposed towards the hero, we are unlikely to believe that he will do it himself without a command, because one is not a warrior in the field. He, at least, needs partners to provide him with water and to be on the safe side, just in case something happens.

Policeman

A lone policeman is, rather, a hero of crime series. You probably looked at them on NTV.

In the summer of 1941, we not only retreated. 19-year-old boy from Oryol fought alone with a column of German tanks

Kolya took up a position on a hill right on the collective farm field.

It is difficult for one person to withstand, achieve anything, win in the struggle. It is said to justify someone's powerlessness, the inability to cope with the matter, or as a reproach for the inability to act together, together. Its initial meaning is clarified on the basis of a more ancient version. One is not a rat in the field, where ratai (from orati to plow) is a plowman, a farmer. The proverb referred to agricultural work requiring several workers. Then the word ratai, by consonance, was replaced by warrior, and such a replacement was also prepared by stable folklore associations of a military field, a battlefield with a field of peaceful labor. The word warrior was synonymously replaced by voivode and warrior. On the basis of the antonymic opposition, a new version of the proverb was formed And one in the field is not a warrior

Kolya Sirotinin, at the age of 19, had to challenge the saying "One is not a warrior in the field," but he did not become a legend of the Great Patriotic War, like Alexander Matrosov or Nikolai Gastello ...

I dedicate my lines to his great feat. Eternal glory to the hero !!!

Yes, in the summer of 1941, everyone had a hard time.
They stood to death, if the need to cover the withdrawal of units ...
He was one soldier in the field, but that is his merit,
That led the tanks of the enemy column from the queens.

In the rye high on the hill where the river was visible,
The highway is behind her, his gunner fearlessly took up his post
And as soon as the first tank came out, the sergeant did not misfire,
He sent a fiery projectile to the car: Here's a bridge ...

And set fire to the closing armor, the "plug" is ready,
The order was to retreat immediately ... I disobeyed. Stock
The shells are too big to leave without a shot,
And suddenly the boy from Orel decides here, now

Continue the fight.

"The Germans rested on him, as in the Brest Fortress"

Kolya Sirotinin was the age of 19 to challenge the saying "One is not a warrior in the field." But he did not become a legend of the Great Patriotic War, like Alexander Matrosov or Nikolai Gastello.

In the summer of 1941, the 4th Panzer Division of Heinz Guderian, one of the most talented German tank generals, broke through to the Belarusian town of Krichev. Parts of the 13th Soviet Army were retreating. Only the gunner Kolya Sirotinin did not retreat - quite a boy, short, quiet, frail.

According to the essay in the Oryol collection "Good Name", it was necessary to cover the withdrawal of troops. “There will be two people here with a cannon,” said the commander of the battery. Nikolai volunteered. The second was the commander himself.

- Kolya took up a position on a hill right on the collective farm field.

The whole point lies in the word "in Russian"! A person “tailored in Russian” has a number of unique qualities. A warrior always has something to defend! His patriotism leads him to defend the Fatherland, his native land. His love for his family, for his friends, in the same way makes a person fight for them, for their safety. And at the same time, taking up arms, going to war - it was a spiritual uplift and impulse. And Russian soldiers selflessly defended everything that is dear to their hearts. Here is even a history of exploits. This is a personal decision of one soldier! This is not an order from the commander. Alexander Matrosov closed the enemy embrasure with his chest, freeing the way for the rest of the soldiers to attack at the cost of his life. The commander did not order him. It was just that at that moment he was "one warrior in the field" and there was no one to hope for.

Or in ancient times, two heroes from each side went out in front of the army and fought a duel in front of everyone. And how important it was to win so that everyone else had confidence in victory!

So a warrior and one can be.

Field. There is a warrior in him

The expression "not a warrior alone in the field" resonates loudly with the Soviet doctrine, which denies the role of the individual in history. They say that history is moved by the masses, by the people who themselves, albeit involuntarily, choose their own leader. And this leader only obeys the will of the majority

"One! - Who needs it ?!"
The voice of a unit is thinner than a squeak.
Who will hear it? - Is it a wife!
And then if not in the bazaar, but close ...
It is bad for a person when he is alone.
Woe to one, one is not a warrior -
every big lord to him,
and even weak, if two ...
One is nonsense,
one - zero,
one - even if very important -
will not lift a simple five-shank log,
all the more a five-story house "(V. Mayakovsky, poem" Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)

“We did not make a scandal - we lacked a leader.
There are few real violent ones - so there are no leaders "

- another great poet V. Vysotsky argues with the great poet ("Letter to the Editor")

Indeed, the whole story refutes the underestimation of the role of personality in it. Even the French are unlikely to immediately name the leaders, and what is her fate? And it was committed under the banner of Lenin, the Great Patriotic War was won under the banner of Stalin, it took place under the banner of Yeltsin.
No, and there is only one warrior in the field, if he is a person, if he is able to lead people, because a people is a faceless mass, a crowd, a herd. It goes where the leader leads, and does what he tells him to

"On March 7, troops sent hastily against Napoleon came to Grenoble - two and a half line infantry with artillery and one hussar regiment. Napoleon was already approaching Grenoble. The most critical moment was approaching. There could be no question. The royal troops could shoot him and his soldiers from afar, without even losing a single man, since Napoleon did not have a single gun. On March 7, in the morning, Napoleon arrived in the village of Lamur. , blocking the road ... Napoleon looked through the telescope for a long time at the troops advanced against him. Then he ordered his soldiers to take the gun under their left hand and turn the muzzle into the ground. - he commanded and went ahead directly under the guns of the forward battalion of the royal troops lined up against him. The chief of this battalion looked at his soldiers, turned to the adjutant of the garrison commander and said to him, pointing at his soldiers: "What should I do? Look at them, they are pale like death, and tremble at the very thought of the need to shoot at this man. "He ordered the battalion to retreat, but they did not have time. Napoleon ordered 50 of his cavalry to stop the battalion that was preparing to retreat." Friends, do not shoot! - the cavalrymen shouted. ! " The battalion stopped. Then Napoleon came close to the soldiers, who froze with rifles at the ready, not taking his eyes off a lone figure in a gray frock coat and a triangular hat approaching them with a firm step. “Soldiers of the fifth regiment!” Was heard in the dead silence. “Do you recognize me? " - "Yes Yes Yes!" - shouted from the ranks. Napoleon unbuttoned his coat and opened his chest. "Which of you wants to shoot your emperor? Shoot!" Until the end of their days, eyewitnesses could not forget those thunderous joyful cries with which the soldiers, having upset the front, rushed to Napoleon "(E. Tarle, chapter" 100 days ")

Use of Expression in Literature

— « No one would have protected her from the wrath of the chief designer: the director, laughing, always justified him, the party organizer did not interfere, the chairman of the factory committee - well ..."(VF Panova" Kruzhilikha ")
— « Just feel that I alone, without your help, can do nothing. ... - We feel, father! .. "(V. Ya. Shishkov "Emelyan Pugachev")
— « It is now clear to me - to horror: I was - alone, like a finger; but I amused myself with a social fiction, as if there are some friends who understand me exactly here; They didn’t want to understand me here: neither Vladimirov, nor S.M. Soloviev, not to mention the comrades in the course ..."([Andrey Bely" Why I became a Symbolist ... ")
— « You cannot make people free from under the stick. ... And I am alone, there are no assistants "(D. S. Merezhkovsky "Alexander the First")
— « Although the enemy refused any direct resistance, waiting for us to retreat, there was a Chechen who, contrary to the proverb that, with the help of Allah and his rifle, decided to defend the crossing over Aksai. "(FF Tornau "Memoirs of a Caucasian Officer")

(meaning) - for one person, or in a significant minority, it is pointless to fight a superior enemy. We need to look for another solution.

The proverb is indicated in the book "" (1853) (section - ""). There is also a close proverb - "You can't tie a knot with one hand."

The word "field" used to mean not only the meaning we are accustomed to, but also "A place occupied by an army, under the open sky, camp camp" ((1863-1866)). Accordingly, the proverb refers to a battlefield in which one person cannot cope with the enemy's army.

Examples of

(1896 - 1984)

"Conversations with Ranevskaya" (Gleb Skorokhodov, 2004): "While the shooting was going on, I rushed about, got angry, still hoped, and suddenly something will come out: in the cinema, it happens and one warrior in the field. "

(1844 - 1927)

"",. Volume 1 "From the notes of a judicial figure" (Publishing house "Legal Literature", Moscow, 1966):

“The unfortunate Kroneberg, seeing the complete lack of support from the ministry and the impudent triumph of the government, gave up on everything and, apparently, said to himself, in this case, not without reason, that“ there is safety in numbers»."

(1828 - 1910)

"Hadji Murad"

(1821 - 1881)

"Humiliated and Insulted"- Masloboev says to Ivan:

"I have the rules: I know, for example, that there is safety in numbers, and - I do business. "

(1860 - 1904)

"" (1891), ch. I: “Once, during breakfast, my clerk Vladimir Prokhorich reported to me that the Pestrovian peasants had already begun to tear off the thatched roofs to feed the cattle, Marya Gerasimovna looked at me with fear and bewilderment.

What can I do? - I told her. - and I have never experienced such loneliness as I do now. I would give dearly to find at least one person in the entire county on whom I could rely. "

Images

"One in the field is not a warrior" - usually in this way they regretfully comment on the struggle without a chance of victory for one person with superior forces, for example, with the system.

The meaning of the proverb "One is not a warrior in the field"

This old Russian proverb belongs to the category of those that suggest several versions of their origin. According to one of them, in this phrase there was a replacement of concepts due to their consonance. It is assumed that the original expression sounded like "One in the field, do not battle." At the time of the proverb's appearance, the word "ratai" meant a plowman who alone would not have been able to plow a large field. "Ratay" was consonant with the word "warrior", that is, a member of the rati, an irregular peasant military unit. Subsequently, the "army" was transformed into an "army", and the "warrior" into a "warrior".

The second version indicates that the concept of "field" envisaged not only agricultural value, but also military. Accordingly, a loner who appeared on the battlefield automatically became an easy target, rather a victim than a warrior.

There is a third version, according to which this proverb has a continuation "One in the field is not a warrior, but a traveler." This refers to a later period in history, when the main internecine wars ceased, and travelers were able to relatively safely move between cities alone.

An interesting common school interpretation of the appearance of the expression "One is not a warrior in the field." It says that the problem of the struggle against the Tatar-Mongol yoke was precisely the fragmentation of the Russian principalities and their constant civil strife. The victory turned out to be possible precisely when several of them united under pressure from Dmitry Donskoy.