Human - life is given to you! But for what. Why do people live on earth? Why is a person born and lives

20.09.2019

Read also

The art of ancient greece

Legendary Greek statues

The Ugliest Man in the World

The tale of the priest and his worker

The latest technology for kids

Every thinking person at least once asked himself the question: what is life for.

What on Earth?

Why did we come to this world?

Let's look for an answer.

Why is life given Who found the answer about the meaning of life

Life is given ... You don't have to live in misery or constant problems. - true of any person. You just need to decide what you need in order to be happy, because each person has a different understanding of happiness. So find out what you need to be a happy person.

Life is given in order to be happy ... Remember this always, especially in those moments when you start to feel sad and suffer. You do not have to be sad, tormented by some loss, hardship or the departure of another person. You are able to be happy even in such difficult times. Why not? Did you promise someone to suffer when someone leaves you? Or are you obliged to shed tears if you lose your job?

All these models of behavior (tears, the feeling of a catastrophe) are embedded in human consciousness by society. But if you don't want to suffer, then you shouldn't. You are free to live your life the way you want. You can arrange a holiday in honor of parting with your loved one. You can relax at sea after leaving your job. You don't have to shed tears if you allow yourself and want to smile even when everyone else is crying.

Life is given to be happy ... And if you do not want to suffer, then do not do it even in those minutes when everyone else is crying, dissatisfied or suffering.

And in conclusion - a poem.

Life is given.

Life is given to play
And in the process of playing, experience inspiration.
Life is given to us so that we can learn to fly
Let it be in dreams, but flying is a must!

Life is given to feed
Those who ask for food and warm up a little
Life is given to live it with interest
And with love to find adventures on the road.

Life is given to accept it with the one that is given
And change to one from which bliss.
Life is given both inside and outside - in full.
Abundance Light is given - perfection is given.

Life is given to be drunk to the bottom
And they wished each other a real miracle.
Life is given and is visible in noble deeds,
And sparkles with knowledge in righteous people.

Life is given so that we can learn to forgive
How parents in childhood forgave a prank.
Life is given to create and teach yourself -
Become a little kinder, just a little ...

Evgeny Stuzhuk. A source.

And you, my reader, how do you answer this question? Why is life given to man?

It is good for all of us to think about our personality and our life. We know that each person chooses one or another variant of life, or the variant of life is imposed on him.
Domestic psychologist Vladimir Nikolaevich Druzhinin suggested that over the long years of its historical existence, mankind has invented several options for life.

There are 7 approximate life options:

Life achievement;

Life as creativity;

Life as a foreword;

Life is a dream;

Living by the rules;

Life is a pastime;

Life versus life.
The most important ideas that Druzhinin relies on in his book are the following.
There are variants of life that are independent of the individual, invented by mankind and reproduced in time. A person, depending on specific circumstances, can choose one or another, but the version of life can be imposed on him.
The concept of a variant of life is an integral psychological characteristic of an individual being and is determined by the type of a person's attitude to life. There are psychological parameters that can be used to describe life options, but they are difficult to formalize, although they lend themselves to verbalization.
The variant of life forms the human personality, typifies it. The individual turns into a representative of a life personality type. He enters life, in this or that version of life, using his abilities, temperament, character, and comes out as a typified person. It is possible to change the variant of life.

AS A HYPOTHESIS

The author lists seven life options in the book, each of which is deeply and thoroughly analyzed. And, by the way, it is far from impartial, as required by the natural-scientific paradigm. V.N. Druzhinin demonstratively does not try to fetter himself with the postulates of the notorious scientific nature. He warns in the foreword that this book is not a scientific study, but, perhaps, only one big hypothesis. And in the text itself, no, no, yes, and a slight irony breaks through in relation to scientists, even the title of one of the chapters sounds like this: A review necessary in any monograph.
Druzhinin believes that caricature and grotesque can be ways of knowing life, therefore he uses them boldly and talentedly when describing options for life.
Life options are the result of social being, in which the individual either turns on against his will, or actively chooses them. Life options typify his personality.
Druzhinin believes that for Adler, for example, the concept of life style works within the limits of only one of the life options: life-goal achievement.
Viktor Frankl, in turn, recognizes only such an option as life-ministry.
Considering the most typical, polar variants of life, V.N. Druzhinin, as a criterion, is guided by the introduced by K.A. Abulkhanova the concept of timeliness, optimal coordination of the temporal structure of activity with external social changes, resolution of contradictions between personal and social time.

LIFE AS A FOREWORD

As one of the options for life, Druzhinin describes life as a preface. The current life is seen as a preparation for the real life, the real life. As a matter of fact, all life turns into a search.
What is the subjective model of the world based on, in which human existence is regarded as preparation for life? According to Druzhinin, based on the hypertrophied ability of a person to make a forecast and ideal plans for the future. This is especially clearly manifested in various religions, for which earthly life, the one and only, is viewed as a vale of suffering, as a preparation for another life, more perfect.
This approach to existence is clearly expressed in the aphorism of Andrey Knyshev: You need to work on yourself all your life in order to become as good as possible by death.

LIFE AS CREATIVITY

This option is, without a doubt, the most attractive to the author. According to Druzhinin, the creative process is internal, intrapsychic. The idea is primary, and its external implementation in the text, musical notation, on a CD or on a concrete wall is secondary.
A person who is in a creative state, as it were, surrenders to his psychic reality. More precisely, one can say: a reflexive person becomes a passive participant in the life of his second creative person. A person who implements this strategy of life is forced to coordinate two streams of his life, internal (creative) and external. It is clear that the life of the spirit is more important for him.

LIFE AS ACHIEVEMENT

This option is in many respects opposed to the previous one, since the person of action chooses the external flow of life, and not the internal one.
A person of action must distinguish between defeats and victories, and a creative person can neglect this, moreover, a black-and-white assessment of the world prevents creative realization: But you yourself should not distinguish defeats from victory (B. Pasternak).
But here's what is important: it is the man of action that is the type of personality most approved by Western civilization! This is the kind of person who clearly understands what he wants and is sure that his successes and failures depend only on him (he has an internal locus of control).
Druzhinin does not at all sympathize with such a person, as one might suppose. He has an extremely negative attitude towards the personality, before which the majority of Russian psychologists are accustomed to bowing to the self-actualizing personality. V.N. Druzhinin quotes A. Maslow, accompanying it with his comment: A self-actualizing person accepts himself as he is. He has no feelings of guilt, shame and anxiety. He feels the joy of life. [He freed himself from such a chimera as conscience. What a bastard, this self-actualizing person! V.D.]. And further: Personally, when reading Maslow's books, instead of a pink, sugar, portrait of a self-actualizing personality, a portrait of an egocentric and an egoist rises before my eyes, objectively and calmly looking at the environment, indifferent to the pains and anxieties of this world, realizing his self with infantile spontaneity without looking back at surrounding and not experiencing a sense of shame and remorse.
So that's it!

LIFE-DREAM

A welcome option for everyone whose burden of troubles, work and worries is too heavy. Such a life is generated by the desire to plunge into a world where there are no problems, pain, anxiety, but there is peace and bliss.
The spectrum of care options is huge, from alcoholism to Internet addiction. The question of questions: is it possible that the reason for people leaving for such a world is not only in their individual psychological characteristics and social situation, but also in the fact that socially approved options for life require the impossible from a person?

LIFE BY RULES

Another version of the life strategy. He who has chosen life according to the rules relieves himself of anxiety for the future, for the results of his actions and, in general, from a feeling of uncertainty. All his worries and worries are associated with external events that can disrupt his life and the lives of his loved ones. But if everyone around tries to break the rules, then the person who observes them finds himself in a difficult situation in the position of an eternal scapegoat. And then a person's confidence in the future is replaced by constant concern for his own fate and the fate of those who trusted him.
That is why people who live by the rules are the main potential clientele of psychotherapists, psychoanalysts, psychics, sorcerers, traditional healers. Living by the rules is the life of the majority.

LIFE-TIME

This is the way of people who have nothing more to desire. The main flaw of this variant of life is the absence of the past and the infinity of the present. In fact, this is an escape from boredom.
There are two ways to structure time for such a person: to embark on an active search for pleasures, entertainment, adventures, etc., or to surrender their fate in the hands of time organizers, who, according to Berne, are especially valued in the modern world. Time organizers provide a person with many options for spending time: he forgets about the non-existent meaning of life and fills the present with events, and the past with memories.

LIFE AGAINST LIFE

This option is chosen by people for whom aggression and hatred have become habitual states, people who have received global psychological trauma. Life becomes a struggle for them. A person declares war on the world around him, but at the same time he declares war on himself, since he is a part of this world and cannot exist without it.
Life versus life is an antiworld that devours everyday human existence. Indeed, people who have joined this version of human existence or have chosen it are ambassadors of death, imagining themselves to be fighters against evil.
Druzhinin believes that the internal condition for choosing the option of life versus life is an extremely strong emotional sensitivity and rigidity of the psyche of some people with a poor mental life and an extroverted consciousness.

OUT OF TYPOLOGY

Reading a book by V.N. Druzhinin, I admired the brilliant language, precise comparisons, vivid passages, the author's boundless erudition, unexpected and apt quotations. Before us is not a ponderous scientific work, but an elegant psychological and philosophical essay that easily deals with the stereotypes of psychological thinking.
It is wonderful that such a book exists.
It is sad that out of seven life options, only one is truly constructive life-creativity. But this is from the usual, stereotyped positions. In the end, for example, both dream-life and life by the rules have a lot of attractive sides!
It is a pity that the book does not describe life as ministry, which is mentioned several times.
Reflecting on the content of each described variant of life, I often wondered: and the author himself, having comprehended the most important life strategies, which variant did he prefer?
Vladimir Nikolaevich possessed an amazing gift of an existential designer: he managed to assemble his short, bright, unique life from separate elements, pieces of a mosaic so that it could not even fit into his own typology. Perhaps this is a feature of truly talented people.

Our talk is getting quieter
Since honor is from the muse
Not to those who write
And to those who find and read.

Igor VACHKOV.

Meaning- that's what is most important in life. Striving to make dreams come true, to implement plans.
SV Kovalev believes that the meaning of a person's life should not only lead him to the desire to survive in this world, but to the meaning, the question "For what?" Answering the question "For what?" we bring some clarity to our meaning of life, which supports it in the most difficult situations. The meaning of life is a twofold function. On the one hand, a person needs meaning to overcome difficulties, if only he believes and understands that he is not playing a stupid role in a fairy tale invented by an idiot. On the other hand, the meaning should have a path to the intended goal, and not a refuge from difficulties and troubles. That is, it is necessary to look for the meaning of life not only in desires, but also in the true sense of real life. The meaning of life has four origins: vocation, social context, purpose (mission) and transpersonal level. The meaning of life can be figuratively expressed as the phenomenon of "nesting dolls" - when one is layered into another. The four levels of the meaning of life are when a social level (mission) is layered on the level of vocation, and above it is the purpose and higher is the existential level of being in the world. Therefore, people who are at different semantic levels assert differently about the meaning of life. Someone thinks, for the main semantic level, the achievement of their vocation (in the profession), someone in the fulfillment of their mission in society, someone in their destiny, and someone in the realization of themselves in creativity, creative activity, and who something in the transpersonal unity of natural, social and spiritual principles and in the understanding of the short duration of their stay on earth. Before we can talk about the meaning of life, each person needs to answer six questions: "Who?", "Why?", "What?", "How?", "Where?" ("When?", "С by whom? ")," For what? ".
The question "Why?" If a person does not answer the question "Why am I here in this world?" - then everything is meaningless and chaotic for him!
The question "What?" If a person has answered himself why he is here in this world, then what he should investigate, what to realize, and he is responsible for his destiny.
The question "How?" The answer to this question lies in his mission, that is, how he can know happiness in this life, fulfilling his destiny.
Meaning - In what world?
Mission - In the name of what?
The question "Where?" The answer to this question is in what professional field he is going to fulfill his vocation and mission.
The question "For what?" Answering the question "For what?" we bring some clarity to our meaning of life.
Environment - Where ?, When ?, With whom?
Behavior / Actions -What?
Abilities - How?
Beliefs - Why?
Values - Why?
Intentions - For what?
Identity - Who?
S.V. Kovalev believes that human well-being is based on 5 postulates:
* health;
* relationships;
* love;
* money;
* Work;
He answers the question: "What is worth wanting for real well-being?"

Kovalev quotes Flemming Funch, who believes that for the meaning of life it is necessary to find some kind of clarity. Clarity is an understanding of your essence in order to be responsible for what you have understood and the activity in what you have understood. Clarity is a triad of understanding, responsibility and action.
In our world, there are 6 levels of clarity: personal, diode (clarity of oneself and another), group clarity, public clarity, planetary clarity and stellar (cosmic) clarity.
Flemming Funch believes that each person has their own state of development in various areas of life. “The spheres are not just different areas of life.<..>A person with a certain level of ability may well choose a fairly narrow field of action in which there will be no trouble.<..>
1. Personal clarity
Personal clarity means that a person takes responsibility for what he is. He acknowledges that he is the cause of his position and does not blame others for it. .. He can clarify the situation simply by consideration. Something may not become clear only if the person does not know what to consider. He is aware of his intentions and naturally works to carry them out. He always has something to do. Such a person perceives his feelings and intuitive urges, without needing to bring them to the level of intelligence. He is simply capable of simply Being, without necessarily giving it any meaning. He is fully confident that he is moving in a positive direction.
2. Interpersonal (diode) clarity
Clarity in interpersonal relationships means taking responsibility for a space that includes two people. Basically, this means that a person can get along with almost anyone. He can maintain relationships with a wide variety of people, without the need to evaluate them and react to their actions and statements. Such a person conveniently simultaneously retains several different points of view, even if they do not agree with each other. He can convey his ideas in a variety of ways, addressing people with different realities. He is flexible enough to interact with another person in a mutually acceptable way, does not need to impose his fixed ideas on him. He directly perceives the intentions of others with a minimum of mental interpretation. He has an intuitive instinct that is useful to others. He knows how to notice in everyone a positive intention, and just allow them to be, without the need to interpret or change them.
3. Group clarity
Clarity in the field of group activities means that a person is able to take responsibility for a space containing the activities of many people that develop over time. This means that he understands which groups he is in and which he is not, and is able to feel the spirit, the inner essence of the group. If necessary, he can create a new group. He is able to maintain a relationship with any existing group, and is also capable and willing to take action. Such a person prefers to do something rather than talk and think about it. He does not react negatively to the response to his actions and is able to defend his position. He knows how to create his own "additional parts" that can exist independently. He feels comfortable in the presence of numerous incompatible or conflicting points of view without the need to change any of them.
4. Public clarity
Clarity in the community sphere means taking responsibility for a common space that encompasses multiple groups and infrastructures and government issues. This includes the ability and willingness of a person to become a public figure, if necessary, while maintaining a public role without the need to react negatively to it. In addition, a person is capable of leading activities in which he himself is not interested. This means that he directly senses the cycles, forces and ideas that shape the development of a situation in time, and can easily or manage without focusing only on specific events. He can generate ideas and principles without the need to relate them to specific situations.
5. Planetary clarity
Clarity in the planetary sphere means taking responsibility for entire closed systems and everything that is contained in them. This means that a person has a direct sense of how everything is being combined into a single whole. he intuitively feels and speaks, taking into account the situation as a whole. He is fluent in many interrelated disciplines and naturally considers the birth, growth, decline, cessation and ecology of any action, principle or idea without any evaluations or negative reactions to any part of the ongoing cycles. Such a person radiates harmony with all life.
6. Stellar clarity
Freedom from attachment to a particular planet, species, or system. Lack of response to problems of this magnitude. Feeling the cycles of stars and solar systems.
Complete clarity
Ability is in direct understanding with everything that is. The ability to stay balanced in all conditions. Lack of automatic reactions. Complete self-confidence as a perfect creative source.<..>
The sequence of spheres is a good guideline for which to involve a person.
But be careful with someone who has not achieved personal clarity, they are probably not ready for this.
A person with personal clarity should be involved in interpersonal relationships, but should not be immersed in a group setting. When he has interpersonal clarity, the time will come to bring him to groups whose actions somewhat exceed his capabilities "(3, p. 358-365).

Literature:
1. Kovalev S.V. Neurotransforming. M .: Your books. 2014.
2. Kovalev S.V. How to live in order to survive. M .: Your books. 2014.
3. Flemming Funch Transforming Processing, M.: New Planet, 2002.

Material Psychologist

Life balance wheel

It is convenient to analyze your life priorities with the help of a drawing, where the main directions and values of life are presented as the radii of the life circle.
Get rid of the illusion that the circle of life values will always have the same axes: no, different people have their own list of values and their priorities, and a psychologist can select one or another circle for different audiences and different tasks.
At the very least, select different illustrations, even for the same topic.
If we remember that men are more development-oriented and live in attack, and women are more oriented towards preservation and protection, then the topic of Business and work for men is probably better reflected by the "Career" ray, and for women - by the "Finance" sector. and with the decoding "Have a financial protection plan."
In the synthon approach, the wheel of life balance is usually represented as the Wheel of Life with the following axes: Home and Space, Family and Friends, Health, Money, Career, Free Time, Love, Entertainment and Rest.

Why do people live on earth? From time immemorial, both great philosophers and ordinary people have been looking for the answer to this question. But none of them has come to the final conclusion yet, because this task has no single solution. There are as many schools of thought, as many opinions, and maybe even more.

And yet, some were able to find logical answers that could explain the existence of man.

How often do we reflect on being and living?

The most carefree time is childhood. During this period, we all run like crazy in our homes, pretending to be pirates, superheroes, robots. Thousands of amazing ideas may swarm in our head, but there is not a single question about the meaning of life. And why?

And only after crossing the threshold of youth, a person begins to look for an answer to it. “Why does a person live? What is his purpose? What is the meaning of my life? " - all these questions troubled the heart of each of us. But some quickly threw them away, switching to more pressing problems, while others, on the contrary, spent their entire lives in search of undeniable truth.

Ancient philosophers and the meaning of life

Once Aristotle said: “Cognition of the soul is the main task of a philosopher, since it can give answers to many questions ...” Moreover, he believed that any thinker should look for meaning in everything, since this search is an integral part of ourselves. He taught that it is not enough to accept things as they are, you also need to understand why they are needed in this world.

German philosopher Georg Hegel was also puzzled by the question of why a person lives in this world. He believed that such a craving for self-knowledge is inherent in us by nature and is our true I. Moreover, he argued: if we understand what role is assigned to a person, then it will be possible to unravel the purpose of other phenomena in the universe.

Also, do not forget about Plato and his reflections on why a person lives on earth. He was sure that the search for one's destiny is the highest good for a person. In part, it was in this search that his meaning of life was hidden.

God's plan, or why do people live on the plan?

You cannot talk about the meaning of life and not touch on the topic of religion. After all, all existing beliefs have on this issue. In their sacred texts there are clear instructions on how to spend your life and what is the highest good for a person.

So, let's look at the most common denominations.

Christianity. According to the New Testament, all people are born to live a righteous life, which will give them a place in paradise. Therefore, their purpose in life is to serve the Lord as well as to be merciful to others.
Islam. Muslims have not strayed too far from Christians, their faith is also based on serving God, only this time to Allah. In addition, every true Muslim must spread his faith and fight the “infidels” with all his might.
Buddhism. If you ask a Buddhist: "Why does a person live?", He will most likely answer like this: "To become enlightened." This is the goal that all followers of the Buddha pursue: to clear their minds and go to nirvana.
Hinduism. Each has a divine spark - Atman, thanks to which a person after death is reborn in a new body. And if in this life he behaved well, then at the next rebirth he will become happier or richer. The highest goal of being is to break the circle of rebirth and indulge in oblivion, which gives pleasure and peace.

Scientific point of view on the purpose of man

Questioned the headship of the church. This was due to the fact that humanity received another version explaining the emergence of life on Earth. And if at first only a few agreed with this theory, then as science developed its adherents became more and more.

But how does science look at the issue we are discussing? Why does man live on earth? In general, everything is pretty simple. Since man is descended from an animal, then their goals are similar. And what is most important for every living organism? Right, procreation.

That is, from a scientific point of view, the meaning of life is to find a reliable partner, reproduce offspring and take care of them in the future. After all, this is the only way to save the species from extinction and ensure a bright future for yourself.

Cons of previous theories

Now we should talk about what the disadvantages are in these concepts. After all, both scientific and religious hypotheses are not able to give an exhaustive answer to the question: "Why do people live on earth?"

The downside to scientific theory is that it highlights a common goal that is ideal for the entire species. But if we consider the problem on the scale of one individual, then the hypothesis loses its universality. After all, it turns out that those who are not able to have children are completely deprived of any meaning in life. And a healthy person is unlikely to like to exist with the idea that his only purpose is to transfer his genes to offspring.

The position of religious communities is also imperfect. After all, most religions put above the earthly. Moreover, if a person is an atheist or an agnostic, then his existence is devoid of any meaning. Many people do not like this dogma, therefore, over the years, the church foundations begin to weaken. As a result, a person is again left alone with the question "why do people live on earth."

How can you find the truth?

Now what? What if the scientific point of view does not fit, and the church is too conservative? Where can you find the answer to such an important question?

In fact, there is simply no universal solution to the problem. Each person is a person, therefore, it is unique. Everyone must find their own path, their own meaning and their values. This is the only way to find harmony within yourself.

It is not necessary to always follow the same path. The beauty of life is that there are no set rules and boundaries. Everyone has the right to choose specific ideals for himself, and if they seem false from time to time, they can always be replaced with new ones. For example, many people work half their lives to make a fortune. And when they achieve this, they understand that money is far from the main thing. Then they again begin to search for the meaning of being that can make them more beautiful.

The main thing is not to be afraid to think: "Why do I exist and what is my purpose?" After all, if there is a question, then the answer to it is sure to be found.

The essence of our being? Why are we given life? Saint Gregory the Theologian: “We received being in order to prosper; and prospered after receiving being; we have been entrusted with paradise to enjoy; we have been given a commandment to preserve it and earn glory. " But we already come to a rather vicious world, often paying the price for the sins of our parents. It is not possible to prosper correctly in the world. As a result, a person dies and as a result of inevitable worldly sinfulness will be doomed to eternal torment. What is all this for? Natalia.

Archpriest Mikhail Samokhin answers:

Hello. Natalia!

Life is given to man in order to serve God. Indeed, prosperity, paradise, glory were originally intended for man, but people themselves rejected all this at the time of the Fall. And now a person needs to cleanse his soul and devote his whole life to getting closer to God. You will prosper only when you feel God, prayerfully communicate with Him, rejoice in His presence in your life. I disagree with you that we are paying for the sins of our parents. According to the teaching of the Church, everyone is responsible for his own sins. We inevitably reap the consequences of sin. Sin in this sense is like a disease, to one degree or another infecting everything that surrounds a person. I also disagree with the statement about the inevitability of sin. There are always righteous and saints in the Church, just in our times the Lord providentially hides them. Pray that the Lord will reveal to you the possibility of salvation and show you your path in life.

Respectfully yours, Archpriest Mikhail Samokhin.